True, The statement suggests that although there was a significant amount of effort put into getting the new law passed, the impact it has is not substantial.
This could mean that the law is not comprehensive enough or that its effects are too minor to have a significant impact. It is possible that the law was passed as a symbolic gesture rather than as a practical solution to a problem.
Alternatively, it could be that the law was designed to have a slow and steady impact that may not be immediately noticeable. However, without more information on the specific law and its intended purpose, it is difficult to determine the precise reason why the impact is minimal.
Nonetheless, the statement suggests that the effort put into passing the law was not commensurate with the benefits it provides.
To know more about law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28121935
#SPJ11
the united nations commission on sustainability argued that sustainability is maintaining the ability to accommodate three important sources of change. which of the following statements reflects these sources of change?
The world is changing, we are changing, and we are changing the world statement reflects these sources of change
The world is changing, we are changing, and we are changing the world is often used statement. According to the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), sustainability requires adjusting to significant sources of change - the changing planet, our changing needs, and our changing behaviors. In order to assure a better future for both the present and future generations, the idea of sustainability involves striking a balance between economic, social, and environmental goals.
It acknowledges that the world is changing, as are our needs and desires, and that the world is affected by our behaviors. Therefore, in order to handle these causes of change in a sustainable manner, we must adopt a comprehensive and integrated strategy. When pursuing sustainability, this phrase emphasises how crucial it is to consider how the social, economic, and environmental systems are interconnected. It also highlights how maintaining a sustainable future necessitates ongoing adaptation and change.
Read more about United Nations on:
https://brainly.com/question/16689991
#SPJ4
___________ promotes the recognition of ideologies. A. Social controlc. Ethnocentrismb. Social movementd. War.
The acceptance of ideologies is encouraged through social movements.
What exactly are social movements?
Networks of unofficial relationships involving a variety of people, groups, and/or organizations involved in political or cultural issues are referred to as social movements. These interactions are based on a commonality of collective identities. The American civil rights movement, second-wave feminism, the LGBT rights movement, environmental activism and conservation initiatives, opposition to mass surveillance, etc. are illustrative instances. They frequently focus on subjects that are outside of the classroom but nonetheless pertinent. Reform movements, revolutionary movements, reactionary movements, self-help organizations, and religious movements are the primary categories of social movements. Social movements frequently need to draw sizable populations in order to be successful.
To learn more about social movements refer to
https://brainly.com/question/20416654
#SPJ4
Which of the following entities are responsible for implementing
guidelines or requirements for ethical and/or consenting research
experiments? Select all that apply.
IRB
ONIJ
DAS
OIRS
Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
What are IRB ethical guidelines?Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
People with expertise and training in non-scientific fields, people with expertise and training in scientific fields, and members of the community who might serve as subjects for research studies make up the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a committee.
An IRB has the power to approve, demand changes are made (to secure approval), or disapprove research in accordance with FDA regulations. The rights and welfare of human research subjects are safeguarded in large part by this group review.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) IRB.
To learn more about IRB refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8905808
#SPJ4
24 . what is the best way to monitor alcohol consumption when guests move from the bar to the dining area?
The best way to monitor alcohol consumption when guests move from the bar to the dining area is to assign waitstaff to oversee the alcohol service and consumption.
The waitstaff can keep a tab of the amount of alcohol served to each guest and monitor their behavior to ensure responsible consumption.To maintain the safety of the guests and reduce the risk of overconsumption, it is also recommended to limit the amount of alcohol served per guest and to offer non-alcoholic alternatives such as mocktails or soft drinks. Additionally, it is essential to train the waitstaff to recognize the signs of intoxication and to cut off service to guests who appear to have had too much alcohol.Furthermore, displaying signs around the venue reminding guests to drink responsibly and to never drink and drive can also help to promote responsible alcohol consumption.
To know more about alcohol , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/947751
#SPJ11
which amendment prohibited the federal government and the states from setting a voting age higher than 18?
