Government policy, political stability or instability, corruption, tax policy, labour law, environmental law, and trade restrictions are a few examples of those factors which influence political party.
The government may also have a significant impact on a country's infrastructure, health regulations, and educational system. The media, the role of emotions, political socialisation, tolerance of diversity in political viewpoints, and other factors are all important public impacts.
The National Minimum Wage, for example, has an impact on business profits and employment rights. The need for these factors are that they can enact new laws like this. Governments may also pass new health and safety regulations that require businesses to alter their operations, for instance by training their workers.
To know more about political party factors refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/25149051
#SPJ4
Which style of communication should officers maintain?
-Aggressive
-Passive
-Assertive
-Passive-aggressive
Every agency and organization has both internal and external politics. How can you as a member of your criminal justice agency establish yourself as a team player yet not become bogged down in politics that exist
Answer:
The law companies that value excessive ethics comply with the legal guidelines not solely in letter however go past what
What evidence demonstrates that Canada has succeeded in fostering
multicultural acceptance?
Answer:
In Canada there are many examples of multiculturalism. For example, Canada lets in refugees and immigrants and does not care about their race, religion, or culture.
Amy, Blake, and Carlos are involved in a traffic accident in Oklahoma. Amy is from Oklahoma, Blake is from Texas, and Carlos is from Oklahoma. If Amy sues Blake and Carlos for damages in excess of $100k, where should the case be heard and under who's jurisdiction may she sue (state or federal)?
Answer: Oklahoma or Texas
Explanation:
In the United States, when there is an accident involving multiple people who are residents of different states, lawsuits arising from the accident can be heard in the state where the accident occurred, or the state where one of the defendants is a resident of.
In this case the accident occurred in Oklahoma so it can be heard there.
One of the defendants, Blake, is from Texas so the case can be heard there as well.
A low risk environment is a condition when
Lightly-traveled, two-lane roads in the city or in rural or suburban areas are generally considered to be Low-Risk Environments. In these areas, the speed limit is usually restricted to 35 mph or less and there are fewer right-of-way conflicts.
Hope this helps :P
Brainliest? ^///^
Procedure Title manage legal and ethical compliance
Answer:
Explanation:
The procedure for managing legal and ethical compliance is a set of guidelines and processes that organizations follow to ensure that they comply with all relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards. The steps involved in managing legal and ethical compliance typically include:
Identify applicable laws and ethical standards: The first step in managing legal and ethical compliance is to identify all relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards that apply to the organization and its activities. This includes federal, state, and local laws as well as industry-specific regulations and ethical guidelines.
Develop policies and procedures: Once the relevant laws and ethical standards have been identified, the organization should develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance. These policies and procedures should be documented and communicated to all employees.
Train employees: It is important to ensure that all employees are aware of the organization's legal and ethical requirements and are trained on how to comply with them. This includes training on relevant laws and regulations, as well as ethical standards and the consequences of non-compliance.
Monitor compliance: The organization should regularly monitor compliance with legal and ethical requirements, including conducting internal audits and reviews. This can help identify areas where the organization may be at risk of noncompliance and allow for corrective action to be taken.
Respond to violations: If a violation of a legal or ethical requirement is identified, the organization should take appropriate action to address the violation. This may include disciplinary action, corrective measures, or reporting the violation to relevant authorities.
Continuously improve: Finally, the organization should continuously review and improve its legal and ethical compliance program to ensure that it remains effective and up-to-date with changing laws and regulations.
By following these steps, organizations can help ensure that they comply with all relevant legal and ethical requirements, minimize the risk of noncompliance, and maintain the trust and confidence of stakeholders.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
one example of Treaty and instrument used in international
payments. Please explain the benefit of each.
One example of a treaty used in international payments is the Bretton Woods Agreement, while an example of an instrument is the Letter of Credit.
The Bretton Woods Agreement, established in 1944, aimed to promote stability in international monetary relations. It created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to facilitate economic cooperation and support development. One of its key benefits was the establishment of fixed exchange rates, which reduced currency volatility and promoted international trade.
