New hampshire is the only state that has no law requiring adults to do what while driving.

a. True
b. False

Answer:

Enforcing Laws: Nominating people to run a executive departments.

Influencing new laws: giving congress information about the country and giving Congress ideas for new laws.

Explanation:

Answer:

Influencing new laws: giving congress information about the country, giving Congress ideas for new laws.

Enforcing Laws: Nominating people to run executive departments.

Explanation:

The equipment which hostage negotiation team members should carry in their car includes:

This refers to the discussion between armed aggressors and trained police officers in order to diffuse a hostile situation that involves the use of hostages.

Hence, we can see that some of the equipment which a hostage negotiation team would carry includes writing materials, communication equipment, first aid, etc.

Read more about hostage negotiation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1569401

Answer:

I do think that 'notice and hearing' is the suitable option!

A municipal bond is a debt instrument issued by a state, city, or local government to finance various public projects.

An unqualified legal opinion on a municipal bond refers to the assurance given by a legal expert that the bond meets all the legal requirements and regulations necessary for its issuance. This opinion is considered a critical factor in determining the bond's creditworthiness and investor confidence. The unqualified legal opinion assures investors that the municipal bond is valid, enforceable, and binding. It also confirms that the bond's offering documents are accurate, complete, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations. The legal opinion provides investors with a high level of confidence in the municipal bond's creditworthiness, making it more attractive to potential buyers. In summary, an unqualified legal opinion is an essential component of the issuance of a municipal bond as it helps to increase investor confidence and ensure the bond's validity and enforceability.

To learn more about government, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13540610

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).

wikipedia

The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.

The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.

What Is Digital Currency?

Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike  plutocrat or other goods like gold or  oil painting.  By streamlining the current  fiscal system, digital  plutocrat can  grease  briskly and more affordable  fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to  apply  financial policy.

Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are  exemplifications of different types of digital  plutocrat.

The  amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in  sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.  

Digital currencies have some  downsides, including the fact that they can be  unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.

To learn more on Digital currency from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/28963893

#SPJ1

The intention that John Smith would have for saying that if a man did not work, he would not eat is for everyone to be hardworking and to thrive in the economy. He wanted all to be committed to the success of the new colony.

Captain John Smith was a soldier, explorer, adventurer, and writer. We may follow the growth of a man who played a major role in Jamestown's eventual success and the establishing of its reputation as the first permanent English settlement in North America through the narrative of his early life.

Because he wanted everyone at Jamestown, Virginia, to dedicate themselves to the success of that first colony established in 1607, John Smith established a "no work, no food" policy. With that kind of weather and the challenging circumstances of starting over in a new place, Jhon Smith knew how difficult it would be to flourish. He therefore did not want anyone to adopt a "free ride" mentality. He said that at that time.

Read more on John Smith here: https://brainly.com/question/17837412

#SPJ1

Explanation: Gradpoint

The decision in the trial of John Peter Zenger was a step forward for the establishment of freedom of the press in the United States. The case is widely credited with establishing the principle that the truth is a defense against charges of libel and that the public has a right to know and discuss public figures and events.

Learn more about John Peter Zenger: https://brainly.com/question/513924

#SPJ11

This statement is true. Most industrialized countries have single court system or also known as unified court system. The courts in these countries have the power to hear both local and national cases.

A unified court system or single court system also attempts to address some issues that are related to the overabundance of courts at the local level.

Legal scholars argued that a centralized administration and judiciary system would effectively streamline the ability to preside over legal matters in the early 20th century. They called for an end to the fragmentation of court systems. Consequently, a unified or single court system emerged.

These court systems were typically created by local residents to supervise and carry out verdicts in local rather than national cases.

Find out what is not a level of court that exists in a unified court system: https://brainly.com/question/2710612

#SPJ4

A) Assignment of income is the correct answer.

According to this principle, Oprah will be taxed on the value of cruise tickets. It is just an assignment of income like gifts.

It is standardized. No further explanation is required.

You can directly assign a portion of your income to another individual through an assignment of income. Numerous taxpayers wrongly believe that assigning your income to someone else will cut your taxable income, even though there are many good reasons to do so. You can divert taxes, but you cannot divert income when you assign income.

To know more about the assignment of income, visit;

brainly.com/question/17578836

#SPJ4

Answer:

Judicial Activism: Judicial activism is the assertion (or, sometimes, the unjustified assertion) of the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. Judicial restraint is the refusal to strike down such acts, leaving the issue to ordinary politics. Through judicial activism, judges can use their own personal feelings to strike down laws that they would feel are unjust. Whether it is an executive order, an immigration issue or a criminal proceeding, judges would have a good vantage point in deciding a certain case's outcome.