The 26th Amendment prohibited the federal government and the states from setting a voting age higher than 18. This amendment was ratified on July 1, 1971. It expanded voting rights to young adults.
The primary motivation behind the 26th Amendment was the ongoing Vietnam War. Many young people argued that if they were old enough to be drafted into military service at the age of 18, they should also have the right to vote and influence the political decisions affecting their lives. The slogan "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote" became a rallying cry for those advocating for lowering the voting age.
Before the 26th Amendment, the voting age in most states was 21. However, the push for change gained momentum during the late 1960s and early 1970s, resulting in the proposed amendment being passed by Congress on March 23, 1971.
Afterward, the amendment needed to be ratified by three-fourths of the states, and this process happened remarkably quickly, taking just over two months.
Once ratified, the 26th Amendment ensured that the voting rights of 18-year-olds could not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age. This change was a significant victory for young Americans, granting them a voice in the democratic process and acknowledging their role in society.
To learn more about federal government here:
https://brainly.com/question/695831#
#SPJ11
Chill vibes come vibe with others
LESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*inhales*SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*inhales*SSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSS*Inhales*SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*inhales8SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*inhales*SSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS*Inhales*SSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO*inhales*OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You have figured out the marginal cost and marginal benefit of buying an extra smoothie. In 2 to 3 sentences describe how you would use these measurements to make a decision that leaves you better off?
It would be logical to make the purchase if the marginal advantage of getting an extra smoothie outweighed the marginal expense.
How do you make judgements using marginal cost and marginal benefit?The marginal benefit and marginal cost both serve as markers for changes in a product's price or value. Marginal benefit impacts the consumer, whereas marginal cost affects the producer.
How can the optimal level of any activity be determined using marginal benefit and marginal cost?As long as marginal revenue equals marginal cost, an activity should be carried out, according to the fundamental principle of marginal analysis. Activities that result in a company's marginal costs being higher than its marginal revenue have a net negative benefit.
To know more about marginal expense visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16751121
#SPJ1
Why do you think a "reliable, scholarly
Source is always stressed in academic
writing?
Any willful and unlawful use of force or violence on the person of another is the definition of which one of the following crimes?
a.) Battery
b.) Assault with a deadly weapon
c.) assault
The definition of "Any willful and unlawful use of force or violence on the person of another" corresponds to the crime of "Battery" (option a). Battery typically involves intentional physical contact or harm caused to another person without their consent.
Battery is a crime involving any willful and unlawful use of force or violence on another person. In contrast, assault (option c) is an attempt or threat to use force or violence, while assault with a deadly weapon (option b) is an assault involving a weapon capable of causing severe harm or death. Battery specifically refers to the actual physical contact or use of force against another person without their consent.
Battery can encompass a range of actions, from minor physical altercations to severe acts of violence. Examples may include punching, kicking, slapping, or any other intentional physical contact resulting in harm. The severity of the offense may vary based on factors such as the extent of injury caused, the presence of aggravating circumstances, or the use of weapons.
To learn more about crime, visit: https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ11
In cases where the convicted is convicted of two or more charges, and the judges sentences begin on the same day and are completed when the longest term is served it is called a: concurrent sentence (true o r false)
Answer:
concurrent sentence
Explanation:
A concurrent sentence refers to a type of sentence judges are able to give defendants convicted of more than one crime. Instead of serving each sentence one after another, a concurrent sentence allows the defendant to serve all of their sentences at the same time, where the longest period of time is controlling.
Class or individual Evidence?
Evidence Example: A note was found at a crime scene. A notepad with a similar type of paper was found in the desk of a suspect. Is the note be individual or
class evidence to the pad of paper?
A) class evidence
B) individual evidence
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Individual characteristics can be identified as Individual characteristics can be identified as
having originated with a particular person or having originated with a particular person or
source
hope this helps
why Allah created you? and why Allah create earth and sky?