On the other hand, a Letter of Credit is a financial instrument used in international trade. It serves as a guarantee of payment from a buyer's bank to a seller, ensuring that the seller will receive payment once the agreed-upon conditions are met. This instrument provides security to both parties, as the seller knows they will be paid, and the buyer knows that payment will only be made upon successful completion of the transaction.
To know more about International Payments, visit:
brainly.com/question/33985660
#SPJ11
HUMAN RIGHTS. Based on UDHR, CEDAW, and CRC, Is there any right deprived to you? How do you feel? Who was responsible for its denial?
Based on the UDHR, CEDAW and CDC, there is no deprived right for me, however legally human, women's and children's rights can be fulfilled, we know that there is still a long way to go for greater social equity.
What is the UDHR?It corresponds to a document adopted by the United Nations in 1948 which attests to the set of inalienable rights of man, that is, the basic rights of any individual received at the time of his birth, such as the right to life, liberty and security. .
CEDAW corresponds to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, being an international treaty of the United Nations of 1979, which specifies the rights of women.
The CRC is the Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, the protection of all children on freedom from neglect, abuse and any type of violence.
Therefore, as much as such conventions are in force in most countries of the world, there are still many changes and efforts that need to be made so that every individual has a dignified life, with opportunities, education and development, this being a collective effort to be achieved.
Find out more about Human Rights on:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
is law civics if so
What role is exemplified by the President vetoing a bill that was passed by Congress? Chief Diplomat Chief of State Chief Executive Chief Legislator
answer: Chief Legislator
Which General Staff member directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives?
A. Operations Division Director
B. Planning Section Chief
C. Tactics Section Chief
D. Operations Section Chief
The General Staff member that directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives is: A. Operations Division Director.
Who is a Operations Division Director?An operations Division Director can be defined as the person whose duty is to manage the day to day operation of a business.
The Director of Operations tend to supervise or oversee all the tactical operation of the company in which they work for and they as well ensures that the goals and objectives of the company is achieved.
Therefore we can conclude that the correct option is A.
Learn more about Operations Division Director here:https://brainly.com/question/6369558
#SPJ1
true or false common law and statutory law do not protect investors;
false
common law does protect investors because it relies on judicial decisions and precedents.
Exclute in the law means to
Answer:
Exclusion means the act or practice of excluding, which is keeping out. When used in relation to tax matters it refers to an item of income excluded from gross income.
Explanation:
this is a test i need this NOW
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
The successful FSO candidate demonstrates the skills, abilities, and personal qualities needed to be a diplomat. Diplomats have distinct personalities...They tend to be enterprising individuals, which means they’re adventurous, ambitious, assertive, extroverted, energetic, enthusiastic, confident, and optimistic. They are dominant, persuasive, and motivational. Some of them are also artistic, meaning they’re creative, intuitive, sensitive, articulate, and expressive.
They must stay calm in stressful or difficult situations and be able to think on their feet, adjusting quickly to changing situations. They must be able to work with people from other cultures with different values, political beliefs, and religions. Diplomats need strong analytical, organizational, and leadership skills. They must have good judgment and high integrity. In addition, they must be able to communicate effectively, both in writing and orally. They must be able to learn at least one foreign language, often several, during their careers. Finally, they must be resourceful and creative problem solvers
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
Answer:
NOT YOU CHEATING ON A TEST CHILEE SHWEA
Explanation:
Which of the following is true in regards to alcohol abuse?
A. It is the result of just one bad experience.
B. It happens by accident
C. It involves intentional overuse.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i took it it should be right
It involves intentional overuse is true in regard to alcohol abuse. Hence, option C is correct.
What is alcohol abuse?Alcohol abuse can be both psychological and physical.It is primarily caused by excessive alcohol consumption on a regular basis, which becomes the person's habit of consuming alcohol on a regular basis and becoming abusive to the other person.
Secondary alcohols are produced when alcohols interact with other atoms. These secondary alcohols include methanol, isopropanol, and ethanol, the three forms of alcohol that people regularly consume.
drinking more frequently or for a longer period of time than expected. persistent desire to reduce or control drinking, or one or more failed attempts to accomplish so. Significant social, professional, or recreational activities curtailed or discontinued as a result of drinking.
Thus, option C, intentional overuse, is correct.
