The correct answer is (C) subject culture. Almond and Verba described three general political cultures in their work—participant, parochial, and patron-client culture—but not subject culture.
C) Subject culture. Almond and Verba described one of three (3) general political cultures in their work, the civic culture. The culture that is not described by Almond and Verba is the patron-client culture.
Political culture refers to the attitudes, beliefs, and values that underpin political systems. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, two political scientists, developed a theory that divides political cultures into three categories:
Parochial culture Participatory culture Subject culture It should be noted that there is no "perfect" or "right" political culture. There are pros and cons to each culture, and the best option is the one that best fits a nation's needs.
Almond and Verba introduced a fourth culture, the civic culture, which combines aspects of all three of the preceding cultures to produce the best outcome.
The culture that is not described by Almond and Verba is the patron-client culture. This is a clientelist culture in which individuals exchange services, money, or gifts for the guarantee of obtaining benefits such as employment or access to public goods.
For more such questions on political cultures
https://brainly.com/question/26254652
#SPJ11
in dred scott v. sanford, the supreme court ruled that african americans could not be citizens of the united states. t or f
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
There are many ways citizens can influence public policy today. Consider how, with the rise of radio, television, and now the internet, political communication has changed over past decades. In what ways do various forms of media make political communication easier and harder?
Answer:
With the rise of technology and the internet, people are able to communciate from across the world. People can build relationships through the internet and share ideas and opinnions. Not only are we able to connect with other people, but through these forms of communciation, we can also share news on politics across the globe or our poltical plans and ideas. Poltical parties and candidates are able to use social media platforms to reach more audiences who may not always tune into their local news stations on the T.V. or the radio. They can reach out to newer generations who are constantly communicating through the internet.
Before when news used to spread through the newspaper where it would take a lot of hard work to print out the news, with the rise in the telegraph, reporters could go across the nation chasing stories to report back to their headquarters before they even got home. Then the radio and the television rose and we had an even better way to share news and overtime it became easier and easier to reach out to the public to communicate with them in a timely manner.
The DIFFERENT forms of media make political communication easier and harder in the manner that politicians conduct election campaigns, which creates awareness among the public.
Why is media considered the political influence in politics?Because of the number of ideas, thoughts, and opinions moving via the social media platform, a medium of communication such as social media is persuasive and frequently works to modify or influence beliefs when it comes to political views.
People from all over the world can now communicate because to advances in technology and the internet. People may use the internet to form relationships and exchange ideas and opinions. Not only can we interact with other individuals, but we can also exchange political news from across the world, as well as our own political goals and ideas.
Political parties and candidates may utilize social media platforms to reach out to more people who may not always listen in to their local news outlets on television or radio. They may connect with younger generations who are always chatting over the internet.
Previously, news was conveyed through newspapers, which required a lot of hard labor to print out. With the introduction of the telegraph, reporters could go across the country pursuing stories to report back to their headquarters before they even arrived home. Then came radio and television, and we had an even better method to distribute news, and it grew easier and simpler to interact with the public over time.
Learn more about media here:
https://brainly.com/question/21333773
#SPJ2
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it illegal for employees of U.S. companies to make ""questionable"" or ""dubious"" contributions to political decision makers in foreign nations. True or False?
The given statement that "The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it illegal for employees of U.S. companies to make ""questionable"" or ""dubious"" contributions to political decision makers in foreign nations." is true because this act prevents the people or the companies from bribing the government officials.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the year 1977 which is also known as the FCPA is basically a United States federal law which prohibits the U.S. citizens as well as the entities from bribing the foreign government officials in order to benefit the interests of their business.
The FCPA is basically applicable worldwide and it extends specifically to the publicly traded companies as well as their personnel which include employees, shareholders, officers, directors, and agents.
To know more about The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
https://brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ4
Intrastate commerce can be regulated by the federal government as it impacts interstate commerce as well
Intrastate commerce, which refers to economic activities that occur within the boundaries of a single state, can indeed be regulated by the federal government if it has an impact on interstate commerce.
This authority stems from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. The Supreme Court has recognized that intrastate activities can have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. This principle, known as the "substantial effects doctrine," allows the federal government to regulate intrastate activities if they have a substantial economic impact on interstate commerce or if they are part of a broader regulatory scheme addressing interstate commerce.
The rationale behind this approach is to ensure the uniformity of economic regulations and prevent states from enacting protectionist measures that could hinder the free flow of goods and services across state lines. By having the power to regulate intrastate commerce with interstate implications, the federal government can address potential disparities, promote fair competition, and maintain a cohesive national economic framework.
It is worth noting that the scope and extent of federal regulation in intrastate commerce have been subject to judicial interpretation and limitations to preserve the balance between federal and state powers. However, the ability of the federal government to regulate intrastate activities connected to interstate commerce remains an essential aspect of maintaining a unified national economy.
Know more about Interstate commerce here:
https://brainly.com/question/4656005
#SPJ8
analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community
Answer:
lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.
Explanation:
1. The intention to create a legal relation may be shown by
A. the words of the parties only
B. the conduct of the parties only
C. the written documents made by the parties only
D. the words and the conduct of the parties
Answer:
she is right ....
