-1 2/7 + 4 i really need to answer this.

Answer:

I might be wrong but Karl misplaced the (5). Karl puth the 5 in the (x) area instead of the y.it had to be (3-5)^2

The converse of the statement "If a figure is a square, its diagonals divide it into isosceles triangles" would be:

"If a figure's diagonals divide it into isosceles triangles, then the figure is a square."

The converse statement is not necessarily true. While it is true that in a square, the diagonals divide it into isosceles triangles, the converse does not hold. There are other shapes, such as rectangles and rhombuses, whose diagonals also divide them into isosceles triangles, but they are not squares. Therefore, the converse of the statement is not always true.

Therefore, the converse of the given statement is not true. The existence of diagonals dividing a figure into isosceles triangles does not guarantee that the figure is a square. It is possible for other shapes to exhibit this property as well.

In conclusion, the converse statement does not hold for all figures. It is important to note that the converse of a true statement is not always true, and separate analysis is required to determine the validity of the converse in specific cases.

for similar questions on triangles.

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ8

The maximum likelihood estimator for the variance, (ui|\(X_{2i}\), \(X_{3i}\), β₄\(X_{4i}\)), is unbiased.

To analyze the bias of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the variance, we need to consider the assumptions and properties of the regression model.

In the given regression model:

\(Y_i\) = β₁ + β₂\(X_{2i}\) + β₃\(X_{3i}\) + β₄\(X_{4i}\) + U\(_{i}\)

Here, \(Y_i\) represents the dependent variable, \(X_{2i}, X_{3i},\) and \(X_{4i}\) are the independent variables, β₁, β₂, β₃, and β₄ are the coefficients, U\(_{i}\) is the error term, and i represents the observation index.

The assumption of the classical linear regression model states that the error term, U\(_{i}\), follows a normal distribution with zero mean and constant variance (σ²).

Let's denote the variance as Var(U\(_{i}\)) = σ².

The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the variance, σ², in a simple linear regression model is given by:

σ² = (1 / n) × Σ[( \(Y_i\) - β₁ - β₂\(X_{2i}\) - β₃\(X_{3i}\) - β₄\(X_{4i}\))²]

To determine the bias of this estimator, we need to compare its expected value (E[σ²]) to the true value of the variance (σ²). If E[σ²] ≠ σ², then the estimator is biased.

Taking the expectation (E) of the MLE for the variance:

E[σ²] = E[ (1 / n) × Σ[( \(Y_i\) - β₁ - β₂\(X_{2i}\) - β₃\(X_{3i}\) - β₄\(X_{4i}\))²]

Now, let's break down the expression inside the expectation:

[( \(Y_i\) - β₁ - β₂\(X_{2i}\) - β₃\(X_{3i}\) - β₄\(X_{4i}\))²]

= [ (β₁ - β₁) + (β₂\(X_{2i}\) - β₂\(X_{2i}\)) + (β₃\(X_{3i}\) - β₃\(X_{3i}\)) + (β₄\(X_{4i}\) - β₄\(X_{4i}\)) + \(U_{i}\)]²

= \(U_{i}\)²

Since the error term, \(U_{i}\), follows a normal distribution with zero mean and constant variance (σ²), the squared error term \(U_{i}\)² follows a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom (χ²(1)).

Therefore, we can rewrite the expectation as:

E[σ²] = E[ (1 / n) × Σ[\(U_{i}\)²] ]

= (1 / n) × Σ[ E[\(U_{i}\)²] ]

= (1 / n) × Σ[ Var( \(U_{i}\)) + E[\(U_{i}\)²] ]

= (1 / n) × Σ[ σ² + 0 ] (since E[ \(U_{i}\)] = 0)

Simplifying further:

E[σ²] = (1 / n) × n × σ²

= σ²

From the above derivation, we see that the expected value of the MLE for the variance, E[σ²], is equal to the true value of the variance, σ². Hence, the MLE for the variance in this regression model is unbiased.

Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimator for the variance, (ui|\(X_{2i}\), \(X_{3i}\), β₄\(X_{4i}\)), is unbiased.

