The doctrine which is applied when a defendant violates an existing statute intended to prevent the injury in question to persons of a class which includes the plaintiff is: Group of answer choices Negligence per se. Res ipsa loquitur. Proximate cause statute. Concurrent statutory violation.

Answer:

28 percent

Explanation:

Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.

Answer:

At their heart, all public relations campaigns are about planning and strategy. After all, without a good strategy, it would be impossible for a PR expert to ensure that they were having the right impact on an audience with their marketing solutions, or that they were releasing press content at the right time. The “strategic planning” part of public relations is what sets it apart as a critical component of building a business and managing a company reputation.

Strategic planning starts with setting a goal for a PR campaign. Once a vision of success is established, PR companies can then work alongside their clients to carve out an effective route to that end target. Strategic planning ensures that press releases go out just at the right time to cause a social splash, and that reputation management strategies have components in place that allow businesses to respond quickly when disaster strikes.

Explanation:

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

Hi,

All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or changes existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

He's representing the United States.

Explanation:

When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.

Answer: 3653

Explanation: one hour is 3600 seconds

Its True, Little's Law can be thought of as a relationship between units and time.

Little's Law is an equation that represents the connection between the average number of items in a queue, the average time it takes for an item to get through the queue, and the average arrival rate of items per unit of time. In queuing theory, Little's Law is fundamental, and it is used in various fields.Little's Law states that: The average number of items in a stationary system is equal to the average rate of arrival of items multiplied by the average time that an item spends in the system.

L = λWWhereL = Average number of items in the systemλ = Average rate of arrivalW = Average time spent by an item in the systemHence, Little's Law can be thought of as a relationship between units and time.

Learn more about  units and time here:https://brainly.com/question/13893070

#SPJ11

Victimology is a field of study that focuses on the study of victims of crime and the impact of victimization. It examines the personal, social, and economic impact of criminal activity on victims and their families.

Here are some good reasons for studying victimology even if a student is not majoring in criminology or criminal justice:
1. Develops Empathy and Compassion: Studying victimology allows students to develop empathy and compassion towards victims of crimes. As they learn about the various types of crimes and the impact on the victims, students become more sensitive to the needs of victims and are more willing to help.

2. Awareness of Victimization: Studying victimology raises awareness of victimization, its causes, and how to prevent it. This is useful not only in criminology and criminal justice but also in other areas of life, such as social work, counseling, or healthcare.

3. Develops Critical Thinking Skills: The study of victimology requires critical thinking skills to analyze the causes, impact, and prevention of crime. This skill is useful in all areas of life, such as decision-making, problem-solving, and conflict resolution.

4. Develops a Sense of Justice: Studying victimology helps students develop a sense of justice and fairness. Students learn about the legal system, victim’s rights, and how to fight for justice for the victims.

5. Prepares for Future Careers: Victimology provides students with the skills and knowledge required for various careers, such as law enforcement, social work, victim advocacy, and counseling.

In conclusion, the study of victimology has benefits beyond the field of criminology and criminal justice. It helps students develop a sense of justice, empathy, and critical thinking skills. It also raises awareness of victimization and prepares students for various careers.

To know more about justice visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32393997

#SPJ11

Answer:

it's when the act of buyers and sellers freely and willingly exchanging in Market transactions

Explanation:

!

Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon

Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?

Let's consider all the choices:

Answer: Resources

Hope that helps!

#LearnwithBrainly

Once a trial starts, the parties can still choose to settle the lawsuit instead of relying on the jury's decision. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the trial process. So, the statement is false.

False. Once a trial starts, the parties still have the option to settle the lawsuit even if the trial is ongoing. Settling a lawsuit means that the parties reach an agreement and resolve their dispute outside of court. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the litigation process, including during an ongoing trial.

In fact, many lawsuits are settled before reaching a final verdict from the jury. Settling a case allows the parties to have control over the outcome and potentially avoid the risks and costs associated with a lengthy trial. Settlement agreements are typically reached through negotiations between the parties and may involve compromises and concessions.

