What steps should we launch to succeed the expedition conducted by

Kailash Satyarthee?​

Answer: A

Explanation: The Hohokam lived in a desert with little rain, so they figured out how to irrigate their crops. They also became good at trade with other people. The Anasazi used the landscape to build their homes. They built networks of ditches to irrigate the desert. They cleared forests to make room for farmland. They relied on fishing and hunting for food. They built mounds to increase farmland.

The three diagrams commonly used for visualizing cause-and-effect relationships are the linear diagram, the systemic diagram, and the circular diagram. Among these diagrams, the systemic diagram most closely resembles how events unfold in reality.

The systemic diagram represents cause-and-effect relationships as a complex network or system of interconnected factors. It recognizes that events and outcomes are influenced by multiple variables that interact with each other in intricate ways. This diagram acknowledges the interdependence and interconnectedness of various factors in a system, reflecting the complexity of real-life cause-and-effect relationships. Historians might choose to use another diagram instead of the systemic diagram for several reasons:

1. Simplification: The systemic diagram can be complex and may not be suitable for all situations. Historians might choose to simplify cause-and-effect relationships by using a linear diagram, which represents events as a straightforward sequence. This simplification can make the relationships easier to understand and communicate.

2. Clarity: In certain cases, historians might opt for a diagram that provides clarity by highlighting the most significant cause-and-effect relationships. They may choose a circular diagram, which emphasizes recurring or cyclical patterns, particularly when studying historical events with repetitive or cyclical characteristics.

3. Specific Focus: Depending on the research question or the aspect of history being examined, historians may find that another diagram, such as a linear or circular diagram, better aligns with their specific focus. Different diagrams can offer different perspectives and insights into cause-and-effect relationships, allowing historians to emphasize particular aspects of the historical narrative.

Ultimately, the choice of diagram depends on the historian's objectives, the complexity of the historical events being studied, and the need for clarity and simplification. Different diagrams offer different visual representations and can help historians convey their analysis and interpretations of cause-and-effect relationships in history effectively.

To know more visualizing cause-and-effect relationships. ,click

brainly.com/question/32152193

Answer:

Hello uh, hope this help you !

Explanation:

The river was used to transport American products from inland to the Port of New Orleans. President Thomas Jefferson's decision to purchase Louisiana territory was to overcome this problem and take complete control over the river and its surrounding areas, which was vital for American trade.

Wallace Ferguson in his book had told that the last five centuries has been based on the interpretation of Renaissance. The past history of renaissance opens for the contemporary beliefs and values of the western culture. This is one of the crucial importance in regards to the evolution of western civilization.

Answer:

it reflected the changing attitude because it made whites see that blacks were people too

Explanation:

Answer:

Becuse Babylonian society, the society to which the Hammurabi Code belonged to, was an extremely stratified society, divided by castes: the royal caste, the priest caste, the merchants caste, the farmers caste, and the slaves caste.

This means that the society was very hierarchichal, instead of egalitarian. All people were not considered equal under the law, like we do today. Poorer farmers were considered to be worth less than a wealthy landowner, or a priest, and an offense by a poor farmer was thought to be more serious than an offense by the wealthy landowner or the priest.

Explanation: The US government was not collecting taxes from the people.

Answer: one thing i would think the U.S. would want to do other than protecting an international persian gulf state would be to do it for oil since Kuwait was rich with oil which was the first reason Iraq invaded kuwait for.

Explanation: yeah, that's my answer

Answer:

totalitarianism, form of government that theoretically permits no individual freedom and that seeks to subordinate all aspects of individual life to the authority of the state. Italian dictator Benito Mussolini coined the term totalitario in the early 1920s to characterize the new fascist state of Italy, which he further described as “all within the state, none outside the state, none against the state.” By the beginning of World War II, totalitarian had become synonymous with absolute and oppressive single-party government. Other modern examples of totalitarian states include the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, the People’s Republic of China under Mao Zedong, and North Korea under the Kim dynasty.