Answer:
allah has created us to worship him only and no one else
Which of the following would most likely be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment?
OA.
Confiscating the cellphone of a student who made a bomb threat
OB.
Searching the lockers of all students with black hair
O c. Stopping a vehicle believed to be involved in a bank robbery
OD
Stopping and searching all cars at the US-Mexico border
Answer:
OB
Explanation:
There is no reason to confiscate them but people in all other options could be doing something, have done, or they are currently doing it. Everything but OB is reasonable.
Choose ten (10) law enforcement agencies or occupations where you would like to work in the future, in accordance with the practice of the criminology profession as stated in RA 11131. Explain each law enforcement agency in 50 words you have chosen why you will be joining.
The 10 law enforcement agencies or occupations that fall under the practice of criminology as stated in RA 11131 and a brief description of each:
Philippine National Police (PNP)National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP)Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP)Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)Philippine Coast Guard (PCG)Bureau of Immigration (BI)National Prosecution Service (NPS)Public Attorney's Office (PAO)Forensic Science ServicesWhat is the description for these law enforcement agencies?The descriptions are as follows:
Philippine National Police (PNP) - the country's primary law enforcement agency that maintains peace and order and prevents and suppresses crime.
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) - the country's premier investigative agency that conducts high-level and complex criminal investigations and provides intelligence support to law enforcement agencies.
Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) - responsible for the safekeeping, reformation, and rehabilitation of persons deprived of liberty.
Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) - responsible for preventing and suppressing fires and responding to other emergency situations.
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) - responsible for implementing the government's anti-drug campaign and enforcing drug laws.
Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) - responsible for ensuring the safety and security of the country's maritime jurisdiction and protecting its marine environment.
Bureau of Immigration (BI) - responsible for implementing the country's immigration laws and policies and managing the entry and exit of foreign nationals.
National Prosecution Service (NPS) - responsible for the prosecution of criminal cases and the protection of the rights of victims and witnesses.
Public Attorney's Office (PAO) - provides free legal assistance to indigent clients and serves as the legal defender of the poor.
Forensic Science Services - provide scientific and technical services to support the investigation of crimes and the administration of justice, including crime scene investigation, DNA analysis, and forensic pathology.
One would prefer to join any of these law enforcement agencies because one would love to make the world a better place as a law abiding citizen that one is.
learn more about law enforcement agencies: https://brainly.com/question/27722655
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a potential drawback to using ninhydrin?
It will react to any moisture on the object
o It only has a 647 percent success rate at visualizing prints
It can dissolve wnuen evidence on the object
It has not been approved for use in court as evidence
N
The major potential drawback to using ninhydrin, a chemical for detecting ammonia or primary and secondary amines, is C. it can dissolve written evidence on the object.
Ninhydrin has been widely used for fingerprinting and in gathering forensic evidence. Ninhydrin reacts with the amino acids present in fingerprint residue.
The drawback to using ninhydrin is not because it reacts to moisture, has a 64.7% success rate, or has not remained unapproved.
Thus, the potential drawback to using ninhydrin is its ability to destroy written evidence.
Learn more about ninhydrin for fingerprinting here: https://brainly.com/question/7465168 and https://brainly.com/question/13382174
If you are convicted of a DUI you could lose your life savings paying fines or restitution to the people that you have injured or killed.
a) true
b) false
LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin. While visiting Six Flags Over Georgia in Atlanta, she was criminally assaulted by Hans, a Minnesota resident. Ordinarily, venue in this criminal case would originally be in _____________.
As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be Georgia.
Why would the venue be Georgia?The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.
Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.
Find out more on original venues at https://brainly.com/question/342388.
For 100 points, what are Wilbur Soot's rules, and, who is LUNA!?
Answer:
sorry i do not know number one.
Brandon Luna
He has handled over 5000 criminal cases as a former Deputy District Attorney and now offers his experience to you as a Criminal Defense Attorney. He started Luna Law to help good people who have made a mistake navigate through the confusing and often scary criminal justice system.
