how did the american public respond to the alien and sedition acts?
Answers
Answer:
Matthew Lyon, a Republican congressman from Vermont, became the first person tried under the new law in October 1798. A grand jury indicted Lyon for publishing letters in Republican newspapers during his reelection campaign that showed “intent and design” to defame the government and President Adams, among other charges. Lyon acted as his own attorney, and defended himself by claiming the Sedition Act was unconstitutional, and that he had not intended to damage the government.
He was convicted, and the judge sentenced him to four months in prison and a fine of $1,000. Lyon won reelection while sitting in jail, and would later defeat a Federalist attempt to kick him out of the House.
Another individual famously prosecuted under the Sedition Act was the Republican-friendly journalist James Callender. Sentenced to nine months in prison for his “false, scandalous, and malicious writing, against the said President of the United States,” Callender wrote articles from jail supporting Jefferson’s campaign for president in 1800.
After Jefferson won, Callender demanded a government post in return for his service. When he failed to get one, he retaliated by revealing the first public allegations of Jefferson’s long-rumored relationship with a slave woman, Sally Hemings, in a series of newspaper articles.
Explanation:
sorry if its too long or doesnt help
Related Questions
Identify the main reason why the South wanted to keep slavery.(1840 to 1900)
Answers
Answer:
The South was convinced that the survival of their economic system, which intersected with almost every aspect of Southern life, lay exclusively in the ability to create new plantations in the western territories, which meant that slavery had to be kept safe in those same territories, especially as Southerners...
Who was Léonard Autié
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Léonard-Alexis Autié, also Autier, often referred to simply as Monsieur Léonard, was the favourite hairdresser of Queen Marie Antoinette and in 1788–1789 founded the Théâtre de Monsieur, "the first resident theatre in France to produce a year-round repertory of Italian opera."
How did the majority of Supreme Court justices in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson interpret the 14th Amendment?
Racial segregation is constitutional if the facilities are the same for everyone.
All citizens are equal under the law and therefore segregation is illegal.
Blacks are not citizens and therefore have no legal protection.
Separate but equal facilities only apply to white citizens, not blacks.
Answers
Answer: In an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation. Justice Brown conceded that the 14th Amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law, but held that separate treatment did not imply the inferiority of African Americans.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is, Racial segregation is constitutional if the facilities are the same for everyone.
Explanation:
I took the test
The image below shows anti-Castro forces launching an attack during the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.
Black and white image showing armed men storming a beach. They have guns drawn.
© De Agostini Picture Library/Universal Images Group/ImageQuest 2019
What type of response does this image illustrate?
Diplomacy
Isolation
Intervention
Trade
Answers
Intervention
The Bay of Pigs invasion was an attempt by the US to prevent communism from taking hold in Cuba. They sent fighters there, believing that the Cuban people would welcome them and go against their government. The invasion failed in a matter of days due to a lack of support from the US mainland.
Hurry !!! Now, use the position statement you used earlier
and the ideas you gathered, and write an editorial
that is one paragraph in length. Include your
position statement and supporting ideas.
When you are done, proofread your work and
correct any errors.
Answers
Answer:
The Necessity of Change.
When you are a student and supposedly you have everything you need, life is easy. Since my early years, there were no lacks. Food, education, clothes, even gifts, and vacation every summer.
My Dad had a very nice position in a government office and every Christmas, the tree was surrounded by presents. Real, expensive presents. That being the case, I thought I was a successful young man. My ideas were good, my grades were good and my opinions were right. How it could be the other way if I had everything I needed and much more.
Explanation:
I js did it this is correct
Answer: Hey guys this is what I wrote I also got a 100% on the assignment
Speaking out will make other staff members of the school listen if not the first person you talked to. Help other students who are facing the problem you are. Also we have the right of freedom of speech, speak out. Ever since I started school I have had good grades in all my classes except one and so did my best friend but hers was in math mine was in English so we helped each other understand the concept. Since we banned together to help each other we did better.
Please hit that THANKS button below hope ya'll have a great day also if possible please mark brainlest it would mean a lot to me
Why is this portrait of Pocahontas important to the study of the early colonies in North America?
A:It was painted by a famous artist.
B:it is valuable to art collectors and museums.
C:It is a rare record of dress in the English colonies.
D:it is a rare portrait of an important woman in history.
E:It documents the relationship between early English settlers and Native Americans.
