qualified domestic relations order, is the 10% ira early withdrawal penalty waived in a divorce $10,000

Yes, generally it is possible to limit the exercise of any entitlement by the owner of a thing contractually.

The owner of an item frequently has the option of agreeing to a contract with another party that restricts the execution of that party's entitlements or rights. A software creator may engage into a licence agreement with a user that restricts user's capacity to change or redistribute software, or a homeowner may enter into a contract with a renter that restricts tenant's use of property.

The amount to which the exercise of a right or entitlement can be constrained by contract, however, may be subject to legal restrictions. For instance, legislation protecting certain rights that cannot be waived or negotiated away may exist in some jurisdictions. Furthermore, any contractual restrictions on rights or entitlements must be properly drafted to ensure they are enforceable in court and do not violate any laws.

Read more about entitlement on:

https://brainly.com/question/24224291

#SPJ4

Constitution of United States of America 1789

Explanation:

You posted a photo of the 1st amendment, but didn't ask what you were looking for so I am just assuming this is what you need

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1

Explanation:

features of federalism are

1 there are two or more level of government

2different tires of government the same citizen but each tier has its own jurisdiction specific matter of Legislature and taxation and administration

3 the level of jurisdiction of the respective level of or two tires of government are specified in the constitution so that existence and authority of each tier of government is constitutionally granted

4 the fundamental provisions of the Constitution cannot be an literally changed by one level of the government such changes required the contest of both level of government

5 sources of revenue for each level of government clearly specialised to ensure its financial authority

I hope it will help you

please mark answer as a brainliest answer

thank you

The idea of "states' rights" remains very popular in the south and the west.

The concept of states' rights is based on the idea that the federal government should have limited power and that individual states should have more autonomy to govern themselves. This idea was central to the political debates leading up to the American Civil War, with southern states arguing for the right to secede from the Union and maintain their own institutions, such as slavery. While the Civil War settled the issue of secession, the concept of states' rights has continued to be an important part of political discourse in the United States.

The popularity of states' rights tends to be strongest in regions with a history of political conservatism and libertarianism, such as the south and the west.

To know more about American Civil War, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/769992

#SPJ11

Ahmed Shah Massoud, who was assassinated two days before the attacks of September 11, 2001, was a prominent military and political leader in Afghanistan.

He was a key figure in the United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan, an anti-Taliban coalition that fought against the Taliban regime in the late 1990s. The coalition was better known as the Northern Alliance, which was comprised of different ethnic and political groups in Afghanistan.

Massoud played a crucial role in leading the Northern Alliance to push back against the Taliban and gain control of several parts of Afghanistan. His assassination was a significant blow to the anti-Taliban movement and left a void in Afghanistan's political landscape.

The United States subsequently invaded Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks and supported the Northern Alliance in its efforts to topple the Taliban regime.

To know more about Shah Massoud visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31606356

#SPJ11

In the case of Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez, the parties involved in the dispute are the Garden City Boxing Club (GCB) as the plaintiff and Luis Dominguez as the defendant.

The facts associated with the case are as follows: Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, which installed a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant.

Antenas mistakenly listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. According to the contract, a commercial establishment could show the boxing match if it was authorized by GCB and paid the appropriate fee based on the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment.
Mundelein Burrito, although classified as a residence, showed the boxing event to its patrons without paying the proper fee for a commercial establishment. As a result, GCB filed a lawsuit against Luis Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match.
The legal issue in question is whether Dominguez, as a sole proprietor, should be held personally liable for the actions of Antenas Enterprises.
In this case, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. Under the principle of "piercing the corporate veil," a court may disregard the legal entity of a corporation or business entity and hold the individual owner personally liable if it is proven that the individual has not properly maintained the separation between their personal and business affairs.
In this case, Dominguez, as the sole proprietor of Antenas Enterprises, failed to correctly classify Mundelein Burrito as a commercial establishment, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without paying the required fee. By neglecting to follow the contract terms and incorrectly representing the establishment, Dominguez can be held personally liable for the lost fees.
The appropriate rule of law that supports this decision is the principle of piercing the corporate veil, which allows the court to hold the individual owner personally liable for the actions of the business entity when they have not maintained proper separation between personal and business affairs.
While it is essential to consider other perspectives, in this case, the judgment would be in favor of GCB. By failing to classify Mundelein Burrito correctly, Dominguez breached the contract terms, resulting in financial loss for GCB. Dominguez's responsibility as the sole proprietor includes ensuring the correct classification of establishments and complying with contractual obligations.
In summary, based on the facts and legal principles involved, Dominguez should be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions. The principle of piercing the corporate veil supports this decision, as Dominguez failed to maintain the separation between personal and business affairs, leading to the improper showing of the boxing match without the required fee.