Answer:
Rule #1: N0 B00mers
Rule #2: N0 Z00mers
Rule #3: N0 Weebs (under the penalty 0f death) ((I'm l00king at y0u Phil))
Rule #4: N0 Marvel Stans
Rule #5: Stan L00na
Rule #6: N0 K-P0p
Rule #7: (bbh) N0 My Little P0ny, Friendship Is F--K
Rule #8: N0 Vide0s I've Already Seen Bef0re
Rule #9: Staged Vide0s Are S--T
Rule #10: Ign0re rule number 5
Rule #11: L0ud Are S0METIMES Funny
Rule #12: Respect All Auth0rity, Unless They Challenge Y0ur Rights. If S0, Break A Windshield (That Was a J0ke for Legal Purp0ses)
I don't know #2 :')
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
the plaintiff in a negligence case was injured in a car accident with the defendant. the plaintiff's attorney retained a physician to examine the plaintiff and to testify regarding the plaintiff's injuries. after the physician examined the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney discussed the physician's findings with the physician. the plaintiff's attorney and the physician also discussed what the physician should include in the expert witness report that will be provided to the defendant. the defendant then conducted a deposition of the physician. during the deposition, the defendant's attorney asked the physician to describe what was said in his conversations with the plaintiff's attorney. the plaintiff's attorney objected to those questions. are the defendant's questions regarding the plaintiff's attorney's discussions with the physician properly subject to discovery?
plaintiff's attorney's discussions with the physician properly subject to discovery is depended on the jurisdiction and the rules of evidence.
In some countries, conversations between a lawyer and an expert witness they have hired are protected by the attorney-client privilege. The defendant wouldn't be able to learn the communication's contents in that situation. The communications between a lawyer and an expert witness that the lawyer has retained, however, are not protected by the attorney-client privilege in some countries. The defendant could then learn what was communicated in that scenario.
As a result of the "work product doctrine," which protects an attorney's work and includes communications with expert witnesses, the defendant in this case would not be able to learn what was said in the correspondence.
The court may nonetheless order disclosure of the communication even though the attorney-client privilege is in effect if the information is required for a just conclusion to the matter and cannot be learned in any other way. Therefore, it would rely on the particular jurisdiction and the facts of the case to determine whether the defendant's inquiries about the conversation the plaintiff's attorney had with the doctor are appropriately subject to discovery.
To learn more about attorney
brainly.com/question/22471236
#SPJ4
Your own thoughts about criminal justice system?
Answer:
The justice system does not respond to most crime because so much crime is not discovered or reported to the police. Law enforcement agencies learn about crime from the reports of victims or other citizens, from discovery by a police officer in the field, from informants, or from investigative and intelligence work.
Explanation:
The mens rea of accessory-after-the-fact statutes states that the accessory personally aided the person who committed the crime. (T/F)
The mens rea of accessory-after-the-fact statutes states that the accessory personally aided the person who committed the crime. This statement is true.
An accessory after the fact is any person who, has the knowledge that a crime against the United States has been committed still receives, relieves, soothes, or helps the offender in an effort to thwart or avoid his prosecution, or punishment.
Mens rea, is a Latin word that translates to simply "the wicked mind" or "guilty mind," has entered modern legal society by radically altering the global criminal law system. The idea of Mens rea first emerged in England in the 1600s when judges began to assert that an act by itself could not constitute criminality unless it was coupled with a guilty state of mind. For Mens Rea, the degree for a certain common law crime varies. Larceny required a felonious mindset, whereas murder required a malevolent mindset.
Mens rea is frequently used in conjunction with the phrase general intent, although this causes ambiguity because general intent is used to explain criminal responsibility when a defendant does not aim to produce a specific outcome.