2 ANSWER"S PLEASE!!! :>
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
She helped English settlers Louis and Clark and for that she is an important part of our early American history
Question 4 of 5
The U.S. Constitution creates a balance between the state and national
governments. This is an example of
OA. federalism
OB. checks and balances
C. representative democracy
OD. separation of powers
SUBMIT
Answers
Answer:
C. Representative democracy
Answer:
C. Representative Democracy
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
What are your thoughts on branding soldiers as punishment?
Answers
where is the grand canal
Answers
Answer:
The Grand Canal is a vast waterway system in the north-eastern and central-eastern plains of China, running from Beijing in the north to Zhejiang province in the south.
is the idea that all citizens, as well as their leaders, are equal and subject to the same requirements. (i dont know what im learning just something to do with the founding fathers or something)
Answers
Answer:Equality
Explanation:
everyone is subject to the same requirements
Snake Story
Becky moved off of the porch slowly, backing through the door and into the house. She slammed the sliding glass door shut and stood for a moment, relieved to have something solid between her and the snake on the porch.
The glass was cool under her hands despite her pounding heart. She tried to slow her breathing. She was safe, at last, inside. Or was she? How had that snake gotten into the screened-in and walled-up back porch. If it could get in there, it's possible it could get inside where she was as well.
Becky wasn't someone who was normally skittish about wild things. She'd handled snakes before, picked up lizards many times, caught frogs in the garage and let them go. But snakes seemed to always catch her off guard. They would turn up when least expected. She would see them out of the corner of her eye and just the surprise of it would make her jump; her adrenalin would pump, her heart would thump, and her panic would take over.
What was she going to do? She couldn't just stand there waiting for the snake to decide to leave. What if it were venomous? It didn't look like a viper, but it could be. She would need to get out there soon to water the plants.
"What this requires is some advanced planning," she said out loud to her cat, Louie. "And, I will probably have to go 'once more into the fray' kitty," she said, looking in the cat's direction for emphasis.
"First things first, though," she said. The cat meowed back. It often did that, having become used to being talked to. "Let's look that fellow up," Becky said walking to her bookshelf.
"Let's see, snakes," she said, thumbing through her reptile and amphibian identification book. "It's brown and gray, with some black. With a pattern that looks ... there it is," she said thumping the page so hard that Louie jumped. "Not venomous," she said, triumphantly.
"It's an oak snake, Louie," she returned the book and strode over to her closet. "Not venomous, but I am still not taking chances," she said.
She reached into the closet and pulled out her heaviest jacket. It was lined and stuffed thick with lots of padding. Then she found her mittens and a pair of rubber boots. She knew even non-venomous snakes would sometimes threaten to strike when scared. "And that threat would work on me," Becky said aloud again, though Louie had no idea what she was talking about.
"It's 90 degrees outside, Louie," she said, "so get the iced lemonade ready for when I return."
It wasn't much of a plan, but it was the best she could come up with. With her armor on, she was already sweating when she slowly pushed open the sliding glass door and stepped back on to the porch.
She was pretty sure the snake would slither away from her presence. She propped open the outside door, and hoped she could shoo the snake in that direction.
Sweat dampened her arms and collected on her face. She spread her arms out, and took a few steps toward the snake. There was so much for it to hide beneath. Becky regretted the rocking chairs and all the plant stands between where the snake was in the corner and the door to the outside.
At first it seemed like the snake was just going to remain where it was, flicking its tongue every now and then. Becky waved her arms, lunged in its direction, and stomped her feet. It sat there, coiled in the corner, as if perfectly happy to remain there. In a fit of desperation, she picked up one side of the rocking chair the snake was under and let it drop. The snake jumped, raised its head like it was going to strike, and then stayed right where it was.
"Snake," Becky said, "This is not how it works. You have got to go." The snake moved its head back and forth, swaying a bit, and that gave Becky an idea.
She had read somewhere that snakes can "hear" thanks to the ability to process vibrations through the bone in their jaw. This awareness of vibrations in the ground was one reason it was very hard to sneak up on snakes. She quickly realized that getting the snake out was going to be a lot easier than she had thought.
Becky turned on the radio she kept on the porch and lowered it to the ground, pointing in the snake's direction. She adjusted the controls so that the bass was as high as it could go. Then she cranked up the volume. She envisioned the snake swaying to the sounds of "Dancing Queen by Abba, and then leaving the porch and going far far away.
