I dont understand this got a test tomorrow someone please help

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

exponent on 1 is 9

Answer:

Start with equation,

         y''(x) = f(x) = 6y/(10x-x²)               about point x₀ = 5

Then,

       y(x) = a₀ + a₁(x-5) + a₂(x-5)²+ a₃(x-5)³ + a₄(x-5)⁴...….

by inspection,

           y(5) = a₀      and       y'(5) = a₁

then,

y''(5) = 6a₀/(50-25) = 6a₀/25              

y'''(x) = 6y'/(10x-x2) - 6y(10-2x)/(10x-x2)2

then,                      

                              y'''(5) = 6a₁/25 - 0 = 6a₁/25                

y''''(x) = 6y''/(10x-x2) -12y'(10-2x)/(10x-x2)² + 12y/(10x-x2)² + 12y(10-2x)2/(10x-x2)³

then,

    y''''(5) = (6/25)(6a₀/25) + 0 + 12a₀/625 + 0

              = 48a₀/625

So,

y(x) = f(x) = f(5) + f'(5)(x-5) + f''(5)(x-5)2/2! + f'''(5)(x-5)3/3! + f''''(5)(x-5)4/4! …

                                                       or

y(x) = f(x) = a₀ + a₁(x-5) + (6ao/25)(x-5)2/2! + (6a1/25)(x-5)3/3! + (48a₀/625)(x-5)4/4!...

                                                         or

y(x) = f(x) = a₀ + a₁(x-5) + (3a₀/25)(x-5)²+ (a₁/25)(x-5)³+ (2a₀/625)(x-5)⁴.....

Learn more about equation here-

https://brainly.com/question/3391581

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

25, i think

The most accurate answer to the regional manager's question is: The probability is less than 1%.

The 99% confidence interval provided for the proportion of customers visiting the store for the first time is [0.23, 0.29). This interval suggests that we can be 99% confident that the true proportion of new customers falls within this range. Since the confidence interval does not include 30%, it indicates that the probability of the true proportion being higher than 30% is less than the specified confidence level of 99%. Therefore, the probability is less than 1%.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

It would take approximately 1.34 years longer for Dylan's money to triple compared to Owen's money.

To find out how much longer it would take for Dylan's money to triple compared to Owen's money, we need to determine the time it takes for each investment to triple.

For Owen's investment, the continuous compound interest formula can be used:

A = P * e^(rt)

Where:

A = Final amount (triple the initial amount, so 3 * $310 = $930)

P = Principal amount ($310)

e = Euler's number (approximately 2.71828)

r = Interest rate (7 7/8% = 7.875% = 0.07875 as a decimal)

t = Time (in years)

Plugging in the values, we have:

930 = 310 * e^(0.07875t)

Now, let's solve for t:

e^(0.07875t) = 930 / 310

e^(0.07875t) = 3

Take the natural logarithm of both sides:

0.07875t = ln(3)

Solving for t:

t = ln(3) / 0.07875 ≈ 11.15 years

For Dylan's investment, the compound interest formula with monthly compounding can be used:

A = P * (1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:

A = Final amount (triple the initial amount, so 3 * $310 = $930)

P = Principal amount ($310)

r = Interest rate per period (7 1/4% = 7.25% = 0.0725 as a decimal)

n = Number of compounding periods per year (12, since it compounds monthly)

t = Time (in years)

Plugging in the values, we have:

930 = 310 * (1 + 0.0725/12)^(12t)

Now, let's solve for t:

(1 + 0.0725/12)^(12t) = 930 / 310

(1 + 0.0060417)^(12t) = 3

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

12t * ln(1.0060417) = ln(3)

Solving for t:

t = ln(3) / (12 * ln(1.0060417)) ≈ 9.81 years

The difference in time it takes for Dylan's money to triple compared to Owen's money is:

11.15 - 9.81 ≈ 1.34 years

Therefore, it would take approximately 1.34 years longer for Dylan's money to triple compared to Owen's money.

For more questions on money

https://brainly.com/question/29498634

#SPJ8

The expressions that shows relationship that are not equal.

Inequality are expression that are separated by an equal sign. The inequality signs are >, <, ≥, ≤, or ≠

If a two numbers are not equal, then one is either greater or less than the other. The relationship between values that are not equal is as shown;

6 < 7

23 > 15

This are expressions that shows relationship that are not equal.

Learn more on inequality here: https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

Answer: inequality

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to determine the percentage of deaths that occurred in 2004. To do so, you have to calculate the relative frequency for the fifth category and multiply the result by 100 to express it as a percentage.

