Poor people released without paying bail show up for court at the same rates as people who pay bail.the holding of individuals accused of misdemeanors in jails.
The impoverished are likely to be detained until the trial if they cannot afford to post a monetary bail. The impoverished may spend more time in jail awaiting trial than the length of the punishment they get at the conclusion of the trial since even straightforward felonies can take months to reach trial. A BILL THAT WILL BE CALLED AN ACT RELATING TO RULES FOR SETTING THE AMOUNT OF BAIL, TO THE RELEASE OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ON A FINANCIAL BOND OR A PERSONAL BOND, TO RELATED DUTY OF CERTAIN OFFICERS TAKING BAIL BONDS AND OF A MAGISTRATE IN A CRIMINAL CASE, TO CHARITABLE BAIL ORGANI.
To learn more about misdemeanors in jails click the link below:
brainly.com/question/14319608
#SPJ4
The use of the public wearing of letters was used to publicly shame criminals, including those who
were guilty of "moral crimes." In this system, A stands for
Atheist
Adulterer
Arrogant
Agent
one of the strongest foreign policy tools possessed by the president are executive agreements.
According to question, The Senate's advise and consent are required for all ambassadorial appointments, which are made at the president's discretion.
The President "shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present approve," as stated in the American Constitution (Article II, section 2).Treaties are legally binding agreements that are incorporated into international law.
The commander in chief is the president. He has the authority to sign treaties and executive agreements, designate ambassadors, and welcome them.
To know more about executive visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11422252
#SPJ4
Workers also have the right to refuse to do a job if they believe in blank faith that they are exposed to an imminent danger.
Workers have a right to refuse a job if they believe in good faith that the job exposes them to danger.
What is the concept of good faith?The concept of good faith tells us that the worker has had reasonable grounds to believe in the existent of danger.
They have the right to refuse any job that they consider to be dangerous and they are covered from any forms of reprisals for doing such.
Read more on good faith here:
https://brainly.com/question/24725464
Every day someone complains on how the core system does not work I would like you to suggest three things that you think should be changed to the system why they should be changed and how that part of the system should work
Answer:
It’s been eight years since the Common Core State Standards were unveiled and states began adopting them for use in their evaluation programs. The firestorm of controversy which initially greeted their introduction into American education from both sides of the political aisle seems to have died down somewhat and presently the Common Core appears to have been accepted as a part of the landscape in most of the nation, even as a handful of states that have not adopted it have established similar sets of academic standards.
91. When confined to bed, clients should change positions at least every two hours.
(A) True
(B) False
Answer:
Falso
Explanation:
Which is most often a cause for a change in career or lifestyle?
adjustments in vacation
adjustments in life roles
career satisfaction
lifestyle satisfaction
Answer:
B. Adjustment in life roles.
Explanation:
Question: Under what conditions can a person legally handle,
offer for transport, or transport dangerous goods? (5 Marks)
To legally handle, offer for transport, or transport dangerous goods, one must have certification, authorization, appropriate equipment, and comply with regulations regarding safety, packaging, labeling, and documentation.
To legally handle, offer for transport, or transport dangerous goods, several conditions must be met. The person involved should have a certificate of competency demonstrating their training and ability to handle such goods safely. Additionally, specific permits may be necessary for the transportation of hazardous materials. The individual must be authorized, which may involve possessing an endorsement on their commercial driver's license. Adequate equipment and resources are essential, ensuring that the transport vehicle is equipped with necessary safety features. Compliance with regulations governing hazardous material handling is crucial, encompassing safety standards, packaging, labeling, and documentation requirements. These conditions ensure the safe and legal transportation of dangerous goods.
learn more about legally handle here;
https://brainly.com/question/29571180
#SPJ11
The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that ______ can cause in tort law.
The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that false statements and product disparagement can cause in tort law.
Defamation is a tort that encompasses false statements about a person or entity that harm their reputation. In this case, the false claim of finding a finger in the chili caused damage to Wendy's brand image, leading to a decline in sales and public trust.
Moreover, the false statement also constitutes product disparagement or trade libel, which involves making false statements about a business's products or services to harm their reputation and economic interests.
The Wendy's chili incident highlights the potential harm caused by false statements in tort law, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and the need for legal recourse to seek compensation for the damages suffered.
Learn more about Defamation here:
https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ11
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Can an action be legal but immoral,
Can an action be morally right but unlawful?
Explain the Full Fundamental Law with formulae? Haren
The full fundamental law of arithmetic is a theorem in number theory. It states that every positive integer greater than 1 can be factored into a unique product of prime numbers. That is, any integer n can be written in the form:n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * p3^a3 * ... * pk^ak where pi are prime numbers and ai are non-negative integers.