Coming back into the house she began peeling off the now damp armaments she had put on earlier. "Louie, there is more than one way to skin a snake," she said laughing. She watched as the snake uncoiled and moved cautiously in the direction of the door. Bending down to pick up Louie Becky sighed and stroked his head. "'Cause no one ever wants to skin a cat sweetie
The glass was cool under her hands despite her pounding heart. She tried to slow her breathing. She was safe at last inside.
What is the main purpose of this sentence in the story?
a
Create tension
b
Describe the setting
c
Resolve conflict
d
Lessen tension
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
In your opinion, why did people feel the need for
heroes such as the Lone Ranger and Superman
during the Great Depression? Check any of the
boxes that you agree with.
Heroes provide an escape from day-to-day
struggles
Heroes help people believe that things will
get better.
People want to believe that a hero could
rescue them from their situation.
Answers
Answer:
I'd say the first two personally
Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that the need for heroes such as the Lone Ranger and Superman were felt by people during the Great Depression, because,
Heroes provide an escape from day-to-day strugglesHeroes help people believe that things will get better.Therefore, the options A and B hold true.
What is the significance of the Great Depression?
The period of the Great Depression can be referred to or considered as the one during which the American society faced its biggest economic crisis, which prolonged its effects and lasted for a time-frame of almost a decade.
The society felt a need of superheroes during this period, because their works gave a hope that the heroes overcome their struggles for a brighter tomorrow, and that the things are turned into better by the heroes.
Therefore, the options A and B hold true and states regarding the significance of the Great Depression.
Learn more about the Great Depression here:
https://brainly.com/question/17642418
#SPJ5
What is the first step in the lawmaking process?
A. A committee recommends a bill for debate in Congress
B. A new bill is sponsored by a member of Congress
C. The president signs or vetoes a proposed law
D. A state holds an initiative to propose a new law
Answers
Describe the impact Manifest Destiny had on the Native Americans of the Great Plains.
Answers
Answer:
The philosophy drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion and was used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans and other groups from their homes. The rapid expansion of the United States intensified the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union, leading to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Explanation:
(NO LINK ANSWERS) {100 points to revise this 5 paragraph essay and brainiest to person who meats standards.}
The colonization of Indians by non-Indian society exemplified just how lines got drawn on the land in the Pacific Northwest. It was not a clear-cut or precise process, and it was not a process that was seen the same way by all the parties involved. Policy toward Native Americans in the Pacific Northwest was an extension of the Indian policy developed at the national level by the U.S. government. In other words, the rules and regulations for dealing with Indians were established and administered by various federal officials based in Washington, D.C.—by superintendents of Indian affairs and Army officers, by Senators and Congressmen, by members of presidential administrations and Supreme Court justices. Yet western settlers—the residents of states, territories, and localities—attempted with some success to modify national Indian policy to suit their own ends. Moreover, the natives who were the objects of these policies also attempted to modify and resist them, again with a limited degree of success.
Joseph Lane
To explain the development of relations between Indians and non-Indians in the Pacific Northwest, then, one needs to keep in mind that there were federal points of view, settler points of view, and native points of view. The plural—"points of view"—is deliberate. It is also crucial to keep in mind that there was no unified perspective among any of the parties involved. Neither the officials of federal government, nor the settlers of the Northwest, nor the Indians of the region were unanimous in their thinking about and responses to American Indian policy as it was applied in the Pacific Northwest. (Indians from the same band or tribe sometimes ended up fighting one another; some women proved more sympathetic to Indians than men did; the U.S. Army was often much more restrained in dealing with natives than settler militias were.) This lack of agreement was surely one of the things that complicated, and to some extent worsened, relations between Indians and non-Indians. It makes generalizations about those relations tenuous.
Joseph Lane (right). (Reproduced in Johansen and Gates, Empire of the Columbia, New York, 1957. Photo courtesy of Special Collections, University of Oregon Library.) Portrait of Isaac I. Stevens (below). The federal Office of Indian Affairs assigned to Stevens the task of carrying out the new reservation policy in Washington Territory. (Special Collections, University of Washington, Portrait files.)
Isaac Stevens
Although it is risky, then, I want to offer the generalization that 19th-century America was an achieving, acquisitive, non-pluralistic, and ethnocentric society. It had tremendous confidence in its way of life, and particularly its political and economic systems, and it aspired to disseminate its ways to those who seemed in need of them or able to benefit from them—including Indians (and Mexicans and, at times, Canadians). The nation was tremendously expansive, in terms of both territory and economy. Its assorted political and economic blessings (at least for free, white, adult males) seemed both to justify and feed this expansionism. Thus expansion was viewed as both self-serving (it added to the material wealth of the country) and altruistic (it spread American democracy and capitalism to those without them). The nation's self-interest was thus perceived to coincide with its sense of mission and idealism.
