Due to the fact that no other body can topple them. No, in the sense that, as it did with egregious judgments, the Supreme Court has the authority to eventually overturn or amend its own precedent.
A Supreme Court ruling may be overturned?When the Supreme Court issues a verdict on a constitutional matter, the decision is essentially final; it can only be overturned by the constitutional amendment process, which is rarely used, or by a fresh decision by the Court. New legislative action may be taken, though, when the Court interprets a statute.
Asking the court to grant a writ of certiorari is the main way to request a review from the court. This is an application to have the Supreme Court direct a lower court to send the case file up for review.
A motion to reconsider and notice of motion can be submitted within 30 days of the judgment date if a party disagrees with the judge's ruling.
To learn more about Supreme Court ruling refer to
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
Hey guys just wanted to know if Yall can help me to know something, so I was on a soccer game and a kid pushed me on purpose and posed to fight Me but I trowed a punch and knocked him out, he has a purple mark on the face, what the max thing I can get in trouble, can I go to jail? I'm 17 years old by the way, help me out with you guys knowledge
Answer:
ok don't worry, first i dont think youll go to jail and if you do its probably overnight unless you did something worse, then it'll be longer depending on what you did. But i doubt youll go to jail for one punch, maybe get yelled at but you'll be fine
Explanation:
When a court is later called upon to determine the existence of a contract or interpret an agreement, which theory do courts use in their analysis?
When a court is later called upon to determine the existence of a contract or interpret an agreement, they use the theory of contract law.
This theory involves analyzing the intentions of the parties involved, the terms and conditions of the agreement, and any surrounding circumstances or context that may affect the interpretation of the contract. The court will also consider any applicable laws or regulations that may impact the contract.
The court will consider various factors, such as the plain meaning of the contract's language, the context in which the agreement was made, industry customs, and any evidence of the parties' intentions or understanding. The goal is to ascertain the mutual intent of the parties and apply the contract's terms accordingly.
Ultimately, the court's goal is to determine the meaning and enforceability of the contract and to ensure that both parties are held accountable for their obligations under the agreement.
Learn more about Contract Law :- https://brainly.com/question/32352052
#SPJ11
A person is charged with robbing $10,000 from a jewelry store. Match the probation officer and the parole officer to their specific tasks of this case.
Answer:
Parole officer: speaks to judges
probation officer: makes a plan
probation officer: monitors
Parole officer: acts carefully
Explanation:
I hope it is correct!
Answer:the pic below
Explanation:On edge
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
this is a tax-sheltered retirement plan in which people can annually invest earnings up to a certain amount; the funds are taxed when they are withdrawn after age 59 1/2. what is it
The given description describes the Individual Retirement Account (IRA), which is a tax-sheltered retirement plan in which people can annually invest earnings up to a certain amount. The funds are taxed when they are withdrawn after age 59 1/2.
What is Individual Retirement Account (IRA)?Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is a tax-sheltered retirement plan in which people can annually invest earnings up to a certain amount. The funds are taxed when they are withdrawn after age 59 1/2.Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is a type of savings account that is designed to encourage saving for retirement by offering tax advantages. A person contributes money to an IRA and investments are made with the funds, either by the account owner or by a financial institution acting on the account owner's behalf. The earnings on the investments grow tax-free until they are withdrawn from the account.
Learn more about Individual Retirement Account (IRA)
https://brainly.com/question/28505061
#SPJ11
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports? rule 26 rule 24 rule 25 rule 27
The rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that requires expert witnesses to submit written reports is Rule 26.
Under Rule 26(a)(2)(B), a party must disclose the identity of any expert witness it may use at trial and must provide a written report that includes the expert's opinions, the basis and reasons for those opinions, and other information about the expert and the testimony that they may provide. rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports? rule 26 rule 24 rule 25 rule 27 .This requirement aims to ensure that the parties have sufficient information about the expert witness's opinions and methodology before trial, which can facilitate more informed and efficient litigation.
Learn more about reports here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ11
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Which of the following is TRUE regarding police and security rights and responsibilities?
- Police officers have more authority when it comes to searches but not questioning on private property
- Police officers are responsible for protecting private property, while security officers defend the general public.
- Security officers can make arrests on private property while police officers cannot
- Security officers can monitor much broader areas while police officers are confirmed to securing only what has been assigned them by their employer.
Police officers have more authority when it comes to searches but not questioning on private property is true regarding police and security rights and responsibilities.
