The primary way federal housing policy changed during the 1980s was through a shift towards market-oriented approaches and a decrease in direct government involvement.
In the 1980s, federal housing policy underwent significant changes, marked by a shift towards market-oriented approaches and a reduced emphasis on direct government involvement in housing programs. This period saw a decrease in funding for public housing construction and a transition towards voucher-based rental assistance programs, such as the Section 8 program.
The government sought to promote private sector involvement in housing through initiatives like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), which incentivized private investment in affordable housing projects. Additionally, deregulation and financial sector reforms were implemented, aiming to stimulate homeownership and expand access to mortgage financing. These policy changes reflected a broader ideological shift towards market-driven solutions and a reduced reliance on direct government provision of housing assistance.
To know more about federal housing policy click here brainly.com/question/28203303
#SPJ11
Essay on civil and criminal laws on malaysia?
Answer:
are various definitions of the term “legal system”. A Legal System is the framework of rules and institutions within a nation regulating individual’s relations with one another and between them and the government.(Book) In this world, there are many types of legal systems, but the few major legal sytems of the world today are civil law, common law, customary law, religious law, socialist and mixed law systems.
Civil law is the dominant legal tradition today in most of Europe, all of Central and South America, parts of Asia and Africa, and even some discrete areas of the common-law world, like Louisiana and Quebec. The origin of civil law is from the Roman law. The civil law is a set out of comprehensive system of rules which are applied and interpreted by judges. Besides that, civil law is older, more widely distributed and in many ways more influential than the common law.
Common law is a system of law that is derived from judges’ decisions, rather than statutes or constitutions. It is based on tradition, past practices and legal precedents set by courts through interpretation of statues, legal legislation, and past rulings.It is english origin and is found in United States and other countries with strong english influences
Customary law is a traditional common rule or practice that has become an intrinsic part of the accepted and expected conduct in a community, profession, or trade and is treated as a legal requirement. Not many countries in the world today will operate under a legal system which could be wholly customary. However, customary law still plays a sometimes significant role, like in the matters of personal conduct, in many countries or political entities with mixed legal systems.
Islamic law is derived from the interpretation of the Koran. Its primary objective is social justice, but also includes property rights, economic decision making, and types of economic freedom. Islamic law is mostly found in Pakistan, Iran, and other Islamic states.
Socialist law is based on fundamental tenets of Marxist-socialist state and center on concept of economic, political, and social policies of the state. It can be found in some independent states of the former Soviet Union, China and other Marxist-socialist states.
A mixed legal system is a mixture of two or more legal system practised by some countries.
2.0 Malaysia’s Legal System
Different country practices different types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while others practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example, practices the mixed legal system which includes the Common Law, Islamic law and Customary Law. Malaysia’s legal system comprises laws which have arise from three significant periods in Malaysian history dating from the Malacca Sultanate, to the spread of Islam to Southeast Asia, and following the absorption into the indigenous culture of British colonial rule which introduced a constitutional government and the common law. Malaysia’s unique legal system is designed to balance the delicate racial and religious needs of its heterogeneous people. The Malaysian legal system law can be classified into two . However, according to the democratic ruling system, the Chief Executive is the Prime Minister. This does not mean that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is unable to voice any opinion, but rather that he must act on government advice, whatever his personal view might be. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints a Cabinet to advise him on country’s matter. The Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and a number of Ministers who must all be members of Parliament. Besides that, the Government has set up various agencies to ensure the smooth enforcement of the law. It comprised of three main components, namely ministries, departments and statutory bodies.
laws pertaining to persons professing the religion of Islam.
Share this:
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
OSCOLA
APA
MLA
MLA-7
Harvard
Vancouver
Wikipedia
All ltd, 'L
Trustedsite Law
describe 2 ways in which the states are lawfully bound together.
There are two ways for the States are lawfully bound together to ratify an amendment that if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose which may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both states houses of congress.
The States are lawfully bound together in the article iv relationship between the states that guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against Invasion.It gives to a certain measure of respect to every institutions and other state's laws.
It establishes that the constitution make federal laws that constitute the supreme law of the land, made pursuant to it and treaties made under its authority and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. The credit houses and full faith and Credit Clause that requires every state as part of a single nation.
