Answer: Common Good
Explanation: Thalia is focusing on others, and not only herself. What makes this a common good is that crops can be grown by anyone (common) and the crops are goods. Hope this helps.
Ways to avoid emotional stress when
driving include:
a Always have the radio off
b Obey the rules-of-the-road
c Never change lanes
d Always go
with the flow
Answer:
I will go with D always go with the flow
Statistics show how twice the number of people are employed in private security than in
public law enforcement in the United States. Discuss why the disparity is likely and what
the implications are for public security.
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
It is expensive to fund more police. Need to fill in gap left by police. Getting into police is relatively difficult. Why are there more private security than Police?As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired. There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to. Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.
the us supreme court decision in olmstead v. l.c. directed us states to
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. handed down in 1999, directed U.S. states to provide services to individuals with disabilities in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.
The case involved two women with mental disabilities who were voluntarily admitted to a state-run psychiatric hospital but sought to receive community-based treatment instead In the Olmstead decision, the Supreme Court held that unjustified segregation.
disabilities constitutes discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court ruled that public entities, including states, must provide services to people with disabilities in the most integrated setting possible, giving them the opportunity to live and participate in their communities rather than being unnecessarily institutionalized.
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court:- https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Why did rogue states become more prominent following the Soviet Union's collapse?
a. The Soviet Union's collapse led to power vacuums in certain regions.
b. Rogue states sought to assert their dominance in the post-Soviet era.
c. The fall of the Soviet Union weakened global security measures.
d. Rogue states were emboldened by the absence of a major superpower.
Rogue states became more prominent following the Soviet Union's collapse because the Soviet Union's collapse led to power vacuums in certain regions. Thus, option (a) is correct.
Since the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991, its former client states have been far less isolated internationally. Rogue states' primary source of assistance had been cut off, leaving countries like North Korea, Iran, and Iraq to fend for themselves.
The collapse of the Soviet Union also compromised international security protocols, which gave rogue regimes additional leeway. In the post-Soviet era, rogue states felt empowered to establish their domination because there was no big superpower.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on Soviet Union's, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31565617
#SPJ1
When a court decision consider as a decree?
Answer:
A court decision may be considered as a decree in certain legal systems when it has the force of law and requires compliance by the parties involved. In general, a decree is a final judgment or order issued by a court that determines the rights and obligations of the parties in a legal dispute.
In some jurisdictions, a court decision is automatically considered a decree if it meets certain criteria, such as being final and not subject to appeal. In other jurisdictions, a court decision may be designated as a decree by the court or by the parties involved in the case.
The term "decree" is often used in the context of family law, where it may refer to a court order that sets out the terms of a divorce, child custody arrangement, or other family-related matter. In these cases, the decree is a legally binding document that must be followed by the parties involved.
Answer:
Explanation:
In legal terms, a decree is a formal court order that resolves a particular legal issue or dispute. Decrees are typically issued by judges and can be applied in various types of legal cases, including civil cases, divorce cases, and probate cases.
A court decision may be considered a decree if it meets certain criteria, such as being a final and binding determination of the issues in the case, and if it includes a specific order or ruling that must be followed by the parties involved. The term "decree" is often used interchangeably with terms like "judgment," "order," or "final decision," depending on the type of case and the jurisdiction in which the case is being heard.
When John Smith created the law in Jamestown Colony that if a man did not work, he could not eat, what was MOST likely his intent?
The intention that John Smith would have for saying that if a man did not work, he would not eat is for everyone to be hardworking and to thrive in the economy. He wanted all to be committed to the success of the new colony.
Who was John Smith?Captain John Smith was a soldier, explorer, adventurer, and writer. We may follow the growth of a man who played a major role in Jamestown's eventual success and the establishing of its reputation as the first permanent English settlement in North America through the narrative of his early life.
Because he wanted everyone at Jamestown, Virginia, to dedicate themselves to the success of that first colony established in 1607, John Smith established a "no work, no food" policy. With that kind of weather and the challenging circumstances of starting over in a new place, Jhon Smith knew how difficult it would be to flourish. He therefore did not want anyone to adopt a "free ride" mentality. He said that at that time.