What is the responsibility of police?
The purpose of the police, a state- established association of individualities with authority to apply the law, cover resides lives, property, and health, and discourage crime and civil uneasiness. Their legal authority extends to making apprehensions and using force, which is justified by the state's monopoly on violence. The expression is most constantly used to relate to the police forces of an autonomous state that are permitted to use the state's police power within a specific legal or territorial sphere.
Know more about police - brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ1
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
why were the men at war in 1651
They were at war because there were series of disagreements about religion and the way the country should be ruled
Answer:
Image result for why were the men at war in 1651
The English Civil Wars (1642-1651) stemmed from conflict between Charles I and Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The first war was settled with Oliver Cromwell's victory for Parliamentary forces at the 1645 Battle of Naseby.
Explanation:
HELP, WIL MARK BRAINLEST
The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.
I hope I've helped! :)
In a successful civil RICO action, what civil remedies are available to the prevailing party?
allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
wikipedia
Quiché amendment guarantees the freedom of press
In the U.S. Constitution, the amendment that guaranteed the freedom of press is the First Amendment under the Bills of rights.
What is the first amendment?The amendment is the first subset of the Bill of rights, its refer to the legislation that prohibited any law limiting freedom with respect to religion, expression, peaceful assembly or the right of citizens to petition the government. It also forbids the Congress from promoting one religion over others, restricts an individual's religious practices and helped to connects the Americans because its protects the right to express our deepest beliefs in word and action.
The provision of the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
As the freedom of speech relates to the freedom of press, this means that people can express an opinion (even unpopular) without any fear of government censorship and protects all forms of communication ranging from speeches to art and other media.
Read more about First Amendment
brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ1
tb mc qu. 01-49 if a uniform laws is...if a uniform law is proposed, what are the requirements that each state must follow?multiple choice
A. all states must adopt the uniform statute within six months.
B. states are not required to do anything; the law takes effect one year from the date of the proposed uniform law.
C. all states must adopt the uniform statute within one year.a state legislature can ignore the proposed uniform law, adopt it in full, or adopt it in part.
D. a state legislature is not required to adopt the uniform statute, but if the state legislature decides to do so, the statute must be adopted in its entirety.
A state legislature is the legislative body of a political subdivision in a federal system. Two federations use the phrase “state legislature” in its literal sense. Thus, option C is correct.
What uniform law related to state legislature?The official name of every state is different. In 27 states, the legislature is simply referred to as the Legislature or the State Legislature; in 19 states, it is known as the General Assembly.
The legislative bodies of each of the fifty American states are referred to as state legislatures. Six territorial legislatures are also present.
The legislature is one of a state's three legislative branches. It is the branch responsible for formulating laws and making policy. It also oversees how laws are implemented and carries out research necessary for legislation to be passed.
Therefore, all states must adopt the uniform statute within one year.a state legislature can ignore the proposed uniform law, adopt it in full, or adopt it in part.
Learn more about uniform law here:
https://brainly.com/question/15060097
#SPJ1
What are five situations in which it is legally permissible for co's to use Force
Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.
1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.
2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.
3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.
4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.
5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.
It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.
Know more about Enforcing laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ11
Discuss what is true freedom in your own perspective
Answer:
1.Beyond freedom of choices, true freedom lies in producing larger goodness for the largest mankind and other creatures. When we become one with the mercy of God prevailing in universe, we truly become free from fear and sorrows.
2.Freedom” means many things to many people. Freedom can mean having the opportunity to vote for particular ideas or for people who best represent our views. Freedom can refer to the concept of freedom of speech: the ability to freely voice personal opinions or perspectives
3.the quality or state of being free: such as. a : the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action. b : liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another : independence.
Explanation:
just choose one
Explain jow pressure from family friends and society may have a negative impact on grade 12 learner
Pressure from family, friends, and society can negatively impact a grade 12 learner in a number of ways.
The expectation to perform well academically can lead to stress and anxiety, which can interfere with a student's ability to concentrate and perform well on exams.
What is social pressure?Generally, A student in grade 12 may have a lot of negative effects as a result of the pressure they feel from their family, peers, and society. The pressure placed on students to achieve high academic standards may result in feelings of stress and worry, which can impair a student's ability to focus and cause them to underachieve in their schoolwork.
