Answer:
A. the Panic of 1837 worsening into an economic depression.
Explanation:
President Andrew Jackson's decision to dissolve the Second Bank of the United States, which was a central bank that held the deposits of the federal government and state banks, was a controversial move that had significant consequences. One of the consequences of this decision was that it contributed to the worsening of the Panic of 1837, a financial crisis that began in the United States in 1837 and led to an economic depression.
Jackson's decision to dissolve the Second Bank of the United States contributed to the worsening of the Panic of 1837 into an economic depression, resulting in widespread financial distress and a severe downturn in the economy. Therefore, option A is correct.
The Panic of 1837 refers to a severe financial crisis and economic depression that occurred in the United States. It was characterized by a sharp contraction of credit, widespread bank failures, a steep decline in commodity prices, and high unemployment rates.
The keyword highlights the significant impact of Jackson's decision to dissolve the Second Bank of the United States on exacerbating the panic.
The destabilization of the banking system and loss of confidence in financial institutions contributed to the deepening economic downturn, causing significant hardships for individuals, businesses, and the overall economy during this period.
Learn more about Panic of 1837 here:
https://brainly.com/question/30389938
#SPJ4
I need help please<33. 20 points
At age 29 in 1776, Bernardo de Galvez was appointed governor of Spanish Louisiana. One year later, King Carlos of Spain gave him an important assignment: manage the Spanish smuggling operation to supply the Continental army. Spain had decided to secretly back the colonists because Britain was growing in power, and Spain felt that this was a threat to their interests in the Americas. The American rebellion gave them an opportunity to weaken their old opponent.
According to the passage, why was Spain helping the colonists?
Great Britain’s growing power threatened Spain’s interests.
Spain was making money selling supplies to the Continental army.
Great Britain was unable to sell supplies to the Continental army.
Spain wanted to weaken the power of the Continental army.
I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST WHEN I CAN <3
Great Britain’s growing power threatened Spain’s interests.
During Elizabeth's reign, Catholic Spain (the world's most powerful country at the time) and Protestant England remained friendly. Tensions grew over time, culminating in war in 1585 and the Spanish Armada's invasion of England in 1588.
Years of religious and political tensions culminated in the conflict between Catholic Spain and Protestant England. The Spanish saw England as a competitor in trade and expansion in the Americas' "New World."
The Anglo-Spanish War lasted from 1796 to 1802, and then again from 1804 to 1808 as part of the Coalition Wars. The war ended with the signing of an alliance .
To know more about the The Anglo-Spanish War here
https://brainly.com/question/3044375
#SPJ1
What did the Edict of Milan accomplish?
It ended civil wars in the Roman Empire.
It established four districts in the Roman Empire.
It legalized the Christian religion in the Roman Empire.
It established Byzantium as the capital of the Roman Empire.
Answer:
Yep, it's c
Explanation:
now, in the independent practice, test your understanding of john brown's raid on harpers ferry. why did john brown attack the arsenal at harpers ferry in 1859?
John Brown attacked the arsenal at Harpers Ferry in 1859 as part of an attempt to start a slave insurrection. He believed that by arming the slaves, he could create an uprising that would overthrow the institution of slavery in the United States.
John Brown's Raid on Harpers Ferry: A Fight for Social Justice and FreedomJohn Brown's attack on Harpers Ferry was an attempt to start a slave insurrection in order to end the oppression of African Americans. His attack was motivated by a strong moral conviction that slavery was wrong and must be abolished. He believed that by arming slaves and sparking a revolution, he could create a more just society. His actions were driven by a desire for social justice and freedom for all.
Learn more about Harpers Ferry at: https://brainly.com/question/4933303
#SPJ4
1.B. With the two theories (Feasting Model and Hilly Flanks Theory) which one do you think is accurate why humans moved away from the hunter gatherer lifestyle? or do you think it is a blend of both ideas?
They would have depleted all available plant and animal resources if they stayed in one spot for an extended period of time. As a result, they headed to another restaurant for additional food. Animals move from one location to another. Humans pursued them while they hunted them.
What is the hilly flanks theory?The Hilly Sides hypothesis, offered by Robert Braidwood in 1948, proposes that agriculture began on the hilly flanks of the Taurus and Zagros mountains, where the climate was not drier, as Childe believed, and fertile terrain supported a diversity of flora and animals susceptible to domestication.
Archeologist Bryan Hayden developed the "feasting model idea" for the origins of agriculture. It claims that extravagant shows of authority necessitated intensive agriculture. Large quantities of food had to be prepared in order to routinely hold feasts as a means of asserting control.