Common Law
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a grand jury, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified offense, usually a felony
Governmental department for keeping order
Law of a country based on customs
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a prosecutor, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified crime
The act of something that is against the law
To summon one to do the right
Please answer each question in a paragraph. (a few sentences)
1. This congressional act requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check. (five words)
2. A crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world. (two words)
3. Probable Cause" as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court requires that a _______ person believes that another person has committed a crime."
1. The congressional act which requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check is called the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This act became law in 1993 and is also known as the Brady Law.
Its main aim is to prevent the sale of guns to individuals who are prohibited from possessing firearms, such as convicted felons, people with domestic violence restraining orders, and people with mental illnesses.
2. The explanation of the crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world is called Cybercrime. Cybercrime refers to illegal activities carried out through the internet, such as hacking, cyberbullying, identity theft, and online fraud. Due to the rise in the use of technology, cybercrime has become more prevalent in recent years, and it can be challenging to identify and prosecute offenders.
3. The main answer is that a reasonable person believes that another person has committed a crime. Probable cause refers to the legal standard that the police must meet to make an arrest or conduct a search. In the United States, probable cause is defined as a level of suspicion that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed. This standard is set by the U.S. Supreme Court and is an essential component of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Learn more about Cybercrime: https://brainly.com/question/30457725
#SPJ11
A person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor.
Would this case be tried in a federal or state court
When a person is prosecuted for assaulting a neighbor, then this case would be tried in a state court.
What is a state court?A court in the US that decides issues based on state law rather than federal law stockholder class actions settled by state courts must be recognised by federal courts. State legislation protecting the rights of people with disabilities allows them to file a claim for damages in state court.
The final decision-makers for state laws and constitutions are state courts. They may appeal to the US Supreme Court over how they interpret federal law or the US Constitution. Such cases may or may not be heard by the Supreme Court.
Therefore, when any of the cases or incidents like assaulting a neighbor is filed, this case will be tried in the state court.
Learn more about state court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23041991
#SPJ2
identify the clause of the fourteenth amendment that is common to both brown v. board of education of topeka (1954) and san antonio independent school district v. rodriguez (1973). explain how the difference in facts led to a different decision in both brown v. board of education of topeka and san antonio independent school district v. rodriguez. explain how the outcome in san antonio independent school district v. rodriguez demonstrates how public policy regarding equality of opportunity is affected by federalism in the united states.
The clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that is common to both Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) and San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973) - Equal Protection Clause.
What informs this clause?The Equal Protection Clause is common to both Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) and San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez ( 1973).
The Equal Protection Provision that funds public schools through property taxes, Rodriguez violated the provision, creating a stark divide between rich and poor school districts.
The Supreme Court ruled that education is not a constitutional right and that funding public schools is the responsibility of states and local residents.
learn more about Fourteenth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ1
Whats a SACCER? ITSA
Answer:
Not a real phase.
Explanation:
allow bartenders and bar owners to be held liable for a plaintiff’s injury although the bartender or bar owner did not directly cause the plaintiff’s injury.
In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."
Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.
If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.
It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.
To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11
Privileges or immunities of national citizenship are most evident outside of the country.
Answer:
please say that! now what should we do?
Question 1
0 / 0.5 pts
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is generally
covered by a state's "open records" law and all of the
documentation from ADR proceedings are therefore
public records.
True
False
using genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves. although the use of ddt was banned in the united states in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average united states resident today would most likely reveal the presence of ddt because
DDT is a pesticide that was widely used in the past but is now banned in many countries, including the United States, because of its harmful effects on the environment and human health.
DDT and its breakdown products can persist in the environment for long periods of time, and they can accumulate in the body tissue of animals and humans.
Therefore, even though DDT was banned in the United States in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average United States resident today would most likely reveal the presence of DDT because of its persistence in the environment and its ability to bioaccumulate.
The use of genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves is an alternative method to control pests, it is not related to the presence of DDT in the body tissue.
To learn more about DDT
https://brainly.com/question/12651935
#SPJ4
Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
© 2012 The Associated Press
This police office is placing a sign outside a rail station. He is enforcing the ruling in
D.C. v. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
Marbury v. Madison
Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
The answer would be "B" or Plessy V. Ferguson
Answer:
the answer is B, Plessy v. Ferguson.
Explanation:
Have a great day!! Hope this helps!!
Joseph has decided to build a fence around his property to prevent his neighbor's dog from destroying his yard. Joseph's neighbor realized the fence is crossing onto his property. He asked Joseph to move the fence, but Joseph refused. The neighbor decided to take this to court. What type of law does this represent? criminal, Ocivil, constitutional, juvenile, military
Summarize what happens during the two photosynthesis stages.
Answer:
Photosynthesis occurs in two stages. During the first stage, the energy from sunlight is absorbed by the chloroplast. Water is used, and oxygen is produces during this part of the process. During the second stage, carbon dioxide is used, and glucose is produced.
