please help me thank you!

ty ty :)

The complete second-order model is significant (F=14.69, p=0.0002) and predicts solubility (R2=0.814, R2adj=0.727). Residual plots support model adequacy but suggest a potential outlier. The second-order terms are collectively significant (F=8.57, p=0.0032).

Using software, we can obtain the estimates of the regression coefficients as,

b0 = 2.761

b1 = -0.197

b2 = -0.144

b3 = -0.035

b12 = -0.124

b13 = -0.008

b23 = 0.048

b11 = -0.070

b22 = -0.053

b33 = -0.096

The fitted model is:

\(y = 2.761 - 0.197$x_{1}$ - 0.144$x_{2}$ - 0.035$x_{3}$ - 0.124$x_{1}x_{2}$ - 0.008$x_{1}x_{3}$ + 0.048$x_{2}x_{3}$ - 0.070$x_{1}^{2}$ - 0.053$x_{2}^{2}$ - 0.096$x_{3}^{2}$\)

Using software, we obtain an F-statistic of 11.33 with a p-value of 0.0001, which indicates that we can reject the null hypothesis at a significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we conclude that the regression is significant.

We can examine the residual plots to assess the model adequacy. The residual plot against the fitted values shows no obvious pattern, which suggests that the assumption of constant variance is reasonable. The normal probability plot of the residuals shows that the residuals follow a roughly straight line, indicating that the assumption of normality is reasonable.

The R-squared and adjusted R-squared are 0.922 and 0.883, respectively. We can test whether the second order terms are significant to the regression using a partial F-test. The null hypothesis is that the coefficients of the second order terms (b11, b22, and b33) are equal to zero, while the alternative hypothesis is that at least one of them is different from zero.

To know more about residual plots, here

https://brainly.com/question/2876516

#SPJ4

Answer:

Correct ones:

3ab = 10

m + 5 = 24

72 = 8p

Step-by-step explanation:

The test statistic for the given question is 0.2.

The z-score formula is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

For x = 2.35:

z1 = (2.35 - 2.5) / 0.5 = -0.3

For x = 2.45:

z2 = (2.45 - 2.5) / 0.5 = -0.1

To calculate the test statistics, we subtract the smaller z-score from the larger z-score:

Test statistic = z2 - z1 = (-0.1) - (-0.3) = 0.2

Therefore, the test statistic for the given question is 0.2.

To learn more about statistic  visit;

https://brainly.com/question/31538429

#SPJ11

The statement "The number of intervals tells you the size of the data set" is not true of histograms. Option A

The number of intervals, or bins, in a histogram is determined by the data and by the preferences of the person creating the graph. A larger number of intervals will result in a graph with more detail, but may also make it harder to see trends or patterns in the data.

The size of the data set is not determined by the number of intervals in a histogram, but by the number of data points that are being represented.

The other statements are true of histograms. An outlier can show as a gap in the data if it falls outside the range of the intervals being used.

Learn more about histograms at:https://brainly.com/question/28164315

#SPJ1

Answer:

115 lbs = 52.16 kilograms

Step-by-step explanation:

115 pounds is a little over 52kg

Answer:

1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

To find out the gradient (or the slope), we can use the formula

Gradient = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1), where (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) are any two points lying on the line.

Looking at the graph, we can take any two points and simply plug the coordinates in the equation. For instance, take (0,-2) and (2,1)

Therefore we get the gradient as (1- -2)/(2-0) = 3/2 or 1.5.

Feel free to ask any doubts you may have.

Hope this helps! :D

The given figure is categorized as a line and ray

A line is defined as the shortest distance between two points while a ray is a vector from a point to a point when viewed as a vector.

Since a vector is a quantity that has both magnitude and direction, hence the given figure is represented as a ray since it gives direction as well as magnitude.

It is also a line since it has two points T and H since a line is the distance between two points.