Explanation:

General characteristics of totalitarianism

In the broadest sense, totalitarianism is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. Historical examples of such centralized totalitarian rule include the Mauryan dynasty of India (c. 321–c. 185 BCE), the Qin dynasty of China (221–207 BCE), and the reign of Zulu chief Shaka (c. 1816–28). Nazi Germany (1933–45) and the Soviet Union during the Stalin era (1924–53) were the first examples of decentralized or popular totalitarianism, in which the state achieved overwhelming popular support for its leadership. That support was not spontaneous: its genesis depended on a charismatic leader, and it was made possible only by modern developments in communication and transportation.

Answer:

erosion

Explanation: Over time the water has smooth over rocks

Answer:

Why does conflict develop? in The Final Years

Explanation:

The world has transformed rapidly in the decade since the end of the Cold War. An old system is gone and, although it is easy to identify what has changed, it is not yet clear that a new system has taken its place. Old patterns have come unstuck, and if new patterns are emerging, it is still too soon to define them clearly. The list of potentially epoch-making changes is familiar by now: the end of an era of bipolarity, a new wave of democratization, increasing globalization of information and economic power, more frequent efforts at international coordination of security policy, a rash of sometimes-violent expressions of claims to rights based on cultural identity, and a redefinition of sovereignty that imposes on states new responsibilities to their citizens and the world community.1

These transformations are changing much in the world, including, it seems, the shape of organized violence and the ways in which governments and others try to set its limits. One indication of change is the noteworthy decrease in the frequency and death toll of international wars in the 1990s. Subnational ethnic and religious conflicts, however, have been so intense that the first post-Cold War decade was marked by enough deadly lower-intensity conflicts to make it the bloodiest since the advent of nuclear weapons (Wallensteen and Sollenberg, 1996). It is still too soon to tell whether this shift in the most lethal type of warfare is a lasting change: the continued presence of contested borders between militarily potent states—in Korea, Kashmir, Taiwan, and the Middle East—gives reason to postpone judgment. It seems likely, though, that efforts to pre-

Page 2

Suggested Citation:"Conflict Resolution in a Changing World." National Research Council. 2000. International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9897.×

Add a note to your bookmark

vent outbreaks in such hot spots will take different forms in the changed international situation.

A potentially revolutionary change in world politics has been a de facto redefinition of “international conflict.” International conflict still includes the old-fashioned war, a violent confrontation between nation states acting through their own armed forces or proxies with at least one state fighting outside its borders. But now some conflicts are treated as threats to international peace and security even if two states are not fighting. Particularly when internal conflicts involve violations of universal norms such as self-determination, human rights, or democratic governance, concerted international actions—including the threat or use of force—are being taken to prevent, conclude, or resolve them just as they sometimes have been for old-fashioned wars. In this sense some conflicts within a country’s borders are being treated as international.

There are various prominent recent examples. They include the delayed international military responses to genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, and repression in East Timor; the unprecedented military response of NATO to repression in Kosovo; the establishment and enforcement of no-fly zones in Iraq; and the use of economic sanctions against South Africa and Yugoslavia. Threatened or enacted coups d’état against democratically established governments have also sometimes been treated as international conflicts, as in Haiti. Similarly, threats of the violent dissolution of states or of their dissolution into violence have triggered international concern, as in Bosnia, Albania, and Somalia.

How important are such recent developments? In particular, do they make any important difference in how the actors on the world scene should deal with international conflicts? Do the tools developed for managing international conflicts under the old world system still apply? Are they best applied in new ways or by new entities? Are there new tools that are more appropriate for the new conditions? How do the old and new tools relate to each other?

This book is devoted to examining these questions. This chapter begins the examination by identifying the major strategies of conflict resolution, old and new, that are relevant in the emerging world system. We use the term conflict resolution broadly to refer to efforts to prevent or mitigate violence resulting from intergroup or interstate conflict, as well as efforts to reduce the underlying disagreements. We presume that conflict between social groups is an inevitably recurring fact of life and that the goal of conflict resolution is to keep conflicts channeled within a set of agreed norms that foster peaceful discussion of differences, proscribe violence as a means of settling disputes, and establish rules for the limited kinds of violence that are condoned (e.g., as punishment for violations of codes of criminal conduct)

The citizen responsibility to ensure that their environments promote safe and healthy living is of paramount importance.