Read more on John Smith here: https://brainly.com/question/17837412
#SPJ1
Explanation: Gradpoint
When protecting a president, the secret service must ensure that the president is never more than a few minutes away from a:
Secure location or means of protection.
What does the Secret Service ensure the president is never more than a few minutes away from when providing protection?When protecting a president, the Secret Service must ensure that the president is never more than a few minutes away from a secure location or a means of protection.
This is because the Secret Service's primary responsibility is to safeguard the president's safety and security. By maintaining close proximity to the president, they can respond swiftly in case of any potential threats or emergencies.
Having the president within a few minutes of a secure location allows for immediate evacuation or access to safe spaces in case of danger. This could include secure facilities such as the White House, designated safe rooms, or other fortified areas.
Additionally, the Secret Service ensures that the president is always accompanied by a protective detail, consisting of highly trained agents who provide physical security and act as a deterrent against potential threats.
By minimizing the time it takes to reach a secure location or obtain necessary protection, the Secret Service aims to reduce the vulnerability of the president to potential risks.
Their constant vigilance and strategic positioning help to ensure the president's safety and enable swift response measures in any critical situations that may arise.
Learn more about protection.
brainly.com/question/23421785
#SPJ11
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
the current trend toward recognizing that a premeditated intent to kill need only exist for what period of time?
Answer:
Many jurisdictions are now recognising that a premeditated desire to kill, for the purposes of establishing the crime of murder, only needs to exist for a brief or fleeting period of time. This trend is known as the "transitory intent" or "transitory moment" doctrine. It implies that the intent to kill does not need to be prepared over time, but can be established in an instant before the act of killing occurs.
describe two ways in which a right to say no protect citizens
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
What are the 3 main parts of a debate?
True or False: Referring to people who support the women’s right to choose, as "murderers" is an example of the unethical practice referred to as testimonials.
True: Referring to people who support the women’s right to choose, as "murderers" is an example of the unethical practice referred to as testimonials.
What is the meaning of the term testimonials?Testimonials are unethical practices that should be avoided. A testimonial refers to the method of persuasion used to convince others about the worth or worthlessness of a product or service by way of endorsements, either by a satisfied customer or an expert. Such endorsements can be dangerous when it comes to their effectiveness, legality, and ethics. Additionally, testimonials are a common form of propaganda and a violation of the basic principles of evidence-based argumentation.
Testimonials are a form of propaganda and a violation of the basic principles of evidence-based argumentation. Referring to people who support the women’s right to choose, as "murderers" is an example of the unethical practice referred to as testimonials.
Learn more about Testimonials: https://brainly.com/question/508593
#SPJ11
What are the categories of controlled substances and how are they different from one another?
Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:
Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.
Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.
Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.
Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.
Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.
The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.
what types of jobs are there in a command economy
Answer:
All major industries in a command economy are government-run monopolies. This includes utility companies, banks, and factories producing everything from clothing to cars.
Select the correct answer.
Why is it a good idea to have a carbon monoxide detector in the home?
A.
to prevent an allergic reaction
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
C.
to warn members of the household of smoke from a fire
Answer:
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
b
Explanation:
You live in texas. During the covid-19 pandemic, you decide to visit your cousins in new york city. The number of coronavirus cases in new york state is at an all-time low. The number of cases in texas, however, is at an all-time high. To help control the spread of the disease in new york, the governor of new york issues an order requiring that all visitors from texas quarantine for two weeks upon arrival in new york. This order will be in effect at the time of your planned trip. You had hoped to visit some of the sites of new york city and do not want to spend two weeks inside at your cousin’s house. You believe the order of the governor violates your fundamental right to interstate travel. Does the order of the governor restricting travel violate your substantive due process rights?.
No, it doesn't, because the interest of the government in controlling the spread of coronavirus and protecting the health of New Yorkers is a compelling state interest.
What are fundamental rights?Fundamental rights are a class of rights that have acquired a lot of protection from infringement. These rights are either explicitly declared in a constitution or have been established through the application of the due process of law. The UN's adoption of Sustainable Development Goal 16 in 2015 highlighted the link between promoting human rights and maintaining peace. The Supreme Court has emphasized the need for strong protection against governmental interference with these rights. These rights are explicitly specified in the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, or have been adjudged to exist under the standards of due process. Before a statute is upheld as constitutional, fundamental rights are frequently exposed to intense scrutiny.