Learn more about maximum likelihood estimator click;

https://brainly.com/question/32608862

#SPJ4

The price per T-shirt should be at least $15 to achieve a profit of $250.

To calculate the price per T-shirt that will yield a profit of at least $250, we need to consider the cost of production, the desired profit, and the number of shirts to be sold.

Given that the cost to make each T-shirt is $10, and we want to sell 50 shirts, the total cost of production would be 10 * 50 = $500.

Now, let's calculate the minimum revenue needed to achieve a profit of $250. We add the desired profit to the total cost of production: $500 + $250 = $750.

Finally, to determine the price per T-shirt, we divide the total revenue by the number of shirts: $750 ÷ 50 = $15.

Therefore, to make a profit of at least $250, the price per T-shirt should be set at $15.

By selling each T-shirt for $15, the total revenue would be $15 * 50 = $750. From this revenue, we subtract the total production cost of $500 to calculate the profit, which amounts to $750 - $500 = $250. Thus, by charging $15 per T-shirt, the desired profit of $250 is achieved.

For more question on profit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30495119

#SPJ8

The scale of measurement being used to classify the students in the introductory art class as art majors and non-art majors is nominal.

Nominal scales are used for categorical data, where the items being measured can be placed into categories or labels, but no order or ranking is implied. In this case, the students are being classified into two categories: art majors and non-art majors.

The students are being classified into two categories: art majors and non-art majors. These categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, meaning that every student in the class falls into one and only one of the two categories. There is no inherent order or ranking to the categories, and it is not meaningful to say that one category is greater or smaller than the other. This type of data classification is an example of nominal scale measurement.

Learn more about Scale Measurement Nominal Majors Nonmajors here:

https://brainly.com/question/28541986

#SPJ4

Answer:

------------------------

We have a repeating decimal 4.6(1).

Let's express it as a GP:

Fund the sum of infinite GP, with the first term of a = 0.01 and common ratio of r = 0.1:

Add 4.6 to the sum:

Hence the fraction is 4 11/18.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to use the distance formula to find that distance.  The formula is:

\(d=\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2}\)

Let's call the first point x1, y1 (4, -1) and the second point x2, y2 (0, -2). Plugging into our formula then gives us this:

\(d=\sqrt{ (0-4)^2+(-2-(-1))^2}\)

which simplifies to

\(d=\sqrt{(-4)^2+(-1)^2}\) which is

\(d=\sqrt{17}\) ≈ 4.123 units

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Addition I think

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

So just follow order of operations

9-6=3

3^2=9

9*2=18

18/18=1

Final answer is 1

The efficiency of the Zumba class system is approximately 69.2%, and its utilization is approximately 54.5%.

To calculate the efficiency of the system, we can divide the actual output (number of employees trained) by the designed capacity (maximum number of employees that can be trained per month) and multiply by 100 to get a percentage.

Efficiency = (Actual Output / Designed Capacity) * 100

Efficiency = (600 / 850) * 100 = 70.6%

Therefore, the efficiency of the system is approximately 70.6%.

To calculate the utilization of the system, we can divide the actual output (number of employees trained) by the capacity (maximum number of students per month) and multiply by 100.

Utilization = (Actual Output / Capacity) * 100

Utilization = (600 / 1100) * 100 = 54.5%

Therefore, the utilization of the system is approximately 54.5%.

The Zumba class system at the local gym has an efficiency of approximately 69.2% and a utilization rate of approximately 54.5%. The efficiency indicates how well the system is performing relative to its designed capacity, and in this case, it suggests that the system is operating at a reasonably high level. The utilization rate, on the other hand, indicates how much of the available capacity is being utilized, and in this case, it suggests that the system is operating at around half of its maximum capacity. This information can be used by the gym to evaluate the performance of their Zumba class program and make informed decisions regarding resource allocation and potential improvements.

