Role of Speaker The Speaker is the presiding officer of the house and is charged with several duties and obligations by means of regulation and by the residence policies.
Because the presiding officer of the house, the Speaker keeps order, manages its complaints, and governs the administration of its commercial enterprise.
The Speaker of the residence is accountable for administering the oath of the workplace to the contributors of the U.S. House of Representatives, giving individuals permission to speak on the house floor, designating members to function as Speaker pro tempore, counting and affirming all votes, appointing individuals to committees, sending bills.
Learn more about Speaker here: https://brainly.com/question/26492392
#SPJ4
When you apply for an original Driver's License or Identification card,you must present an acceptable birth date/legal presence document and provide your social security number (SSN).
Choose matching definition
1 True
2 False
The given statement "When you apply for an original Driver's License or Identification card, you must present an acceptable birth date/legal presence document and provide your social security number (SSN)" is true because when you apply for an original Driver's License or Identification card, you must provide documentation that proves your legal presence in the United States, as well as your Social Security Number (SSN).
This documentation can include a birth certificate, passport or a permanent resident card. You should also provide documentation that proves your address of residence, such as a utility bill or rental agreement. This information is required because it is necessary for the state to verify that you are a legal resident of the state and that you are eligible to receive a driver's license or other form of identification.
By providing your birthdate and SSN, you are helping to verify your identity so that the state can be sure that it is issuing the license or identification to the correct individual.
To know more about Social Security Number go to
https://brainly.com/question/23913541
#SPJ4
Which of the following is considered as innovative criminal defense strategy?
O self-defense
O battered women's syndrome
O duress
O mistake
Considering the available options, the choice that is considered as an innovative criminal defense strategy is "battered women's syndrome."
What is battered women's syndrome?Battered women's syndrome is a medical and psychological term that is used to describe the severe mental health ailment resulting from serious domestic abuse.
Given the legal situation, battered women's syndrome is not a typical condition that is common but has been innovated by some defenders to justify their offense so they can get discharged and acquitted.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Battered women's syndrome.
Learn more about the criminal defense strategy here: https://brainly.com/question/11342133
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
Jessica and Emma are full-time employees at the Benjamin Limited Liability Company. They went to a coffee house named New Heaven Café near their office in the lunch time. Jessica ordered one coffee for her and a bottle of beer for her friend. Emma drank about half of the bottle, which was made of dark glass and labelled with white bold words.
When Emma poured the remainder of the beer into a tumbler, she found a stranger. At this point, the decomposed remains of a snail floated out. She was shocked and suffered a severe painful stomach. She had to spend a week in hospital. The doctor confirmed that her stomach problems might have been caused by the inferior quality beer.
The Western Beverages company which manufactured and supplied beer to New Heaven Café confirmed that their manufacturing process was controlled strictly, which had never caused any incidents like that.
Emma’s boss was very angry when she had a week leave in busy days at work. She explained that she had an urgent health problem. However, the boss was insistent with his intention; she was fired on the first day she was back to work. Emma is so upset and needs some legal advice.
Requirements:
Emma has approached you for some legal advice. Write a report outlining the following:
Explain the above legal issues with reference to the English legal system, decided and recorded case law.
The assignment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Emma confuses as to whether there is a contract between her and the beer
manufacturer. Explain the essential elements of contract.
2. Advise Emma whether she may successfully sue the Western Beverages company
for negligence. Explain the essential elements to claim for negligence.
3. Advise Emma of her legal position with regards to Benjamin Limited Liability
Company. Explain the different types of dismissal.
Contract refers to an agreement between two or more party to carry out a duty in return for consideration
1. Yes, there is a contract between him and the beer company because he paid a sum for the beer and the company is responsible for producing good and healthy beer.
2. Yes, Emma can sue the company because she has suffered damage from use of the beer. She suffered health-wise and loss her job because of health issue arising from use of the beer.
