Answers
A § 501(c)(3) organization that would otherwise be classified as a private foundation can avoid such classification if it satisfies the requirements for public charity status.
To avoid being classified as a private foundation, a § 501(c)(3) organization must meet the criteria for public charity status. Private foundations are subject to stricter regulations and restrictions compared to public charities. To qualify as a public charity, the organization must demonstrate a broad base of public support, which can be achieved by meeting certain financial and operational tests. These tests assess the organization's sources of funding, the level of public involvement and support, and the nature of its activities. By satisfying these requirements, the organization can avoid being classified as a private foundation and enjoy the benefits and flexibility associated with public charity status.
to learn more about regulations
click here brainly.in/question/7276445
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Despite concerns raised by her constituents, a member of the House of Representatives votes in favor of a bill, believing that in the long term it is in the best interest of her constituents. This is an example of which of the following models of representation?
a. Delegate
b. Politico
c. Trustee
d. Virtual
Answers
Despite concerns raised by her constituents, a member of the House of Representatives votes in favor of a bill, believing that in the long term it is in the best interest of her constituents. This is an example of a trustee representation. The Option C is correct.
What does trustee representation means?The trustee model of representation is a type of representative democracy that is frequently contrasted with the delegate model. Constituents elect their representatives as 'trustees' for their constituency in this model.
These 'trustees' have the freedom to deliberate and act in their own conscience, even if it means going against the explicit desires of their constituents; this is also known as a free mandate. In the delegate model, on the other hand, the representative is expected to act strictly in accordance with the beliefs of their constituents.
Read more about trustee representation
brainly.com/question/29607652
#SPJ1
Essay help- Discuss and resolve the debate, issue, or question of whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit the number of designated classes; e.g., LBTQI etc., or expand them. At what point should the “queering” or “queerness” end? Include in your discussion, how useful the race-class-gender paradigm has been in criminology and its expansion or refinement
Answers
Answer:
The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.
Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.
The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.
In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.
Explanation:
The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology as it has allowed scholars to examine how these three factors intersect to produce different experiences of oppression. However, this paradigm has been criticized for being too narrow and not taking into account the experiences of individuals who do not fit into these three categories. Therefore, it is important to expand the paradigm to include other identities, such as sexual orientation, ability, and nationality.
In terms of limiting or expanding designated classes, I believe that it is important to expand them to include a broader range of identities. By doing so, we can better understand how different forms of oppression intersect and produce different experiences of violence and crime. However, it is also important to recognize that there is a point where the "queering" or "queerness" should end. We should not create so many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand.
In conclusion, intersectional and queer criminology should expand the number of designated classes to include a broader range of identities. However, we should also be mindful of not creating too many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand. The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology, but it is important to expand it to include other identities.
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
Answers
This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
A. Rose is lost and pulls her car into Micha's driveway for a moment to get her bearings. B. Oscar is a twelve-year-old neighbor of Micha's who has snuck into Micha's backyard to swim in his pool. C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates. D. Ron is Micha's friend whom Micha has invited to his home to watch the Super Bowl.
Answer:
C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates.
Explanation:
Micha is responsible for all the people in her cafeteria, as well as being responsible for the food security of her customers. For this reason, we can say that when Juanita enters Micha's cafeteria, she consumes her products, she becomes Micha's responsibility. The other scenarios shown in the question, do not have the direct responsibility of Micha, or do not require any responsibility from her, but from third parties.
__________ is a form of __________ on the basis of sex and is
illegal under federal law.
Sexual harassment, slander
Sexual orientation, discrimination
Sexual harassment, libel
Answers
The answer is Sexual harassment, slander. Sexual harassment, is a form of slander on the basis of sex and is illegal under federal law.
A form of harassment known as sexual harassment uses overt or covert sexual references, as well as unwanted and inappropriate offers of incentives in exchange for sexual favours. From verbal indiscretions to sexual abuse or assault, sexual harassment covers a wide spectrum of behaviours.Harassment can happen in a variety of social contexts, including the workplace, the family, schools, and places of worship. Any sex or gender might be a victim or a harasser. Sexual harassment is forbidden under current legal regulations. Due to the fact that sexual harassment laws do not impose a "general civility code," they sometimes do not outlaw simple taunting, casual remarks, or minor isolated incidences.
Read more about sex discrimination at
https://brainly.com/question/31916116
#SPJ4
What is tenancy at sufferance?
Answers
A tenant at sufferance is a person who legally acquires possession of property but continues to hold it unlawfully after the lease's expiration date or the end of its term.