For more information about alcohol abuse, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2526379
#SPJ2
Survey questions should be: a. open-ended b. complex c. closed d. transition
Survey questions can be either open-ended or closed-ended, depending on the purpose and desired responses. Therefore both option a and b are correct.
Respondents are free to give comprehensive, unrestricted responses to open ended questions in their own words. These inquiries frequently begin with the words "What," "Why," or "How," and they invite participants to share their ideas, judgments or experiences.
On the other hand, respondents have a limited number of predetermined response options when answering closed ended questions. Formats like multiple choice, rating scales or yes/no answers are frequently used in these questions. Closed-ended inquiries are helpful for gathering precise and quantifiable data, making comparison and analysis simpler.
To know more about open ended questions here
brainly.com/question/30553689
#SPJ4
Pioneer gangs related to Special Crime Investigation
Answer:
Explanation:
none
If you discriminate against a person because of sexual orientation, gender expression and/or gender identity your conduct does not violate Title IX and HISD policies against sex discrimination.
If you discriminate against a person because of sexual orientation, gender expression and/or gender identity your conduct does not violate Title IX and HISD policies against sex discrimination is false
What is the role of the Title IX coordinator?
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. This includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
In addition, many school districts, including the Houston Independent School District (HISD), have policies that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Discrimination against a person because of their sexual orientation, gender expression, or gender identity would violate both Title IX and HISD policies against sex discrimination.
Therefore, It is important to note that discrimination based on any protected characteristic, including sexual orientation and gender identity, is wrong and should not be tolerated. All individuals should be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender expression, or gender identity.
Learn more about sex discrimination from
https://brainly.com/question/9649905
#SPJ1
See full question below
If you discriminate against a person because of sexual orientation, gender expression and/or gender identity your conduct does not violate Title IX and HISD policies against sex discrimination. true or false
Differentiate the classification of food and beverages facilities
Answer:
Food and beverage facilities are classified into two namely; the Primary and Secondary facilities.
While the Primary facilities are mainly concerned with the preparation of food and beverages for the customers, the Secondary facilities are concerned with the provision of catering services as an arm of another business entity.
Explanation:
In the Primary Food and Beverage facilities, the main focus of such facilities is the preparation of food and beverage for customers. Examples of facilities under this category include hotels, bars, restaurants, coffee shops, etc.
The Secondary Food and Beverage Facilities are an arm or offshoot of another business. Examples of these are the catering services offered in commercial vehicles, in airplanes, on the trains, at the offices, or on the ships. So they are just one of the many services offered by these media.
there is a case thats not from your state but it is mandatory auhority in your state, how is this possible
Answer: the reason for that is becasue it may be on the borader line of the states where it had happen
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
Discuss whether, and if so how, harm reduction policies may
affect drug trafficking, drug consumption, and crime (400)
words
Harm reduction policies are public health strategies aimed at reducing the negative consequences associated with drug use, without necessarily requiring abstinence. These policies focus on minimizing the harms to individuals and communities by providing services such as needle exchanges, opioid substitution therapy, and supervised consumption sites.
Firstly, harm reduction policies can indirectly affect drug trafficking. By providing access to sterile needles and syringes through needle exchange programs, for example, harm reduction initiatives can reduce the transmission of blood-borne diseases among people who inject drugs. This can decrease the demand for drugs by lowering the health risks associated with injection drug use. Consequently, a reduced demand may lead to a decrease in drug trafficking as there is less profit to be made in supplying a smaller market. However, it is important to note that drug trafficking is a complex issue influenced by various factors, and harm reduction policies alone may not entirely eliminate it.
Secondly, harm reduction policies can have an impact on drug consumption patterns. By offering services such as opioid substitution therapy, where opioids are replaced with safer alternatives like methadone or buprenorphine, individuals are provided with a medically supervised and regulated approach to manage their drug use.
Finally, the relationship between harm reduction policies and crime is multifaceted. By providing a safe and controlled environment for drug consumption through supervised consumption sites, harm reduction initiatives can reduce the public visibility of drug use. s. However, it is important to recognize that harm reduction policies alone cannot entirely eradicate drug-related crime, as it is influenced by various socioeconomic factors and systemic issues.
Learn more about blood-borne diseases : brainly.com/question/27960155
#SPJ11
What are the common causes of electrical injuries Accidents at least 5 answers?