3. Since the dismissal is done harshly, he can seek for resolution with the management to retain him back.
Read more about Contract element
brainly.com/question/8116487
Which of the following are characteristics of the executive branch as outlined by Article II of the United States Constitution?
I and II only.
I and IV only.
II and III only.
III and IV only.
The section that are characteristics of the executive branch as outlined by Article II of the United States Constitution is II and III only.
What informs Article II of the United States Constitution?Article Two of the United States Constitution showcases the executive branch of the federal government, which carries out and enforces federal laws.
Article II eatablished the Executive Branch and the offices of the President and Vice President. It explains the rules for electing the President (through the Electoral College), eligibility (must be a natural-born citizen at least 35 years old), and term length. The 12th and 25th Amendments modified some of these rules.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Article II of the United States: https://brainly.com/question/28768341
#SPJ1
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
Everyday we wake up to news reporting on the internet, TV and other social media about statistics in the criminal justice field. If we look at these statistics objectively, what purpose do they serve in your understanding of crime as a Criminal Justice major and/or a Criminal Justice professional.
As a Criminal Justice major or a Criminal Justice professional, statistics in the field of criminal justice serve several important purposes in understanding crime: Informing policy and decision-making, Assessing crime rates and trends, Evaluating criminal justice policies and programs, Identifying disparities and informing social justice efforts, Supporting research and academic understanding.
Informing policy and decision-making: Crime statistics provide valuable data that informs policymakers and professionals in making informed decisions regarding crime prevention, law enforcement strategies, resource allocation, and policy development. By analyzing trends and patterns in crime statistics, policymakers can identify areas of concern, assess the effectiveness of interventions, and develop evidence-based strategies to address crime.
Assessing crime rates and trends: Crime statistics help in assessing the prevalence and nature of crime in different areas and over time. They provide an objective measure of crime rates, allowing criminal justice professionals to identify high-crime areas, analyze trends, and allocate resources accordingly. By monitoring changes in crime rates, professionals can evaluate the impact of interventions and adjust strategies as needed.
Evaluating criminal justice policies and programs: Statistics play a crucial role in evaluating the effectiveness of criminal justice policies and programs. By examining relevant data, professionals can assess the outcomes and impact of specific initiatives, such as community policing, rehabilitation programs, or crime prevention strategies. This evaluation helps in determining the success of interventions, identifying areas for improvement, and refining approaches to better address crime-related challenges.
Identifying disparities and informing social justice efforts: Crime statistics can highlight disparities and inequalities within the criminal justice system. By examining data related to arrests, convictions, sentencing, and other aspects, professionals can identify potential biases, disproportionate representation of certain groups, or unequal treatment. This information can contribute to efforts aimed at promoting fairness, equity, and social justice within the criminal justice system.
Supporting research and academic understanding: Crime statistics serve as valuable data sources for researchers, academics, and students in the field of criminal justice. They provide a foundation for empirical studies, theoretical analysis, and scholarly research, helping to advance knowledge and understanding of crime, its causes, and its consequences. Statistics enable the formulation and testing of hypotheses, the identification of emerging issues, and the development of theories in the field.
Overall, statistics in the criminal justice field play a crucial role in informing policy, assessing crime rates and trends, evaluating programs, addressing disparities, and supporting research. They provide a quantitative basis for understanding crime and contribute to evidence-based decision-making and practices in the criminal justice system.
To know more about Criminal Justice, click here https://brainly.com/question/30629034
#SPJ11
if alabama passes a statute specifically permitting high school girls to try out for and play on varsity high school football teams if qualified, that statute would be reviewed using
The statute would be reviewed using intermediate scrutiny. Maintaining sexual equality is a policy that is crucial to the achievement of a governmental goal and is subject to intermediate scrutiny.
More about intermediate scrutiny:
The 2nd degree of deciding matters through judicial process is known as intermediate scrutiny in American constitutional law. The remaining categories are often referred to as stringent scrutiny and rational basis review.
