Yes, the senate requires a 2/3 majority to pass a bill in the respective houses in order to pass a bill later which becomes a Law.
What is a Senate?The Senate is a council, often the upper or lower house of a bicameral legislature.A parliament or council, usually with high consultative and legislative powers. the second house of a bicameral parliament of a large political bodyThe Senate has the sole power to confirm presidential appointments requiring approval and to advise on and approve the ratification of treaties. However, he has two exceptions to this rule.The House must also approve the appointment of the Vice President and treaties affecting foreign trade.Senate Majority and Minority Leaders (also known as Senate Floor Leaders) are the two Filipino senators elected as official leaders by their respective political parties or coalitions. They serve as the party's primary spokesperson in relation to Senate business who traditionally serve as deputy leaders, primarily count heads, rally party members for voting and quorum calls, and stand in for majority or minority leaders in their absence.A majority government is one whose one or more of her ruling parties has an absolute majority of seats in parliament. This is in contrast to minority governments, where the largest party only has multiple seats in parliament. The ruling majority determines the balance of power.to know more senate refer to
https://brainly.com/question/2633611
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements limitations, prohibitions, and challenges is false?
Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government
The false statement among the limitations, prohibitions, and challenges listed is: "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government."
In reality, one of the primary reasons for classifying information is to protect national security, not to prevent embarrassment to the government. The classification system is designed to safeguard sensitive information that, if disclosed, could potentially harm the country's interests, compromise intelligence sources, or endanger individuals. Classifying information is governed by specific criteria and guidelines that prioritize national security concerns over potential embarrassment. The U.S. government has established clear procedures and standards for determining what information should be classified and the level of classification required.
In summary, the false statement is that "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government." Classification of information primarily aims to protect national security rather than prevent government embarrassment.
To know more about national security, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2639721
#SPJ11
Lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract
If a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
What is an unfair contract?An unfair contract is one that adversely affects the rights of one of the contracting parties.
Such an unfair contract is void.
By definition, a void contract is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable ab nitio.
Answer Options:a) Contract will be modified
b) Contract is voided
c) Contract is voided, subject to investigation
d) Contract is valid
Thus, if a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
Learn more about void contracts at https://brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
Can a prisoner sue me
Which of the following is true about the duty of care?
a. Breach of duty of care is not actionable unless the plaintiff suffers injury or injury to his or her property.
b. The damages recoverable for breach of the duty of care are independent of the effect of the injury on the plaintiff's life or profession.
c. Reasonable person standard is used to determine the amount of damages that a defendant owes a plaintiff.
d. A firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when his safety is not at stake does not breach his duty of care.
The given statement "A firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when his safety is not at stake does not breach his duty of care" is correct.
Hence, the correct option is d.
Option d is true because a firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when their safety is not at stake does not breach their duty of care. This is known as the public duty doctrine, which provides that firefighters and other emergency responders have a duty to the general public as a whole, rather than to individual citizens.
As such, they are generally not liable for damages resulting from their failure to provide assistance in a specific situation, as long as they did not create the danger themselves.
Option a is partially true because a breach of the duty of care may not be actionable unless the plaintiff suffers injury or damage to their property.
Option b is false because the damages recoverable for breach of the duty of care are not independent of the effect of the injury on the plaintiff's life or profession.
Option c is also false because the reasonable person standard is used to determine whether a defendant has breached their duty of care, not the amount of damages owed to the plaintiff.
To know more about duty of care here:
https://brainly.com/question/29917351
#SPJ4
To establish proximate cause in a negligence claim, it is necessary to prove that the.
To establish proximate cause in a negligence claim, it is necessary to prove the foreseeability.