This factorization is unique up to the order of the factor. The proof of this theorem is beyond the scope of this answer, but it relies on the fact that any integer can be written as a product of primes. This fact can be proven using Euclid's lemma, which states that if a prime number divides the product of two integers, then it must divide at least one of the factors.
To know more about arithmetic, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16415816#
#SPJ11
The images show what happened to two people who invested $1,000.
Gale starts with $1,000.
Gale's investments:
- Savings account: $200,1% retum
- Mutual fund: $600, 7% return
- Stock:
$200, -10% return
Alex starts with $1,000.
Alex's investments:
- Stock:
$1,000, -10%
return
Value one year later:
Profit:
$1,024
$24
Value one year later:
Profit:
$900
($100)
Which investment advice would Gale most likely give to Alex?
The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
What are mutual funds?A mutual fund is an organization that brings collectively cash from many human beings and invests it in stocks, bonds, or different properties.
The mixed holdings of stocks, bonds, or different properties the fund owns are called its portfolio.
Hence, The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/3151209
#SPJ5
The best investing advice Gale would probably provide Alex is to put money into mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than other types of investments.
What is mutual fund?A mutual fund is a business that pools the money from several investors and uses it to buy stocks, bonds, or other types of real estate. The portfolio of the fund refers to its assortment of stocks, bonds, and various real estate interests.
The primary investments of mutual funds are frequently categorized as money market funds, bond or fixed income funds, stock or equity funds, or hybrid funds. Index funds, which are passively managed funds that follow the performance of an index, are another classification for funds. As a result, Gale will probably advise Alex to invest in mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than any other type of investment.
Learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/31417979
#SPJ7
Probably the full options are:
A. mutual fund
B. natural resources
C. government bonds
D. certificate of deposit
In the planning function, public management's main focus is on the executing the assigned tasks
In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. - False
When organizational management is in the planning phase, this is when it defines its aims, goals, and action plans to accomplish them. One of a firm's most crucial steps is strategic planning because it addresses the organisation's long-term needs. It must be well-structured, contain the organisation's mission, vision, and values, and aid in the achievement of the firm's goals and objectives.
Setting goals, objectives, and priorities as well as creating strategies and action plans to accomplish them are the primary areas of emphasis for public management when performing the planning function. Despite being a crucial component of the implementation stage, carrying out given duties is not the primary concern of the planning function.
Complete Question:
In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. True/False
Read more about planning function on:
https://brainly.com/question/3504046
#SPJ4
New York's SHIELD Act. New York recently passed the SHIELD Act, a law that states that if you do business online from anywhere in the world, and you are a customer that lives in the state of New York, your business comes under the laws of the state of New York. (See the Tripwire article linked below.) Do you think a state should be able to extend its jurisdiction worldwide like this? Do you think businesses will start to refuse service online for customers who live in states with overreaching cyber laws? Or, do you think businesses will adjust and learn to cope with 50 different sets of state laws in cyber? Do you think the framers of our Constitution gave us a set of laws flexible enough to handle these kinds of situations? How is this different from the California Consumer Privacy Act? Compare and contrast these two laws. New York Passes a Law that Further Expands Cyber Protection (tripwire.com) California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) | State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
The SHIELD Act passed in New York allows the state to extend its jurisdiction worldwide for businesses conducting online activities with New York customers.
The SHIELD Act gives New York the power to exercise global jurisdiction over companies that conduct internet business with residents of New York. There is disagreement over whether a state should have such broad global authority. To avoid the complications of compliance, some organizations may decide to reject service to customers in jurisdictions with stringent cyber laws. However, some organizations might decide to modify their procedures and adjust to the various cyber regulations of other states.
The Constitution's creators did offer a legal framework that permits adaptability and flexibility to changing circumstances. To successfully handle the problems created by international online transactions and data privacy, however, existing rules may need to be substantially refined given the quick growth of cyber-related issues.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), in contrast to the SHIELD Act, places more of an emphasis on privacy protection. According to the CCPA, people of California have certain rights regarding their personal information. These rights include the right to access and correct their personal information, the right to know what data is collected and how it is used, and the right to refuse to have their data sold.
The SHIELD Act, on the other hand, imposes notification requirements in the event of data breaches and requires organizations to implement appropriate protections for the security of personal information. Although both laws deal with internet privacy, their methods and purviews are different.
To know more about SHIELD Act here https://brainly.com/question/29645014
#SPJ4
How do drivers who have a physical dissability compensate for their dissabilityy
Answer:
Adapted Vehicles, & etc.