Therefore, the tenant at sufferance is someone who unjustly retains possession after a legitimate title has expired. He isn't much different from a trespasser, really. A tenancy at sufferance is essentially a fiction used to prevent continued ownership that would be considered trespassing. According to some, it is the smallest and lowest kind of interest that can exist in the real world. The relationship between a landlord and tenant is not established by a tenancy at sufferance. Therefore, it cannot be established by a contract and only results from a legal implication.
Learn more about legitimate here:
https://brainly.com/question/1748528
#SPJ4
middle and marketing
An offence like blasphemy would be prosecuted un Oa) royal law b) criminal law c) canon law d) civil law
Answers
An offense like blasphemy would be prosecuted under criminal law.
Blasphemy, which refers to the act of showing contempt or irreverence towards religious beliefs or deities, would typically fall under the jurisdiction of criminal law. Criminal law encompasses offenses that are considered harmful to society as a whole and are therefore subject to legal punishment. Blasphemy laws exist in some jurisdictions and are designed to protect religious sensitivities and uphold the sanctity of certain beliefs.
Criminal law is a branch of law that deals with offenses against the state or society. It sets out the rules and regulations regarding prohibited activities and establishes penalties for those found guilty of committing such offenses. Blasphemy laws, where they exist, are enforced through the criminal justice system, and individuals accused of blasphemy would be prosecuted under criminal law. It is important to note that the existence and enforcement of blasphemy laws vary across countries and legal systems.
To know more about criminal law, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30565181
#SPJ11
2. List all the facts relevant to deciding whether
Damms had taken enough steps to attempt
to murder Marjory Damms according to the
Wisconsin statute. In the case of state v. damms
Answers
Actors who attempt to conduct crimes that they plan to do are nonetheless guilty of the crime even
If it is impossible and the actor is unaware of it.
A clear action taken with the intention of committing a crime suffices to qualify.
Since the actor knows he did all required to ensure the planned crime was committed, he cannot avoid punishment due to the fortunate situation that the desired outcome was unattainable due to a fact he was not aware of to murder Marjory Damms.
Defendant was found guilty of attempting to murder someone. In his appeal, the defendant maintained that because the pistol was empty, it was impossible for him to have committed the murder, and as a result, he was not guilty of the crime.
According to the defendant, the statutory phrase "save for the involvement of some other extraneous circumstance" in Wis. Stat. 939.32(2) applied to the inability of achievement caused by the pistol not being loaded. Additionally, the defendant claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to find him guilty of attempted murder.
To know more about murder visit:https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ9
What if the disturbance in question is not noise but cigarette smoke seeping from neighboring units into the unit of a nonsmoking tenant?
Answers
In this situation, the disturbance is not a form of noise, but rather an issue of air quality. Cigarette smoke can be harmful to health, and it is understandable that a nonsmoking tenant would not want to be exposed to it in their own living space.
The tenant should first try to talk to their neighbors and request that they refrain from smoking in a way that allows smoke to seep into other units.
If the issue persists, the tenant can bring the matter to the attention of their landlord or property management company, as they may have policies in place to address this type of issue.
Ultimately, ensuring a healthy and safe living environment should be a top priority for all parties involved. The tenant should first try to talk to their neighbors and request that they refrain from smoking in a way that allows smoke to seep into other units.
Learn more about disturbance here
https://brainly.com/question/25822770
#SPJ4
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The ___ perspective of the criminal justice system holds that criminals choose to commit crimes and must be punished harshly for their actions.
A. Rehabilitation
B. Crime control
C. Due process
D. Nonintervention
Answers
The crime control perspective of the criminal justice system holds that criminals choose to commit crimes and must be punished harshly for their actions. This perspective emphasizes the importance of maintaining social order and deterring future criminal behavior through strict and swift punishment.
Supporters of the crime control perspective argue that it is necessary to prioritize public safety over the rights of individual criminals and that the threat of punishment can effectively deter potential offenders. Critics of the crime control perspective, on the other hand, argue that it can lead to the over-criminalization of minor offences and disproportionate punishment for certain groups, such as low-income and minority populations.
They argue that a more rehabilitative and restorative justice approach is needed to address the root causes of criminal behaviour and reduce recidivism. Overall, the crime control perspective represents one approach to the criminal justice system, but it is important to consider the potential consequences and limitations of such an approach in addressing the complex issues of crime and justice.
