the principle of federal supremacy is correctly reflected in which of the following statements:

Answer:

Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples

Answer:

The Georgia Court of Appeals was established by constitutional amendment. Judges are now to be elected by popular vote to six-year terms. 1898: Established that Georgia superior court judges are now to be elected by popular vote.

Explanation:

Answer: Discharged

Explanation:

Answer:

interactions between police and citizens will always be inherently coercive to some

The amendment that is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reproductive choice is the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, contains several provisions that have been central to modern debates on affirmative action and reproductive choice. Specifically, two clauses within the amendment are frequently referenced in these contexts: the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been instrumental in cases involving affirmative action, where individuals or groups challenge government policies that use race or ethnicity as a factor in promoting diversity or remedying past discrimination.

The Supreme Court has ruled that any governmental use of race must meet a strict scrutiny standard, meaning it must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

This clause has been the basis for protecting an individual's right to privacy, which has been cited in cases involving reproductive choice. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) established that a woman has a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause.

know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29517519

#SPJ11

Answer:

United States District Court

Explanation:

I think it would be the United States District Court because this is the US mail we're talking about. If this was like a local UPS, FedEx, or Amazon truck it would probably be something different.

Answer:

I think its United states district court

Explanation:

Answer:

sorry I need the points I got no answer

It is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.

Understanding the hierarchy of the courts is essential for citizens involved in the legal system, as it helps navigate the judicial process and know the appropriate steps to take when on trial. Here's how the court hierarchy works and what citizens can do when facing a trial:

1. Court Hierarchy:

  - Trial Courts: At the base of the hierarchy are trial courts, where legal proceedings begin. These courts handle cases at the initial level, where evidence is presented, and decisions are made based on the facts of the case and applicable laws.

  - Appellate Courts: Above trial courts are appellate courts, which review decisions made by the trial courts. Appellate courts assess whether errors of law occurred during the trial or if there were procedural irregularities. They do not re-evaluate the facts or conduct new trials. Instead, they focus on matters of law and ensure proper application of legal principles.

  - Supreme Court (or Highest Court): At the top of the hierarchy is the highest court in the jurisdiction, often known as the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals (depending on the country). The highest court generally reviews cases that involve significant legal issues or conflicts in interpretation of the law. Its decisions set precedents and have a binding effect on lower courts.

2. As a Citizen on Trial:

  - Know Your Rights: As a citizen on trial, it is crucial to understand your rights. This includes the right to legal representation, the right to remain silent, the right to a fair trial, and the right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.

  - Seek Legal Counsel: It is advisable to seek legal counsel to guide you through the legal process, ensure your rights are protected, and provide expertise in building your defense.

  - Present Your Case: During trial proceedings, you can present evidence, call witnesses, and testify in your defense. Your legal counsel will help you navigate the process and present your case effectively.

  - Appeal if Necessary: If dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial, you may have the right to appeal the decision. Contract with your attorney to determine if there are grounds for an appeal based on errors of law or procedural irregularities.

It is important to note that specific legal procedures and rights may vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system in which the trial takes place.

Therefore, it is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.

learn more about contract here: brainly.com/question/32254040

#SPJ11

Answer:

1.4,2

Explanation:

Answer:

OB)False

Explanation:

give me brainliest

Notaries may not use electronic technology to notarize wills, codicils, and testamentary trusts. This is a false statement.

A testamentary trust is a type of trust that is established in a testator's will and comes into existence after their death. Multiple testamentary trusts may be mentioned in a will, which may also handle the entire estate or just a portion of it.

Electronic notarization necessitates the presence of both the Colorado notary public and the subject of the notarial act. distance notarization The notary public need not be at the same location as the person for whom the notarial act is carried out, but they must still be in Colorado.

Therefore, The statement is false.

Learn more about testamentary trust, here;

https://brainly.com/question/30026906

#SPJ2

The term for being of the same mind is "agreement".

The term "agreement" refers to a situation in which two or more persons have the same opinion or belief regarding a certain issue or matter. It is an agreement or a consensus formed by debate, negotiation, or compromise.

The term "agreement" refers to a state of alignment or oneness among people, groups, or organizations. It has the potential to produce beneficial outcomes such as mutual benefit, cooperation, and progress, while also increasing understanding and respect for diverse ideas and opinions.

Learn more about "Agreement at https://brainly.com/question/27899951

#SPJ1

Answer:

to celebrate the holiday

to show how the holiday started

Explanation:

This is the reading

The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.

—Chief Justice Warren Burger,

Opinion of the Court,

Lynch v. Donnelly

1984

From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.

Answer:

To celebrate the holiday

To show how the holiday started

Explanation:

The requirements for a licensee in this situation may vary depending on the specific laws and regulations in the jurisdiction where the house is located. However, in general, a licensee (such as a real estate agent or broker) has certain obligations when it comes to disclosing known material defects or issues with a property.