Learn more about states bound together click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/13749430
#SPJ4
You are not happy living in your apartment with noisy neighbors upstairs. They party all night often past your building's 10pm curfew. You have complained many times and your landlord has done nothing to help. What violation of landlord duties can you use to attempt to escape this lease?
The violation of landlord duties that you can use to step in is the Noise Violations
What are Noise Violations?
Noise Violations can be defined as an item that constitutes the lease violation of an apartment, it involves creating noise and disturbing the peace of other tenants in a building.
It should be noted that after several complaints, it is the responsibility of the landlord to step in and make things right.
Learn more about lease violations here
https://brainly.com/question/330262
#SPJ1
Does this video give you a better understanding of how individuals become involved in radical jihad? What are some ways we can help other countries prevent the radicalization of youth and young individuals?
The essential point of as fighting isn't the change of but instead the development and guard of the state. Just a single source has alluded to the more extensive target of the development that 'saw the horrible condition of the in the subcontinent.
Who were The Youngsters?Youngsters who are in danger of might have low confidence, or be casualties.
Such could target them and let them know they can be essential for something particularly amazing, later conditioning them into removing themselves from their ones.
Anybody can be , yet factors, for example, being effectively impacted and make kids and youngsters especially. Youngsters who are in danger of might have low confidence or be survivors of or separation.
Therefore he began a development to lay out the public authority of by and by, which they had lost after the Realm.
Learn more about Youngsters here:
brainly.com/question/6401353
#SPJ1
When going to vote in Texas, we must bring an acceptable ID with we to the polls. Some examples of acceptable IDs include: - Texas driver's license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) - Texas election identification certificate issued by DPS - Texas personal identification card issued by DPS - Texas license to carry a handgun issued by DPS - United States military identification card containing the person's photograph - United States citizenship certificate containing the person's photograph - United States passport It is important to remember to bring one of these acceptable IDs with you when you go to vote in Texas, as you will not be allowed to cast your vote without one.
That is correct. Texas law requires voters to present an acceptable form of photo identification before they can cast their ballot.
The list of acceptable IDs includes options such as a Texas driver's license, election identification certificate, personal identification card, or license to carry a handgun. The ID must have the voter's photo, name, and date of birth, and it must have been issued by the state of Texas or another state, or by the federal government.
It is important for voters to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted. If a voter does not have an acceptable ID, they may cast a provisional ballot, which will be counted only if the voter presents a valid ID to the elections office within 72 hours after the election.
Overall, it is important for voters to be aware of the requirements for voting in Texas and to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted.
Learn more about Texas visit: brainly.com/question/30504811
#SPJ11
If a person takes the 5th" and refuses to speak so as not to incriminate themselves, this is the 5th Amendment protection against ?
A right against forced self-incrimination.
Describe and explain the difference between politically based and religiously based terrorism; which is more dangerous and why.
Terrorism is defined by political terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence." Religiously motivated terrorism results from human moral standards being heavily influenced by religion belief and practise.
What connection exists between religious fundamentalism and terrorism?Terrorism, which seeks to advance its ideological goal via bloodshed, assassinations, and the instillation of fear in society through a variety of methods of religious fundamentalism.
Which is more risky, and why?Terrorism is influenced by a number of factors, including societal inequality, state economic performance, war and violent conflict, state corruption, and political instability. While pressure can be administered with violence as well as other methods in a religious context, the violent act is sanctified and approved of by the religious organisation.So, it is challenging to compare them based on how harmful they are, but it is obvious that neither is beneficial for an economy.
To know more about Religiously based terrorism; visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2681683
#SPJ1
the drawing of legislative district's boundaries in such as way as to maximize the influence of a certain group or political party.
The drawing of legislative district's boundaries in such as way as to maximize the influence of a certain group or political party Gerrymandering .
Gerrymandering is the political manipulation of electoral district boundaries in representative democracies with the aim of granting an undue advantage to a party, group, or socioeconomic class within the constituency.
The manipulation may involve "cracking," which dilutes the supporters of the opposing party across many districts, or "packing," which concentrates the supporters of the opposing party in one district in order to weaken their support in other districts.
Additionally, incumbents can be safeguarded through gerrymandering. According to Wayne Dawkins, this results in politicians choosing their supporters rather than supporters choosing their supporters.
Learn more about Gerrymandering to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/17346046
#SPJ4
viewing blacks as superstitious, whites as uncaring, and jews as shrewd are examples of
Viewing blacks as superstitious, whites as uncaring, and Jews as shrewd are examples of stereotypes or prejudiced beliefs based on racial or ethnic generalizations.