What is a proximate cause?A proximate cause, as used in law and insurance, is an incident that is sufficiently connected to an accident for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. In legal terms, there are two sorts of causation: cause-in-fact and proximal (or legal) cause. The "but for" test is used to determine cause-in-fact: The result would not have occurred if the activity had not taken place. The activity is a precondition for the injury, but it might not be sufficient in and of itself. The but for test fails in a few situations. A second criteria is used to decide if an activity is close enough to a harm in a "chain of events" to be considered legally acceptable because but-for causation is so simple to demonstrate.
To learn more about proximate cause, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12644777
#SPJ4
Navy SEAL work is considered "black ops," which can be morally dubious. Explain whether you think black ops are ethical, and why: you may refer to specific operations in your answer.
Answer:
um u gotta be more clear plsss
in a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information obtained during discovery.
In a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information in the pleadings. This statement is TRUE.
A request for judgment on the pleadings is appropriately made in a federal civil action once all pleadings, including the complaint, answer, any counterclaims, cross-claims, and answers, have been filed. This kind of motion is made simply on the claims made by the parties in the pleadings, without taking any evidence into account.
A move for judgment on the pleadings asks the court to determine that there are no genuine factual disputes and to conclude the case by applying the law to these undisputed facts. When one party files a request for judgment on the pleadings, they argue that even if all of the facts asserted by the other party are true, the case should still be determined in their favor.
To know more about pleadings refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
Do you think it is fair for law enforcement officers to be able to stop and frisk citizens? Why or why not?
Which of the following is an example of an independent federal agency?
select all that apply.
FDIC
Amtrak
FEC
FCC
CIA
Fannie Mae
EPA
Answer:
FCCExplanation:
I hope it's helpful for you
All of the following are part of the "individual mandate" provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) except with limited exceptions, every resident of the United States will be required to have health insurance that meets certain basic requirements. individuals were allowed to opt out of the insurance program if they could prove they had no serious health issues and did so before the act fully took effect in the year 2014. individuals who do not acquire health insurance will be subject to a fine. in 2017, fines for not having health insurance are the greater of $695 per person or 2.5 percent of income.
"Individuals were allowed to opt out of the insurance program if they could prove they had no serious health issues and did so before the act fully took effect in the year 2014."
Under the individual mandate, every resident of the United States is generally required to have health insurance that meets certain basic requirements. However, the provision allowing individuals to opt out based on proving no serious health issues before 2014 is not accurate. The ACA did not include such an exception based on personal health conditions for opting out of the insurance program.
The other statements regarding the requirement to have health insurance and the imposition of fines for not acquiring health insurance are correct. The ACA initially included a penalty for individuals who did not have health insurance, although it's worth noting that the penalty was reduced to $0 starting in 2019 through subsequent legislation.
To know more about ACA
brainly.com/question/14010081
#SPJ11
An insurer goes bankrupt and is unable to pay on any of its insureds' claims. Which of the following will happen?
A. The insureds will not be paid.
B. The claims will be paid by a nationally-based program.
C. The claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
D. The claims will be paid by the state Department of Insurance.
The insurer's claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
When insurers breach contractual obligations because of financial impairment, the New Jersey Life and Health Guaranty Association was established to safeguard policyowners, reinsurer, and recipients under life insurance policies, health insurances, annuity contracts, and supplemental contracts. The entity accepting the risk and promising to cover losses that occur during the policy period is known as the insurer, often known as a "insurance business." For regular premium payments, the insurer agrees to cover losses. The insurer is one of the parties who agrees to cover potential financial losses that may result from a calamity in an insurance contract. The insurance provider is able to cover the losses incurred by the insured.
Learn more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/989296
#SPJ4
Which of the following is necessary for a valid legal contract?
A)
A Texas Real Estate Commission form
B)
Government acceptance
C)
Statutory approval
D)
Lawful objective
Correct option is D, Lawful objective is necessary for a valid legal contract.
What is a legally binding contract?A contract must have many essential components in order to be legally binding: clearly stated conditions (contract terms), consent from both parties, who must be of sound mind; and legality (i.e., the agreement cannot be related to criminal acts).