Judicial Restraint: Advocates of judicial restraint argue that judges do not have the authority to act as policy makers. Among judicial restraint advocates are Thomas Jefferson, Learned Hand and Hugo Black. Opponents argue that activism is a necessity when the other branches of government do not act to bring about social change.

Answer: The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet.

Explanation:

When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.

The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.

In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.

A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.

To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579

#SPJ4

The role of the judge in the common-law tradition differs from the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition in several ways.

In the common-law tradition, judges play a significant role in creating and interpreting laws through the use of judicial precedent. This means that judges have the power to make law based on their interpretation of previous court decisions. This is in contrast to the civil-law tradition where judges are bound by the legal code and are not able to create new laws through judicial precedent. Instead, judges in the civil-law tradition are responsible for applying the law to the facts of the case before them.
Another key difference between the two traditions is the level of discretion that judges have. In the common-law tradition, judges have a great deal of discretion when interpreting laws and applying them to individual cases. This is because the law is often vague and open to interpretation. In contrast, judges in the civil-law tradition have less discretion since the law is typically more prescriptive and detailed.
Overall, the role of the judge in the common-law tradition is more active and creative, while the role of the judge in the civil-law tradition is more passive and focused on applying the law to the specific case at hand.

Learn more about court :

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ11

Explanation:

A citizen is a permanent resident of a state, while an alien is a temporary resident, who comes for a specific duration of time as a tourist or on diplomatic assignment

Answer:

Explanation:

The chicken is out into the batter. Then shaken up in a bag. once you finish that, fry it. Then it’ll be good and kwispy

the MNC .multinational corporations is the world's largest forms of corporations

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer to this question would depend on the specific laws and regulations of the state in question.

In general, notarial acts require the personal appearance of the individual requesting the act in front of the notarial officer. However, some states have enacted laws that allow for remote online notarization (RON) using tamper-evident technology.

If the state in question has laws allowing for RON, then it is possible that a notarial officer could perform a notarial act using tamper-evident technology if the individual requesting the act appears remotely. In this case, the notarial officer would use a video conferencing system to visually observe the individual and confirm their identity, while also using tamper-evident technology to ensure the security and integrity of the transaction.

It is important to note that the specific requirements and procedures for RON vary from state to state, and not all states allow for this type of remote notarization. Additionally, notarial officers must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including those related to technology and cybersecurity, when performing notarial acts remotely.

In general, notarial acts require the personal appearance of the individual requesting the act in front of the notarial officer.

Any written account of facts prepared by a notary, notary public, or civil-law notary, authenticated by the notary's signature and official seal, and describing a procedure carried out by or before the notary in their official role, is referred to as a notarial act.

When a notarial act is the recognized record of a fact, it is the only legal way to substantiate that fact; otherwise, it is typically inadmissible.

The Central Government, for the entirety or any part of India, and any State Government, for the entirety or any part of the State, may appoint any legal professionals or other persons who meet the requirements to serve as notaries.

Learn more about the Notarial Acts here:

https://brainly.com/question/28314658

#SPJ2

The process by which the defense learns of evidence held by the prosecution is called discovery.

Discovery is a legal procedure in which both the prosecution and the defense exchange relevant information and evidence they possess before a trial. It is an essential component of a fair trial, ensuring that each party has access to the evidence necessary to present their case effectively and avoid surprises during trial proceedings.

During the discovery process, the prosecution is typically required to disclose evidence it intends to present at trial, including documents, witness statements, expert reports, and any other relevant materials. This disclosure helps the defense understand the case against their client and allows them to prepare an appropriate defense strategy.

Discovery also allows the defense to request specific evidence or information from the prosecution. This can include requesting access to physical evidence, requesting witness statements, or seeking information about the credibility or prior convictions of witnesses. The defense may use this information to challenge the prosecution's case, gather evidence to support their own defense, or identify potential weaknesses or inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence.

The specific rules and procedures for discovery can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case. In some jurisdictions, there are formal processes and deadlines for exchanging discovery materials, while in others, it may be more informal and left to the discretion of the parties or the court.

The purpose of the discovery process is to promote fairness and transparency in the legal system. By allowing both the prosecution and the defense to access and exchange relevant information, it helps ensure that each party has an equal opportunity to present their case and uncover the truth. In summary, the process by which the defense learns of evidence held by the prosecution is called discovery. It is a crucial part of the legal process that allows for the exchange of information and evidence between the parties, promoting fairness and ensuring that each side has access to the necessary materials to present their case effectively.