Stereotyping involves assigning certain characteristics, behaviors, or qualities to individuals or groups based on their perceived membership in a particular race, ethnicity, or social category. These stereotypes can be based on biased beliefs, misinformation, or cultural biases.
The examples provided reflect negative stereotypes that have been historically perpetuated and can contribute to discrimination and prejudice. It is important to recognize that such stereotypes are not based on accurate and fair assessments of individuals but rather generalize entire groups based on limited information or biased perceptions.
Challenging and dismantling stereotypes is crucial for promoting understanding, equality, and social harmony. It requires acknowledging the diversity and complexity within racial and ethnic groups, fostering empathy, promoting cultural education, and actively confronting biases and prejudices.
To know more about prejudiced beliefs, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28229923#
#SPJ11
State your position on Christianity and world relegion
In 12 Sentence
Explanation:
Religion is a belief. For example, atheism is a belief that there is no God.
Christianity is a belief, but it is more than that. Christianity states that Christ is the Creator if the world, and died on the cross for the sins of the world, rising again the third day.
Christianity has not been proven to be false, and is the foundation for the U.S.
It has changed lives permanently, and ensured a home in Heaven for any that would just accept Him as their Savior.
My personal experience is that God did change my life, and I'm not afraid to die, because I know my destiny; one that is real.
from where does the office of the speaker of the texas house of representatives derive its power?
The office of the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives derives its power from the Texas Constitution and House rules.
The Texas Constitution, as well as the procedures and customs of the Texas House, give the office of Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives its authority. The Speaker is a position of significant power and influence who is chosen by the House members. The Speaker has the authority to preside over House meetings, interpret and apply the rules, choose the members and chairs of committees, and manage the legislative process.
The Speaker has additional authority over the legislative calendar and which bills are discussed. Although the Texas Constitution and House rules give the Speaker authority, the Speaker's actual power is also influenced by the support of the House members and the political climate in the chamber.
Learn more about Texas Constitution at:
brainly.com/question/28189890
#SPJ4
The police-community relations movement (PCR) developed out of the:
Answer:
Please if you want to get the answer correctly and understanding, check your question first.
a law providing that no legal assistant may serve on boards of directors of national banks would be a(n):
a law providing that no legal assistant may serve on boards of directors of national banks would be Constitutional in nature.
About Law
The exact meaning of law is up for debate, but it is generally understood to be a set of regulations that are made and enforced by social or maybe a government structures to control behaviour. It has been called both a science and the practise of justice in diverse contexts. Statutes can be created by a group of legislators or a single lawmaker; the administration can issue decrees & regulations; or judges can set precedent, mainly in common law systems. Private individuals have the power to enact legally binding agreements, such as arbitration clauses that substitute alternative dispute resolution procedures for traditional court action.
To know more about common law systems:
brainly.com/question/12650394
#SPJ4
Goffman says that there are two institutions that oversee the journey children travel to adulthood – explain and discuss the characteristics of these two institutions and what they offer.
Answer
The colleges and the prison
Explanation:
Both are college and prison. According to alice Hoffman, as american children transition to adulthood they go through two institutions. The first is the college institute while the second is the prison.
The college is where the teenager goes to further his education in order to prepare for a life he can have. That is a career. While the prison prepared the teenager for a life he hoped not to have and a place he hoped not to be.
While the college prepares people for a good life and career, the prison is a place for rehabilitation.
critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include study of the injustices and social harms perpetrated by those who hold power. group of answer choices a)True b)False
The statement is true. Critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by those in positions of power.
Critical criminologists advocate for a broader understanding of criminology that goes beyond the traditional focus on street crime and individual offenders. They argue that the field should encompass the examination of systemic injustices and social harms committed by powerful individuals and institutions. This perspective seeks to analyze the structural and societal factors that contribute to crime and deviance, including the role of power dynamics, social inequalities, and oppressive systems.
Critical criminologists emphasize the importance of studying white-collar crime, corporate misconduct, state violence, institutional discrimination, and other forms of harm perpetrated by individuals and entities with power and influence. They highlight how these acts can have significant social, economic, and political consequences, yet often go unnoticed or receive less attention compared to street-level offenses.