To know more about contractual visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27899951

#SPJ11

Principles and standards of conduct that direct company decisions are what is meant by organisational ethics.

To learn more about Organizational ethics, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/13311490

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The ceremonial and real executive functions of the president in the presidential system of government are:

The ceremonial role of the President in a Presidential system of  government includes or involves actions like opening of new session of national ceremonies like independence day celebration, welcoming visiting Head of States from other countries, and receiving Credentials of foreign Ambassadors into the country.

It also involves acting as Patron of many non-partisan organization specifically  that of international organization.

The real executive function of a President in a presidential system of government are:

1. President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by legislative.

2. President is also responsible in appointing Ministers, subject to legislative approval and heads of federal commission.

3. President is also responsible or has the power to sign legislation into law or to veto bills enacted by the legislative.

4. President also has power to give pardons and clemencies for criminal of Federal crimes.

Answer:

Ceremonial functions of a President is only exercised in the case of an emergency such as a coup d’etat or government breakdown. This is because the Presidents who perform ceremonial functions are known as Head of States and not Head of Governments. This is common in countries with a monarchical origin and the monarchs are referred to as the Head of States.

The real executive functions of a President which is the Head of Government in this case include supervision and control of the executive arm of government, preparation of executive budgets to sent to the Congress and implementation of policies and programs.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.

Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.

Answer:

Explanation:

Lia and Bianca entered into a contract. It was agreed that if Lia will be Bianca’s event coordinator for four weeks, the latter will give Lia the amount of P50,000. Is Lia’s obligation legally enforceable?

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation did not solve some of the problems that the republic was going through and that was why it was necessary to create the federal constitution, which created and gave power to a unified government and which managed to suppress the problems and challenges that the country presented. However, the constitution had to be approved by the delegates of each state and not everyone was willing to approve it. A group of delegates called anti-federalists, believed that the constitution gave the president too much power and that was dangerous.

To have the support of anti-federalists, the federalists agreed to add a bill of rights to the new document, which ended up working.

The executor have to pay the beneficiaries for one year

The fact is that an Executor has a long list of responsibilities to finish throughout the probate procedure before the beneficiary inheritance occurs.That might be a shocking reality for recipients. Additionally, they can become frustrated or pressure the Executor to distribute their inheritance early. The executor must first obtain permission from the probate court before they are legally permitted to manage the estate in a standard probate case (one in which assets are not kept in trust). They are unable to access the deceased's money or create an estate bank account.

In order to start the probate procedure, the executor files a petition with the Will.

We can learn more about the probate procedures here:

https://brainly.com/question/28498557#

#SPJ4

Answer:

i think its c

Explanation:

Answer:

members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years.

Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts

Explanation:

The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers. However, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills.

The legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.

We need to understand that the law refers to the discipline and profession concerned with the customs, practices, and rules of conduct of a community that are recognized as binding by the community. In essence, the enforcement of the body of rules is through a controlling authority known as the police etc.

Basically, the primary aim of law is to protect all human interests by regulating the conduct of individuals in the society. In conclusion, the legal concept that is the most important to shaping the ultimate concept of law is known as Equality.

Read more about concept of law

brainly.com/question/4384

#SPJ1

Trial evidence is not heard by appeals courts, in contrast to trial courts. As a result, witnesses do not testify at appeals. Instead, attorneys on both sides dispute the law that governs the case in front of a panel of judges.

An appeal is a procedure used in law where parties ask for a formal revision of an official decision and cases are examined by a higher authority. The purpose of appeals is to clarify and interpret the law as well as to correct errors that have been made. Despite the fact that appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law nations did not adopt an affirmative right to appeal until the                 19th century.

For many centuries, there have been appellate courts and various systems of error rectification. Hammurabi and his governors served as the nation's highest appellate courts during the first dynasty of Babylon. The Valerian and Porcine laws, which date back to 509 BC, recognized the appeals process.

To know more about appeal click here:

https://brainly.com/question/8643122

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

In appeals cases lawyers for both sides appear before a panel of judges to argue about the law applicable to the vase. Explain how appeals and appellate processes differ from trials and trial processes.

As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be Georgia.

The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.

Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.

Find out more on original venues at https://brainly.com/question/342388.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

i just did the test and picked true and thats WRONG

Answer:

False!!!

Explanation:

First Choice Healthcare's liability to Danny under U.S. law is best stated as: they are not liable due to lack of negligence.

In this situation, the company took great care to prevent customers from being harmed and the implant malfunction was unforeseeable, unrelated to their negligence.

Since there was no negligence on First Choice's part, they are not liable for Danny's injury. U.S. law generally requires a showing of negligence in order to hold a company liable for injuries caused by their products.

And in this case, First Choice has demonstrated a strong commitment to safety and customer-centered practices.

To know more about U.S. law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30280940#

#SPJ11

In Bahrain, commercial law consists of compulsory and non-compulsory sources that govern various aspects of commercial transactions and activities.