To know more about Efficiency, visit

https://brainly.com/question/15418098

#SPJ11

Answer:

5 and 5

Step-by-step explanation:

5 divided by 5 is 1

5 plus 5 is 10

Answer:

D. 0.00003471

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 66 degrees, y = 33 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

y=33 degrees from SAS congruency. x=180- (180-33*2)=33*2= 66 degrees

Answer:

-1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

pass (0,1) (2,0)

slope = rise/run = -1/2

The graph of g is Transformation up 7 units.

what is Transformation?

A graph transformation is a method for altering an existing graph or graphed equation to create a different version of the graph that follows. The modification of algebraic equations is a typical form of algebraic issue.

solution:

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

g(x) = f(x) + k

Also, we have the value of k to be

k = 7

From the question, we can interpret g(x) = f(x) + k as f(x) is shifted up by k units

This means that

g(x) = f(x) + k

So, we have

g(x) = f(x) + 7

Hence, the transformation is (a) translated up 7 units

To learn more about Transformation from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/1620969

#SPJ1

The probability that individual ii-2 exhibits the disease given a 75% penetrance is 0.75 or 75%.

Penetrance refers to the probability of an individual expressing a particular trait or disease given their genetic makeup. In this case, the penetrance of the disease is 75%, which means that there is a 75% chance that an individual with the genetic mutation for the disease will actually exhibit the disease. Therefore, the probability that individual ii-2 exhibits the disease given this penetrance is also 0.75 or 75%.

1. Penetrance is the probability that an individual with a specific genotype will express the associated phenotype or disease.
2. In this case, the penetrance of the disease is 75%, which means there is a 75% chance that an individual with the disease-associated genotype will exhibit the disease.
3. Given this penetrance, the probability that individual ii-2 exhibits the disease is 0.75 or 75%.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

Answer:

13.85$

Step-by-step explanation:

105$-8$=97$

97$/7$=13.85$

Answer: About $13.86

Step-by-step explanation: To find how much the cost of the forks is, we need to subtract the value of the lunch box from the total cost, because we don't need to find the value of the lunch box. So:

105 - 8 = 97

So, now since he bought 7 forks, we need to divide 7 by 97. So:

97 / 7 = 13.857142857142858

So, we need to round to the nearest cent. So, the 7 is greater than 5, so we round up. So, we have $13.86 each. So, check, we do:

13.86(7) + 8

97.02 + 8

= 105.02

This is the closest he can buy for each fork is ABOUT $13.86. I hope this helps ;)

Answer:

This function is a quadratic.

Explanation:

If you sketch a graph, you will see the points form a U, representing a quadratic function.

The correct order to draw the angle bearing of 55° at a point is as follows:

Draw a vertical line from point X to represent North. Option D.

Place the centre of the protractor on point X and 0° on the North line. Option B.

Make a mark at 55°. Option C

Draw a line from point X through the mark. Option A.

An angles can be drawn from a point using a protractor to measure the angle of its bearing before joining the formed angle.

The correct steps that should be used include the following;

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/25215131

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think the answer is 1/2

The value of the numerical expression (5 - 4) x 1/2 will be 0.50.

Algebra is the study of algebraic expressions, while logic is the manipulation of those concepts.

The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This rule is used to answer the problem correctly and precisely.

The expression is given below.

⇒ (5 - 4) x 1/2

Simplify the expression, then we have

⇒ (5 - 4) x 1/2

⇒ 1 x 1/2

⇒ 1 / 2

⇒ 0.50

The value of the numerical expression (5 - 4) x 1/2 will be 0.50.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Use PEMDAS to determine order of operations.

P = Parentheses

E = Exponents

M/D = Multiplication/Division

A/S = Addition/Subtraction

The operation in the parentheses must be performed first, which is the addition of 6.1 + 12.

The next operation to perform is multiplication, which is 415 times (6.1 + 12).

The last operation to perform is the subtraction of 415 times (6.1 + 12) from 8.3.

6.1 + 12 = 18.1

8.3 - 415(18.1)

8.3 - 7511.5 = -7503.2

The solution of the inequality 6x < 42 is answer 3 in the figure.

What is Inequality?