In the case of the water stain on the second floor ceiling, the licensee is typically required by law to disclose this information to potential buyers or parties interested in the property. The licensee has a duty to provide accurate and complete information about the property's condition that may materially affect a buyer's decision.

The specific steps the licensee should take can vary, but typically it involves documenting the issue, informing the homeowner/seller about the water stain, and discussing the disclosure obligations. The licensee may also recommend further inspection or evaluation by a qualified professional to determine the cause and extent of the water stain and any potential impact on the property.

It is important for the licensee to comply with the applicable laws and regulations regarding disclosure requirements and act in the best interest of all parties involved in the real estate transaction. Consulting with a real estate attorney or relevant authority in the jurisdiction can provide more specific guidance in these situations.

To know more about specific laws, please visit

https://brainly.com/question/29829977

#SPJ11

There are a lot of human rights.  The right that protects your purchase  is right to redress.

In terms of business, Consumers also have the right to be compensated when they have cases such as misrepresentation, shoddy goods and unsatisfactory services. This helps to remove doubt and makes sure there is credibility of the producers and the goods being produced are of quality.

Learn more about right to redress from

https://brainly.com/question/3884093

Answer:

right to redress

Explanation:

lol

Answer:

Your own decision!

Explanation:

Don't let other people influence choices that are totally up to you to choose

The federal government had to shut down due to a lack of funds appropriated rational material.

at the beginning of the new 2014 federal fiscal year because the Senate refused to pass the bill with provisions to delay the Affordable Care Act, and the two legislative houses had not developed a compromise bill by the end of September 2013 either. Due to furloughs of federal workers, reduced public services, and delays in payments to Federal grantees, States, localities, contractors, and people, the closure had an impact on millions of Americans. Government shutdowns take place in the United States when financing bills for the government's upcoming fiscal year or a temporary funding measure are not passed. Federal agencies continue to carry out their mandates countrywide. crucial activities and processes as decided by agency heads. To confirm your telework schedule and to get more information from your agency head, please get in touch with your supervisor rational material.

Learn more about rational here :

https://brainly.com/question/30359155

#SPJ4

Answer:

Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?​

Explanation:

This research project, which took more than a year to complete, would not have been

possible without the cooperation and support of a large number of people and organizations

committed to improving American jury trials.

We start by acknowledging and thanking the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Office of

Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice, for funding the project and the associated

NIJ Visiting Fellowship grantee B. Michael Dann was privileged to enjoy. Special thanks are

owed Christopher A. Innes, Chief of the Justice Systems Research Division, Office of Research

and Evaluation, NIJ, for his support, suggestions and patience during the fellowship and research

project. Many others at NIJ are owed thanks as well, but the Director, Sarah V. Hart, was

especially interested and encouraging. NIJ DNA experts Dr. Lisa Forman and Kim Herd, an

Assistant U.S. Attorney and former Special Assistant to the NIJ Director on DNA, offered

valuable technical advice in the project’s early planning phases.

NIJ’s financial grant was administered by the National Center for State Courts in

Williamsburg, Virginia. That indispensable work was ably performed by Sherry KeeseeBuchanan and Mary Hogan and overseen by Paula Hannaford Agor at the National Center.

Nicole Waters provided expert assistance with the statistical analyses.

We are indebted to the members of the project’s Advisory Committee who gave us

invaluable counsel and advice concerning research design and which jury trial innovations to

test, among other things. The Advisory Committee was chaired by Judge Ronald S. Reinstein, a

trial judge from Phoenix, Arizona, and member of NIJ’s Commission on the Future of DNA

Evidence; Robert P. Biancavilla, Deputy Chief, Nassau County (New York) District Attorney’s

Office; Connie L. Fisher, Forensic Examiner, FBI Laboratory, Quantico, Virginia; Paula

Hannaford-Agor, Principal Court Research Consultant, National Center for State Courts,

Williamsburg, Virginia; Judge Gregory E. Mize, Superior Court for the District of Columbia

(Ret.); Anjali R. Swienton, Consultant, SciLaw Forensics, Ltd., Germantown, Maryland; and

Beth Wiggins, Senior Research Associate, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C. Professor

William Shields, of the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, served as an

additional resource on mtDNA analysis, answering questions and providing us with useful

material about the interpretation of mtDNA tests.

We recruited several cast members for two separate tapings of the “trial” for use in the

subsequent mock jury trials. The first shoot took place in June 2003, in Tempe, Arizona, at the

Arizona State University College of Law. The Tempe cast included Leonard Ruiz, an Arizona

prosecutor; Susan Corey and Chad Pajerski, local public defenders; James Humphrey, a former

Phoenix Police Department detective; Katherine Dann, a student at George Washington

University; and Elliot Goldstein, Professor of Biology, Arizona State University. The

videographer in Arizona was Manny Garcia of Manny Garcia Productions, Inc. In Phoenix.