Expanding the scope of criminology to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by the powerful aligns with a critical perspective that challenges existing power structures and seeks social justice. It recognizes the need to analyze and address the crimes and harms that occur within societal institutions and power dynamics, in addition to examining individual criminal behavior.
Learn more about Critical criminologists here: https://brainly.com/question/32764138
#SPJ11
1. What are at least two key distinctions between a developed and a developing nation that the
table suggests? What is a key distinction between the United States and both other nations? (2
points)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
You did not give the table but here are some differences between a developed nation and a developing nation.
First and foremost, we should note that a developed country is one that is highly industrialized, has a high GDP and has a high per capital income while a developing nation is one that has low industrialization, low GDP and low per capita income.
Secondly, a developed nation typically has a low unemployment rate while a developing nation has a high unemployment rate.
Thirdly, a developed nation has a low birth rate and a low infant mortality rate while a developing nation has a high birth rate and a high infant mortality rate.
Furthermore, a developed nation has a high standard of living and good infrastructural facilities such as good road network, constant power supply etc while a developing nation has a low standard of living and poor infrastructural facilities.
Lastly, the resources of a developed nation are effectively and efficiently used while a developing nation mismanages its resources.
1.
The U.S Army and U.S Navy are established and organized by separate legislation. (True or False)
True. The U.S. Army and U.S. Navy are indeed established and organized by separate legislation. The U.S. Army is established and regulated by the United States Code.
Title 10, while the U.S. Navy is established and regulated by a different section of the code, specifically Title 10, Subtitle C, Part II. The U.S. Army and U.S. Navy are two distinct branches of the United States Armed Forces and have separate chains of command, operational structures, and traditions. Each branch has its own unique roles, responsibilities, and areas of expertise.
The legislation that governs their organization and operations reflects this differentiation. It's worth noting that both the Army and Navy ultimately fall under the oversight of the Department of Defense, which is responsible for coordinating and supervising all branches of the U.S. military. However, the specific legislation that establishes and organizes the Army and Navy differs.
Learn more about legislation here
https://brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ11
This occurs when a party takes action in reliance on the promise of another, who then breaks that promise.
a. promissory estoppel
b. intentional interference with a contractual relationship
c. retaliation for an act supporting public policy
d. constructive discharge
Promissory estoppel occurs when one party takes action in reliance on the promise of another, who then breaks that promise.
So, the correct answer is A.
In such a situation, the party who relied on the promise may seek legal remedy. This legal principle prevents the promisor from denying the promise or claiming that the promise should not be enforced.
Promissory estoppel ensures that the relying party is protected from harm caused by the broken promise and helps maintain fairness and justice in contractual relationships. It serves as an exception to the general rule that a contract must have consideration to be enforceable.
Hence,the answer of the question is A.
Learn more about promissory estoppel at
https://brainly.com/question/15563691
#SPJ11
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
LEA
What is rule of law
Answer:
the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that isfairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.
Suppose you are reading descriptions of job openings and notice one that says the individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement. What job description are you probably reading? abuse and social services manager social, community, and emergency manager disaster and emergency services manager child protective services manager
Answer:
What methods would you use to collect job analysis data? 2. You work in the human resource department of a large brewery in Atlantic Canada. You are in the process of writing job descriptions for all managerial and supervisory staff. One manager who is in the production division of the brewery refuses to complete a job analysis questionnaire.
Explanation:
The individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement is a description of an abuse and social services manager. Option A. This is further explained below.
What are social services?Generally, Social services are simply defined as services provided to groups that aid in the development of individuals.
In conclusion, A description of abuse and social services manager includes the ability to examine an organization and adopt strategies for improvement.
Read more about social services
https://brainly.com/question/15059623
#SPJ2
one of the reasons some regulations are controversial is because they require bureaucrats to choose between policy goals that are often incompatible, such as the federal drug-approval process.
True, Regulations are contentious in part because they force the bureaucracy to choose between frequently contradictory policy objectives, such as the federal medication approval procedure.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a federal agency, is in charge of approving medications. It does this by ensuring the security, safety, and efficacy of biological goods, medical equipment, our country's food supply, cosmetics, and radiation-emitting products.
Generic medications must receive FDA approval; however, unlike brand-name medications, which must submit NDAs with animal and human safety data, generic medications do not. For the FDA to approve generic medications, a different application known as the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is necessary.