We can learn more about mens rea at:
https://brainly.com/question/10513615#
#SPJ4
Discuss criticisms of separation of powers
Answer:
One criticism of separated powers is that it can also result in weak government, especially if the legislative and executive branches are controlled by different political parties.
Explanation:
Answer:
The criticisms of the doctrine of separation of powers are: Complete separation is not possible, Complete separation is not desirable, Impracticable in itself, and Separation of powers can lead to deadlocks and inefficiency.
Please give me brainliest - you get 25% as well! I swear!
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
The distinction between "Broken Windows" strategies and "zero tolerance" tactics may be one of degree. What sorts of public disorder do you think could be controlled by zero tolerance (automatic arrest) tactics, and what might be better suited to a more tolerant, "as long as your behavior remains civil" approach? Drug sales? Drug use? Prostitution? Graffiti? Panhandling? Shoplifting? Truancy? Others?
Explanation:
The two different tactics or strategy of policing may be considered as “Broken Windows” and “zero tolerance”.
“Broken Windows” may be referred to as the analogy of a window that is broken and is not repaired which indicated that no one cares and it thus invites further vandalism.
While on the other hand, the tactic of "zero tolerance" may simply mean taking care of the little things right away. It is considered as an aggressive and hostile way to policing and it is loosely translated to arrest lot many people that is possible for lot many things.
what is the effective date for ifab’s current laws of the game?
INTEGRATE INFORMATION
In 2013, the
Environmental Protection Agency (a federal agency)
Supreme Court agreed to hear a case challenging
regulations related to greenhouse gases. The case
had previously been heard in federal court-most
recently, by the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit in 2012. What type of
jurisdiction did the Supreme Court have in this case,
and why?
Answer: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a major case challenging Environmental Protection Agency regulations of greenhouse
Explanation:
The activist advocate M.C. Mehra v/s. Union Of India AIR 1988 SCR (2) 583* filed a writ petition ordering the closure of a number of polluting tanneries near Kanpur.
What do mean by Environmental Protection Agency?The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal government agency established by the Nixon Administration to protect human health and the environment. The EPA develops and enforces environmental laws, inspects the environment, and provides technical assistance to reduce threats and aid in recovery planning.
Thus, The Court ruled that if the EPA wants to continue its inaction on carbon regulation, it must do so in accordance with the Act, which requires it to consider "whether greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change."
Learn more about Environmental Protection Agency here:
https://brainly.com/question/13055175
#SPJ2
To___means to make someone follow the rules to compel obedience
Answer:
Enforce.
Explanition:
By this, they are enforcing rules. Aka "leading by example."
You discover that another criminologist has been investigating a similar topic: an increase in rates of burglary in residential homes in Pearville. As you continue to investigate, it appears that others have done some research on various increases in crimes in Pearville and confirmed that the recent closure of a power plant and the loss of thousands of jobs has put a strain on many residents who are normally law-abiding. However, the shoplifting incidents have been committed mostly by juveniles, so you’re not sure how they are connected to the loss of jobs by adults. You decide to put together a hypothesis, which you will test.
Which of the following is the best example of a hypothesis related to this topic?
Question 2 options:
a)
If a juvenile has a relative who was part of the recent job layoffs in Pearville, they are more likely to have shoplifted in the past year.
b)
Juvenile delinquents should be charged as adults and given the full penalties faced by older offenders, regardless of their age.
c)
Shoplifting in the United States increases because the world is getting more dangerous as the years go by and jobs are scarcer.
d)
Burglars and shoplifters both are involved in criminal and deviant behavior.
The best example of a hypothesis related to this topic is (a) "If a juvenile has a relative who was part of the recent job layoffs in Pearville, they are more likely to have shoplifted in the past year."
What is the hypothesis?Generally, This hypothesis directly links the loss of jobs in Pearville to the increase in shoplifting incidents committed by juveniles.
It is a specific and testable statement that can be supported or refuted through further research and analysis.
Read more about hypothesis
https://brainly.com/question/29519577
#SPJ1
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11