Citizens have a responsibility to educate themselves about potential hazards and risks in their surroundings. This includes being aware of environmental pollutants, safety regulations, and health guidelines. By staying informed, citizens can make informed decisions to protect themselves and take necessary actions to address any potential dangers.

Citizens should actively participate in community initiatives and advocacy for safe and healthy environments. This can involve engaging in neighborhood associations, local governance, or environmental organizations to raise awareness, voice concerns, and work towards implementing policies and practices that promote safety and well-being. Through collective action, citizens can have a greater impact and drive positive change.

Citizens must adopt responsible behaviors and practices that contribute to a safe and healthy environment. This includes proper waste disposal, adherence to safety regulations, practicing good hygiene, and promoting sustainable practices. By taking personal responsibility for their actions, citizens can reduce pollution, minimize risks, and create a healthier living environment for themselves and others.

know more about promote safe here:

brainly.com/question/17001736

#SPJ11

Answer:

opportunities which they lacked compared to other states.

2. Rhode island wanted the condition that a bill of rights be included.

Explanation:

1. Delaware's condition was based on their size and also the fact that they lacked economic opportunities. They believed that if the federal government was stronger, then they would be protected against attacks and also be more open to Economic opportunities like other states. They were the first to ratify this constitution

2. Rhode island decide to boycott because they couldn't trust a federal government that had so much powers at its disposal. They were the 13th state to ratify the constitution, but they had the condition that a bill of rights be included.

Explanation:

Answer:

Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, and slave owners were promised or guaranteed property rights under the fifth amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

A law that is unconstitutional is one that violates the principles and provisions of the supreme law of the land, which is the constitution. Such a law may infringe on the rights and freedoms of the people, or exceed the powers and limits of the government. The remedy for a law that is unconstitutional is to challenge it in a court of law, where judges can review its validity and compatibility with the constitution. If the court finds that the law is indeed unconstitutional, it can declare it null and void, and prevent its enforcement. This process is known as judicial review, and it is an essential mechanism for upholding the rule of law and protecting democracy.

MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!

Credit refers to borrowing money or obtaining goods and services with the promise of repayment. Interest is the cost of borrowing or the return on investment for lending money. They became more common due to economic growth, industrialization, advancements in banking, changing attitudes towards debt, and globalization.

Credit refers to the ability to borrow money or obtain goods or services with the promise of repayment in the future. Interest, on the other hand, is the cost of borrowing money or the return on investment for lending money, typically expressed as a percentage.

During this period, the increasing prevalence of credit and interest can be attributed to several factors.

In summary, credit and interest became more common during this period due to the need for capital, advancements in financial systems, changing societal attitudes, and the demands of a globalized economy. These factors combined to promote the growth and acceptance of credit as a means of accessing funds and conducting economic activities.

For more questions on Credit

https://brainly.com/question/23044376

#SPJ8

Historians consider the greatest achievement of the Byzantine Empire to be the preservation of Greek and Roman cultures because even after the fall of the two empires, the Byzantine empire continued to uphold their cultures.

The Byzantine Empire was also known as the Eastern Roman Empire, because the citizens of that empire considered themselves Roman rather than Byzantine. The empire spoke primarily in Greek unlike their Western counterpart. By the time of the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD, both empires had pretty much split and had staring governing themselves, even having two emperors.

The Byzantine Empire lasted well into the next millennium and fell into the hands of the Ottoman Empire in 1453 AD. The Byzantine Empire, which was predominantly Catholic, soon began to be influenced by other upcoming religions and this led to the Great Schism.

One of the prides of the Byzantine Empire was the Corpus Juris Civilis, or the Roman Law, published during the reign of Emperor Justinian. This, along with the Byzantine Senate, form the roots of many legislations in the modern world.

To know more about the Roman Empire, go to https://brainly.com/question/27985217

It can be argued that imperialism came before nationalism, as the concept of imperialism has been present in human history for centuries, while nationalism emerged as a modern political ideology in the 18th and 19th centuries. Imperialism is the practice of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means, often for economic gain. Nationalism, on the other hand, is the belief in the importance of a shared national identity and the desire for self-rule.

