Political parties in texas are currently more influential in some parts of the state than in others. The party with the areas in texas in which it tends to dominate are
Democratic Party:
- Urban areas
- Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas-Fort Worth
Republican Party:
- Suburban areas
- Rural areas
There will only be four recognized political parties in Texas as of 2021. Contrary to popular assumption, starting a political party does not automatically entitle it formal recognition. For a party to be recognized by the state, there are certain norms and regulations that must be followed. You may find the Texas regulations here, but keep in mind that each state is responsible for deciding how it wants to recognize parties.
For instance, some jurisdictions demand that before a new party is recognized, a politician must win an election while competing as a candidate for it. Texas does not let candidates to declare themselves "independent" from their connected party, unlike several other states.
To know more about Political parties in texas visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12443795
#SPJ4
discuss what should be done when a judge behaves unethically and unprofessionally
When a judge behaves unethically and unprofessionally, it is crucial to address the situation appropriately. Here are some steps that can be taken:
Reporting the behavior: Any instances of unethical or unprofessional conduct by a judge should be reported to the appropriate judicial oversight body or commission. This ensures that the misconduct is documented and investigated.
Conducting an investigation: The judicial oversight body should conduct a thorough investigation into the reported misconduct. This may involve gathering evidence, interviewing relevant parties, and reviewing the judge's actions.
Disciplinary actions: If the investigation confirms the judge's unethical behavior, disciplinary actions should be taken. The severity of the misconduct will determine the appropriate disciplinary measures, which can range from private reprimands to public censure, suspension, or even removal from office.
Judicial education and training: To prevent similar incidents in the future, ongoing judicial education and training programs should emphasize ethical conduct, professionalism, and the importance of upholding the principles of justice.
Transparency and accountability: It is essential to ensure transparency in the disciplinary process and communicate the actions taken against the judge to maintain public trust in the judiciary.
Addressing unethical and unprofessional behavior by judges is vital for upholding the integrity of the justice system and maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. It requires a combination of reporting, investigation, appropriate disciplinary measures, ongoing education, and transparency to maintain high standards of judicial conduct.
Learn more about Investigation
https://brainly.com/question/29365121
#SPJ11
Should Remembrance Day be declared an official statutory holiday? Why or why not.
Answer:
Remembrance Day should be declared as an official statutory holiday.
Explanation:
It should be an official statutory holiday because it is one of the most important holidays for our country. This day recalls the soldiers that have died at the end of the first world war. Thousands of people attended events around the country commemorating the war and military sacrifice. It was still a day to mourn the fallen, but there were intermittent pleas to remember the horrors of war and to embrace peace throughout customary ceremonies.
Which of the following is considered a social effect of a crime?
O Strained relationship with loves ones
Changes in sleeping and eating habits
Attempting to shut out the pain
Medical loss due to injury
Answer:
Stained relationship with love ones.
What did the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act achieve by regulating interstate commerce
it brought the federal government full force into the drug marketplace
Answer:
The 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act achieved several things by regulating interstate commerce. It prohibited the manufacture, sale, or transportation of adulterated or misbranded food and drugs in interstate commerce. It established federal inspections of food and drugs and required accurate labeling of ingredients. The Act also empowered the Bureau of Chemistry (later the FDA) to set standards for the purity and strength of food and drugs, and to seize and condemn products that did not conform to these standards. Additionally, it gave consumers more protection from dangerous or fraudulent products, and helped create a more level playing field for businesses by eliminating unfair competition from companies that were cutting corners on safety or quality. Overall, the act brought the federal government full force into the drug marketplace to ensure the safety and purity of food and drugs for consumers.
In 2016, sports newscaster Erin Andrews and former wrestler Hulk Hogan were both awarded substantial monetary damages after winning their respective cases involving invasion of privacy. It is believed that the juries in both cases wanted to sanction the defendants by sending a clear message that individual's privacy must be respected regardless of who they are. The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as:
Answer:
Punitive damages
Explanation:
Based on the information given the monetary damages that was awarded in these two cases are described as PUNITIVE DAMAGES reason been that we were told that the juries has the intention to sanction the defendants who is the person that was found guilty after been accused of committing a crime by sending a clearer message to the defendants that individual’s or people's privacy have to be respected regardless of who they are in order to serve as a lesson to the defendants and to others who may have the intention of committing the same crime and as well to punish the defendants for the crime that was committed by him or her just as in the case of both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan who were awarded monetary damages after winning their cases that involve the invasion of privacy.
Therefore The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as: PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
Since the United States began to receive the new crown vaccine, health officials have stated that people who have completed the vaccination are unlikely to be infected or suffer from serious illness or even die. However, preliminary data from 7 states suggest that the arrival of the Delta virus strain in July may " Changed everything".