To calculate the relative frequency you have to divide the absolute frequency by the sample size:

Multiply the result by 100 to express it as a percentage and round it to the nearest tenth of a percent:

The percentage of deaths that occurred in 2004 is 27.8%

Answer:

No

7x7=49 and 8x8=64, 56 does not have an exact square root

Answer:

what type of help......

The statement which says "The intersection of three planes can be a ray." is; True

In terms of line segments, the intersection of a plane and a ray can be a line segment.

Now, for the given question which states that the intersection of three planes can be a ray. This statement is true because it meets the definition of plane intersection.

Read more about Line Planes at; https://brainly.com/question/1655368

#SPJ1

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Saw a one star rating on the other answer, so I put false as my answer and got it correct.

Therefore 128 ways that Peter can make 8 steps and land back at vertex A.

There are two possible directions for each step that Peter can take, either clockwise or counter-clockwise.

Therefore, for 8 steps, there are 2^8 = 256 possible ways that Peter can make the steps. However, only half of these ways will end with Peter back at vertex A, since the other half will have him end at the opposite vertex.

Therefore, there are 256/2 = 128 ways that Peter can make 8 steps and land back at vertex A.

Learn more about vertex here: https://brainly.com/question/17987697

#SPJ1

Answer: 17/33

Step-by-step explanation:

Or means add the 2 probabilities

There are a total of 33 outcomes.

getting a small clip is 15/33

getting a medium clip is 12/33

add the two probabilities 15/33 +12/33 = 17/33

I'm sure of my numbers.  I think the question is off or answers  

Answer:

The average speed on the return trip is 2.44 miles/h.                  

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the average speed we need to use the following equation:

\( \overline{v} = \frac{d}{t} \)

Where:

d: is the distance

t: is the time

Since the question is to find the average speed on the return trip, we will take the data of the time and speed of only the return trip.

\(\overline{v} = \frac{d}{t} = \frac{5 + 1/2}{2 + 1/4} = 2.44 miles/h\)                

Therefore, the average speed on the return trip is 2.44 miles/h.

I hope it helps you!

Answer:

25, 26, 27

Step-by-step explanation:

By adding these three consecutive integers together, you get 78. Test it on a calculator if you'd like to.

Answer:

The outcomes produced by A would be greater than B. A further explanation is provided below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

In process A,

Produced units = \(32x^{1.5}\)

In process B,

Produced units = \(4x^3\)

If the outcomes are equivalent then,

⇒ \(32x^{1.5}=4x^3\)

⇒     \(x^{1.5} = 8\)

By taking log both  sides, we get

⇒    \(log \ 8= 1.5 \ log \ x\)

⇒          \(x=3.99\)

The number that is a factor is 63 is C. 7.

In mathematics, a factor of a number is a divisor of the given number that divides it completely without leaving any remainder.

A factor is a number that divides another number by itself and leaves no remainder. In other words, if multiplying two whole numbers yields a product, then the numbers being multiplied are factors of the product because the product is divisible by them.

A divisor of an integer n, also known as a factor of n, is an integer m that can be multiplied by another integer to produce n. In this case, n is also said to be a multiple of m.

In this case, the factors of 63 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21 and 63.

The factor is 7.

Learn more about factor on:

https://brainly.com/question/24734894

#SPJ1

Complete question

Which of the following numbers is a factor of 63

2

5

7

11

Refer to the diagram below. We need to find the areas of the green and blue regions, then subtract to get the area of the orange track only.

The larger green region is composed of a rectangle of dimensions 200 meters by 4+42+4 = 50 meters, along with two semicircles that combine to make a full circle. This circle has radius 25 meters.

The green rectangle has area 200*50 = 10000 square meters. The green semicircles combine to form an area of pi*r^2 = pi*25^2 = 625pi square meters. In total, the full green area is 10000+625pi square meters. I'm leaving things in terms of pi for now. The approximation will come later.

The blue area is the same story, but smaller dimensions. The blue rectangle has dimensions 200 meters by 42 meters, so its area is 200*42 = 8400 square meters. The blue semicircular pieces combine to a circle with area pi*r^2 = pi*21^2 = 441pi square meters. In total, the blue region has area 8400+441pi square meters.

After we figure out the green and blue areas, we subtract to get the orange region's area, which is the area of the track only.

orange area = (green) - (blue)

track area = (10000+625pi) - (8400+441pi)

track area = 10000+625pi - 8400-441pi

track area = (10000-8400) + (625pi - 441pi)

track area = 184pi + 1600 is the exact area in terms of pi

track area = 2178.05304826052 is the approximate area when you use the pi constant built into your calculator. If you use pi = 3.14 instead, then you'll get 2177.76 as the approximate answer. I think its better to use the more accurate version of pi. Of course, be sure to listen/follow your teachers instructions.