It is important to note that once a trial reaches a verdict, the decision of the jury is binding and the parties must abide by it, unless there are grounds for appeal or other legal remedies. However, prior to the jury reaching a verdict, the parties retain the ability to settle the lawsuit and avoid the uncertainties of a trial outcome.

Learn more about lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30705473

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search

Answer:

What do you want me to do?

The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.

The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.

Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.

It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.

In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.

To know more about Movement visit-

brainly.com/question/11223271

#SPJ11

Gunshot Residue Test

This test gives the forensic analysists the ability to determine several things. For example, this test does allow them to see if the suspect fired a weapon, was close to a weapon that was fired, and looking at the test results to see the distance from muzzle to target.

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

no options

Explanation:

Answer: the reason for that is becasue it may be on the borader line of the states where it had happen

Answer:

Devisee

Explanation:

Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.

He describes democracy as a system of government with four key elements: i) A system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; ii) Active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; iii) Protection of the human rights of all citizens; and iv) A rule of law

Answer:

true beacuse there always part of the mainstream

Answer:

false

Explanation:

One significant way for vested parties to get sufficiently close to those in government is to utilize previous authorities as lobbyists. Texas has solid regulations managing campaigning by previous government authorities.

Lobby- A vested party is coordinated to impact government choices, particularly regulation. To campaign is to endeavor to impact such choices. lobbyist. An individual endeavoring to impact government choices for the benefit of the gathering.

Terms here (24) How does "the entryway" in Texas contrast with that of numerous different states? It has serious areas of strength for moderate power.

A political activity board of trustees (PAC) is a confidential gathering that raises and disseminates assets for use in political races.

To learn more about the lobby here

https://brainly.com/question/14088008

#SPJ4

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.

The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.

To know more about genocide visit:

brainly.com/question/32013150

#SPJ11

Under the proposed city ordinance, police officers would have discretion when dealing with individuals possessing less than four ounces of marijuana. They could either (a) arrest the offender, leading to possible jail time or (b) write the offender a ticket, treating the infraction like a traffic violation.

Whether this policy is just and fair depends on various factors, such as the potential for unequal treatment, the prioritization of law enforcement resources, and the impacts on the community. On one hand, allowing officer discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential biases in how offenders are treated. On the other hand, treating minor marijuana possession as a traffic violation could reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and allow officers to focus on more serious crimes.

As for the impact on police officers protecting the community, this policy could make it easier for them to allocate resources more effectively and concentrate on higher-priority issues. However, if discretion is not applied consistently and fairly, it could create mistrust and tensions within the community. Ultimately, the success of this policy would depend on how effectively it is implemented and monitored.

To know more about the Illegality of Marijuana Possession- https://brainly.com/question/29800924

#SPJ11

To establish res ipsa loquitur in negligence cases, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the event was a kind that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence.

Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine used to relieve plaintiffs of the burden of evidence of negligence in certain negligence cases. It is based on the idea that certain incidents are so clearly attributable to a defendant's negligence that no further explanation is necessary.The plaintiff must demonstrate that the event was a kind that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence to establish res ipsa loquitur in negligence cases. The doctrine is only applicable when the plaintiff cannot establish the actual cause of the event or when the defendant had sole control over the instrumentality that caused the event. The defendant must have a duty to the plaintiff, and the negligence must be within the scope of that duty.The event that caused the plaintiff's injury or harm must be unusual or uncommon and not expected to occur in the absence of negligence. The harm must be caused by the defendant's act of negligence, and the defendant must have had exclusive control over the instrumentality that caused the harm. Finally, it must be shown that the plaintiff was not responsible for the harm or injury.The res ipsa loquitur doctrine places the burden of proof on the defendant to prove that they were not negligent, rather than the plaintiff to prove that the defendant was negligent.To establish res ipsa loquitur in negligence cases, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the event was a kind that ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence.

to know more about evidence visit:

brainly.com/question/33111254

#SPJ11