American Indian policy bespoke this mixture of idealism and self-interest. White Americans proposed to dispossess natives and transform their cultures, and the vast majority of them remained confident throughout the century that these changes would be best for all concerned. Anglo-American society would take from Indians the land and other natural resources that would permit it to thrive, while Indians would in theory absorb the superior ways of white culture, including Christianity, capitalism, and republican government. For the first half of the 19th century, federal officials pursued this exchange largely with an Indian policy dominated by the idea of removal. Removal policy aimed to relocate tribes from east of the Mississippi River on lands to the west, assuming that over time the natives would be acculturated to white ways. There were numerous problems with this policy, of course. For our purposes, one of the key problems was that removal policy regarded lands west of the Mississippi as "permanent Indian country." By the 1840s, numerous non-Indians were moving both on to and across those lands, ending any chance that they would truly remain "Indian country." By midcentury the Office of Indian Affairs had begun devising another policy based on the idea of reservations. This institution, new at the federal level, has had a central role in relations between Northwest Indians and non-Indians since 1850.
Answers
Answer:
I fell it was good is it yours?
i like how you cover all the topics and how you really explain everything
it kind of looks like it was copy and pasted though
but if its yours than thats a compliment.
brainliest plzzzz
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The colonization of Indians by non-Indian society exemplified just how lines got drawn on the land in the Pacific Northwest. It was not a clear-cut or precise process, and it was not a process that was seen the same way by all the parties involved. Policy toward Native Americans in the Pacific Northwest was an extension of the Indian policy developed at the national level by the U.S. government. In other words, the rules and regulations for dealing with Indians were established and administered by various federal officials based in Washington, D.C.—by superintendents of Indian affairs and Army officers, by Senators and Congressmen, by members of presidential administrations and Supreme Court justices. Yet western settlers—the residents of states, territories, and localities—attempted with some success to modify national Indian policy to suit their own ends. Moreover, the natives who were the objects of these policies also attempted to modify and resist them, again with a limited degree of success.
Joseph Lane
To explain the development of relations between Indians and non-Indians in the Pacific Northwest, then, one needs to keep in mind that there were federal points of view, settler points of view, and native points of view. The plural—"points of view"—is deliberate. It is also crucial to keep in mind that there was no unified perspective among any of the parties involved. Neither the officials of federal government, nor the settlers of the Northwest, nor the Indians of the region were unanimous in their thinking about and responses to American Indian policy as it was applied in the Pacific Northwest. (Indians from the same band or tribe sometimes ended up fighting one another; some women proved more sympathetic to Indians than men did; the U.S. Army was often much more restrained in dealing with natives than settler militias were.) This lack of agreement was surely one of the things that complicated, and to some extent worsened, relations between Indians and non-Indians. It makes generalizations about those relations tenuous.
Joseph Lane (right). (Reproduced in Johansen and Gates, Empire of the Columbia, New York, 1957. Photo courtesy of Special Collections, University of Oregon Library.) Portrait of Isaac I. Stevens (below). The federal Office of Indian Affairs assigned to Stevens the task of carrying out the new reservation policy in Washington Territory. (Special Collections, University of Washington, Portrait files.)
Isaac Stevens
Although it is risky, then, I want to offer the generalization that 19th-century America was an achieving, acquisitive, non-pluralistic, and ethnocentric society. It had tremendous confidence in its way of life, and particularly its political and economic systems, and it aspired to disseminate its ways to those who seemed in need of them or able to benefit from them—including Indians (and Mexicans and, at times, Canadians). The nation was tremendously expansive, in terms of both territory and economy. Its assorted political and economic blessings (at least for free, white, adult males) seemed both to justify and feed this expansionism. Thus expansion was viewed as both self-serving (it added to the material wealth of the country) and altruistic (it spread American democracy and capitalism to those without them). The nation's self-interest was thus perceived to coincide with its sense of mission and idealism.