Common causes of electrical injuries are: lack of training, improper electrical equipment, lack of protective gears, unsafe environments and not isolating circuits properly.
In the factory setting, electrical accidents are frequently occurring, if not always inevitable. They can happen because of a variety of factors, including management, machinery, or personnel. Accidents, as the cliché goes, just happen; there is frequently no single individual to blame. The issue is that they occur far too regularly and have a great deal too many potentially harmful effects for us to get complacent about them. It's interesting to note that close to half of these factors have a direct connection to employee training and level of job competency. Electrical workers implicated in accidents are frequently ill-equipped, unprepared, or misinformed to do their own tasks safely and confidently.
Learn more about electrical injuries here:
https://brainly.com/question/8549725
#SPJ4
Which of these entities is considered a covered entity?
A. Consultants
B. Billing agency
C. Physician practices
D. Accountants
Option C. Physician practices these entities is considered a covered entity.
A covered entity, as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, refers to certain organizations or individuals that are required to comply with HIPAA regulations in order to protect the privacy and security of individuals' health information. Out of the entities listed, the one considered a covered entity is Physician practices
Physician practices, including individual doctors and medical groups, are generally considered covered entities under HIPAA. These entities provide medical services directly to patients and handle protected health information (PHI) as part of their regular operations. PHI includes any individually identifiable health information, such as medical records, treatment history, and health insurance information.
Consultants, billing agencies, and accountants, on the other hand, are not automatically considered covered entities under HIPAA. While they may come into contact with PHI in their work with healthcare providers, their status as covered entities depends on the specific circumstances and the nature of their relationship with the healthcare organization.
If these entities perform functions or activities that involve the use or disclosure of PHI on behalf of a covered entity, they may be considered "business associates" under HIPAA and would need to comply with certain requirements to protect PHI.
It is important to note that the determination of whether an entity is a covered entity or a business associate under HIPAA can be complex and may require a case-by-case analysis. Organizations should consult legal and regulatory experts to ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations based on their specific roles and responsibilities.
Know more about PHI here:
https://brainly.com/question/14423306
#SPJ8
is there a statute of limitations on property liens?
On property liens, a judgement lien is valid for ten years. A property lien is a formal claim made against assets that gives the holder access to the asset in the event that a debt is not paid.
A county records office or a state agency must both file and approve a property lien. The property owner is then informed in writing with specific terms that action has been taken to reclaim the property.
Creditors may use property liens in a variety of circumstances. A legal claim to particular assets that has been authorized by the courts is known as a property lien. A county records office or state agency is where a creditor must apply and be granted permission for a property lien.
To learn more about property liens, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/30024963
#SPJ4
Joe enters into a contract with Harry only because of Harry's threats. Later, Joe refuses to perform, claiming that he entered into the contract under duress. Harry sues to enforce the contract. To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened a. Joe with a wrongful act. b. Joe with an illegal act. c. Joe with deadly force. d. to file a civil suit against Joe. e. either A or B.
Answer:
B. joe with an illegal act
To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened Joe with a wrongful act. Thus the correct option is A.
What is a Contract?An agreement signed between two individuals based on mutual consent where both parties are getting something in return when enforceable by law is said to be a contract.
In the given case, it states that Joe enters into a contract with Harry because harry forces him to do so. Later jow refuses to perform the contract by stating that he entered under duress in the contract.
In the given case, To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened Jow with a wrongful act as forcing someone to be part of the contract is said to be a wrongful act where the willingness of an individual is absent.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Answer:
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Explanation:
The statement below is from a jury's decision in a court case.
"We, the jury, rule in favor of Mrs. Garcia, and order Mr. Wakefield to pay the sum of twenty thousand dollars, plus attorney fees and court costs.."
Based on the statement above, what type of case has the jury decided?
A. civil
B. criminal
C. military
D. statutory
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:
A). Civil
What are the types of cases?The courts deal with a number of cases which include:
Civil CasesFamily CasesCriminal casesAs per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.
The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Jury" here:
brainly.com/question/20407684
Do you bananas or not bananas?
Answer:
YES
B
A
N
A
N
A
S
Explanation:
Yeah