A written or verbal promise by one party to another party to fulfill a duty in exchange for payment constitutes a contract. Four essential components are required for a basic binding contract: an offer, acceptance, consideration, and the intention to establish legal relations. A legally binding agreement is a promise made by two or more parties to carry out an obligation in return for something of value.
To learn more about valid legal contract from given link
https://brainly.com/question/7127760
#SPJ4
What happens when a president doesn’t return a bill in 10 days and what is the exception to that rule?.
Here's what will happen if the President does not return a bill and refuses to sign it:
- It means the President is effectively exercising their veto power.
- Yet, unless the Congress isn't in session during those ten (10) days, the bill will automatically become a law, though.
- The U.S. Constitution states that a vetoed bill may still become law if Congress overrides the president's decision with a supermajority vote of two-thirds of members of both the House and the Senate.
What is this veto power anyway?
To veto means to forbid or temporarily prohibit the execution of projects that have been attempted. However, since we're discussing the President's and the legislative branch's authority, vetoing refers to stopping a bill or the implementation of legislation passed by a legislature from becoming law, either permanently or temporarily.
Read about the concept of a pocket veto here: https://brainly.com/question/957050
#SPJ4
If I have interval-level data, this means I can do which of the following with the responses:
a.classify
b. Average
C. Rank-order
D. All of the above
Answer:
a classify. data can be classified into four levels of measurement
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict construction, originalism, pragmatism, etc.) and which mode you favor.
Answer:
There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.
The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.
I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.
The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.
Explanation:
The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.
What color indicates you are in a work area?
are police bad? most of them are.
Answer:
I don't know I think that they sometimes just hurt people because they are doing their job but I honestly don't know.
Explanation:
Generally, harassment only applies if you were the direct target of the offensive conduct. True or false?.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is a false statment that By and large, harassment possibly applies on the off chance that you were the immediate objective of the hostile lead.
Harassment can apply regardless of whether you were not the immediate objective of the hostile direct. Provocation alludes to any unwanted way of behaving, remarks, activities, or correspondence that establishes a threatening or scaring climate for an individual or a gathering in light of safeguarded qualities like race, religion, identity, age, handicap, or different elements. It can happen while seeing such way of behaving coordinated at others or in any event, when in a roundabout way impacted by it.
Numerous enemy of segregation and badgering regulations perceive the more extensive effect of provocation, permitting people who experience an unfriendly climate or witness harassment to make a lawful move or look for response to resolve the issue and safeguard their privileges.
Learn more about objective, from:
brainly.com/question/31807796
#SPJ7
What formal power would the president use to enact an economic stimulus bill?
Answer:
Executive powers
Explanation:
Executive powers are held by the president of the United States, and has a part in the decision of passing bills to make them laws.
Hope I helped.
How do you proceed if an item is out of stock
If Irene accepts goods shipped from Indonesia that were wrongfully obtained, has she committed an intentional tort against property? Explain.
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
what supreme court case overturned a minimum wage law for women?
The Supreme Court case that overturned a minimum wage law for women was Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923).
The case challenged a minimum wage law in the District of Columbia that required employers to pay a minimum wage to female employees. The law was challenged by the owner of Children's Hospital, who argued that the law violated the constitutional right to contract freely. The Supreme Court agreed with this argument and struck down the law, ruling that it was unconstitutional. The decision was controversial and was later overturned by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established a national minimum wage for all workers.
To know more about Supreme Court click here:
brainly.com/question/6975569
#SPJ4
prior to foreign travel you must ensure that your antiterrorism/force protection
You must confirm that your Force Protection Level 1 training is up to date before departing for a foreign destination. The same channels used for sending confidential materials can be used for sending secret materials.