Answer: Hello There!................
The vaccine is called mRNA-1273 and was developed by NIAID scientists and their collaborators at the biotechnology company Moderna, Inc., based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) supported the manufacturing of the vaccine candidate for the Phase 1 clinical trial.
“Finding a safe and effective vaccine to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 is an urgent public health priority,” said NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. “This Phase 1 study, launched in record speed, is an important first step toward achieving that goal.”
Explanation:
Mark me brainest please. Hope this helps. Anna ♥
How are members of house committees determined?
Explanation:
Each of the committee is determined at the beginning of the Congress
U.S. Constitution
How relevant is the U.S. Constitution today? Are our basic rights as citizens firmly protected or are we seeing some erosion of those rights?
Consider laws regulating the right to bear arms, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, etc.
The U.S. Constitution is still highly relevant today and continues to serve as the foundation of American law and government. The basic rights of citizens, such as the right to bear arms, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, are enshrined in the Constitution and are protected by the courts. However, there is ongoing debate and discussion about the interpretation and application of these rights in contemporary society. Some argue that there is erosion of these rights, while others argue that they are still firmly protected. Ultimately, the ongoing relevance and protection of these rights will depend on the actions and decisions of government officials, lawmakers, and the courts.
Should a psychologist be allowed to give an expert opinion on sanity? Why or why not?
Answer:
yes they should
Explanation:
a psychologist should be able to give an expert opinion on sanity because they study the mind or mental states. This means that they know what is takes to be insane or sane.
List the advantages of unit management for staff members
Answer: Unit management enhances communication between staff and inmates, maintains regularity for employees and inmates alike, empowers decision-making at the front-line level, and increases direct supervision and monitoring of offenders.
Explanation: ye
What is the theme of this book? According to that theme, what are the differences between the individual rights perspective and the public order perspective?
The theme of the book, "Criminal Justice" is:
Individual Rights vs. Public Order.The difference between the individual rights perspective and the public order perspective is this:
The criminal justice system helps in the maintenance of individual rights while the public order helps to maintain the rights of the general society.What is a theme?A theme refers to the central message that a text has for its readers. The theme of the text on Criminal Justice is about the interplay between Individual rights and public order.
Whereas the rights of individuals are safeguarded through the criminal justice system, public order helps to ensure that the rights of people in a society are maintained.
Learn more about criminal justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/27846688
#SPJ1
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
when liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as ______ liability.
When liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as strict liability.
The term strict liability refers to liability that is determined without regard to guilt mind. A person can be held legally accountable for losses or harms brought on by their actions, regardless of what they intended or felt at the time. This legal principle is known as strict liability.
It is not necessary to demonstrate the defendant's negligence or malicious intent when there is strict liability. The focus should be on the act itself and whether it was harmful. Strict liability is frequently used in situations involving inherently risky activities, such as managing wild animals, producing hazardous materials, or engaging in risky activities.
Learn more about strict liability at:
brainly.com/question/32157948
#SPJ4
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
taylor sued the giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw. the most likely outcome of this case is:
The most likely outcome of Taylor suing the Giants for the allegedly negligent warm-up throw is that the case will be dismissed.
In the scenario given, Taylor is suing the Giants for a warm-up throw that was allegedly negligently made. There are a few issues with the case, such as: If the throw was a warm-up throw, then it is unlikely to have been aimed at Taylor directly.
As such, it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent in their actions. If the Giants were negligent in their actions, it would be difficult to prove that the alleged negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury. Taylor would need to prove that the injury would not have occurred if the Giants had not been negligent, which is difficult to prove.
If the case does go to trial, the Giants would likely argue that Taylor assumed the risk of injury by attending the game in the first place. This is a common defense used in sports injury cases where the injured party knew or should have known that there was a risk of injury but participated in the activity anyway.
Based on these issues, it is most likely that the case will be dismissed. The burden of proof in personal injury cases is high, and it is difficult to prove that the Giants were negligent and that their negligence was the direct cause of Taylor's injury.
To know more about allegedly negligent refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30258088#
#SPJ11
Define discretionary decision making, explain why discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts and provide specific examples of prosecutorial discretion.
Discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts because the criminal justice system is complex and there are often multiple options for how to proceed in a case.
Prosecutors, in particular, have a great deal of discretion in deciding how to handle a case. This allows them to take into account factors such as the severity of the crime, the strength of the evidence, and the resources available.
What does discretionary decision making means?Making discretionary decisions means making decisions based on logic and judgment rather than pre-determined criteria.
It is common for the source of authority to provide criteria in relation to the decision when the authority for making a decision comes from legislation or an internal procedure.