American Indian policy bespoke this mixture of idealism and self-interest. White Americans proposed to dispossess natives and transform their cultures, and the vast majority of them remained confident throughout the century that these changes would be best for all concerned. Anglo-American society would take from Indians the land and other natural resources that would permit it to thrive, while Indians would in theory absorb the superior ways of white culture, including Christianity, capitalism, and republican government. For the first half of the 19th century, federal officials pursued this exchange largely with an Indian policy dominated by the idea of removal. Removal policy aimed to relocate tribes from east of the Mississippi River on lands to the west, assuming that over time the natives would be acculturated to white ways. There were numerous problems with this policy, of course. For our purposes, one of the key problems was that removal policy regarded lands west of the Mississippi as "permanent Indian country." By the 1840s, numerous non-Indians were moving both on to and across those lands, ending any chance that they would truly remain "Indian country." By midcentury the Office of Indian Affairs had begun devising another policy based on the idea of reservations. This institution, new at the federal level, has had a central role in relations between Northwest Indians and non-Indians since 1850.
Which statement best completes the list showing the steps in the presidential
election process?
1.?
2. Parties select their presidential candidates through primaries and
caucuses.
3. Candidates for each party compete in a general election.
A. National conventions are held to select candidates for the primary
elections.
O B. Potential presidential candidates form exploratory committees
C. Members of the Electoral College meet to nominate presidential
candidates
O D. The Senate approves a list of candidates for each party's
presidential nomination.
Answers
The statement that best completes the list showing the steps in the election process is Potential presidential candidates form exploratory committees. The correct option is b.
In other U.S. election, candidates are elected directly by popular vote. But the president and vice president are not elected directly by citizens. Instead, they are chosen by electors through a process called the Electoral College. The process of using electors comes from the Constitution. It was a compromise between a popular vote by citizens and a vote in Congress.
Each state gets as many electors as it has members of Congress, House and Senate. Including Washington, D.C.’s three electors, there are currently 538 electors in all.
Learn more about candidates, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30525505
#SPJ7
Which statement describes how the southern states that formed the Confederacy reacted to Abraham Lincoln's election?
A They crafted an alliance with Mexico.
B They seceded from the United States.
C They signed a treaty with Canada.
D They declared war on the United States.
(i will give brainly)
I need the right answer to pass my grade
Answers
Answer:
B They seceded from the United States.
Explanation:
brainliest please!
hope this helps :)
Explain the basic beliefs of Confucius and how that relates to ancestors. Be sure to cite specific examples from your lesson.
Plz Help me
Answers
Answer:
The purpose of Confucianism would be uphold people's morals socially, politically and philosophically. Confucianism stresses filial piety (respecting ancestors), education (civil service exams) as well as relationships (towards elders, friends, siblings etc).
Explanation:
Which rights are protected by the Fifth Amendment? Choose four correct answers.
the right to a grand jury
the right to avoid double jeopardy
freedom of speech
freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
protection from testifying against oneself
due process under the law
Answers
hope this helps
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to a grand jury, the right to avoid double jeopardy, protection from testifying against oneself, and due process under the law. It does not directly protect freedom of speech or freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.
Explanation:The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides several protected rights to individuals. These include:
The right to a grand juryThe right to avoid double jeopardyProtection from testifying against oneselfDue process under the lawThe Fifth Amendment does not directly protect the right to freedom of speech or freedom from cruel and unusual punishment. These rights are protected by the First and Eighth Amendments, respectively.
Learn more about Fifth Amendment here:https://brainly.com/question/32158787
#SPJ2
Look up information on Ash Wednesday, Lent, and Carnival. Write a paragraph on each, telling how these special times are related. Your report should be 200 words in length.
Answers
Answer:The Lenten fast is a Christian fast (for Catholics) which lasts for 40 days. Other Christian denominations also join in. The Lenten fast is not practised on Sunday and usually comes to an end on the Holy Saturday. The Holy Saturday is the day before Easter Sunday.
Ash is very important during the Day of Ashes which is usually a Wednesday. It is used to symbolise death and repentance.
It is a Christian holy day of prayer and fasting. The Shrove Tuesday comes before the Ash Wednesday and usually takes place on the first day of Lent, the six weeks of repentance or remorse before Easter. Ash Wednesday is traditionally observed by Western Christians and many other Christian the world.
Way before the lent, the Carnival usually holds. It is a festive period which holds in February or March. During the Carnival, people wear colorful masks and attires and hold a parade.
Cheers!
Explanation: ggs bwo
Ash Wednesday, Lent and Carnival are all related in that they are all part of the Christian tradition. Ash Wednesday marks the beginning of Lent, and Carnival is a celebration that takes place before Lent. Lent is a time of reflection and repentance, while Carnival is a time of revelry and celebration.