Explanation:
Drivers who have a physical disability may compensate for their disability in various ways, depending on the nature and severity of the disability. Some common methods of compensation include:
Adapted vehicles: Many drivers with physical disabilities use vehicles that have been adapted to their specific needs. For example, a driver with a lower limb disability may use a car with hand controls or a wheelchair-accessible van.Prosthetic devices: Drivers with limb amputations or other physical impairments may use prosthetic devices to help them operate a vehicle. For example, a driver with a missing left hand may use a prosthetic device that attaches to the steering wheel to help with steering.Assistive technology: There are a variety of assistive technologies available to help drivers with physical disabilities. For example, some drivers may use voice-activated controls, touchscreens, or other devices to operate their vehicle.Training and education: Drivers with physical disabilities may undergo specialized training and education to help them compensate for their disability. This may include training on how to use assistive technology or specialized driving techniques.Medical treatment: In some cases, drivers with physical disabilities may receive medical treatment or physical therapy to help them compensate for their disability. For example, a driver with a spinal cord injury may undergo physical therapy to improve their upper body strength and coordination.what are international human rights?
International human rights refer to a set of universal rights and freedoms that are recognized and protected by international law.
These rights are considered to be inherent to all human beings, regardless of their race, gender, nationality, religion, or other characteristics, and they are intended to ensure that all individuals are treated with dignity, respect, and equality.
Some examples of international human rights include the right to life, liberty, and security of person; the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion; the right to freedom of expression and opinion; the right to education and access to information; the right to work and to fair labor practices; the right to healthcare and social services; the right to a fair trial and due process of law; and the right to participate in government and public affairs.
These rights are enshrined in international human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. These treaties and agreements have been adopted by most countries in the world, and they form the basis of international human rights law.
While the protection of international human rights remains an ongoing challenge, the recognition and promotion of these rights are essential to building more just and equitable societies. By upholding the principles of international human rights, countries can work to ensure that all individuals are able to live with dignity, freedom, and equality, and that their basic human rights are respected and protected.
Learn more about labor here:
https://brainly.com/question/14348614
#SPJ11
Name and explain the purpose of one law/legislation that protects citizens
against the specific human right violation you have chosen.
Answer:
Domestic Violence Act and Criminal Law Act
Explanation: the Domestic Violence Act No 116 of 1998 and Criminal Law Act No 32 of 2007. Both are framed to protect women against any form of violence in South Africa
When John Smith created the law in Jamestown Colony that if a man did not work, he could not eat, what was MOST likely his intent?
The intention that John Smith would have for saying that if a man did not work, he would not eat is for everyone to be hardworking and to thrive in the economy. He wanted all to be committed to the success of the new colony.
Who was John Smith?Captain John Smith was a soldier, explorer, adventurer, and writer. We may follow the growth of a man who played a major role in Jamestown's eventual success and the establishing of its reputation as the first permanent English settlement in North America through the narrative of his early life.
Because he wanted everyone at Jamestown, Virginia, to dedicate themselves to the success of that first colony established in 1607, John Smith established a "no work, no food" policy. With that kind of weather and the challenging circumstances of starting over in a new place, Jhon Smith knew how difficult it would be to flourish. He therefore did not want anyone to adopt a "free ride" mentality. He said that at that time.
Read more on John Smith here: https://brainly.com/question/17837412
#SPJ1
Explanation: Gradpoint
when the framers of the u.s. constitution guaranteed freedom of the press, one of the things they had in mind was the ability of the news media to serve as a those in positions of power.
When the framers of the US constitution guaranteed freedom of the press, one of the things they had in mind was the ability of the news media to serve as a watchdog over those in positions of power.
The essential tenet of freedom of the press or free media is that expression and communication through a variety of media, including electronic and written media, especially published information, should be seen as a right to be freely practiced. Such freedom denotes the lack of intervention from a power-hungry state; its conservation may be attempted through some kind of constitution or other forms of security and legal protection.
A democracy where the people are the government's ultimate arbiters depends on freedom of the press, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment. A free press serves as just a watchdog that really can look into and report on misconduct by the government.
Learn more about freedom of the press here:
https://brainly.com/question/9537637
#SPJ4
How does criminological research impact social policies ?
flexible manufacturing system plays a part in economics?
Consider the expressions T - G and Y - T - C. Which of the following statements is correct?a.Each one of these is equal to national saving.b.Each one of these is equal to public saving.c.The first of these is private saving; the second one is public saving.d.The first of these is public saving; the second one is private saving.
The first of these is public saving; the second one is private saving is correct when considering the expression T - G and Y - T - C.
What distinguishes public from private savings?National savings are the sum of all private and public savings. It stands for the economy's domestic supply of loanable money. Public sector savings, or government savings, are just what their name implies. Private sector savings, or the total of household and business savings, are made in the meantime.
The term (T G TR), which equals government tax revenue less government spending on goods and services less transfers, is also referred to as public saving or the budget surplus. However, judicial review can only be utilized against the public sector, as in the case of pension plans. Private saving is the total amount of savings made by households and private businesses. Tax payments made to the government or adjustments brought about by changes in asset prices are excluded.
