Do you think it is fair for law enforcement officers to be able to stop and frisk citizens? Why or why not?

Answer:

Nah

Explanation:

Answer:

dont ask this

Explanation:

sir this is a Wendy's drive thru

Answer: Justice Reinvestment is a data-driven approach to improve public safety, reduce corrections and related criminal justice spending, and reinvest savings in strategies that can decrease crime and reduce recidivism.

The answer to the question is d. Liability is increased. A request for relief of liability is typically made when an individual or organization is seeking protection from legal responsibility for a particular action or event.

When a request for relief is granted, the liability may be reduced or eliminated, meaning that the individual or organization is no longer responsible for the consequences of the action or event. However, it is not possible for the liability to be increased as a result of the request for relief. In fact, if the request is denied, the liability may remain unchanged, but it cannot be increased as a direct result of the request. It is important to note that a request for relief of liability does not guarantee protection from legal action, and each situation must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Ultimately, the outcome of a request for relief of liability will depend on the specific circumstances of the situation and the decision of the legal system.

learn more about liability here:

https://brainly.com/question/18484315

#SPJ11

Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.

Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.

In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.

To know more about Capital punishment here

https://brainly.com/question/28180014

#SPJ1

Answer: D. all of the above

Explanation:

When driving you are responsible for operating a vehicle meaning you must stay focused and not let anything distract you from the road.  

State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).

Answer:

D.) Gabriel Tarde

Explanation:

He was a criminologist and social psychologist

Answer:

It is C, Hans Eysenck.

Explanation:

I put Gabriel Tarde and got it wrong. So person above me is wrong.

Answer:

Bad behavior or innapropriate behavior

Explanation:

Answer:

If the official treaty of the declaration of intemperance isn't multiplied by the diameter of the radius x would be 46 and be subtracted by i.

Explanation:

Lemme break It down to you on foe nem

If the quadrilateral starts in the circumference of the radius the convention source of law wouldn't be able to be multiplied by 6 x 2q unless it is stuck under a bush where I hide my squirrels at.

Other than that you would only get the 42 minus x equals 89 if the declaration independence qualifies as 22986.

Hope this helped

Answer:

Misrepresentation is about giving of inaccurate information by one party (or their agent) to the other before the contract is made which induces them to make the contract. If a person makes a contract in reliance on misrepresentation and has to face loss as a result, they can revoke the contract or claim damages.

Answer:

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)

Answer:

false

Explanation: If someone is involved in a crime they don't have to do somthing bad but if someone just robbed the bank and you driving the getaway car then when the police come you will automatically be guilty. Basically, if you helping someone who is in the wrong you are guilty...

The answer is 'False'. Ryan is not exempt from legal action because he assisted Lindsey in hiding the money. Ryan is equally at fault if he assists a criminal in their work. Therefore, choice (B) is the right one.

Helping someone commit a crime is persuading, instigating, or coercing them to do so. The phrase "aiding and abetting" is frequently used to refer to a single act.

A person accused of helping the perpetrator before or after committing a crime is charged with aiding, abetting, or being an accessory. Usually, the individual accused of helping to commit the crime or acting as an accomplice was not there when it was committed.

Proof that the co-conspirator was aware that the principal had committed or was about to commit a crime is necessary for all three accusations.

Necessary punishments are there for the above charges.

Therefore, the correct answer will be Option (B).

Learn more about aiding and abetting, from:

brainly.com/question/13466876

#SPJ2

Explanation:

The supreme court has its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government. the president and Congress, recognizes the limits of it's own power

The value of explicit rules in bureaucratic institutions is that they help ensure consistency and fairness in decision-making and provide clear guidance for employees.

Explanation:In bureaucratic institutions, explicit rules provide a framework for operations. These rules help ensure consistency and fairness in decision-making by providing a clear standard for evaluating actions. They also provide clear guidance for employees, making it easier for them to understand what is expected of them and how they should perform their duties. Additionally, explicit rules help ensure that decisions are made based on objective criteria rather than personal biases or preferences. This can help reduce the likelihood of favoritism or discrimination and promote a more merit-based system of evaluation and advancement.

To know more about bureaucratic  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30505419

#SPJ11

The United States Supreme Court case that upheld the principle of implied powers is McCulloch v. Maryland.

McCulloch v. Maryland, decided in 1819, involved a dispute over the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland's attempt to tax the bank. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing the majority opinion, addressed the issue of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8).

The Supreme Court held that the creation of the Second Bank of the United States was within the scope of Congress's implied powers. Marshall's opinion established the doctrine of implied powers, stating that Congress possesses powers not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as long as they are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.