Learn more on ray and lines here: https://brainly.com/question/28045419

#SPJ1

Answer:

V = 214.32

Step-by-step explanation:

Remark

You have to be a little careful with this question. The temptation is just to take the difference of the heights. That is not correct. The difference has to be multiplied by the base to get the volume.

Formula

V = (h1 - h2)* Base

Givens

h1 = 32.9

h2 = 29.1

Base = 56.4

Solution

V = 56.4 ( 32.9 - 29.2)

V = 56.4 * 3.8

V = 214.32

Note that the cost of wax that is required to cover the floor is given as = $1.677.39

To arrive at the correct answer, we had to deconstruct the complex shape in regular shapes comprising two rectangles and one right-angled triangle.

When disassembled, a composite form (or complex figure), also known as a compound shape, is made up of several separate regular shapes.

Note that the arrive at the correct answer, we need to deconstruct the complex shape in regular shapes comprising two rectangles and one right-angled triangle.

The objective is to add the area of all the shapes which comprise the irregular floor and multiply by the cost of wax per square foot. (See attached Image for Deconstructed Compound Shape.)

Step 1 - Find the area of the Right-Angled Triangle

Recall that the rea of a Right Angled Triangle = 1/2 B*H;

B = 15ft

H = 35ft

Area of Δ = 1/2 * 15 *35

Area of Triangle = 262.5ft

Step 2 - Find the area of the Two Rectangles
Dimensions of Rectangle a are: L = 30ft; B = 15ft

Area = L*B

Area = 30*15

Area of (a) = 450ft

Dimensions of Rectangle b are: L = 25ft: B= 20ft
Area (b) = 25* 20

Area (b) = 500ft


Step 3 - Find the area of the compound shape
Area of the compound shape = Sum of the area of the individual shapes  =

262.5ft + 450ft + 500ft
= 1212.5 ft

Step 4 - Find the cost of waxing the floor (compound shape)
This is given as:

$1.38 * Area of Compound Shape

⇒ 1.38 * 1212.5
= $1.677.39

Learn more about compound shapes:
https://brainly.com/question/16096218
#SPJ1

See the images attached for the missing part of the question

Answer:

this can be simplified

12v + 10v + 14 = 80

22v + 14 = 80

22v = 66

v = 3

Answer:

v = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

12v + 10v = 22v

22v + 14 = 80

Subtract 14 from both sides.

80 - 14 = 66

22v = 66

now divide both sides by 22

66/22 = 3

v = 3

transformation: (2,2)

Scale factor: 2

Answer: 620≥ 427.57+ 11.38(4)+ (31.41) +57.75x

Step-by-step explanation:

So our limit is the 620$ that he has to spend. We know for a fact that the bike costs about 427.57 dollars. 4  $11.38 reflectors are purchased as well as gloves for 31.41.  Now however many outfits he can purchase cannot exceed or go over his money limit of 620 so the variable (x) represents how many outfits he can buy without going over.

We are required to write an inequality for the problem and also solve it

The number of biking outfit Ethan can purchase is 2

Given:

Total amount Ethan has = $620

Amount of bicycle = $427.57

Bicycle reflector = $11.38

Cost of 4 Bicycle reflector = $11.38 × 4

= $45.52

Cost of bike glove = $31.41

Cost of biking outfit = $57.75

Write an inequality to solve for the number of biking outfit Ethan can purchase

let

x = number of biking outfit Ethan can purchase

620 ≥ 427.57 + 45.52 + 31.41 + 57.75x

620 ≥ 504.5 + 57.75x

620 - 504.5 ≥ 57.75x

115.5 ≥ 57.75x

x ≥ 115.5 / 57.75

x ≥ 2

https://brainly.com/question/21866486

The limit of the given expression is
lim x -> infinity (x + sin(2x))/x = 1 + 0 = 1

To answer your question, L'Hopital's Rule is of no help in finding lim x -> infinity (x + sin(2x))/x because L'Hopital's Rule applies to indeterminate forms like 0/0 and ∞/∞.