To learn more about judicial review, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15004014
#SPJ1
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
a § 501(c)(3) organization that otherwise would be classified as a private foundation can avoid such classification if it satisfies:
A § 501(c)(3) organization that would otherwise be classified as a private foundation can avoid such classification if it satisfies the requirements for public charity status.
To avoid being classified as a private foundation, a § 501(c)(3) organization must meet the criteria for public charity status. Private foundations are subject to stricter regulations and restrictions compared to public charities. To qualify as a public charity, the organization must demonstrate a broad base of public support, which can be achieved by meeting certain financial and operational tests. These tests assess the organization's sources of funding, the level of public involvement and support, and the nature of its activities. By satisfying these requirements, the organization can avoid being classified as a private foundation and enjoy the benefits and flexibility associated with public charity status.
to learn more about regulations
click here brainly.in/question/7276445
#SPJ11
summarize the most important factors establishing and ending the "Hands Off Doctrine" I need help
Answer:
Establishing factor is fear of violations and ending factor is prisoner's right movement.
Explanation:
The most important factors that is responsible for establishing the "Hands Off Doctrine" are fear of violations and to avoid collision between arms of government. Courts feared that separation of powers and federalism would be violated if courts intervened in the work of institutions related to the state. The hands-off doctrine ended of two factors i.e. the prisoner's right movement and activism of federal judges. The hands-off doctrine formally ended with two decisions taken by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s.
Floyd is riding his bicycle down the street while texting on his phone. floyd does not see vivian, a store owner, who is putting magazines out in front of her storefront. he looks up just in time and swerves to miss vivian but knocks her entire magazine rack and newsstand down, totally destroying it. is floyd liable?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, Vivian has a competent loss and lost money.
Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
What is money?Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.
Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.
Therefore, a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ2
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
Which of the following is an example of a power exclusively granted to the Senate in Article II of the Constitution?A Declaring warB Overriding a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vetoC Confirming ambassadorsD Creating spending bills
Confirming ambassadors is an example of a power exclusively granted to the Senate in Article II of the Constitution
What's in an ambassador?A country or international organization's highest-ranking representative abroad is an ambassador. A strong leader who is also a competent manager, tenacious negotiator, and a well-liked American envoy are all necessary qualities for an effective ambassador.United States ambassadors perform more than standard diplomatic duties due to the country's position in the world and function as a power broker. An ambassador commands a great deal of respect and status as the president's principal representative to a foreign country or body like the United Nations."The President shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate to make Treaties, if two thirds of the Senators present consent," the Constitution states in Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2. Thus, the President and the Senate each have a portion of the authority to make treaties.To learn more about ambassador refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/870924
#SPJ4
Que lo llevo hacer un gran ciclista a richard carapaz
Richard Carapaz is a great cyclist because :
His natural talent for cyclingHis hard work and dedicationHis mental strengthHow did Richard Carapaz become such a great cyclist ?Carapaz has continuously been a solid and quick cyclist, and he includes a natural capacity to climb slopes. Carapaz could be a exceptionally difficult laborer, and he is continuously seeking out for ways to progress his cycling. He puts in long hours of preparing, and he is continuously willing to thrust himself to the constrain.
Carapaz could be a exceptionally rationally intense cyclist, and he is able to remain centered and spurred indeed when things are intense. He incorporates a never-give-up demeanor, and he is continuously willing to battle for triumph.
Find out more on great cyclists at https://brainly.com/question/15980275
#SPJ4
Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shooting occurred less than one year ago. Your officer shot and killed an unarmed man, but the officer was acquitted of all charges in the shooting. Since the verdict was announced, there has been an uptick in crime in your city. You were made aware of the incident before you were hired, and you were told that the Department is now engaging in “de-policing” - departing from proactive policing – because of the anti-cop hostility in the community. Before you even had a chance to put your coffee mug on your new desk, your administrative assistant runs into your office yelling, “they’re here!” You find out that a protest march is underway with numerous reporters working their way through the melee. Your community has lost trust in your Police Department and the courts, and they are demanding that you do something. Community leaders make their way into your office. You pause a moment - and then say, “Good to see you. You saved me a phone call. Come, let’s sit down and discuss what we can do to help our community.”
Answer:
Explanation:
1. As a leader of police officer, you have many years of policing under your belt, so with that role in mind you can establish new rules and regulations for your officers as the chief.
2. As someone who is new to the community, listening to the thoughts of the community leader will be essential to helping reduce crime and protests.
3. Gathering of evidence of the case of the police officer killing the unarmed man can 1. help determine if there really was a case of self defense or not 2. familiarizing yourself to the case more on evidence and less of word of mouth and 3. reappealing the verdict to manslaughter.
4. Establish a compromise with the community leader to address "de-policing" as unproductive counter to the rising crime rates.
5. Establish new regulations for the community leaders so no similar reoccurring incidents may repeat themselves in such turmoil.