The law or policy being contested must be proven to serve an important government interest using methods that are closely related to that purpose in order to pass the intermediate scrutiny test.
Learn more about intermediate scrutiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/28266959
#SPJ4
1. What are the 20 rights Criminal defendants have?
The rights to counsel, the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, and the right to a quick and open trial are all included in this.
What are a criminal's fundamental rights?In India, the accused's rights are broken down into three categories: those before the trial, those during the trial, and those after the trial. The rights of the accused also include the right to a fair trial, the ability to post bail, the ability to retain the services of a criminal defense attorney, and the availability of free legal aid in India.
What is the accused's most crucial legal right?In the US criminal justice system, the presumption of innocence is the most significant constitutional guarantee. Lower courts in the US have often received warnings from the Supreme Court that juries need to be properly educated that a defendant is innocent unless proven guilty.
To know more about rights visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30169554
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!! ILL GIVE 100 POINTS
Identifie similarities between the Georgia State Level Government and the United States Federal Government for the Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branches
Answer: you can just use an online source all the similarities and everything else is on the internet
Explanation:
if a case settled in courts-martial is appealed, it is removed from the military system and placed into the federal judicial system. what is the rationale behind this approach?
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, other military forces, military formations, and bodies in which military service is required by federal law (hereinafter also referred to as bodies),
as well as other powers in accordance with the federal constitution, are subject to the jurisdiction of the military courts of the Russian Federation, which are federal courts of general jurisdiction.
Based on the territorial basis, circuit (fleet) military courts and garrison military courts are established where the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, as well as other military forces, formations, and bodies, are stationed. Military courts are situated in public locations.
To learn more about the military system from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/11631955
#SPJ1
When a condition operates to terminate a party's absolute promise to perform, it is called a:
a. condition precedent.
b. condition subsequent.
c. simultaneous condition.
d. concurrent condition.
When a condition operates to terminate a party's absolute promise to perform, it is called a condition subsequent.
A condition subsequent is a condition that, if it occurs, will terminate the party's obligation to perform. In contrast, a condition precedent is a condition that must be met before a party is obligated to perform, while a simultaneous condition is one that must occur at the same time as the party's performance. A concurrent condition is one that is dependent on the actions of both parties and must occur simultaneously for the performance to be completed.
In contract law, it is important to understand the different types of conditions that may affect the performance of the parties. A condition subsequent can be written into a contract to allow one or both parties to terminate their obligations under certain circumstances. This type of condition can provide a level of flexibility for the parties, while still ensuring that the terms of the agreement are met.
Overall, understanding the different types of conditions that can affect a contract is essential for ensuring that the parties' obligations are clearly defined and enforceable. By including specific conditions in a contract, parties can ensure that they are protected and that the terms of the agreement are met.
To know more about party's obligation
https://brainly.com/question/31360516
#SPJ11
In 2016 37% of the speeding drivers in the US under 21 years old who were involved in fatal crashes
In 2016, 37% of drivers under 21 years old who were involved in fatal crashes in the US were found to be speeding.
In 2016, a significant statistic revealed that 37% of the drivers under 21 years old who were involved in fatal crashes in the United States were found to be speeding. This statistic indicates the alarming impact of speeding among young drivers and its contribution to fatal accidents. Speeding is a dangerous behavior that increases the risk of losing control of the vehicle, reduces reaction time, and magnifies the severity of collisions.
The high percentage highlights the need for effective measures to address this issue and promote safer driving habits among young individuals. This includes comprehensive driver education programs that emphasize the risks and consequences of speeding, stricter enforcement of speed limits, and increased public awareness campaigns to educate young drivers about the importance of responsible driving.
By addressing speeding as a significant factor in fatal crashes involving young drivers, efforts can be made to save lives and reduce the devastating impact of such accidents. Promoting a culture of safe driving practices and instilling a sense of responsibility among young drivers is crucial in creating a safer road environment for everyone.
For more such question on US
https://brainly.com/question/14994944
#SPJ11
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
Which method is usually a way for a person to become an official candidate for President of the US?