One historical event that illustrates the precedence of imperialism is the colonization of the Americas by European powers in the 15th and 16th centuries. This was driven by the desire for economic gain and control over resources, as well as a belief in European cultural superiority. Nationalism did not emerge as a dominant ideology until several centuries later, during the French Revolution and the subsequent rise of nation-states in Europe.

Furthermore, it can be argued that nationalism emerged as a response to imperialism, as colonized peoples began to assert their own identities and desire for self-rule in the face of foreign domination. This was seen in movements such as India's struggle for independence from British colonial rule in the 20th century.

In summary, while both imperialism and nationalism have had a significant impact on human history, imperialism can be seen as the earlier concept, with nationalism emerging as a response to imperialism in the modern era.

Answer:

May 3, 2017 · In the next 10 years, do you think we will see the emergence of new ... to teach new skills at the scale that is necessary to help workers keep abreast ... that job training is not a primary concern at a time when accelerating ... we will not segregate schooling from work and real-world thinking and development.

Total war is a type of war in which all aspects of a society are mobilized towards the war effort, including the economy, industry, and population. The goal is to achieve complete victory by exhausting the enemy's resources and will to fight.

World War I was a total war because it involved the mobilization of entire populations and resources of the belligerent countries to support the war effort. The war was fought not only on the battlefields but also in the factories, fields, and homes of the civilian population.

The images of World War I provide evidence of its total war nature. The propaganda posters and photographs from the war show how the government of the belligerent countries mobilized their populations to support the war effort.

For example, the posters showed images of soldiers and civilians working together, urging citizens to buy war bonds and to support the troops in any way possible. The images also depicted the effects of the war on civilians, such as the destruction of homes, displacement of people, and the loss of life.

In addition to the mobilization of populations, World War I was a total war in other ways. It involved the use of new technologies such as tanks, airplanes, and poison gas, which were used to devastating effect on the battlefields. The war also saw the introduction of unrestricted submarine warfare, which targeted civilian ships, and the use of propaganda to influence public opinion in support of the war effort.

Overall, World War I was a total war because it involved the mobilization of entire populations and resources of the belligerent countries to support the war effort, and it affected all aspects of society, from the battlefield to the home front.

Know more bout World War I here :

brainly.com/question/8535233

#SPJ11

Answer: It was mostly preserved entirely except for the eventual abolition of slavery.

Explanation:

Answer: D. -It was mostly preserved entirely except for the eventual abolition of slavery.

Explanation: In some areas, particularly in the Caribbean, the caste system was mostly preserved, with racial and social divisions remaining intact. However, the Latin American Revolutions did lead to the eventual abolition of slavery, which was an integral part of the caste system.  This abolition marked an important step towards dismantling the system of social hierarchy based on race and ethnicity.

Learn more about the Latin American Revolutions here: https://brainly.com/question/21164862.

Answer:

Art, technology, and trade

Explanation:

While the common consensus may still be that the impact of the Vikings during the Viking Age, which lasted from about 800 to 1100 AD, was not very enduring, the Viking culture had a lasting impact on the art, technology, and trade of every population they encountered across Europe and Scandinavia

A Loyalist could respond to the Patriots' arguments against British taxation by saying it was justified and needed.

Before Great Britain started to tax the colonists, they had practiced salutary neglect. This was a good type of neglect and let the colonists deal with matters on their own, without British interference. Great Britain only cared about the colonies making money for them, so they left them alone for the most part.

This changed when the French and Indian War ended, as Great Britain needed to pay for the very expensive war. This was when they stopped practicing salutary neglect and started to tax the colonists. The French and Indian war was fought on the soil of the colonists and Loyalists argued that it was fought in order to protect the colonies, so it was fair that Great Britain was taxing them.

Even after the French and Indian War, Great Britain assigned troops to protect the colonists from outsiders. They also used this as a way to justify them taxing the colonists, which Loyalists deemed to protect and help the colonists.

Answer:

Explanation:

there are different types of investments?

1. growth investments

2.shares

3.property

4. cash

5. fixed interest