Learn more about prosecution here

https://brainly.com/question/30357961

#SPJ11

Answer:

A). Responsible market hunters

Explanation:

The key focus of the 'responsible market hunters' is to ensure scientific management and sustenance of wildlife populations. They play a direct and significant role in conserving wildlife by offering information about the amount of hunted as well as non-hunted species, endangered animals, etc. which helps the wildlife agencies to keep a check on managing the wildlife populations and prevent them from extinction and maintain biodiversity. Thus, option A is the correct answer.

When it comes to sustaining and managing wildlife populations, this is the primary focus of D. Professionals in government wildlife agencies.

Government wildlife agencies:

The professionals in these wildlife agencies are the ones that do the bulk of the work and so it can be said that their primary focus is to sustain and manage wildlife populations.

In conclusion, the roles described are primarily that of wildlife agencies and their professionals.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/4609501.

The correct answer is C. To meet with constituents in Washington DC and in the district.

Explanation:

In the U.S. government system, the national government level is connected with the local government level including citizens of all states. An example of this is that constituents (individuals who vote) of all states are informed about the actions of national entities such as the House of Representatives and this entity integrates members from different states.

In the quote presented, the House representative Mike Honda refers to the role of House of Representatives to "meet with people who live in our states" who are the constituents and in this way keep them informed about the actions of the national House of Representatives "tell them about what is happening in government". According to this, the duty Honda is referring to is "To meet with constituents in Washington DC an in the district."

Answer:

to meet with constituents in Washington D.C. and in the district

Explanation:

Just did the quiz on Edge 2021

Plz click the Thanks button!

<Jayla>

Answer:

I don't understand why Maria's government has to serve time for not paying taxes There are a lot of people in high positions that don't pay taxes. They lie about their taxes. Let's start with the nations capital Washington D.C. I think he should have gotten any time. That's just my personal opinion.

McDonald's and the jury had different perceptions of social consensus, consequences, and proximity in the coffee spill case.

In the coffee spill case, the jury and McDonald's had different moral perspectives. In contrast to the jury, McDonald's placed more emphasis on social consensus, the severity of the consequences, and proximity because it felt that its actions were not unethical. McDonald's may have felt emotionally detached from the consequences because it downplayed the potential harm and saw serving hot coffee at 170 degrees as standard industry practice.

In contrast, the jury found that Stella Liebeck's injuries were serious, questioned whether it was socially acceptable to serve such hot coffee and directly addressed the trial's immediate consequences. These different perspectives on social consensus, consequences, and proximity affected how McDonald's and the jury reacted to and assessed the case's moral implications.

Learn more about social consensus at:

brainly.com/question/28523873

#SPJ4

As Gerald uses a gun in a store to get enough money to buy the medication and get prosecuted after that. This is an example of criminal law because it concerns behavior so threatening that society outlaws it altogether.

As a branch of law, the criminal law means the body of law that relates to crime. It is mostly prescribes for conduct perceived as threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of people inclusive of one's self.

Going forward, most of our criminal law are established by statute, that  is, most of our the laws are enacted by a legislature. It also includes the punishment and rehabilitation of people who violate such laws.

Missing options"a. morality because Gerald is trying to save his ill wife. b. criminal law because it concerns behavior so threatening that society outlaws it altogether. C. civil law because it regulates the rights and duties between parties, d. constitutionality because the U.S. Constitution allows citizens to save their loved ones."

Read more about criminal law

brainly.com/question/199340

#SPJ1

This assertion is accurate. Crimes against morality and public order create a problem in finding a balance between those values and people's freedom to pursue their civil liberties.

The constitution grants citizens certain freedoms in order to shield them from tyranny. Because it cannot deprive them of the freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights, American citizens should have confidence in their government to safeguard their civil rights.

Yes, I do think that it is feasible to strike a balance between social control and respect for legitimate authority as well as individual liberties and rights because: Individual rights are those that all American citizens are given by the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights.

Personal freedom typically takes precedence over the emphasis on efficient law enforcement methods. As a result, unjustified searches and seizures are forbidden and considered a breach of citizens' rights.

Learn more about civil liberties: https://brainly.com/question/2375577

#SPJ4

ANSWER:

D

The Reason my Answer's D is because in my History book, the Bill of rights says We the People. and so the Government runs from it's citizens

Answer: The side that files the appeal is called the "appellant." The other side is called the "respondent." If you appeal, the appellate court will review the trial court record to decide if a legal mistake was made in the trial court that changed the outcome of the case.

Answer:

In my opinion I think so because what happened to our rights and people that don't obey the law should be the one's to pay for it not us.

hope this helps

have a good day :)

Explanation: