The federal government provides grants-in-aid to state and local governments as a means of supporting initiatives that are deemed important to the nation's economic growth, development, and welfare.
According to the following option, the federal government's chief reason for providing grants-in-aid is to give money to state and local governments for specific purposes. Grants-in-aid are monies given to a government or other organization for a particular purpose or project. Grants-in-aid are often given by a higher-level government to a lower-level government to support a public program.
Some examples of grants-in-aid are: formula grants that are awarded for a particular purpose with particular rules specified in advance; Project grants that are awarded to support specific projects, generally following a competitive selection process; Block grants that are given to states or communities for a variety of purposes without many constraints; categorical grants, which are provided for a specific function or to a specific group of people.
These grants frequently come with conditions and demands, which can include reporting obligations, maintenance of a specific program or policy, or matching funds from the grant recipient. The federal government provides grants-in-aid to the state and local governments in order to make it possible for the states to carry out the policies and programs that are of federal concern.
These policies and programs are intended to address issues that transcend state boundaries. They are intended to be able to provide the funding that is necessary to implement programs that are beyond the states' budgets.
For more questions on federal government
https://brainly.com/question/31134219
#SPJ11
Should Nucor have acted promptly to prevent such behavior?
Answer:
Should Nucor have acted promptly to prevent such behavior?
How could U.S. national interests lead to potential conflicts with other countries?
Answer: This relates to the idea of realism
Explanation:
Less trade deals= economic conflict
Less foreign aid=politcal conflict
Less international work equals cold relationships with other countries could damage vital relationships especially with those the U.S. needs for resources such as Saudi Arabia for oil.
7. What amendment says that powers NOT given to the national government are reserved (given)
to the states?
(10 Points)
Amendment 1
Amendment 10
Amendment 27
Amendment 14
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its the 10th amendment.
Explanation:
hope this helps!
only the most compelling state interest could justify a law which discriminates against a suspect class, such as race. which scotus standard of review - or test - is applied in such cases?
Only the most compelling state interest could justify a law that discriminates against a suspect class, such as race The 15th Amendment gave all people of color the right to vote is applied in such cases.
The Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) to the United States Constitution prohibits the centralized and every state from denying or abridging a citizen's right to vote "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." it completely sanctioned on February 3, 1870,[1] as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments.
In the ultimate years of the American Civil War and the Reconstruction Era that followed, Congress repeatedly debated the rights of scores of former black slaves. By 1869, amendments had been passed to get free of slavery and supply citizenship and equal protection beneath the laws, however, the election of Ulysses S. Grant to the presidency in 1868 convinced a majority of Republicans that protective the franchise of black male voters was necessary for the party's future.
Learn more about 15th Amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/620540
#SPJ4
who is responsible if an inappropriate scope of work is used in an appraisal assignment?\
If an incorrect scope of work was used in an appraisal assignment, it is ultimately the appraiser who penned the appraisal report who bears responsibility.
How to determine who is responsibleResponsibility of an inappropriate scope of work is used in an appraisal assignment.
The appraiser who wrote the appraisal report is ultimately responsible if an improper scope of work was used in an appraisal assignment.
Since they hold a professional license, appraisers are required to follow set standards and procedures when doing their duties.
The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), which are applicable in the United States, are provided by appraisal organizations including the Appraisal Institute and the Appraisal Foundation.
These guidelines provide direction on creating a suitable scope of work for each assessment assignment as well as outlining the ethical and professional duties of appraisers.
Learn more on appraisal assignment here;
https://brainly.com/question/32992420
#SPJ4
how does the supreme court decide whether a right is protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment from impairment by the states?
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution both contain a Due Process Clause, which according to US constitutional law forbids the government from arbitrarily taking away someone's "life, liberty, or property" unless specifically permitted by law.
Prior to 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court gave these clauses a broad interpretation, coming to the conclusion that they offer three types of protection: procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceedings); substantive due process, which forbids the use of vague language in-laws; and they serve as the means of incorporating the Bill of Rights.
identification of the specific dictates of due process generally requires consideration of three distinct factors: first, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an incorrect deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and, finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved in the official action.
The development of the law of personal jurisdiction has also been influenced by procedural due process, as it is fundamentally unfair for a state's legal system to seize someone's property without any relationship with them.
Therefore, a substantial component of U.S. constitutional law is focused on whether the kind of ties to a state is sufficient for that state to assert jurisdiction over a nonresident while still complying with procedural due process.
Learn more about the U.S. constitutional here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
you will not be required to parallel park when the rearmost of the six spots is available, or when there are two consecutive open spots.
Yes, you will not be required to parallel park when the rearmost of the six spots is available, or when there are two consecutive open spots.
What is Parallel Parking?
A vehicle is parked parallel to the road, in line with other parked cars, using the parallel parking technique. Driving slightly past the parking place while parallel to the car in front of it and maintaining a safe distance is typically required for parallel parking, which is then followed by reversing into the space.
Therefore, you will not be required to parallel park when the rearmost of the six spots is available, or when there are two consecutive open spots.
To know more about Parallel Parking, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/14959750
#SPJ4
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
As you approach an intersection blanks around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection
Answer:
As you approach an intersection scan around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection.
Explanation:
When approaching an intersection you need to get a good visual overview of what is going on from all directions.
If you are approaching an intersection with traffic lights you should be scanning well ahead, therefore you should be prepared to stop if you see that the lights are green from a distance because they will most likely be red by the time you get to the intersection.
At any rate, be prepared to yield to the traffic ahead of you or that are already in the intersection.
Which one of the following statements is NOT part of the biochemical point of view?
The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific view point.
What is biochemical point of view?Biochemical view helps to view things or happening in a way to fit that help fill it into life form.
They are scientific view of a particular statement
Therefore, The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific
view point.
Learn more on biochemical below
https://brainly.com/question/3652831
#SPJ2
Government is a trustee. Argue for and against.
Answer: the government is a trustee
Explanation:
Which agreement must be signed between a Criminal Justice Agency and a Private contractor who accesses CJI is the
A private contractor who accesses CJI must sign a privacy policy with a criminal justice agency.
Criminal justice is the process of giving those who have been accused of crimes justice. The government and many institutions that make up the criminal justice system. The goals contains helping the victims emotionally, rehabilitating criminals, and stopping the fresh crimes.
The primary elements of the criminal justice system are the police, the prosecution and defence teams, the courts, and the prison system. Because it provides the conventional means of resolving disputes and prosecuting offenders for crimes against society, a good criminal justice system is crucial to the rule of law.
To learn more about Criminal Justice visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30089720
#SPJ4
Why was the great fire of London in 1666 so devastating
Temporary buildings were erected that were ill-equipped, disease spread easily, and many people died from this and the harsh winter that followed the fire. As well as the loss of life, the financial costs were staggering. 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, The Royal Exchange, Guildhall, and St.
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
The monthly cost to receive insurance coverage is known as a(n)
A. premium
B. liability
C. deductible
D. application
Answer: A; premium
Explanation: Just did it on A pex
The monthly cost of the receiver's insurance coverage is called a premium. Hence the option A is correct.
What is a premium?A premium is an amount to be paid to the insurance policy and is a sum that isn addd to the ordinary price or change.
The premium is price that is for above and beyound some basic or internsic value. It may be the price to protect form the hazard or loss. The pemium is derived form a latin word that means prize.
Find out more infirmaion about the premium.
brainly.com/question/25280754
which statement below best explains why, despite tremendous oil reserves, the nigerian government still has difficulty providing social services throughout the country?
Mismanagement of oil revenues and widespread corruption hinder effective allocation of resources for social services in Nigeria.
What factors hinder the Nigerian government's ability to provide social services despite having substantial oil reserves?The statement that best explains why, despite tremendous oil reserves, the Nigerian government still has difficulty providing social services throughout the country is:
"The mismanagement of oil revenues and widespread corruption hinder effective allocation of resources towards social services."
Mismanagement of oil revenues: Nigeria is a major oil-producing country, and oil exports constitute a significant portion of its revenue. However, the mismanagement of these revenues has been a persistent challenge. Factors such as poor fiscal management, lack of transparency, and inadequate accountability mechanisms have led to inefficient allocation and utilization of oil revenues. This mismanagement prevents the government from effectively investing in social services and infrastructure development. Widespread corruption: Corruption is a significant problem in Nigeria, impacting various sectors, including public administration and governance. Corrupt practices, such as embezzlement, bribery, and diversion of funds, undermine the government's ability to provide social services. Instead of being allocated towards public welfare, funds intended for social services may be siphoned off by corrupt officials, hindering the delivery of essential services to the population.Together, the mismanagement of oil revenues and widespread corruption create barriers for the Nigerian government to allocate resources effectively towards social services. These factors contribute to the difficulty in providing adequate healthcare, education, infrastructure, and other essential services to the people of Nigeria.
Learn more about oil revenues
brainly.com/question/15642364
#SPJ11
in which country on the graph was the recent voter turnout 83 percent?
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
What is the future that you want? Explain in four to five paragraphs what you would like to see countries commit to in a "Global Commitment Plan for the Environment." Be sure to mention what the role of the US would be in this plan and the role of the business sector.
One of the biggest concerns facing the planet right now is environmental damage. To ensure its protection, several practices and social systems have emerged.
But, all countries have to come together to formulate plans towards "Global Commitment Plan for the Environment."
Some of the key developments regarding these are-
1. The 2019 Sustainable Development Summit-
In September 2019, heads of state and government convened at the UN headquarters in New York for the Sustainable Development Summit to track and thoroughly assess progress in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
After the approval of the 2030 Agenda in September 2015, the event marked the first UN conference on the SDGs.
2. Conference on Climate Action for 2019-
At the September 2019 Climate Action Summit, 65 nations and significant subnational economies, including California, made a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by the year 2050. In addition, 70 nations said they would either increase their national action plans by 2020 or have already started the process.
3. UN HIGH LEVEL POLITICAL FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT-
The UN High-Level Political Conference on Sustainable Development serves as the principal international venue for discussing achievements, obstacles, and lessons gained in implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as well as allowing nations to present their Voluntary National Reviews.
The Forum meets periodically under the aegis of the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council.
Role Of U.S. in this -
Laws including the National Environmental Education Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act are enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Several of these have existed long before the agency was established.
These type of initiatives lets us take a step forward towards Global commitment plan for the environment.
To know more about Environment Protection visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19297330
#SPJ1
exclusion clause
Explain FOUR of the following using relevant case law where appropriate: (a) "Actual undue influence. (b) A collateral contract (c) Incorporation by a course of dealing. (d) The contra proferentem rul
(a) Actual Undue Influence: Actual undue influence occurs when one party exerts undue pressure or influence on another, causing that party to enter into a contract against their free will. It involves the domination of one party over the other, taking advantage of a relationship of trust or confidence. In cases of actual undue influence, the contract may be voidable at the option of the victim.
A notable case illustrating actual undue influence is Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No. 2) [2002]. The House of Lords clarified the elements of actual undue influence, emphasizing that it requires proof of coercion, domination, or a relationship that gives one party the ability to exert undue influence over the other. The case set important guidelines for identifying and assessing actual undue influence in contracts.
(b) Collateral Contract:
A collateral contract is a separate and distinct agreement that coexists with the main contract and supports or adds to its terms. It usually involves a promise made by one party to induce the other party to enter into the main contract. While the main contract may contain an exclusion clause, a collateral contract can provide additional rights or obligations that override or modify the terms of the exclusion clause.
In the case of Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951], the court recognized the existence of a collateral contract. The parties had entered into a contract for the purchase of paint, which contained an exclusion clause limiting liability for defects. However, the court held that a separate oral collateral contract existed, whereby the seller promised that the paint would be suitable for the purpose stated. This collateral contract allowed the buyer to claim damages for breach of the suitability promise, despite the presence of the exclusion clause in the main contract.
(c) Incorporation by a Course of Dealing:
Incorporation by a course of dealing refers to the practice of including terms from previous dealings or consistent conduct between parties into a current contract. It arises when parties have a regular pattern of conduct in their dealings and a consistent understanding of certain terms that should be included in their contracts.
An example of incorporation by a course of dealing is the case of Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd [1972]. The court held that a clause excluding liability for implied terms could be incorporated into the contract by a consistent course of dealing. The parties had engaged in a series of previous transactions with similar terms, and it was determined that they had mutually understood and accepted the exclusion clause as part of their ongoing contractual relationship.
(d) The Contra Proferentem Rule:
The contra proferentem rule is a principle of contractual interpretation that applies when there is ambiguity or uncertainty in the wording of a contract. It states that any ambiguity should be construed against the party who drafted or imposed the clause, typically the party seeking to rely on it. This rule is particularly relevant when interpreting exclusion clauses in contracts.
An important case demonstrating the application of the contra proferentem rule is Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v The King [1952]. The Privy Council held that an exclusion clause excluding liability for damage to goods was not effective because it was ambiguous. The clause was drafted by the party seeking to rely on it, and the court applied the contra proferentem rule to interpret the clause strictly against that party. As a result, the clause did not operate to exclude liability.