In order to maintain operational effectiveness and support mission accomplishment, the notion of force protection (FP) entails safeguarding military troops, their families, civilian coworkers, facilities, and activities against threats or hazards. Members of NATO use it as a doctrine. After the Beirut barrack bombings in Lebanon in 1983, the idea of force protection was first developed. The U.S. military had grown accustomed to and predictable with regard to asymmetric attacks by state and non-state actors using terrorist and guerilla methodologies because of its Cold War focus on potential adversaries employing large conventional military forces at the time (such as the Soviet Union, etc.). After that, the Defense Department as a whole devised force protection (which was later adopted by the Coast Guard) to make sure that a similar situation never occurred to American personnel again. Adapting defensive strategies to avoid being dependable is a hallmark of force protection itself.
Learn more about Force Protection here
https://brainly.com/question/13512003
#SPJ4
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. What can the accused legally do in this case?.
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. In this situation this is legally appeal.
In the legal system, an appeal is the procedure by which a matter is examined by a higher authority and the parties ask for a formal revision of a ruling. Appellations serve two purposes: they remedy mistakes and they clarify and interpret the law.
Despite the fact that appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law nations did not codify an affirmative right to appeal into their legal systems until the 19th century. The idea of a right to appeal is a relatively new concept in common law jurisdictions, despite some scholars' claims that it "is itself a substantive liberty interest." Observers have also noted that common law regimes were notably "slow to integrate a right to appeal into either its civil or criminal.
To know more about Appeal in law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14992025
#SPJ4
The ______ enforces federal environmental statutes, while _______ enforces workplace safety regulations.
Answer: EPA, OSHA
Explanation:
Which of the following national holidays does not occur in the winter?
Many national holidays do not occur in the winter in the United States. One national holiday that does not occur in winter is "Memorial Day, which falls between May 25–31."
Other national holidays that do not occur in winter in the United States include the following:
Juneteenth National Independence Day on June 19th;Independence Day on July 4th;Labor Day on September 1 to 7th;Columbus Day, on October 8th to 14th;Veterans Day on November 11th;Thanks Giving Day on November 22 - 24;This is based on the fact that Winter occurs in the United States between December 21s to March 20th.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that various national holidays do not fall within the winter period.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/16406621
What are the key differences between homegrown terrorism and domestic acts of violence?
Homegrown terrorism involves people within a particular nation while domestic violence is not place specific.
What is the difference between homegrown terrorism and domestic violence?Homegrown terrorism are people from within the state or nation without any outside backing while domestic act of violence can be done by an individual in any part of the nation. It is not specific.
Learn more on domestic violence below,
https://brainly.com/question/1490223
#SPJ1
How might limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes affect schools
Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools may impact nutrient intake, culinary variety, cost-effectiveness, and cultural authenticity of meals.
How limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools impact nutrition, culinary variety, costs, and cultural considerations?Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools can have various effects. Here are some potential impacts:
Nutritional considerations: Starchy vegetables like potatoes can be a significant source of carbohydrates, fiber, and certain vitamins and minerals. Limiting these vegetables may result in reduced nutrient intake among students, particularly if suitable alternative options are not provided. It is important to ensure that any limitations on starchy vegetables are accompanied by a diverse range of nutritious alternatives to maintain a balanced diet.Culinary variety and student preferences: Potatoes are a versatile ingredient used in various dishes, and they may be popular among students. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could potentially reduce the culinary variety offered in school meals, leading to fewer options and potentially impacting student satisfaction and food preferences.Cost considerations: Potatoes are often considered a cost-effective food item, which can be beneficial for schools operating within budget constraints. If starchy vegetables are limited, schools may need to explore alternative options, which could potentially lead to increased costs for sourcing and preparing other vegetables or ingredients.Cultural and regional considerations: Potatoes hold cultural significance in many regions, and certain cuisines heavily rely on them as a staple ingredient. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could impact the cultural authenticity of meals served in schools, particularly in communities where potatoes are traditionally consumed.Learn more about Limiting starchy vegetables
brainly.com/question/20859432
#SPJ11