Attorney Mara Siegel, another local public defender, consulted regarding the script.

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.

Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.

Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.

The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?

cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money

Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income

Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"

Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:

brainly.com/question/31749142

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Films that tell stories present a narrative that can be fictional or not, but whose central purpose is to engage and entertain the viewer, as in the film "Karma: What goes around, comes around.

What is the plot of the film?

This Korean film specifically was released in 2020, being the horror genre and tells the story of a teacher who finds her deceased father's diary, in the house where she lived in her childhood, and from there discovers secrets and mysteries involving such deaths. .

Therefore, cinematographic works aim to lead to emotion, reflection, personal expression, engagement and entertainment, being the analysis of what a good film is to be personal and based on the perspective of the spectator.

Answer:

The correct option is;

1. Storing food

Explanation:

Tracking and checking the complete food production system from the farms to the point of consumption to determine, prevent and manage potential hazards before they take place is enabled by the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP)

A critical control point is a stage in the processing of food at which there is an opportunity for hazard prevention or reduction to reasonably acceptable levels. Procedures and operations that can lead to outbreak of foodborne diseases are critical control points

Processes such as storing food, cooking of the food, and, reheating are examples of critical control points.

Answer:storing food

Explanation:looked up the answer on answersheet

Answer:

B: The Articles

Explanation:

In the United states,state police power comes from the tenth amendment to the which gives states the right and powers not delegated to the United states.

Answer:

A bill of rights was not necessary

Explanation:

The delegates at the Philadelphia Convention turned down the idea of including a list of citizens' rights in the Constitution because they believed that a bill of rights was not necessary. Many of the delegates believed that the Constitution itself provided sufficient protections for individual rights, and that a bill of rights would be redundant or even dangerous. Some argued that listing specific rights could be limiting and that including some but not all rights would give the impression that those not listed were not protected. Others feared that listing rights could imply that the federal government had powers beyond those specifically granted in the Constitution. Additionally, some delegates were concerned that if a bill of rights was included, it might lead to future attempts to add more rights or limit existing ones.

However, there was also significant opposition to the Constitution because of the lack of a bill of rights. Many anti-federalists argued that a bill of rights was essential to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government. As a result, when the Constitution was ratified, several states included a call for a bill of rights as a condition for their approval. The first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, were added to the Constitution in 1791.

Absolute immunity is the right to be free from the corollary of a suit's results, and from the burden of defending oneself altogether. Qualified immunity only shields an administrative officer from liability if the officer's activities are: within the scope of his/her office; are in objective good faith.

What is  an absolute and a qualified immunity?

Absolute immunity is given to government officials and protects them from criminal lawsuits and prosecution as long as they are acting within the scope of their duties.

On the other hand, qualified immunity only applies if specified conditions are met. If government officials make actions that violate federal law of constitutional rights, they can be prosecuted because they knowingly violated the law.

Judges and prosecutors have Absolute immunity.

To know more about immunity:

https://brainly.com/question/14271813

#SPJ4

The judicial powers of the State are vested in the Supreme Court, the nation's highest court. Lower federal courts exist, although they are not officially established by the Constitution.

Instead, Congress created them within Constitutional authority after concluding that they were required. The Supreme Court has judicial power over "all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution" according to Section 2 of Article III, which means that the court's primary duty is to determine whether or not legislation is valid. Among the various types of cases, it handles include those involving ambassadors, those involving admiralty and marine jurisdiction, and disputes between two or more nations. Legal disputes that reach the Supreme Court often include questions of statutory construction, constitutionality, and/or their respective statutes' applicability. Judicial review is the procedure through which it may be determined whether or not a statute is in accordance with the Constitution. The judicial branch relies on this procedure to ensure that the legislative and executive branches are subject to appropriate checks and balances. In the absence of a written constitution, courts rely on their implicit authority to conduct judicial review. In a landmark decision from 1803, the Supreme Court established its inherent authority to conduct judicial review in the case of Marbury v. Madison.

Learn more about the judicial review at:

brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ4

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:

Black educated females

The correct answer is D. It is primarily judicial in origin and based on court decisions.

Civil Law is a legal system that originated from Roman law and the Napoleonic Code. It is primarily based on codified laws and statutes rather than court decisions. In Civil Law jurisdictions, rules and principles are derived from the written legal codes and serve as the starting point for legal interpretation and application. Civil Law systems are found in countries such as France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, and many countries in Latin America.

Option D is incorrect because Civil Law is not primarily judicial in origin and based on court decisions. Instead, it relies on written laws and statutes as the primary source of legal authority.

To know more about Napoleonic Code

https://brainly.com/question/2895638

#SPJ11