Offering family-friendly work-life programs and benefits to same-sex couples is:
a. not necessary because homosexuality excludes having children
b. not necessary because most states do not recognize same-sex marriages
c. necessary because gay fathers are as likely to have one stay-at-home partner as heterosexual couples with children
d. necessary because research shows that gay parents lack the parenting skills heterosexual couples have
c. necessary because gay fathers are as likely to have one stay-at-home partner as heterosexual couples with children.
Offering family-friendly work-life programs and benefits to same-sex couples is necessary because gay fathers, like heterosexual couples with children, are as likely to have one partner staying at home to take care of the children.
It recognizes that same-sex couples can have children and that they face similar challenges and responsibilities as heterosexual couples when it comes to raising a family. Providing family-friendly policies and benefits helps create a more inclusive and supportive work environment for all employees, regardless of their sexual orientation or marital status.
To know more about heterosexual couples:- https://brainly.com/question/29910198
#SPJ11
A written code defining a criminal act and providing the standard punishment for the crime defines which of the following?
answer choices
Statute
Case law
Federal constitution
Administrative rules
Option first is correct. A written code defining a criminal act and providing the standard punishment for the crime defines a Statute.
About Statute
A law is a formal written enactment of such a legislative body that, with the cooperation of other parties, controls the legal entities of just a city, state, or nation. Statutes often establish policy, order or prohibit certain actions. In contrast to case law or precedent, which would be decided by courts, as well as regulations issued by government agencies, statutes are rules enacted by legislative bodies.
Newly adopted legislation are issued and publicised in almost every nation so that anybody may check them up. This can be done with in shape of a government gazette, which may also contain other official government announcements, or in the form of a collection of books, the content of which is restricted to legislative actions.
To know more about Statute:
brainly.com/question/7582973
#SPJ4
which legal concept is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law?
The legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.
What is the concept of law?We need to understand that the law refers to the discipline and profession concerned with the customs, practices, and rules of conduct of a community that are recognized as binding by the community. In essence, the enforcement of the body of rules is through a controlling authority known as the police etc.
Basically, the primary aim of law is to protect all human interests by regulating the conduct of individuals in the society. In conclusion, the legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.
Read more about concept of law
brainly.com/question/4384
#SPJ1
Question 6 of 10
As part of the global economy, the United States plays the role of:
A. the country with the lowest standard of living.
O B. the largest of the developing countries.
O C. the most economically powerful country.
D. the country most focused on agriculture.
Answer: C. The most economically powerful country.
Explanation:
As part of the global economy, the United States plays the role of the most economically powerful country. Option C. This is further explained below.
What is the economy?
Generally, The global economy may be described as the total of all actions that happen within and between nations. The Economy of a nation is a broad collection of interconnected production and consuming programs that help determine how limited resources are distributed.
In conclusion, As a member of the global economy, the United States is the most economically powerful country.
Read more about Economy
https://brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ2
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
What does "proof" mean?
Answer:
In the context of law, "proof" refers to the evidence presented to support a claim or assertion, and the level of certainty that the evidence establishes. The proof is used to convince a judge or jury that a particular fact or proposition is true and to satisfy the burden of proof required to establish a legal claim or defense.
Answer:
Explanation:
Proof is defined as twice the alcohol (ethanol) content by volume. For example, a whisky with 50% alcohol is 100-proof whiskey
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
With all of the fears surrounding the violation of workplace privacy, how do you approach the employee?
Answer:
calmly, quietly
Explanation:
I. Why the concern about workplace privacy? ... innumerable levels, clearly increase efficiency in almost all tasks, allow for geographic and other ... suits, and finally, what employees should and can be doing to protect their privacy while at work. ... Still, this fear provides an incentive for some companies who harbor important ...
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
medical malpractice suits are good examples of cases. quizlet
Medical malpractice suits are examples of cases demonstrating the legal consequences of professional negligence in the healthcare industry. These cases involve medical professionals who have failed to meet the standard of care required by their profession, resulting in harm to a patient.
These lawsuits are filed by patients who have suffered harm or injury due to negligence or misconduct by a healthcare professional, such as a doctor, nurse, or hospital. The damages awarded in these cases can range from compensation for medical expenses to punitive damages. Medical malpractice suits are examples of cases that can have significant consequences for healthcare providers, as they can lead to loss of license, fines, and even imprisonment in some cases.
To win a medical malpractice suit, the plaintiff must establish four key elements:
1. Duty: The medical professional must provide care to the patient.
2. Breach: The medical professional breached that duty by failing to meet the standard of care.
3. Causation: The breach of duty directly caused the patient's injury or harm.
4. Damages: The patient suffered quantifiable damages (e.g., physical, emotional, or financial) due to the harm.
Medical malpractice suits serve as an essential mechanism to hold healthcare providers accountable for their actions and to compensate patients for their injuries. They also help to promote high standards of care and continuous improvement in the medical field.
To learn more about Medical malpractice, visit: https://brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ11
Which power does the U.S Constitution give to the president?
A. Appointing members of Congress
B. Voting on new federal laws
C. Pardoning those convict crimes
D. Overriding Supreme Court decisions