An inequality in mathematics is a comparison of two quantities that states whether one is bigger than, less than, or not equal to the other. It shows how the values of the two quantities relate to one another.

Given:

The inequality is = 6x < 42

Now, We can simplify it as 6x < 42

Divide by 6 on both sides;

= 6x/6 < 42/6

= x < 7

Therefore, the correct answer is option 3 in Fig, for the solution of the inequality 6x < 42.

To learn more about inequality from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/25944814

#SPJ4

Answer:

286 mm²

Step-by-step explanation:

A trapezium is given with ,

The area is given by :-

\(:\implies\) Area = 1/2 ( b₁ + b ₂) × h

\(:\implies\) Area = 1/2 ( 24 + 28)×11 mm²

\(:\implies\)Area = 1/2 × 52× 11mm²

\(:\implies\) Area = 286 mm²

Answer:

The answer is D 10.50x =300.000

Step-by-step explanation:

I figured this out by knowing that to find the time you need to divide the total by the given made per hour which is 10.50 and he would make a total of $300 after about 28 hours so it would be 10.50 x being 28 = 300 dollars which gives the equation 10.50x = 300.000

Answer:

It could be 3x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

In quadrant IV, \(\cos(A)\) is positive. So

\(\sin^2(A) + \cos^2(A) = 1 \implies \cos(A) = \sqrt{1-\sin^2(A)} \approx 0.6258\)

Then by the definition of tangent,

\(\tan(A) = \dfrac{\sin(A)}{\cos(A)} \approx \dfrac{-0.78}{0.6258} \approx \boxed{-1.2465}\)

Answer:

okay so I kinda suck at math but if I'm right the answer should be 0.24

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the vector expression 2u⋅(2u−6v) is 144.

Let's start by simplifying the expression 2u−6v. We can factor out the 2 from 2u to get:

2u−6v = 2(u−3v)

Now, we can substitute this expression back into 2u⋅(2u−6v) and get:

2u⋅(2u−6v) = 2u⋅2(u−3v)

We can use the distributive property of the dot product to expand this expression as follows:

2u⋅2(u−3v) = 4(u⋅u)−12(u⋅v)

Now, we can substitute the given values of u⋅v, ∥u∥, and ∥v∥ into this expression:

4(u⋅u)−12(u⋅v) = 4(∥u∥²)−12(9)

We are given ∥u∥, so we can substitute that into the expression:

4(∥u∥²)−12(9) = 4(6²)−12(9)

Simplifying this expression gives us:

4(6²)−12(9) = 144

To know more about vector here.

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ4

The MMPI-2 test is used for the assessment of psychopathology and personality of patients.

It includes 567 true-false questions, resulting in 10 clinical scales, among which one is the anxiety subscale.

A score of 30 or less is usually considered very low.

The questions are answered by the patient, usually in a clinical or research setting.

A one-sample t-test is conducted in the problem, whereby a sample of 18 participants in a yoga group is tested for anxiety scores.

The following are the parameters of the one-sample t-test:Groups:

18 participants

Null hypothesis: The anxiety scores of Felipe's yoga group are statistically equal to 30." value: 30

Type of test: One-tailed test

Alternative hypothesis: The anxiety scores of Felipe's yoga group are greater than 30.

Degrees of freedom: n - 1 = 17T-observed value: (35.2 - 30) / (10.4 / sqrt(18)) = 2.41T-critical value: 1.734

Reject or retain null hypothesis: Since the t-observed value (2.41) is greater than the t-critical value (1.734), Felipe should reject the null hypothesis, which implies that his yoga group's scores are greater than 30.P-value: 0.014Cohen’s d value: (35.2 - 30) / 10.4 = 0.5

If the " value were reduced to 0.01, Felipe would still reject the null hypothesis, since the p-value (0.014) is lower than the alpha level (0.01).

For the sample mean: 35.2CI for 42%: 35.2 ± 0.58CI for 79%: 35.2 ± 1.16CI for 95%: 35.2 ± 2.13

To know more about Degrees of freedom click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32093315

#SPJ11