In addition, the pressure that students feel to conform to the expectations of society, such as choosing a particular career path or college to attend, can cause students to lose sight of their own interests and goals, which can result in feelings of dissatisfaction and a lack of motivation to continue their education.
In addition, the pressure that people feel to comply to certain societal standards may also contribute to feelings of inadequacy and a lack of self-esteem in individuals.
Read more about social pressure
https://brainly.com/question/6690016
#SPJ1
While using cruise control, _____.
A. you don't need to steer or brake
B. you still need to steer and brake
C. you don't need to pay attention to the road
D. you still need to press the accelerator to maintain speed
Answer:
you're answer is B you still need to steer and brake.
B) you still need to steer and brake
Explanation: Cruise control only maintains speed (you can take your foot off the accelerator), BUT you still need to maintain the rest.
Should local police departments work with federal agencies to enforce immigration policies? Why or
why not?
Answer:
No, because local law enforcement has other priorities especially to protect the people of their community, by adding extra task to local law enforcement would obstruct how they respond to local issues and apply more stress that they already have.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was developed by the U.S. to assess the effects a significant federal action will have on the environment, and seek to mitigate this impact. This concept has been adopted by many developed and some developing nations. Which of the following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA?
Group of answer choices
To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts.
To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferrable.
To collect data to deny the project form moving forward.
The following is NOT a major aspect of an EIA: option (D) correct To collect data to deny the project from moving forward. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the method for determining how the environment may be influenced by a proposed activity or project.
EIA is used to forecast environmental effects at an early stage in project planning and design, and to identify ways to minimize adverse effects and improve positive effects. The four major aspects of an EIA are: To predict and evaluate environmental effects.
To avoid or mitigate negative impacts. To examine alternative approaches that may be environmentally preferable. To collect data to help make a decision.
To know more about Environmental Impact Assessment visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16326960
#SPJ11
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
Should police chiefs be appointed or elected? Explain your answer.
what means if you are gagah
Answer:
gagah means manly but whats the question?
Explanation:
Various politicians have often emphasized that unless we seal our Southern border, undocumented/illegal immigrants will enter and drive up crime rates.
Answer:
all the good ones
Explanation:
DONALD TRUMP RON DESTANTIS GREG ABOTT
What kinds of control are available legislatures? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answer:
1. Financial authority: Legislators have the authority to approve budgets and allocate funding to various programs and initiatives.
2. Legislative authority: Legislators have the authority to create and pass laws that govern numerous parts of society.
3. Oversight control: Legislators can investigate and oversee government agencies to ensure they are operating properly.
4. Appointment control: Legislators have the authority to confirm or reject appointments made by the executive branch.
5. Impeachment control: Through the impeachment process, legislatures can remove public officials from office.
All of these checks and balances are necessary for the legislature to keep the government working properly and citizens' rights safeguarded.
Today you have been appointed by the USA Supreme Court to represent one side in the case of Mandrill vs. the USA.
There are some issues which settled by lower courts , but the case was overturned and reinstated multiple times until it reached SCOTUS, Now you have been asked To write a 150 -200 -word brief of the issue is "Mandrill, as an animal, is entitled to the same rights as a human".
Simply list both arguments, side by side
Case: Mandrill vs. America
Issue: Whether Mandrill, as an animal, is entitled to the equal rights as a human.
Arguments:
For Mandrill's Rights:
Animal Sentience and Intrinsic Value: Mandrill advocates argue that animals, inclusive of primates like Mandrills, possess sentience and enjoy feelings and cognitive competencies similar to human beings. They contend that these attributes supply animals with inherent value, deserving of legal safety and popularity in their rights.
Evolving Standards of Morality: Supporters of Mandrill's rights declare that societal attitudes in the direction of animal welfare have advanced over time. They argue that legal recognition of animal rights aligns with contemporary moral and ethical values, selling compassion and empathy toward all sentient beings.
Against Mandrill's Rights:
Legal Status: Opponents argue that the existing felony framework only grants rights to people, as they own a wonderful criminal personality and potential for the moral enterprise. They contend that extending human rights to animals, such as Mandrill, might require a sizable redefinition of felony ideas.
Practical Implications: Critics enhance issues approximately the realistic implications of granting animals identical rights as human beings. They argue that such recognition should have some distance-attaining effects, affecting regions like property ownership, medical studies, and animal agriculture, doubtlessly disrupting established societal norms and human pursuits.