Ash Wednesday is the first day of Lent, a 40-day period of fasting, prayer, and penance in the Christian tradition. It is a day of reflection and repentance, and Christians mark the day by receiving ashes on their foreheads.
The ashes are made from the burning of palm leaves from the previous year's Palm Sunday celebrations. The ashes are a symbol of death and repentance, and they remind Christians that they are dust and to dust they shall return.
Lent is a period of preparation for Easter, and it is a time for Christians to focus on their faith and to grow closer to God. During Lent, Christians often give up something that they enjoy, such as food, alcohol, or entertainment. They may also attend church more often, pray more regularly, or volunteer their time to help others.
Carnival is a pre-Lenten festival that is celebrated in many parts of the world. It is a time for revelry, feasting, and celebration before the start of the Lenten season. Carnival is often associated with Mardi Gras, which is celebrated in New Orleans, Louisiana.
To know mroe about Carnival:
https://brainly.com/question/30462460
#SPJ3
I Told yall, another pare of sweet 100 points! Claim them before someone else does!
Answers
Answer:
Hi again!
Explanation:
Answer:
It's music 'til the wick burns out-
thxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxs!
Explanation:
The dramatic change in the number of Oklahoma's oil workers (from 34,000 in the early 1970s to 102,000 in 1981 to another drop soon after) indicates the ________quality of Oklahoma's oil economy.
A stagnant
В. boom-and-bust
C. prosperous
D. predictable
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
took test lol
The dramatic change in the number of Oklahoma's oil workers (from 34,000 in the early 1970s to 102,000 in 1981 to another drop soon after) indicates the boom and bust quality of Oklahoma's oil industry .Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What happened with Oklahoma's Oil industry?
Oil propelled Oklahoma into the twentieth century, providing an economic foundation that allowed it to grow for decades. The state's petroleum deposits are located within the Mid-Continent Region, a vast reserve. Between 1900 and 1935, Oklahoma led the Mid-Continent in oil production for twenty-two years.
The high demand for petroleum during World War II prompted additional drilling, and 41 were discovered in Oklahoma in 1941.
With the Arab oil embargo in the early 1970s and the deregulation of deep natural gas, the trend was reversed. The development of the Deep Anadarko Basin in southwestern Oklahoma ushered in a new era of oil production.
However, the boom "busted" in the early 1980s, and Oklahoma experienced its first revenue failure in state history in 1982. By 1999, production had dropped significantly, to around 40% of its 1986 level. Concurrently, employment fell, and by the end of the 20th century, only one out of every 60 workers worked in the petroleum industry.
Therefore, the drop in the number of oil workers indicates the boom and bust of Oklahoma's oil industry.
To learn more about Oklahoma's oil industry, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10465722
#SPJ2
How did the Germans survive with so little food?
Answers
Hopefully this sorta helped:)
I need help with these
Answers
Answer:
tbh u should make the points higher :))
Explanation:
The Ming dynasty weakened over time.
Answers
Answer:
The fall of the Ming dynasty was caused by a combination of factors, including an economic disaster due to lack of silver, a series of natural disasters, peasant uprisings, and finally attacks by the Manchu people.
Help please this is due today
Answers
Answer:
It should be arid.
Explanation:
Please Help!!
Directions: Research and describe each of the following topics. Be sure to include the URLs of each resource you used in your research.
Adams-Onis Treaty -
Cherokee Nation v Georgia
Doctrine of Nullification
Seminole Wars
Force Bill
Indian Removal Act
Indian Territory
John Ross
New Echota
Nicholas Biddle
Protective Tariff
Second Bank of the United States
Sequoyah
Spoils System
Tariff of Abominations
Trail of Tears
Treaty of New Echota
Whigs
Worcester v. Georgia
Answers
Answer:
Question is not explained properly
Which statement correctly explains the relationship between state and local governments?
State and local governments work independently of each other.
State and local governments share responsibilities to an equal degree.
State governments receive power based on the decisions made by local governments.
State governments decide which regulations are the responsibility of local governments.
Answers
Answer:Federalism also invulves some limitations on state authority, particularly invulving relationships between state governments.
Explanation:
How did Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin impact not only the economy of the South, but also the lives of people living there in the 19th century? (2-3 sentence explanation)
Answers
↓What are three ways that God speaks to us today?↓
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Words We Hear
The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).
When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.
2. Pictures We See
The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.
At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).
When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.
Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)
Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).
3. Emotions We Feel
Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.
So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.
One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.
So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.