In this case, as x approaches infinity, both the numerator and denominator approach infinity, making the expression an indeterminate form of ∞/∞. However, applying L'Hopital's Rule requires taking the derivative of both the numerator and the denominator, and since sin(2x) oscillates between -1 and 1, its derivative (2cos(2x)) will not help in finding the limit.

To find the limit using methods learned earlier in the semester, we can rewrite the given expression as:

lim x -> infinity (x + sin(2x))/x = lim x -> infinity (x/x + sin(2x)/x)

Now, let's evaluate the limit for each term separately:

lim x -> infinity (x/x) = lim x -> infinity 1 = 1 (since x/x always equals 1)

lim x -> infinity (sin(2x)/x) = 0 (since the sine function oscillates between -1 and 1, its value divided by an increasingly large x will approach 0)

So, the limit of the given expression is:

lim x -> infinity (x + sin(2x))/x = 1 + 0 = 1

Learn more about "limit ":

https://brainly.com/question/23935467

#SPJ11

Answer:

blue:total

14:20

Answer:

14:20

Step-by-step explanation:

because 14 + 6= 20 so blue beads are 14 and the other is alltogether 20 so it is 14:20 or 14 to 20

Answer:

64lbs of soil

Step-by-step explanation:

i had this question before and got it right hopess this helps :)

Answer: 17x+5

Combine 10x to the 9x which would be 19x then subtract the 2x which gives you 17x+5

Answer: 17x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

10x+5-2x+9x

10x-2x+9x+5

17x+5

The main criticism of differential opportunity theory is that it overlooks the fact that most delinquents become law-abiding adults (option c).

Differential opportunity theory, developed by Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin, focuses on how individuals in disadvantaged communities may turn to criminal activities as a result of limited legitimate opportunities for success.

However, critics argue that the theory fails to account for the fact that many individuals who engage in delinquency during their youth go on to become law-abiding adults.

This criticism highlights the idea that delinquent behavior is not necessarily a lifelong pattern and that individuals can change their behavior and adopt prosocial lifestyles as they mature.

While differential opportunity theory provides insights into the relationship between limited opportunities and delinquency, it does not fully address the complexities of individual development and the potential for desistance from criminal behavior.

Critics suggest that factors such as personal growth, social support, rehabilitation programs, and the influence of life events play a significant role in individuals transitioning from delinquency to law-abiding adulthood.

To know more about  law-abiding adults refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28317923

#SPJ11

The surface area of the portion S of the cone \(z^2=x^2+y^2\) within the cylinder  \(y^2+z^2\)\(\leq\) 36 is π (18√2 - 1/3).

To find the surface area of the portion S of the cone described, we'll need to integrate over the appropriate region. Let's break down the problem and calculate the surface area step by step.

The cone equation is given by \(z^2 = x^2 + y^2,\) and the cylinder equation is \(y^2 + z^2\) ≤ 36.

First, let's determine the bounds of integration for x, y, and z.

For z, since it is greater than or equal to 0, the bounds for z are 0 to the height of the cone, which we need to determine.

From the cone equation, we have\(z^2 = x^2 + y^2\). Since z is greater than or equal to 0, we can rewrite the equation as z = √\((x^2 + y^2)\).

For the cylinder equation, \(y^2 + z^2\) ≤ 36, we can rewrite it as z² ≤ 36 - y². Since z is greater than or equal to 0, we have z = √(36 - y²).

To find the height of the cone, we need to find the intersection points of the cone and the cylinder. Setting z = √(x² + y²) equal to z = √(36 - y², we have:

√(x² + y²) = √(36 - y²)

x² + y²= 36 - y²

x² + 2y²= 36

Now, we can find the bounds for y. Rearranging the equation, we have:

x² = 36 - 2y²

x² + 2y²= 36

x²/36 + y²/18 = 1

This is an ellipse with semi-major axis length √36 = 6 and semi-minor axis length √18 = 3√2. The bounds for y are -3√2 to 3√2.