The words "shall" or "must" usually imply that the decision maker must make a specific decision if certain criteria are met, whereas the words "may" or "should" give the decision maker more leeway in weighing various factors.
Read more about discretionary decision making
brainly.com/question/29509213
#SPJ1
Those officers identified by early intervention systems face immediate and serious
discipline.
O True
O False
Answer:
TRUEE
Explanation:
Which of the following conditions would permit a court to invalidate a contract on grounds of unilateral mistake? (Check ALL that apply.)
a. The mistake was caused by an accidental clerical error.
b. One of the parties made a mistake that was so trivial that the contract is conscionable.
c. One party made a mistake about a material fact, and the other party knew about the mistake.
d. The mistake resulted from gross negligence.
Answer:
None of the above
Explanation:
None of the conditions listed would permit a court to invalidate a contract on the grounds of unilateral mistake. The conditions that could permit a court to invalidate a contract on grounds of unilateral mistake are:
a. One party made a mistake about a material fact, and the other party knew or had reason to know about the mistake.
b. The mistake was so serious that the contract is unconscionable, that is, so unreasonable that it is outrageous.
This eliminates answer choices A and B. Option C is not correct because it states that only one party made a mistake about a material fact, and the other party knew about the mistake. In a situation of unilateral mistake, only one party makes a mistake, and the other party is not aware of the mistake or does not have reason to know about it. If the other party knew or had reason to know about the mistake, then it may not be a case of unilateral mistake and the contract may not be invalidated on those grounds.
Option D is not correct because the mistake resulting from gross negligence is not typically considered a valid ground for a court to invalidate a contract on the grounds of unilateral mistake. In general, the courts will only permit the invalidation of a contract for unilateral mistake where the mistake was caused by a serious error or misunderstanding of a material fact that was not within the reasonable knowledge or contemplation of the mistaken party at the time of contracting. Mistakes resulting from gross negligence or carelessness, on the other hand, are generally viewed as the responsibility of the mistaken party, and will not typically provide grounds for contract invalidation.
What law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards?.
The stamp act was the law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards.
About the stamp act
Any law that mandates the payment of a tax on the transferring of specific papers is referred to as a stamp act. All who pay the taxes get their papers legally stamped, which makes them official documents. Stamp acts have historically applied to a wide range of things, including playing cards, dice, prescription medications, checks, mortgages, contracts, marriage licences, and newspapers. After paying the duty, the objects are frequently physically stamped at authorised government offices, however more practical and usual procedures involve paying a fixed amount annually or purchasing adhesive stamps.
To know more about the stamp act:
brainly.com/question/19013647
#SPJ4
what are the religions of the supreme court justices
The religions of the Supreme Court Justices are primarily Catholic and Jewish. Of the nine current Justices, six identify as Catholic, including Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
The remaining three, Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Neil Gorsuch, identify as Jewish. Historically, the Supreme Court has been predominantly Protestant; however, this has changed over time, and now there is no Protestant representation among the sitting Justices. It is important to note that the Justices are expected to remain impartial and uphold the Constitution, regardless of their religious beliefs. Their diverse religious backgrounds may contribute to different perspectives in their decision-making process, but ultimately, they are all committed to ensuring justice and fairness for all citizens of the United States.
to know about supreme court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
one of the three important "limits to what the law can do" discussed by christopher stone is
One of the three important "limits to what the law can do" discussed by Christopher Stone is the limit of feasibility.
Christopher Stone, a legal scholar and professor, identified three important "limits to what the law can do" in his 1975 book "Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior."
The first limit he identified is the limit of feasibility, which refers to the practical constraints on what the law can achieve in terms of changing behavior or achieving certain outcomes. Stone argued that the law is limited by factors such as limited resources, political constraints, and the complexities of the issues it seeks to address.
For example, the law may be unable to effectively address certain social problems due to lack of funding, bureaucratic inefficiencies, or resistance from powerful interest groups. While the law can play an important role in shaping social behavior and addressing societal problems, it is important to recognize its limitations and work to address these constraints in order to achieve meaningful change.
To know more about Corporate Behavior, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961193#
#SPJ11
3 characteristics of an entrepreneur that may a school leaver to become a successful business owner
Answer:Adaptability persistence and hardwork
Explanation:
hard work
There are 3 characteristics of an entrepreneur that may, a school-leaver to become a successful business owner are:
Adaptability.Persistence.Hard work.What is entrepreneur?
The term entrepreneur refers to the person who launched a new business with own risk and profit basis. The setup of new business with new idea and logic is called entrepreneurship. The entrepreneur is the main motive to set up business to generate employment. The entrepreneur is work new idea as called startup company.