Learn more about federal approval here:
https://brainly.com/question/15352304
#SPJ4
Por qué la empatía y el asertividad son habilidades de la comunicación que permiten una mejor adaptación social?
Explanation:
Los seres humanos son seres sociales, por lo que existe la necesidad de desarrollar y mejorar las habilidades de comunicación para que haya una mejor adaptación social en cada entorno que los individuos necesitan para socializar, como en su comunidad local y en el entorno laboral.
Hay dos características que pueden ayudar en esta adaptación social, que es la empatía y la asertividad, que son habilidades que se complementan entre saber escuchar y saber hablar, porque una persona empática es capaz de comprender al otro emocional y cognitivamente, poniéndose en su lugar otro individuo para comprender y escuchar sin juzgar, pero generando identificación y aceptación. Una persona asertiva, en cambio, es aquella que defiende sus opiniones y se comunica de forma clara, directa y objetiva, pero no de forma agresiva, sino a través de una postura firme que genera seriedad y transparencia en la comunicación.
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Place the steps of the presidential election process in the correct order.
Voters participate in the general election.
National party conventions are held.
Voters participate in primaries or
caucuses.
The candidate with the majority of the
votes wins the presidency
The Electoral College votes.
Candidates announce they are running for
their party's nomination?
National party conventions are held.
Candidates announce they are running for their party's nomination
Voters participate in primaries or caucuses.
Voters participate in the general election.
The Electoral College votes.
The candidate with the majority of the votes wins the presidency.
What is the meaning of the Electoral College?An example of a system where an executive president is indirectly elected is the United States Electoral College, which has electors from each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. The electors, who formally select the president through the electoral college, are determined by the public's votes.
Although the phrase "Electoral College" does not appear in the U.S. Constitution, it is how we refer to the procedure by which the United States elects the President. The Vice-President and the President are chosen by the States, which also include the District of Columbia for this procedure.
Learn more about the Electoral College here:
https://brainly.com/question/25375266
#SPJ1
what is the punishment for robbery in the state of california?
Answer:
9 years in prison and $10000 fines
Explanation:
Answer:
"Taking someone else's property through intimidation or force is robbery under California law. Robbery is always a felony, carrying penalties as high as nine years in state prison and $10,000 in fines for a conviction".
Explanation:
California Penal Code 211 PC defines the crime of robbery as “the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.” Robbery is a felony punishable by up to 9 years in state prison.
"Hope this helps"!
~sited from g o o g l e!!
Which of the following is a quality of a command economy?
Individuals determine what goods and services are produced.
The government determines the demand for goods and services.
Training and education for jobs are determined by business firms.
Wages and employment opportunities for individuals are determined by the government.
Answer:
Individuals determine what goods and services are produced.
Explanation:
NOT the goverment person jesus lord
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
The recent collapse of some banks and financial institutions and the merger of others in ghana is proof that the financial system which consists of institutional units and markets that interact, typically in a complex manner, for the purpose of mobilizing funds for investment and providing facilities, including payment systems, for the financing of commercial activity remains unprotected in spite of the the presence of the Regulator and a solid legal system backing it. From the discussion in class and available literature, examine some of the difficulties associated with the financial system and how these challenges have been addressed by the Banks and Specialised Deposit Taking Institutions Act 2016 (Act 930). Are there any novel ways by which some of the challenges may be resolved in your opinion?
Answer:in my opinion some of the problems can be resolved by haing more markets be run by the country so that they can have proper insurance and so the taxtes help flow back into the country.
Explanation:if u have insurance what u lose u can at least get some back and the taxes help the countrys financial problems wich also help u.
conduct that is legal is ethically unquestionable.
a. true
b. false
False, conduct that is legal is ethically unquestionable.
What is Responsible Conduct of Research?The definition of responsible conduct of research (RCR) is "the practise of scientific exploration with integrity." It entails being aware of and using recognized professional norms and ethical principles in the conduct of all scientific research operations. Ethical and responsible research conduct is essential for scientific and engineering excellence as well as public trust. As a result, education in responsible and ethical research conduct is regarded as critical in the preparation of future scientists and engineers. The America COMPETES (Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science) Act of 2007 draws public attention to the importance of the national research community's long-term commitment and broader efforts to provide RCR training as an integral part of professional preparation and long-term success.
To know more about Conduct visit:
brainly.com/question/28608815
#SPJ4