By collecting signatures from citizens
By receiving the endorsement of the local newspaper
By being chosen by the Senate
By announcing their intent to run for President.
Who was declared the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948?
Herman Talmadge was the rightful governor of Georgia in a special election in 1948.
The "three governors issue" in Georgia in 1946–1947, which was sparked by Eugene Talmadge's death as governor–elect, was one of the more peculiar political spectacles in American political history.
Upon Talmadge's passing, his supporters came up with a scheme that let the Georgia legislature choose a governor in January 1947. The newly elected lieutenant governor, Melvin E. Thompson, claimed the position of governor after the General Assembly chose Talmadge's son Herman Talmadge as governor.
Also, the previous governor, Ellis Arnall, refused to step down. Ultimately, the dispute was resolved by the Georgia Supreme Court.
The Georgia Supreme Court concluded in March 1947 that Melvin E. Thompson was the legitimate acting governor of the state because he was the lieutenant governor-elect and ran for re-election.
To know more about Herman Talmadge, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15003731
#SPJ4
I need Help pleaseyc8c9yc9yoc
Answer:
1. A 2. B 3. a 4. C 5. A 6. B 7. C 8. a 9. A 10. B 11. A 12. C 13. B 14. A 15. C 16.B
Explanation:
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
When two vehicles are approaching each other and signaling to turn left, both
vehicles should take the inside path, the lane closest to the center. They will complete
the turn by turning in
of each other.
Answer:
What are you asking? True or False??
12 angry men viewing guide 2. several jurors give reasons why they are voting guilty. list 3 jurors and the explanation for each of their votes
Juror 3: Juror 3 votes guilty due to his personal biases and emotions. He has a strained relationship with his son,
leading him to see the accused as a troubled youth who is guilty of the crime. Juror 3's belief in the accused's guilt is based on his own personal experiences rather than the evidence presented in the case.
His emotions cloud his judgment, making it challenging for him to evaluate the case objectively. It is crucial to challenge his preconceptions and encourage him to separate his personal biases from the facts of the case.
By highlighting the flaws in his arguments and encouraging him to consider alternative perspectives, it may be possible to shift his stance and help him make a more informed decision.
Juror 10: Juror 10's vote is rooted in racism and prejudice. He holds strong views on people from the accused's background being prone to criminal behavior, which drives his belief in the accused's guilt.
Juror 10's vote is a prime example of how personal biases can undermine the integrity of the justice system. It is essential to challenge his discriminatory beliefs and encourage him to evaluate the evidence impartially.
By emphasizing the importance of fairness and equality, it may be possible to shift his perspective and help him recognize the flaws in his reasoning.
Juror 7: Juror 7 votes guilty due to his lack of interest and indifference towards the case. He is primarily concerned with attending a baseball game and wants to wrap up the deliberation quickly.
Juror 7's indifference undermines the integrity of the justice system, and it is important to engage him in the discussion and encourage him to take the case seriously.
By highlighting the importance of his role as a juror and the potential consequences of a hasty decision, it may be possible to shift his focus from personal interests to the pursuit of justice.
It is crucial to ensure that every juror understands the significance of their role and is committed to fulfilling their duties with the utmost seriousness and impartiality.
To know more about evidence click here
brainly.com/question/14584633
#SPJ11
3
What do the Fifth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment have in common?
O A.
O B.
O C.
O D.
They both protect people from unreasonable invasions of their privacy.
They both concern the rights of a person accused of a crime.
They both are about the division of power between the federal and state governments.
They both have to do with a person's rights in a civil case.
Answer:
B – Rights of a person accused of a crime.
Explanation:
This is my best guess; it's either B or D.
Every professor teaches the Constitution differently, of course, but mine often referred to Amendments 4, 5, 6, and 8 as the "Criminal Procedure Amendments"; they relate to how people accused of crimes should be treated and what rights they can expect.