This landmark decision affirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and solidified the doctrine of implied powers, providing a broad interpretation of federal authority. McCulloch v. Maryland remains an influential case in constitutional law and has shaped the understanding of implied powers in the United States.

To learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/546157

#SPJ11

The first woman to serve as Speaker of the House of Representatives in the United States was Nancy Pelosi. She held the position from January 4, 2007, to January 3, 2011, during the 110th and 111th Congresses.

Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, made history as the highest-ranking woman in the U.S. government at that time. She later reclaimed the speakership and has served additional terms as Speaker, including in the 116th and 117th Congresses.

While Callie is a fictional character, the first female astronaut and person of color will soon set foot on the Moon – a historic milestone and part of upcoming NASA Artemis missions. Through a series of graphic novels and digital platforms, First Woman aims to captivate audiences and inspire the next generation of explorers who will return to the Moon.

To know more about  Nancy Pelosi:- https://brainly.com/question/30282926

#SPJ11

Texas' pay-as-you-go spending rules are best summarized as a general prohibition of deficit financing. This means that the state is required to balance its budget every year and cannot spend more than the revenue it collects. This is achieved through a combination of strict budgeting practices and limits on borrowing.

The state of Texas has a two-year budget cycle and must pass a balanced budget at the beginning of each cycle. This means that the state legislature must carefully consider revenue projections and spending priorities in order to ensure that expenditures do not exceed available funds. In addition, the state has established a constitutional limit on the amount of debt that it can incur, which is currently set at 5% of the state's total tax revenue.One important aspect of Texas' pay-as-you-go system is its use of the "Rainy Day Fund." This is a reserve fund that is set aside for use in times of economic hardship or other emergencies. The fund is funded through a portion of the state's oil and gas revenue and is currently valued at over $10 billion. This allows the state to maintain its commitment to balanced budgets while also having a safety net in place for unexpected expenses.In conclusion, Texas' pay-as-you-go spending rules are designed to ensure that the state maintains a balanced budget and avoids deficit spending. This is achieved through strict budgeting practices, limits on borrowing, and the use of a reserve fund for emergencies. While this approach can be challenging at times, it has helped Texas maintain a strong fiscal position and avoid many of the financial difficulties that have plagued other states in recent years.

To know more about financing visit:

brainly.com/question/10024737

#SPJ11

Answer:

Crime scene investigators.

Explanation:

Forensic examination is a type of forensic examination that examines traces of evidence left by people and things to solve identification (which particular person or specific object left traces), diagnostic (establishing the safety or state of objects that created traces) or situational (establishing the conditions for the formation of traces) tasks within a crime investigation, with the ultimate objective of determining who, how and when commited the crime under investigation.

On August 2, 1776, members of Congress affix their signatures to an enlarged copy of the Declaration of Independence. Fifty-six congressional delegates in total signed the document, including some who were not present at the vote approving the declaration.

Nemo judex en causa sua and the second principle. The prohibition against bias states that no one should be allowed to assess his own case. "Audi alteram partem" (hear the other party) signifies that no one should be condemned without being heard.

To learn more about natural justice, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/946945

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

With regards to the question, Howell has committed fraud. In this case, this can be regarded as a mail or wire fraud which is when one uses telephone or mail to defraud someone else.

In this case, Howell may be charged for the unauthorized use of the telephone for his personal use as he made a long-distance telephone calls through the telephone company’s computer- controlled switching system to solicit funding for a nonexistent business enterprise. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act helps address this type of fraud.

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Tons of people have different opinions and thats why we have different polictical parties.

The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.

Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.

On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.

While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.

To know more about obligations.

https://brainly.com/question/32907342

#SPJ11

Answer:

I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war

Explanation:

I may be wrong

Answer:

Italian Americans

Explanation:

Answer:

Accessory, in criminal law, a person who becomes equally guilty in the crime of another by knowingly and voluntarily aiding the criminal before or after the crime. An accessory is one kind of accomplice, the other being an abettor, who aids the criminal during the act itself.

Explanation:

hope it'll be useful

Answer:

In testate succession, you need to file the following documents • Form P.A 78 (petition) • Form P & A 3 (affidavit) • the original will plus 2 photocopies of the will & • original death certificate. contains the prayers, if one wants to be an executor or administrator.

Explanation:

Side note: there is a PDF form on google that you can look at about this topic also.

Answer:

interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed

Explanation:

The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.

The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.

Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.

Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.

Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11