Learn more about Feasting Model and Hilly Flanks Theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/11586720
#SPJ1
Between which two dates on the timeline did Ancient Indians migrate from Siberia to North America
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include the timeline for reference, we can say the following.
Historians and Anthropologists agree that Ancient Indians migrated from Siberia to North America approximately 14,000 years ago. They were hunter-gatherers from the Paleolithic that came from Asia to North America when they crossed the Berin Strait that was frozen due to the extreme cold temperatures of the time. They crossed from modern-day Russian territory to Alaska, and they descended through North America, following herds to hunt them and feed their families until they started to settle in some places.
Why were very few records kept about "conductors", "stations" and "pilots"?
History
What happened in Brenham, TX on the night of September 7, 1866?
Who do you think was to blame? Why? (Be sure to make specific
references to the article and the primary sources from Section 4.3
On the night of September 7, 1866, several dozen Black soldiers from the 25th Infantry Regiment were stationed in Brenham, TX. The soldiers were there to protect against potential attacks from Confederate sympathizers or Native Americans. However, tensions rose when one of the soldiers, Sgt. William Walker attempted to arrest a local white man named James Talbot for disorderly conduct.
Talbot resisted and was eventually released after a scuffle with the soldiers. Later that night, a group of white townspeople formed a mob and attacked the Black soldiers, leading to what is now known as the Brenham Riot. The soldiers retreated to their camp, but the mob followed them and continued to attack, eventually setting fire to the camp and forcing the soldiers to flee. The primary sources from Section 4.3 of the article indicate that the white townspeople were to blame for the Brenham Riot. One source is a report from Major N.A.M. Dudley, the commander of the 25th Infantry Regiment, who described the events leading up to the riot and the violence that ensued. Another source is a letter from a local resident named S.H. Brashear, who wrote to his brother about the riot and expressed sympathy for the Black soldiers. In addition to these primary sources, the article notes that many historians believe the Brenham Riot was part of a larger pattern of violence against Black soldiers during the Reconstruction era. This violence was often fueled by racism and resentment towards the federal government's efforts to protect the rights of Black Americans.
To know more about Black soldiers, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9666796
#SPJ11
Which best describes the impact of the French and Indian War?
A) Even though the British and American colonists defeated the French, it led to the taxation of the colonists by the British Parliament and King George III
B) The French victory forced the British out of North America and led to the colonial rebellion against King Louis XVI.
C)The Native Americans were given all of the land the English took from them, creating strong anger against the British throughout the colonies.
D) It united the British and the American colonists, leading to a period of peace and prosperity.
Answer:
The French and Indian War is often viewed by historians as being a factor in causing the American Revolution. Which of these best explains why this might be the case? a. The Indians believed the colonists would return seized lands to them. b. The . History. Which best describes the impact that the Haitian Slave Revolt had on European countries?
Explanation:
Answer:
A) Even though the British and American colonists defeated the French, it led to the taxation of the colonists by the British Parliament and King George III
Explanation: The British taxed the colonist because they were in debt due to the war this lead to the signing of The Townshend Acts.
If you could mark me brainlyest that would be amazing:)
1) With which game is Francis Drake associated?
hurling
bowls
shinty
Answer:bowls
Explanation:
How did Kaiser Wilhelm I change the power structure in Europe? 1) He broke up the German Federation, which gave France more power in Europe. 2) He beat Austria in the Seven Weeks' War, creating the German Federation. 3) He was defeated by France in the Franco-Prussian War, making France more powerful. 4) He unified Germany to become one of the most powerful nation-states in Europe.
Kaiser Wilhelm I changed the power structure in Europe by beating Austria in the Seven Weeks' War, creating the North German Federation and unifying Germany to become one of the most powerful nation-states in Europe.
How Germany became powerful in the 19th CenturyDuring the reign of Prussian kaiser Wilhelm I, Prussian army was modernized by reforms done by general Helmuth von Moltke, industrialization was fostered in economy and Otto von Bismarck increased the influence of Prussia by the construction of a complex system of alliances in Europe that weakened Austria, isolated France and put the rest of German states into Prussia's sphere of influence.
Two fact fostered an scenario of German unification led by Prussia:
The Prussian victory against Austria in the Seven Weeks' War (1.866), which meant that the latter had to renounce to the leadership of an eventual unification of the German states into one state-nation. This was followed by the formation of North German Federation (1.867), where Prussia was the hegemonic state.The defeat of France against Prussia in the Franco-Prussian War (1.870), which was followed by the formation of the German Empire (1.871), one of the most powerful and industrialized countries in the Europe of its time.Therefore, kaiser Wilhelm I changed the power structure in Europe by beating Austria in the Seven Weeks' War, creating the North German Federation and unifying Germany to become one of the most powerful nation-states in Europe.