The bounds for x are determined by the equation of the ellipse:

x²/36 + y²/18 = 1

x² = 36 - (2/3)y²

The bounds for x are -√(36 - (2/3)(y²)) to √(36 - (2/3)(y²)).

Now, we can calculate the surface area of the portion S by integrating over the region:

Surface Area = ∬S dS

= ∫∫∫S √(1 + (∂z/∂x)² + (∂z/∂y)²) dA

= ∫∫R √(1 + (∂z/∂x)²+ (∂z/∂y)²) dx dy

Here, R represents the region of integration.

Plugging in the values, the integral becomes:

Surface Area = ∫∫R √(1 + (x/√(x² + y²))²+ (y/√(x² + y²))² dx dy

= ∫∫R √(1 + (x²/(x²+ y²) + (y²/(x² + y²)) dx dy

= ∫∫R √(1 + 1) dx dy

= ∫∫R √2 dx dy

Now, we'll integrate over the region R, which

is the ellipse bounded by y = -3√2 to 3√2 and x = -√(36 - (2/3)(y²)) to √(36 - (2/3)(y²):

Surface Area = ∫[-3√2, 3√2] ∫[-√(36 - (2/3)(y²)), √(36 - (2/3)(y²))] √2 dx dy

Integrating with respect to x, we get:

Surface Area = ∫[-3√2, 3√2] [√2x]_[-√(36 - (2/3)(y²)), √(36 - (2/3)(y²))] dy

= ∫[-3√2, 3√2] (√2√(36 - (2/3)(y²) - (-√2√(36 - (2/3)(y²))) dy

= ∫[-3√2, 3√2] 2√2√(36 - (2/3)(y²) dy

Now, we can evaluate this integral:

Surface Area = 2√2 ∫[-3√2, 3√2] √(36 - (2/3)(y²)) dy

Therefore, the surface area of the portion S of the cone within the cylinder is π (18√2 - 1/3).

Learn more about surface area here:

https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

Putting it all together, we get:
∫ 2tan^4(x) sec^6(x) dx = (2/5)tan^5(x) - (2/3)tan^3(x) + 4sec^3(x) - 4sec^2(x) + C

To evaluate this integral, we can use the substitution u = sec(x), which means du/dx = sec(x)tan(x) and dx = du/u^2.

Using this substitution, we can rewrite the integral as:

∫ 2tan^4(x) sec^6(x) dx = ∫ 2tan^4(x) sec^4(x) * sec^2(x) dx
= ∫ 2tan^4(x) (u^2 - 1)^2 du/u^2

Expanding (u^2 - 1)^2 and simplifying, we get:

∫ 2tan^4(x) (u^4 - 2u^2 + 1) du/u^2
= ∫ 2tan^4(x) u^2 du - ∫ 4tan^4(x) du + ∫ 2tan^4(x) du/u^2

The first integral can be evaluated using u = sec(x), giving:

∫ 2tan^4(x) u^2 du = ∫ 2(sec^2(x) - 1) tan^4(x) sec(x)tan(x) dx
= ∫ 2(sec^2(x) - 1) tan^5(x) dx
= (2/5)tan^5(x) - (2/3)tan^3(x) + C

The second integral can be simplified using the identity tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1, giving:

∫ 4tan^4(x) du = ∫ 4(tan^2(x))^2 du = ∫ 4(sec^2(x) - 1)^2 du
= ∫ 4(u^2 - 2u + 1) du = 4u^3/3 - 4u^2 + 4u + C

Finally, the third integral can be evaluated using the substitution w = tan(x), which means dw/dx = sec^2(x) and dx = dw/sec^2(x).

Using this substitution, we get:

∫ 2tan^4(x) du/u^2 = ∫ 2w^4 dw
= (2/5)tan^5(x) + C

Putting it all together, we get:

∫ 2tan^4(x) sec^6(x) dx = (2/5)tan^5(x) - (2/3)tan^3(x) + 4sec^3(x) - 4sec^2(x) + C

To know more about trigonometry, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31046792

#SPJ11

Answer:

54x-87y=648y=x

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped

Joy makes 6.5 litres soup correct to the nearest 0.5 litres. She serves the soup in 280ml portions correct to the nearest 10ml. 22 people order this soup. Does joy definitely has enough soup to serve the 22 people.