To know more about the Criminal Justice System visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28784358
#SPJ11
Title of the Patriot Act gives the president the right to confiscate property of any foreign person who is believed to have participated in an
attack on the United States and also authorizes the Secret Service to
A. create a nationwide electronic crime task force
B. confiscate property of any citizen
C. force citizens born in other countries to relocate to community protection camps
D. submit any material so seized in a court case
Answers
Answer:
A. submit any material so seized in court case
Explanation:
the minimum wage law is an example of responses the unwritten constitution. the unwritten constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution. an interpretation of the constitution. an interpretation of the constitution. the amendment process.
Answers
The minimum wage type of law is an example for an interpretation of the all Constitution.
Minimum Price are an example of minimum wage rules. The minimum wage becomes a legally obligatory price floor if it is set higher than the market clearing wage. The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 is a piece of federal legislation that aims to impose legal minimum wage rates in jobs where sweated labor is common and there is a chance that disorganized workers may be exploited.
According to federal law, a minimum wage is the lowest salary an employee may be paid per hour. Nonexempt workers may not be offered a job or agree to work for less than the legally required minimum wage level for hourly compensation.
Learn more about minimum wage law visit: brainly.com/question/14337883
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
The minimum wage law is an example _____________ of the all Constitution.
1. The unwritten constitution. a right guaranteed by the constitution.
2. A right guaranteed by the constitution.
3. An interpretation of the constitution.
4. An interpretation of the constitution. the amendment process.
ex is an individual-rights advocate while his friend Diana is a public-order advocate. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case?
Diana believes that prison sentences for serious violent offenders should be increased.
Rex believes that the rights of victims take precedence over the rights of accused suspects.
Rex believes that public security takes precedence over individual liberties.
Diana is engaged in lobbying to ensure that the rights of prisoners are protected.
Answers
Rex believes that the government must make sure that citizens' personal freedoms are safeguarded, option A is right.
Rex supports individual liberties, whilst his buddy Diana supports public order. Diana thinks that prison terms for violent felons should be increased. This assertion does not, however, necessarily sum up her position on the balance between public safety and individual liberty. Rex's position on the balance between personal freedoms and public safety also cannot be deduced from the material provided.
A supporter of the employment of criminal justice interventions to uphold public order is known as a public-order advocate, and they frequently place the protection of the community before individual rights. The general well-being of the American people, or society, is public order.
To know more about advocates, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/17027382
#SPJ4
Complete question is:
Rex is an individual-rights advocate, and Diana is a public-order advocate. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case?
A. Rex believes that the state has to ensure the protection of citizens' personal freedom.
B. Rex believes that public security takes precedence over individual liberties.
C. Diana believes that even hardcore criminals should be allowed to exercise their criminal rights.
D. Diana believes that prison officials should be held accountable for prisoners' safety.
T/FThe juvenile court today has jurisdiction over youths under a certain age who: Violate laws applicable to adults, commit status offenses, and are dependent or neglected (p. 353)
Answers
The statement "The juvenile court today has jurisdiction over youths under a certain age who: Violate laws applicable to adults, commit status offenses, and are dependent or neglected" is true as it describes the jurisdiction of juvenile courts.
The majority of the time, juvenile courts have jurisdiction over young people who break laws that apply to adults, commit status offenses like breaking curfews or being out late or who are dependent or neglected. Taking care of the needs of young people who engage in delinquent behavior or are in situations of dependency or neglect is the goal of the juvenile court system.
Instead of solely punishing juveniles as adults would in the criminal justice system, the court seeks to rehabilitate and offer support and guidance to young people focusing on their best interests and potential for future development.
Learn more about juvenile court at:
brainly.com/question/7579071
#SPJ4
Which of the following may private club not do
Answers
What does a plaintiff need to file if they want the defendant to stop performing an action?
Answers
Answer:
If you were wronged, you have the right to sue. But, there are things you have to know before you sue, like:
Who to sue,
Where they are,
What you need to do before you sue them,
Where you should sue them, and
If you should sue them.
These are hard questions to answer, even in an easy case like a slip-and-fall in a store. For example, if you slip on the floor in a supermarket, you have to figure out if the store is part of a chain or just one store, if falling was partly or totally your fault, etc.
In a complicated case, like if the same slip and fall happened on land that the county owns, but that a government agency rents, you have to figure out who was responsible for slippery ground, and follow the laws for suing the government. If you sue a government agency, you have to follow the laws for notice. This is a fancy way of saying that before you sue a government agency you have to fill out papers that say that you’re suing them.
There’s a time limit to give notice. After you file your notice, you don’t have much time to file your lawsuit. Claim limits like this protect hospitals and other businesses. If you do not follow these rules, get ready to fight. If you don’t do things on time, you may lose your right to sue. You could ruin your lawsuit.