To learn more on German unification, we kindly invite to check this verified question: https://brainly.com/question/880843
Answer:
its either d or b
Explanation:
cuz
What was the compromise among the Constituional delegates that resolved the large state v. small
state plan representation problem?
Answer: The Great Compromise.
Explanation: Initially, Constitutional delegates from small states and large states contentiously debated how they should be represented in federal legislature. States with larger populations, such as Virginia and New York, advocated for a legislative system in which the number of seats each state had was proportional to its population. Known as the Virginia Plan, smaller states were afraid that this would grant the larger states unjust power. Therefore, smaller states proposed a plan in which each state had the same number of seats in the legislative system. To prevent further argument, states reached a compromise in which one house of the bi-cameral (two house) legislature would have seats determined by population (House of Representatives) and one with equal number of seats regardless of population (Senate).
The model of the atom proposed by Erwin Schrodinger suggested which of the following?
Answer:
The Schrödinger model assumes that the electron is a wave and tries to describe the regions in space, or orbitals, where electrons are most likely to be found.
He proposed that electrons are arranged in concentric circular orbits around the nucleus
Explanation:
Write a proposal for a new amendment to the US constitution. Be sure to explain why your amendment is necessary and how it will be helpful. Remember, amendments have to be popular amongst the majority of the states to gain approval.
You must have at least five sentences for your proposal.
Answer:
A new and necessary amendment to the Constitution of the United States could be one that guarantees elementary public services to American citizens for free, being provided by the federal government: thus, the provision of a free and public health service at the federal level, which provides universal medical coverage to all citizens for a series of basic and urgent medical treatments, would allow unrestricted access to health by citizens, which would cease to depend on their economic capacity to obtain adequate medical attention to their needs.
Hello, I need any interesting facts or good information on Corrie tan Boom and the Kindertransport. I am assigned to do a project with a WWII topic. Thanks!
Answer:
The ten Boom family were members of the Dutch Reformed Church, which protested Nazi persecution of Jews as an injustice to fellow human beings and an affront to divine authority. In her autobiography, ten Boom repeatedly cited religious motivations for hiding Jews, particularly her family's strong belief in a basic tenet of their religion: the equality of all human beings before God. Their religious activities had also brought the family a history of personal connections to the Jewish community. Corrie's grandfather had supported efforts to improve Christian-Jewish relations in the nineteenth century. Her brother Willem, a Dutch Reformed minister assigned to convert Jews, studied antisemitism and ran a nursing home for elderly of all faiths. In the late 1930s that nursing home became a refuge for Jews fleeing from Germany.
3
Select all the correct answers.
Which two statements explain the passage of the Fair Housing Act on April 11, 1968?
It was passed to protect renters of all races from discrimination.
It was passed to provide assistance to striking grape workers.
It was passed to create a community for African American homeowners.
It was passed to recognize the achievements of Medgar Evers.
It was passed to honor the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr.
Reset
Next
question which statement is the most accurate description of matthew brady? responses he was the first documentary photographer who captured the civil war in pictures. he was the first documentary photographer who captured the civil war in pictures. he was hired by the national child labor committee to take photographs of child laborers. he was hired by the national child labor committee to take photographs of child laborers. he documented the blight of the great depression. he documented the blight of the great depression. he was an architect. he was an architect.
The most accurate description of Matthew Brady is that he was the first documentary photographer who captured the Civil War in pictures.
Matthew Brady, born in 1822, was a renowned American photographer known for his work during the American Civil War. He is widely regarded as one of the pioneers of documentary photography. Brady and his team of photographers documented the war by capturing compelling images of soldiers, battlefields, and the overall impact of the conflict.
Through his photographs, Brady provided a visual record of the war that allowed the public to witness the realities and horrors of battle. His photographs, including iconic images such as the portrait of Abraham Lincoln, became important historical documents and had a significant impact on public perception and understanding of the Civil War.
While the other statements mention Brady's involvement with the National Child Labor Committee or documenting the blight of the Great Depression, these do not accurately reflect his primary contribution and legacy as a photographer. Brady's most notable and influential work was centered around documenting the Civil War, making him a key figure in the history of documentary photography.
To learn more about Matthew Brady visit:
brainly.com/question/2004706
#SPJ11
Which of the following most closely reflects marriage patterns in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries?
A) Divorce rates have dropped, and intact two-parent families are the norm.
B) Women marry at a younger age than they did in the 1970s and 1980s.
C) The marriage rate has risen since the turn of the twenty-first century.
D) Only one in five American households includes a married couple with children.
The most appropriate answer is Only one in five American households includes a married couple with children."Option D is the correct answer.
Since the 1970s and 1980s, marriage patterns have changed dramatically. The majority of people no longer marry in their early twenties. As people marry later in life, they are also more likely to have been married before or to have cohabited with a partner.A) Divorce rates have not declined, and intact two-parent families are not the norm. Divorce rates have remained constant over the past several decades, and only about one-third of American households have intact, two-parent families.
B) Women nowadays marry at a later age than they did in the 1970s and 1980s, not at a younger age.C) Since the turn of the twenty-first century, the marriage rate has fallen dramatically in the United States. People are waiting longer to get married, and some are choosing not to marry at all. Instead, more couples are opting for cohabitation as a way to test their compatibility before making a long-term commitment.
D) Only one in five American households includes a married couple with children. That means that the majority of households in the United States are single-parent, cohabiting, or childless.
Therefore the correct option is D.
For more questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/21148283
#SPJ8
what kind of goods were being transported from
colonies to Great Britain
Answer:
The goods that needed to be brought into England from the colonies consisted of raw materials from natural resources found in the New World such as timber, fur, iron, fish, whale oil, sugar, tobacco, rice and cotton. Rum was one of the few 'finished goods' that were sent to England.
Explanation:
when austria-hungary decleared war on serbia, _____ shows their support of serbia
give brainliest
Austria-Hungary decided to go to war with Serbia, and this caused a lot of tension between the two countries. In response, Russia showed their support for Serbia.
What does it mean “What is the minimum number of hours you are available to work each week?
Answer:
It means what is the least amount of hours that you are available to work each week.
Explanation:
Minimum means least.
what is a first prime minister of India?
Answer: Jawaharlal Nehru
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Cause
Effect.
?
Buddhism spread
across India,
0
A. People were no longer allowed to practice Hinduism in India.
B. Hindu priests got rid of the caste system.
C. Ashoka the Great became a Buddhist,
D. Japanese Buddhists traveled to India,
HELP!!!!!!!! I need this
Answer:
Correct answer is C. Ashoka the Great became a Buddhist.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as Hinduism is still the most practiced religion in India.
Option B is also not correct as caste system remained effective.
Option C is correct. Ashoka was the greatest ruler of Mauryan dynasty who embraced Buddhism.
Option D is not correct as Buddhism had its roots in India and later spread across the globe.
Answer:
The person with the certified answer is correct
Explanation:
its certified its certified and I got it correct on the quiz
do you recognize the bodies in the water?
Answer:
In short, the 'you do not recognize the bodies in the water'. The phrase 'you do not recognize the bodies in the water' repeats over and over again, to avoid the viewer falling victim to the effect.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you sorry if it doesn’t
A political & social movement intended to address problems caused by
urbanization & industrialization was _____.
O Populism
O Progressivism
O Nationalism
O Socialism
A political & social movement intended to address problems caused by urbanization & industrialization was Progressivism. Thus the correct option is B.
What is industrialization?The industrial revolution describes how the economy changed from being based on agricultural practices to being based on machine practices through utilizing equipment through industries.
Progressives worked to address the issues brought on by accelerating manufacturing, urbanization, economic migration, and governmental corruption, as well as by the massive centralization of industrial property in corporations.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about industrialization, here:
https://brainly.com/question/455063
#SPJ1
_____ is a policy of favoring native-born individuals over foreign-born ones is
The policy of favoring native-born individuals over foreign-born ones is called nativism.
Nativism is a political policy that values the interests of native citizens more than those of immigrants. This policy asserts that immigrants can undermine national security, hurt the economy, and threaten social order and morality. Nativism is often driven by fear and xenophobia, as well as concerns over the loss of jobs and cultural traditions.
In history, nativism has been used to justify discriminatory laws and practices against immigrants, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1924.
Today, nativism is still a controversial issue in many countries, with some arguing that it is a necessary tool for protecting national identity and security, while others view it as a form of prejudice and discrimination.
Learn more about foreign-born https://brainly.com/question/15799122
#SPJ11
The policy of favoring native-born individuals over foreign-born ones is called nativism. This policy is a reaction to the influx of immigrants and aims to preserve the privileges of the native-born population, who were often considered superior to the immigrants.