In the one-way ANOVA, the within-groups variance estimate is equivalent to the within-cells variance estimate in the two-way ANOVA.

Option B is right choice.

In the one-way ANOVA, the within-groups variance estimate is equivalent to the within-cells variance estimate in the two-way ANOVA.

This is because both types of variance estimates measure the variation within groups or cells of the independent variable(s).
In a one-way ANOVA, the independent variable has only one factor or level, and the within-groups variance estimate measures the variation within each group or level of the factor.

This estimate reflects the extent to which the data points within each group deviate from the group mean.
In a two-way ANOVA, there are two independent variables or factors, and the within-cells variance estimate measures the variation within each combination of levels of the two factors.

This estimate reflects the extent to which the data points within each cell (or combination of factor levels) deviate from the mean of that cell.
Therefore, the within-cells variance estimate in the two-way ANOVA plays a similar role as the within-groups variance estimate in the one-way ANOVA.

Both estimates reflect the degree of variability within the groups or cells of the independent variable(s) and both are used to calculate the F-statistic and determine the statistical significance of the effects of the independent variable(s) on the dependent variable.

Option B is right choice.

For similar question on variance

https://brainly.com/question/13491340

#SPJ11

Answer:

6x^2+2x-9x-3

=6x^2-7x-3

Answer:

Answer:

x=-8

Step-by-step explanation:

3(2x-1)+7=-44

3(2x)+3(-1)+7

6x-3+7=-44

6x-3+3+7

6x+7=-41

6x+7-7

6x=-48

6x/6=48/6

x=-8

Hope it helped!

Answer: Ellie bought 25 robots.

Step-by-step explanation:

7=5

14=10

21=15

28=20

35=25

Answer:

1:5

5

125

2

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not too sure how to explain this, if you have a question just ask

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A relationship might exist in a sample even though it does not exist in the population, because of b) Sampling error

In statistical analysis, a relationship might appear in a sample even though it does not exist in the population due to sampling error. This occurs when the sample is not fully representative of the population, leading to discrepancies between the sample statistics and the true population parameters.

Sampling error can cause random fluctuations that mistakenly suggest a relationship, which may not be present in the larger population. It is important to consider the limitations and potential sources of error when generalizing findings from a sample to the broader population. So b option is correct.

For more questions like Sampling click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29974523

#SPJ11

There is only one five-digit integer, 37000, that satisfies these conditions.

To determine the number of five-digit integers of the form 37abc that are divisible by 37, we need to consider the divisibility rule for 37. A number is divisible by 37 if and only if the difference between twice the units digit and the remaining part of the number is divisible by 37. In this case, since we have a five-digit integer of the form 37abc, we can write it as:

37abc = 37000 + 100a + 10b + c

Now, let's consider the three given numbers and analyze their divisibility by 37:

37abc:

For 37abc to be divisible by 37, we need the difference between twice the units digit (2c) and the remaining part (37ab) to be divisible by 37. Therefore, we have the congruence:

2c ≡ 37ab (mod 37)

Since 37 ≡ 0 (mod 37), we can simplify the congruence to:

2c ≡ 0 (mod 37)

This implies that c must be divisible by 37. Since c can take values from 0 to 9 (since it is a digit), we have only one possibility: c = 0.

37bca:

Similarly, for 37bca to be divisible by 37, we have the congruence:

2a ≡ 37bc (mod 37)

Again, simplifying the congruence using 37 ≡ 0 (mod 37), we get:

2a ≡ 0 (mod 37)

This implies that a must be divisible by 37. Since a can take values from 0 to 9, we have only one possibility: a = 0.

37cab:

For 37cab to be divisible by 37, we have the congruence:

2b ≡ 37ca (mod 37)

By using 37 ≡ 0 (mod 37), we can simplify the congruence to:

2b ≡ 0 (mod 37)

This implies that b must be divisible by 37. Again, b can take values from 0 to 9, giving us only one possibility: b = 0.

From the above analysis, we can conclude that the only five-digit integer of the form 37abc satisfying the given conditions is 37000. Therefore, there is only one such integer.

To know more about integer here

https://brainly.com/question/490943

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Determine the number of five-digit integer 37abc in base 10 such that each of the numbers 37abc,37bca,37cab Is divisible by 37