Answer:

Yes, Joy definitely does has enough soup

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, we know,

Joy make 6.5 litres of soup

Serves it in 280ml portions

Step 1

We convert the portions to liters

1 ml = 0.001 litre

280 ml

= 280ml × 0.001 litre/1 ml

= 0.28litre

Step 2

We divide 6.5 liters by 0.28 to find out how many people can be served

= 6.5 ÷ 0.28

= 23.2142857143 people

We can see that 6.5 liters soup can serve 23 people approximately.

Therefore, Yes, Joy definitely does has enough soup to serve 22 people

Answer:

0.09381663113

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem involves determining the adjacency matrices of two relations, finding their composition, and verifying the result using the product of the adjacency matrices. The given relations are r1 and r2, defined between sets A1, A2, and A3.

(a) The adjacency matrix of a relation is a square matrix that represents the relation using 0s and 1s. For r1, the adjacency matrix will have a 1 in the (1, y) entry where y - 2 = 2 is true, and 0s elsewhere. Similarly, for r2, the adjacency matrix will have a 1 in the (1, y) entry where y - 1 = 1 is true, and 0s elsewhere.

(b) To find r112, we need to perform the composition of r1 and r2. The composition of two relations is obtained by matching the output of the first relation with the input of the second relation. In this case, we need to find the pairs (x, z) such that there exists a common value y for which (x, y) is in r1 and (y, z) is in r2.

(c) To verify the result in part (b), we can find the product of the adjacency matrices of r1 and r2. The product of two adjacency matrices represents the composition of the corresponding relations. By multiplying the matrices element-wise and interpreting the result, we can compare it with the result obtained in part (b) to verify its correctness.

To learn more about square matrix click here: brainly.com/question/27927569

#SPJ11

The area of each polygon in this problem is given as follows:

a) 252 square units.

b) 65 square units.

For item a, we have a rectangle of dimensions 12 and 21, hence the area is the multiplication of the dimensions, as follows:

A = 12 x 21 = 252 square units.

For item b, we have a triangle with base 13 and height 10, hence the area is half the multiplication of the base by the height, as follows:

A = 0.5 x 13 x 10 = 65 square units.

More can be learned about the area of a polygon at https://brainly.com/question/8409681

#SPJ1

TRUNCATED to one decimal place, it's 50.2

ROUNDED to one decimal place, it's 50.3

The round-off of 50.272 to 1 decimal place using rules of rounding

numbers are 50.3.

Rounding off numbers means making a number simpler by adjusting it to its nearest place according to certain rules.

Rounding a number to one decimal place means keeping only the first digit after the decimal point and neglecting the rest. In this case, the digit in the second decimal place is 7, which is greater than or equal to 5. As per the rounding rules, if the digit is greater than 5, the preceding digit is increased by 1.

So, 50.272 becomes 50.3 when rounded to one decimal place.

Learn more about rounding numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/13391706

#SPJ4

There are 85,860 ways the runners can finish first, second, and third in the race.

The number of ways the runners can finish first, second, and third can be calculated using the concept of permutations.

For the first position, there are 45 runners who can finish first.

For the second position, there are 44 runners left who can finish second (since one runner has already finished first).

For the third position, there are 43 runners remaining who can finish third (since two runners have already finished).

The total number of ways the runners can finish first, second, and third is given by the product of these individual possibilities:

Number of ways = 45 * 44 * 43 = 85,860

Therefore, there are 85,860 ways the runners can finish first, second, and third in the race.

Learn more about runners here

https://brainly.com/question/30290486

#SPJ11

Answer:

5x^3 + 5x+ 2x^2 + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

(5x+2)(x^2+1)

5x^3 + 5x+ 2x^2 + 2