Here's an overview of these sources:

1. Compulsory Sources of Commercial Law:

  a. Legislation: Primary compulsory sources of commercial law in Bahrain include legislation enacted by the government. This includes statutes, regulations, and laws specifically addressing commercial matters, such as the Bahrain Commercial Companies Law, Bahrain Commercial Transactions Law, and Bahrain Bankruptcy Law. These laws set out the legal framework and regulations governing commercial activities.

  b. Judicial Precedents: Judicial precedents, also known as case law, play a significant role in shaping commercial law in Bahrain. Courts' decisions and interpretations of the law in commercial cases establish legal principles and precedents that guide future court decisions and legal interpretations. While not binding on all courts, they serve as persuasive authority and help interpret and clarify the law.

  c. Official Gazette: The Official Gazette, published by the Bahraini government, is another important source of compulsory commercial law. It includes official notices, laws, regulations, and legal announcements relevant to commercial matters. It provides important updates and official information that Businesses and individuals must comply with.

2. Non-Compulsory Sources of Commercial Law:

  a. Customary Practices: Non-compulsory sources of commercial law in Bahrain include customary practices or trade usages. These are commonly followed business practices and conventions within specific industries or commercial sectors. While not legally binding, they may be considered by courts and parties in determining contractual obligations and resolving disputes.

  b. Model Laws and International Conventions: Bahrain may adopt or refer to model laws and international conventions in its commercial legal framework. These include international instruments like the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) or the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Although not directly applicable unless expressly adopted, they provide guidance and influence commercial practices.

It's important to note that the sources mentioned above are not exhaustive, and commercial law in Bahrain may be influenced by other factors as well. Legal practitioners, businesses, and individuals should consult legal experts and refer to official legal sources for specific legal advice and accurate information regarding commercial law in Bahrain.

Learn more about commercial law here:

https://brainly.com/question/31459556

#SPJ11

Peremptory challenge

Explanation:

Jurors aren't selected, they are not discarded, which is not exactly the same. Jurors are selected from a pool of registered voters, or registered, etc. (the selection pool varies in different states). The process of selecting possible juries is called voire dire, and attorneys have two ways for discarding jurors:  

Challenged for cause and discharge: jurors can be discarded based on personal biases or conflicts of interest.

Peremptory challenge: attorney's representing each side may discharge a certain number of jurors without any specific reason at all.

Answer:

Peremptory Challenge is an attorneys secondary attempt to exclude a juror!

Explanation:

Hope it helped♡ :)

Answer:meofrrje

Explanation:

ni pa i43r3t53

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

It is generally true that you should not park a vehicle within 30 feet of a traffic signal or stop sign. This rule is enforced to ensure clear visibility for drivers approaching the signal or sign, allowing them to have a clear line of sight and adequate time to react to changing traffic conditions.

Parking too close to a signal or sign can obstruct the view of other drivers, increase the risk of accidents, and impede the flow of traffic. It is important to adhere to this regulation for the safety and efficiency of road users.

By maintaining a minimum distance from traffic signals and stop signs, drivers can avoid obstructing the view of other motorists and ensure the proper functioning of traffic control devices.

This requirement helps prevent accidents, reduces congestion, and promotes the smooth movement of vehicles at intersections. Additionally, following this rule allows traffic enforcement officers to easily identify vehicles that violate the parking regulations, ensuring compliance with traffic laws and maintaining order on the roads. Remember to always check and adhere to local traffic laws and parking regulations to ensure safe and legal parking practices.

Learn more about Traffic Signs : brainly.com/question/28886899

#SPJ11

To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

To know more about Crime Prevention:

brainly.com/question/14495855

#SPJ1

Answer:  The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

Explanation:  This answer has been confirmed correct.

A time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be Viewpoint neutral and rationally related to a legitimate government purpose to be valid. The correct option is D.

A limited public forum, as used in the context of First Amendment rights, is a venue or area under the control of the government that permits some forms of speech but is subject to reasonable restrictions. Time, place and manner restrictions imposed on a constrained public forum must satisfy specific requirements in order to be valid.

They must not favor or discriminate against any particular perspectives or ideas; rather, they must be viewpoint neutral. The regulations must also be rationally related to a lawful government purpose which means they must serve a legitimate public interest without being capricious or excessively restrictive. Following these guidelines makes it easier to make sure that the laws are constitutionally sound and do not restrict people's freedom of speech.

Learn more about public forum at:

brainly.com/question/25527470

#SPJ4

The complete question is "A time, place, and manner regulation of a limited public forum must be __________ neutral and __________to be valid.

A Content; rationally related to a legitimate government purpose

B Viewpoint; narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest

C Content; narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest

D Viewpoint; rationally related to a legitimate government purpose"