Even more important are time limits called "statute of limitations." These statutes, or laws, say when you can file your action. If you don’t file on time, you lose automatically. For example, if you are in a car crash, you have 2 years to file a lawsuit. This might not be true for your case. You have to check the time limit yourself. But in general this is the case. If you wait one day after the time limit, the Court won’t let you sue, except in very special circumstances.
This means that even if you have a good case, you lose because you didn’t file on time. The person you sue can challenge you at any time. They can appeal and win. That’s because the statute of limitations says if the Court can hear and decide the case at all. If you wait too long, you take away the Court’s jurisdiction to hear your case.
What are Summons and Complaint:
A general civil lawsuit starts when the plaintiff files 2 forms.
A Summons is a notice that says there’s a lawsuit.
A Complaint is a form that says how the person was hurt, who hurt them and how much the damages are.
Where do I file my lawsuit?
There are a lot of things to think when you decide where to file your complaint. For example:
Jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction can mean more than one thing. The Court has to have “jurisdiction” over the defendant. This means that the Court has the right to hear and decide a case for the person you are suing. In general, you have to file your lawsuit where the injury happened, or where the contract was supposed to happen, or where the defendant lives.
There can be other requirements. Check the California Code of Civil Procedure .
Then, the Court also has to have jurisdiction over how much money you want. You have to file your lawsuit in the right court:
Small Claims Court,
Limited Jurisdiction Superior Court, or
Unlimited Jurisdiction Superior Court.
Venue:
Jurisdiction says in what State and what Court you file your lawsuit. Venue is the County where you file your action. Usually, this is the County where the defendant lives or where the injury happened. But, sometimes you can change the Venue. See Law and Motion.
Court locations/hours/maps:
See the list of courthouses. Click on each court to see the hours and maps.
Unlimited Jurisdiction cases:
If you have a case worth more than $25,000, you have an unlimited jurisdiction case. For these cases, you have to give the Clerk:
The Complaint, or petition,
A Civil Case Cover Sheet ,
The filing fee (see the local fee schedule ), and
An original copy of the Summons.
The Clerk will endorse the Complaint, the Cover Sheet and the Summons, and give them back to you with something called a “Civil Lawsuit Notice”. This tells the date and time of your first Court hearing, and which Department (courthouse and courtroom) and Judge your case is assigned to.
You’ll also get an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Information
Explanation:
When you get pulled over and got a warning do they call the primary owner of the vehicle?
Answers
Answer:
No they will not call the primary owner.
Explanation:
That is there responsibility so if they drive in your car and get a warning or ticket it will go to there personal record not yours and they will not call the owner
Laws to protect consumer privacy are quickly becoming the norm. California created the first of these laws in 2018. What is the name of this law?.
Answers
Answer: The California Consumer Privacy Act
The process to search for patents associated with a product to prevent infringement is.
Answers
The process to search for patents associated with a product to prevent infringement typically involves several steps.
Firstly, it's important to identify the relevant patent classification codes and keywords related to the product or technology in question. These can be used to conduct a search in patent databases such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database, the European Patent Office (EPO) database, or international databases like WIPO's PatentScope.
The search should be focused on both granted patents and pending patent applications. It's essential to review the claims and descriptions of the patents found to determine their relevance and potential for infringement. Consulting with a patent attorney or professional search firm may also be beneficial to ensure a comprehensive search and interpretation of the results.
Learn more about Consulting
https://brainly.com/question/29342787
#SPJ11
Look at the bar graph. Which would be the best title for this graph?
A. The Race for President, 2008
B. Voter Turnout 2008-2012
C. Percentage of Voting, 2008-2012
D. Voter Turnout by Income Group, 2008
Answers
Answer:
Option D, Voter Turnout by Income Group, 2008
Explanation:
The graph has two variable - at x axis - income of the voters and at the other i.e the Y axis - Percentage of voters in a given income group.
Hence, the graph is a depiction of total % of people voting in a given income group.
The best title of the graph could be something which indicates the variation of % voting with respect to the income of the voters.
Hence, option D is the correct choice of answer
Answer:
see up my answer is also same
Which rehabilitation programme would you apply to mr x if he were to be incarcerated and why do you think that programme will be effective in rehabilitation
Answers
The most recently developed theory of punishment is that of rehabilitation, which holds that the goal of punishment is to provide the offender with therapy and training so that he would be able to reintegrate into society and function as a law-abiding member of the community. I would prefer this type of rehabilitation programme for Mr.x.
Why is rehabilitation better than incarceration?Addicts who are in recovery usually conduct less expensive crimes. They are also typically arrested less frequently. The cost of obtaining addiction treatment is becoming more accessible thanks to healthcare reforms. Reduced expenses for law enforcement and the courts will result from declining crime rates and fewer arrests.