To know more about fundamental rights visit:- brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ4
A broker requested that the FREC issue an escrow disbursement order (EDO). Before the EDO was issued, the buyer and the seller settled their dispute over the escrow funds. Within how many business days must the broker notify the FREC that the matter has been settled?
A)
10 days
B)
5 days
C)
15 days
D)
30 days
Which of the following is true about the duty of care?
a. Breach of duty of care is not actionable unless the plaintiff suffers injury or injury to his or her property.
b. The damages recoverable for breach of the duty of care are independent of the effect of the injury on the plaintiff's life or profession.
c. Reasonable person standard is used to determine the amount of damages that a defendant owes a plaintiff.
d. A firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when his safety is not at stake does not breach his duty of care.
The given statement "A firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when his safety is not at stake does not breach his duty of care" is correct.
Hence, the correct option is d.
Option d is true because a firefighter who refuses to put out a fire when their safety is not at stake does not breach their duty of care. This is known as the public duty doctrine, which provides that firefighters and other emergency responders have a duty to the general public as a whole, rather than to individual citizens.
As such, they are generally not liable for damages resulting from their failure to provide assistance in a specific situation, as long as they did not create the danger themselves.
Option a is partially true because a breach of the duty of care may not be actionable unless the plaintiff suffers injury or damage to their property.
Option b is false because the damages recoverable for breach of the duty of care are not independent of the effect of the injury on the plaintiff's life or profession.
Option c is also false because the reasonable person standard is used to determine whether a defendant has breached their duty of care, not the amount of damages owed to the plaintiff.
To know more about duty of care here:
https://brainly.com/question/29917351
#SPJ4
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
Radical feminists would suggest that the elimination of male domination would reduce
rates of female crime and male violence against women.
True
False
?
Answer:
true; women are very frequently sexually assaulted by men and because of the patriarchal system, their assualts rarely get attention. if society treated both men and women fairly male violence against women would go down.
What is the major problem with a utilitarian approach to law enforcement activities?
What is the final step for a bill to become a law? A. Being approved by a congressional committe B. Be
The final step for a bill to become a law is Being approved by the president. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
A bill is referred to as any kind of prosal related to new laws or modifications in the existing ones. In order to pass a bill it crosses through several stages which include majority support, debate as well as approval from the president.
The legislative branch can adopt legislation, but the executive branch and the president have the authority to veto them. The bill will be rejected if the president does not approve it.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Bill, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26772399
#SPJ5
The complete question is probably
What is the final step for a bill to become a law? A. Being approved by a congressional committe B. Being approved by the president.
which branch of government has no successors to the presidency
The judicial branch, including the Supreme Court, lacks a designated successor to the presidency, distinguishing it from the executive and legislative branches. This exclusion ensures the independence of the judiciary, enabling justices to focus solely on interpreting laws and upholding the Constitution.
In the United States government, the branch that has no direct successors to the presidency is the judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court.
The judicial branch is responsible for interpreting laws and upholding the Constitution, and its main function is to provide checks and balances on the other branches of government.
Unlike the executive branch, which has a clear line of succession outlined in the Presidential Succession Act, and the legislative branch, which has a designated Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate in the line of succession, the judicial branch does not have a defined successor to the presidency.
If the president and vice president were unable to fulfill their duties, the next in line for the presidency would typically be the Speaker of the House, followed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, and then members of the president's cabinet in a specific order.
However, members of the Supreme Court do not feature in this line of succession.
This separation ensures the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, allowing the Supreme Court justices to focus solely on interpreting the law and deciding cases without concerns of political succession.
To know more about judicial branch refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1060250#
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer. Steven wants to become a member of the labor union. Which law gives him the right to do so? a. Civil rights act b. Fair labor standards act c. Occupational safety and health act d. Wagner act e. Equal pay act.
If Steven wishes to join a union, the Wagner Act will grant him the ability to do so. The right answer is (d).
It required employers to engage in collective bargaining with unions chosen by a majority of the workers in a suitable bargaining unit, and it granted employees the right to create and join unions under Section 7. Employees would have the "right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid and protection," according to Wagner of New York.