There are the there characteristics of an entrepreneur are the successful in the business are adaptability, persistence, hard work. The starting up of a new business with a new idea and logic is called entrepreneurship. The entrepreneur's main motive is to set up a business to generate employment.
As a result, the characteristics of an entrepreneur are the successful in the business are adaptability, persistence, hard work.
Learn more about on entrepreneur, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13897585
#SPJ2
Which statement is true about joint committees?
They are permanent, dedicated to working on a specific kind of bill.
They are primarily investigative, performing research and impact studies.
They contain members of both major political parties.
They are controlled by members of the majority party.
Answer:
C. They contain members of both major political parties.
Explanation:
Correct on Edg 2020
Answer:
C. They contain members from both houses of Congress
Explanation:
Edge 2022
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president biden relating to what kind of debt?.
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president Biden relating to student loan forgiveness plan of debt.
On the same day that a judge dismissed a Republican-led lawsuit by six states contesting the loan-forgiveness scheme, a U.S. appeals court temporarily stopped President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in college student debt.The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered an immediate stay prohibiting any student debt discharge under the program until the court resolves on the states' request for a longer-term injunction while the ruling against them is reviewed.While the six Republican-led states posed "important and significant challenges to the debt relief plan," U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey in St. Louis dismissed their complaint on Thursday, claiming they had the proper legal standing to prosecute the case.Thus the answer is student loan forgiveness plan.
Refer here to learn more about federal appeals court: https://brainly.com/question/24978344
#SPJ4
what is the federal civil rights law that addresses harassment within universities?
Answer:
The federal civil rights law that address harassment within universities is called Tittle IX. Tittle IX allows for students to fight against harassment, sa, r****, discrimination based on s**, and etc.
Explanation:
Use complete sentences and proper grammar. You must label your responses numerically (1-5).
Minimum of one page if possible
Explain why the South has the highest regional homicide rate.
Describe the nature of the victim-offender relationship for homicide.
Explain why the United States has a higher homicide rate than other industrial nations.
Explain why men commit most homicides and aggravated assaults.
Describe the types of robbers.
Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom.
What are the main factors that lead to crime?Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom. Family problems may be the primary cause of criminal involvement.The fundamental steps in a crime scene investigation include physical evidence identification, recording, appropriate collection, packing, preservation, and scene reconstruction.But there are significant regional variations in the legal age of criminal culpability. In North Carolina, the minimum age in the United States is just 6 years old, although other states have no minimum age at all (Cipriani, 2009).To learn more about Crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Crimes Quiz
1/4 Answered
23 mins 57 secs
All changes saved automatically
Jordan Mayberry is on his way to a baseball game on the Valley Light Rail when at 25th & Central a woman gets on
board. Due to the crowded light rail car, the woman stands and takes hold of an overhead bar next to Jordan, whom is
also standing. Jordan says "Hi" to her and she rudely ignores him; the light rail continues its way downtown.
At 4th and Central, a pedestrian named Kevin Whalling, whom is suffering from a broken right leg, wanders in front of
the light rail accidentally. The light rail driver, Mr. Pinkerton, dutifully pulls the emergency stop line, and the light rail
car comes to a screeching halt.
Because of the sudden and unexpected stop, Jordan topples into the woman, causing the woman to fall to the floor
with
Jordan on top of her, luckily the woman was not hurt.
A) is Jordan guilty of battery? Explain
B)are there any defenses to battery in the event Jordan is charged with battery?
Question 1 (1 point)
Which of the following best describes some primary elections that incorporate a
system in which the two candidates with the most votes, regardless of party, become
the nominees for the general election?
runoff election
proportional system
) winner-take-all-system
top-two primary
The best description of the primary elections that incorporate a system in which the two candidates with the most votes, regardless of party, become the nominees for the general election is the "top-two primary".
A primary election is a process in which voters from a political party select the candidate who will run as the party's nominee in the general election. In a top-two primary system, all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, appear on the same ballot in the primary election. The two candidates with the most votes then advance to the general election, regardless of their party affiliation. This type of primary is used in several states in the United States, including California and Washington. It differs from a winner-take-all system, in which only the candidate who receives the most votes in the primary becomes the nominee for the general election, and from a proportional system, in which the number of delegates or nominees a candidate receives is proportional to the number of votes they receive in the primary.
Learn more about primary elections here:https://brainly.com/question/12228045
#SPJ11
state some of the principes of damocracy
- Popular sovereignty
Where the leader/s of a country is chosen by the people (elected democratically).
- Autonomy
The right of a country to be independent and govern itself, either a unitary one where all states is governed by one government or a federal one where autonomy is granted through each state and where each state has its own government.
- Equality
Equality for all people regardless of demographics such as race.