To know more about rehabilitation programme visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22182314
#SPJ9
The police are investigating a crime that occurred at Shoprite. They find a red umbrella in the store where a man was assaulted by an unknown person. Three blocks away from Shoprite, investigators find a wallet with the same fingerprints on them as the umbrella. The place where the umbrella was found is called the...
A) Primary Crime Scene
B) Secondary Crime scene
C) Tertiary Crime scene
D) Accomplice
Answers
primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped
Which statement describes a difference between the legislative producers of the house of representatives and senate.
Answers
The difference between the legislative procedures of the house of representatives and the senate is that the house has more complex debate rules than the senate.
The members of the house of representatives are restricted on their speech time. They only have about 10 minutes of talk time. This is then followed up with questions and answers.
The senate house on the other hand has no such restrictions. Senators may speak for as long as they wish to.
What type of crime shows one of the most serious trends as people live longer, and involves an increased number of professionals in the field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes?
Answers
White collar crime involves an increased number of professionals in the
field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes.
This type of crime is divided into groups which are occupational and
corporate crime. White collar crime mostly involves embezzlement of funds.
This is usually carried out by the professionals in that field.
The white collar crime are usually willing to risk client harm in fraudulent
schemes for their personal gains and is mostly carried out by men than
women as it is easier to convince people it is legit as a man than a woman.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/19320562
In 2010, Louisville-based metal plating business and its chief executive pleaded guilty to felony violations of the Negligence Act. National Environmental Policy Act. Pollution Prosecution Act. Clean Water Act.
Answers
The NEPA created an agency called the council on environmental quality and required that an environmental impact statement be prepared for any major federal action that might significantly affect the environmental quality.
Why was the National Environmental Policy Act passed?The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was created to ensure federal agencies consider the environmental impacts of their actions and decisions.
What was the goal of the Environmental Protection Act?It was created in 1970. They establish programs that are aimed at reducing pollution and protecting the environment.
Describe the federal laws and regulations in place to prevent air pollution.
Learn more about NEPA here:
https://brainly.com/question/1204242#SPJ4Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
Answers
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
Eddy and Carl live in Benoni but decide to spend their December vacation at Umhlanga Rocks. Upon their arrival in Durban they hear that the beaches are closed as a result they are unable to swim. Eddy decides to stroll on the beach, while Carl went Mall hopping. Eddy finds a coin on the beach that is gold in colour. Assuming that the coin was a gold coin Eddy sells the coin for a large sum of money to Carl, who believes Eddy even after inspecting the coin. A few weeks later Carl discovers that the coin is brass and not gold as initially represented by Eddy
1.1. What type of mistake did Eddy commit in terms of South African Law of contract? Evaluate this type of mistake.
Answers
Eddy committed a mistake known as a "mistake as to the nature of the thing" in terms of South African law of contract. This mistake occurs when one of the parties to a contract is mistaken about the identity or nature of the subject matter of the contract.
What type of mistake did Eddy commit in terms of South African Law of contract?In this case, Eddy believed that the coin he found on the beach was a gold coin and represented it to Carl as such. Carl relied on Eddy's representation and bought the coin for a large sum of money. However, it turned out that the coin was not actually made of gold but rather brass. This mistake as to the nature of the thing is a type of mutual mistake, which means that both parties were under the same mistaken belief about the coin.
Under South African law, a contract can be set aside on the grounds of mistake if the mistake is material, i.e., it is so fundamental that it goes to the root of the contract. In this case, the mistake made by Eddy and Carl was a material one, as the identity and value of the coin was central to their agreement.
Therefore, Carl may have a valid claim to set aside the contract and demand a refund from Eddy.
Learn more about contract here:https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
the purpose of competition policy
Answers
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answers
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
URGENT PLS HELP
As you’re driving with your family on your annual road trip, you see a car stopped on the shoulder of the interstate. There are two police cars behind that car, with their lights flashing. About ten miles down the road, you then see another police car sitting alone in the median between both major lanes of the interstate. You notice that your dad, who is driving, begins to slow down quite substantially. What is MOST LIKELY the reason your dad began to slow down the car?
A.
He is following the law that states drivers must slow down when an officer is behind them.
B.
He is trying to see whether the police car belongs to a local police officer or a state trooper.
C.
He is being careful after being deterred when he previously saw the other car being pulled over earlier.
D.
He is avoiding having the police offer issue a warrant for his arrest.
Answers
More than likely
Hope it helps