The 5th Amendment says that accused people cannot be tried twice for the same crime (double jeopardy) and protects a person's right to remain silent, right to attorney, etc. The 6th Amendment guarantees a speedy trial by an impartial jury of one's peers, as well as the right of confrontation.
While these rights protect people accused of civil crimes, they could also theoretically apply to criminal crimes, so I'd guess B.
Powers that are not explicitly listed in the constitution, but are necessary for congress to properly carry out those powers are called_____.
Powers that are not explicitly listed in the constitution, but are necessary for congress to properly carry out those powers, are called implied powers.
An implied power can be referred to or considered as the power that can be assumed to be at the access of an authority, here Congress, and are generally not expressed within the scope of the Constitution.
Congress has been granted with certain implied powers, which are not explicitly mentioned under the Constitution. However, these powers are effective only when the authorities directly exercise them.
Learn more about implied powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/27728796
#SPJ4
The axis powers were made up of coalitions of countries that opposed the ____ powers in World War II
A. Socialist
B. Facist
C. Allied
D. Communist
Investments can make businesses more productive by:
O A. allowing them to ignore the limits of production possibilities
curves.
B. increasing the amount of input needed to create a certain output.
C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
D. removing most opportunity costs for making economic choices.
Answer: C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
Explanation:
I just took the quiz, C is correct! :)
According to Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu, which option leads to human suffering? A. poverty B. greed C. compassion D. violence
A and D
Hope this helps
Answer: B
Explanation:
The theory draws from Tibetan Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu's principles to determine the causes of human suffering. According to the master, suffering is a result of six emotions: desire, anger, GREED, jealousy, pride, and ignorance.
Briefly describe the steps of the law making process of the legislative branch
Answer:
The legislative procedure comprises three main phases: the tabling of the text, its examination by the Parliament and its promulgation by the President of the Republic (after a possible referral to the Constitutional Council for examination of the conformity of the text with the Constitution).
A bill goes through all stages of the legislative process through "a long series of standard motions" on which the House must vote favorably before the bill can become law. [123].
Explanation:
Shondra is a comptroller and has worked at both the local and state level in this position. She has been able to retain her same membership in the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees regardless of the level she worked at. Shondra is a member of a(n) _____ union.industrial
Shondra is member of an industrial union if she has worked at both local and state level in this position.
What is an industrial union?Workers in Finland's light and heavy industries are represented by the Industrial Union, a trade union. On January 1, 2018, the Industrial Union TEAM combined with the Metalworkers' Union and the Wood and Allied Workers' Union to form the union. It joined the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, much like its forerunners. The Industrial Federation's representatives expressed their optimism that the Paperworkers' Union will join within a few years despite the union's decision to opt out of the merger that created it. The building and woodworkers' international, the International Association of food, agricultural, hotel, restaurant, catering, tobacco other allied workers' associations, and the UNI Worldwide Union are the four global union federations to which the union belongs.
To learn more about state, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ4
Stair and Erskine on the development of law
Answer:
Stair, Bell, and Erskine are the most well-known of these. In the 1660s, Stair brought together the elements of customary, feudal, and Roman law into one system based on legal principles and philosophy in his leading work The Institutions of the Law in Scotland (1681).
Explanation:
Hope this helps and have a great day!!!
Which list shows events from the water cycle in the correct order?
which body of the federal reserve system sets the majority of u.s. monetary policy?
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) sets the majority of U.S. monetary policy.
The Federal Reserve System is the central banking system of the United States, and it is responsible for implementing and controlling monetary policy. The FOMC is the body within the Federal Reserve System that is primarily responsible for setting monetary policy. The FOMC is made up of twelve members, which includes the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents. The FOMC meets approximately eight times a year to assess economic conditions and determine monetary policy.
The FOMC is the most important decision-making body in the Federal Reserve System and plays a crucial role in shaping U.S. monetary policy
To know more about U.S. monetary policy ,visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13975105
#SPJ11