Nativism is often driven by a belief in racial and ethnic superiority, as well as a fear of losing power or control to the newcomers. It has been evident in various countries throughout history, including the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, where it was primarily directed at Irish and Eastern and Southern European immigrants. Nativism can manifest itself in different ways, from restrictive immigration policies to discrimination and violence against minority groups. It often leads to tensions between native-born individuals and immigrants, who may feel excluded and discriminated against. However, nativism has also been challenged by advocates for immigrant rights and multiculturalism, who promote inclusion and diversity as essential values for a healthy and vibrant society.In conclusion, nativism is a policy that promotes the interests of native-born individuals over foreign-born ones and is often based on racial and ethnic prejudices. It has been a significant issue throughout history and continues to impact many countries today.
To know more about nativism visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/12257940
#SPJ11
Complete T.A.C.O.S for this political
cartoon
U.S.
Answer:
Time: When was the cartoon created? Look for the date. What else
was happening historically at this time?
Action: What is going on in the cartoon? For example, are the people
asleep, marching, fighting, angry, or laughing?
Caption: What does the cartoon label say? What do you think it
means? Does the caption support the action in the cartoon? Is it critical
of the action?
Objects: What familiar objects or people do you recognize in the
cartoon? (Identify two or three.) Are any of the people or objects
exaggerated in size or action? Do any of the objects/people lead you to
recognize a point of view and/or stereotypes? Do you see objects/people
that you cannot recognize? How could you find out about them?
S ummary: Based on the time, action, caption, and objects, what do
you think the author of the cartoon was trying to say? Try to identify the
tone of the cartoon—satirical, negative, supportive, partisan, proAmerican, pro-British, etc.).
Explanation:
Political cartoons present concise opinions or pointed criticism about issues and events that
are provocative and hard hitting. Your job is to identify, defend, and challenge the drawing’s
main argument. Be aware that political cartoons are deceptively simple. They are not the
“funnies” in the Sunday paper. They are one sided and contain slant and bias. Further, they
often require certain prior knowledge and life experiences in order to be fully understood.
They also rely heavily upon symbols and images, and the lack of text creates an additional
challenge. This is where having a structured plan for analysis will be incredibly helpful. One
such plan is the TACOS strategy.
Why did the US stop with the Trans Atlantic slave trade?
Answer: new federal law Emplaced.
Explanation:
On the first day of January, 1808, a new Federal law made it illegal to import captive people from Africa into the United States. This date marks the end—the permanent, legal closure—of the trans-Atlantic slave trade into our country.
Answer:
An Atlantic trade in African slaves began in 1444, when the portuguese began to ship slaves from west Africa to Europe. For the next hundred years, the main market for these slaves were in Europe and the Atlantic islands owned by portugal and spain. However the discovery of the American in 1492 led to the creation of new colonies with a great need for cheap labour, and from the mid-sixteenth century European ships were carrying African slaves to Brazil, the Caribbean, and North America, in steadily increasing quantities.
according to luther, should secular government force people to be christians or to believe certain things?
Answer:
Luther taught that all Christians must be subject to two distinct, though ideally complementary governments, the spiritual and the secular.
According to Martin Luther, secular government should not force people to be Christians or believe certain things.
Luther believed in the separation of church and state, and that the role of government was to maintain order and protect its citizens. In his famous treatise "On Temporal Authority," Luther argued that the state should not interfere in matters of faith and that the church should not meddle in political affairs. He believed that faith was a matter of the heart and could not be compelled by external forces, including the state. Luther's ideas about religious freedom were groundbreaking at the time, and have had a lasting impact on modern society. Today, the idea of separation of church and state is enshrined in many countries' laws and constitutions, and is seen as a fundamental human right.
To know more about Martin Luther visit:
https://brainly.com/question/878248
#SPJ11
Help please I really need the answer
As a result of the Continental Congress printing more and more dollars over the course of the war, the value of the dollar by 1780....
As a result of the Continental Congress printing more and more dollars over the course of the war, the value of the dollar by 1780 significantly depreciated.
The continuous printing of dollars by the Continental Congress during the American Revolutionary War led to a significant decrease in the value of the currency.
This inflationary trend was driven by the urgent need for funds to finance the war effort. With an increasing supply of paper money flooding the market, its value decreased in relation to goods and services, causing a rise in prices and a loss of purchasing power.
By 1780, the depreciation of the dollar had become severe, leading to economic instability and hardship for individuals and businesses. This hyperinflationary period demonstrated the detrimental consequences of uncontrolled currency issuance and contributed to the eventual adoption of a more stable monetary system in the newly formed United States.
to learn more about monetary system click here:
brainly.com/question/27960880
#SPJ11