Conclusion:
The case of Mandrill vs. The us affords a complicated and controversial difficulty regarding the extension of human rights to animals. Advocates emphasize animal sentience and evolving moral requirements while warring parties highlight prison status and sensible implications.
The Supreme Court needs to cautiously take into account the arguments offered to decide the extent of prison protections afforded to animals in light of societal, ethical, and legal concerns.
To know more about animal welfare,
https://brainly.com/question/28201931
#SPJ4
A trademark is a type of patent.
True or False?
Some law enforcement professionals believe relying on scientific evidence makes it more
difficult to convict criminals when the scientific evidence is not available. In your opinion,
does the reliance on scientific evidence help or hamper law enforcement?
WCapstone in Criminal Justice: Imagine you hear a policymaker boldly proclaim "politics has no place in Criminal Justice". How would you respond to this claim and why?hy do companies use the Economic Order Quantity, and what sort of costs does it seek to minimize? Your company realizes you can supply 1500 units of a certain product when demand is only 1000. Give an example of 2 actions you can explore to address this situation (1 related to supply and 1 related to demand)
While the claim that "politics has no place in Criminal Justice" may sound appealing in its simplicity, it fails to recognize the inherent intersection between politics and the criminal justice system.
Criminal justice policies, laws, and funding decisions are inherently political in nature, as they are shaped by policymakers and influenced by public opinion. Moreover, the criminal justice system operates within a larger societal and political context, addressing issues such as social inequality, public safety, and the protection of individual rights.
However, it is important to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate political influence within the criminal justice system. It is crucial to maintain the integrity and independence of the system, ensuring that political considerations do not undermine the principles of fairness, justice, and due process. The challenge lies in striking a balance between the need for political involvement to address social concerns and the preservation of the system's core values.
Rather than excluding politics from criminal justice, the focus should be on promoting ethical, transparent, and evidence-based decision-making. Policymakers must be held accountable for their decisions, ensuring that they are guided by the principles of justice, equity, and the protection of individual rights. Collaborative efforts between policymakers, criminal justice professionals, and the community can help shape effective and fair policies that address societal needs while upholding the values of the criminal justice system.
Explanation of Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) and Cost Minimization: Companies use the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) to determine the optimal order quantity of inventory that minimizes costs associated with ordering and holding inventory. EOQ takes into account factors such as ordering costs and holding costs to strike a balance between frequent orders (incurring high ordering costs) and large orders (incurring high holding costs).
Ordering costs refer to expenses associated with placing an order, such as administrative costs, transportation costs, or setup costs. Holding costs include expenses tied to carrying inventory, such as storage costs, insurance, obsolescence, and the opportunity cost of tied-up capital. In the given scenario where the company can supply 1500 units while demand is only 1000 units, two actions can be explored to address the situation.
Supply-related action: The company can negotiate with suppliers to reduce lead time, allowing for more frequent and smaller orders. By reducing lead time, the company can align the order quantity more closely with demand, minimizing holding costs associated with excess inventory.
Demand-related action: The company can implement targeted marketing strategies to stimulate demand for the product. This can include advertising campaigns, promotions, or discounts to encourage customers to purchase more units. By increasing demand, the company can reduce the gap between supply and demand, decreasing the need for excessive inventory and minimizing holding costs.
These actions aim to optimize the balance between supply and demand, ensuring efficient inventory management and minimizing costs associated with surplus inventory or stockouts. By considering both supply and demand aspects, the company can strive for cost-effective operations while meeting customer needs.
To know more about Criminal Justice, visit : brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ11
In order to get your original driver license of any type: You will be tested on what four (4) categories.
A) Vision test
B) knowledge of motor vehicles law
C) Traffic Signs
D) Driving Skills
E) All of the above
Answer:
E...
Explanation:
To get your original driver license, you will be tested on vision, motor vehicle law, traffic signs, and driving skills. The correct option is e.
You will be put through four tests in order to get your first driver's license such as vision, legal knowledge of motor vehicles, traffic signs and driving prowess. The vision test determines whether you have the required visual acuity levels for safe driving. Your knowledge of the driving laws and regulations is assessed by the knowledge test.
In order to pass the traffic signs test, you must show that you can recognize a variety of traffic signs and their meanings. Your capacity to drive safely and effectively is evaluated by the driving skills test. If you pass all of these exams, you can be sure that you're ready to get your driver's license and can drive safely.
learn more about driver license here
brainly.com/question/29441847
#SPJ2