The Wagner Act was fiercely opposed by Republicans and big business, and it was challenged in court as an unconstitutional intrusion by the federal government in sectors of the economy that Congress had no authority to regulate because it violated the "freedom of contract" of employers and employees. The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, sometimes referred to as the Wagner Act, is a key piece of American labor legislation that protects employees working in the private sector's ability to form unions, participate in collective bargaining, and take collective action like strikes.
Learn more about Wagner act visit: brainly.com/question/9320709
#SPJ4
the ____ clause of a contract defines what is covered or not covered, which might include the geographical limitations, the validity or invalidity of prior contracts, preferential treatment by the supplier, or other elements.
The exclusion clause of a contract defines what is covered or not covered, which might include the geographical limitations, the validity or invalidity of prior contracts, preferential treatment by the supplier, or other elements.
It serves to limit the liability of one or both parties involved by delineating certain circumstances or conditions that would exempt them from responsibility or accountability.
The exclusion clause can address various aspects such as geographical limitations, the validity of prior contracts, preferential treatment by the supplier, or other relevant elements.
Its purpose is to clearly outline the boundaries and limitations of the contractual obligations and protect the interests of the parties involved.
By explicitly stating what is not covered or what exceptions apply, the exclusion clause helps manage expectations, mitigate potential disputes, and ensure a fair and balanced contractual relationship.
To know more about contract refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32254040#
#SPJ11
DNA evidence is typically easy to find at a crime scene.
True
False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
DNA evidence is useful in solving crimes but it is not easy to find at crime scenes so this is false.
Why isn't DNA evidence more widely used?Even though DNA evidence can help solve a crime faster, it is not very easy to find at crime scenes.
This is because not all can give the relevant material required for DNA testing, and there is also the issue of contamination.
Find out more on DNA evidence at https://brainly.com/question/17677132.
#SPJ2
explain what non-violent direct action is and why it can be so successful.
Answer:
Nonviolent direct action may include sit-ins, strikes, street blockades, sabotage, and counter-economics. Violent direct action may include political violence, assault, arson and property destruction.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King Jr.'s decision to utilize nonviolence was based on religious principles. In fact, King discovered the use of nonviolent action as a political tool through learning about Gandhi's success in India.
King's approach was specifically Christian in orientation, drawing on his own status as a minister and the centrality of the Church in the lives of the Montgomery, Alabama, African-Americans who were the first protestors he led. His speeches utilized the inspirational crescendo structure of African-American sermonizing and he typically used biblical themes in them. This provided a deeper source of unity than the specific issue at hand and his able lieutenants were drawn from the rolls of black preachers.
King's methods were "step-wise." The King Center lists six:
Step One. Information gathering
Step Two. Education
Step Three. Personal commitment
Step Four. Negotiations
Step Five. Direct action
Step Six. Reconciliation
Creating opportunities for resolution without confrontation and ensuring that both proponents and adversaries have sufficiently accurate information to make decisions both about the issue and the process.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
The ONLY type of mistake that can be used as a defense is a mistake of , A) law ,B) fact C)police procedure D) identity
Answer:
fact
Explanation:
I've learned this before and I know its fact
Answer:
The Criminal Defense of Mistake
In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.
Mistakes of Fact
Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.
Mistake of Law
Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.
Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:
When the law has not been published;
When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;
When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or
When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.
Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.
It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.
Mistake and Strict Liability
Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.
Texas law requires any person driving a vehicle to stop no less than (_HOW_MANY_) feet from the nearest rail of a railroad crossing if a clearly visible railroad signal warns of the approach of a train.
Texas law requires any person driving a vehicle to stop no less than 15 feet from the nearest rail of a railroad crossing.
What is law?Law can be defined as the regulation or rules and regulation which a person is expected to abide by.
The Texas law want driver to often stop at least 15 feet if there is a signal that a rail is approaching the railroad so as to avoid colliding with rail and to prevent loss of life.
Therefore Texas law requires any person driving a vehicle to stop no less than 15 feet from the nearest rail of a railroad crossing.
Learn more about Texas law here:https://brainly.com/question/6865491
#SPJ1