To read more about Undue Influence click here
https://brainly.com/question/15250833
#SPJ11
Which of the following phrases or terms regarding materiality is used by the Supreme Court of the United States and
is not found in FASB Concepts Statement No. 2?
a. "amount of a misstatement or omission"
b. "in light of surrounding circumstances"
c. "probable that the judgement of a reasonable person"
d. "significantly altered the total mix of information available"
The correct answer is d) "significantly altered the total mix of information available." The phrase "significantly altered the total mix of information available" is used by the Supreme Court of the United States to define materiality in the context of securities law.
It is not found in FASB Concepts Statement No. 2, which is a financial reporting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The other options, a) "amount of a misstatement or omission," b) "in light of surrounding circumstances," and c) "probable that the judgement of a reasonable person," are concepts that are commonly associated with materiality and can be found in FASB Concepts Statement No. 2, which provides guidance on the definition and application of materiality in financial reporting.
To learn more about FASB, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32252086
#SPJ11
The correct answer is d) "significantly altered the total mix of information available." The phrase "significantly altered the total mix of information available" is used by the Supreme Court of the United States to define materiality in the context of securities law.
It is not found in FASB Concepts Statement No. 2, which is a financial reporting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The other options, a) "amount of a misstatement or omission," b) "in light of surrounding circumstances," and c) "probable that the judgement of a reasonable person," are concepts that are commonly associated with materiality and can be found in FASB Concepts Statement No. 2, which provides guidance on the definition and application of materiality in financial reporting.
To learn more about FASB, click here:
brainly.com/question/32252086
#SPJ11
why your doctor should care about social justice argumentative
Doctors should care about social justice because it is essential to providing quality healthcare. Social justice is the fair and just distribution of resources and opportunities in society.
When people are denied access to healthcare, education, housing, and other essential resources, it has a negative impact on their health.
There are many ways that doctors can promote social justice. They can advocate for policies that improve access to healthcare, such as universal healthcare.
They can also work to address the social determinants of health, such as poverty, discrimination, and environmental pollution. Doctors can also educate their patients about social justice issues and how they can make a difference.
To know more about social justice, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28207883#
#SPJ11
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Notory public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary true or false
The statement "Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary" is true.
A notarial certificate is an official document issued by a notary public that certifies that the signer of a document has been properly identified and has signed the document voluntarily. The notary public's signature and seal are affixed to the notarial certificate, which serves as evidence that the notary's statements and signatures are genuine and have been executed correctly.
Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary, especially if the instrument contains deceptive information. When a notary is aware that a document is fraudulent, the notary should refuse to notarize it.
To know more about Notary public visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28204126
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
Criminal and civil commitment can be best distinguished by
a) whether the one being committed is insane.
b) whether a crime has been committed by the individual.
c) the type of police intervention necessary.
d) the severity of the symptoms and the crime committed.
b) whether a crime has been committed by the individual. The key distinction between criminal and civil commitment lies in whether a crime has been committed by the individual
Criminal commitment and civil commitment are two distinct legal processes related to the involuntary commitment of individuals. The key factor that distinguishes them is whether a crime has been committed by the individual.
Criminal commitment involves the legal process of detaining individuals who have been accused or convicted of a crime and pose a danger to themselves or others. It typically occurs within the criminal justice system and is based on the violation of criminal laws.
On the other hand, civil commitment is the legal process of involuntarily committing individuals to a mental health facility or treatment against their will due to mental illness or the risk of harm to themselves or others. It does not require the individual to have committed a crime but focuses on the need for treatment or protection.
While factors such as the individual's mental state, severity of symptoms, and need for intervention may play a role in determining the appropriate commitment, the fundamental distinction lies in whether a crime has been committed.
The key distinction between criminal and civil commitment lies in whether a crime has been committed by the individual. Criminal commitment involves individuals who have violated criminal laws, while civil commitment relates to the involuntary commitment of individuals for mental health treatment or protection without the requirement of a criminal offense.
To know about civil and criminal law, visit:
brainly.com/question/14217626
#SPJ11
*Economic*
Reviewing your credit reports every year helps you
O A. consolidate your loans
O B. increase your creditworthiness
O C. protect your credit score
O D. raise your credit score
Answer:
It will protect your credit score.
Explanation:
The correct option for the Reviewing your credit reports every year helps you is C. protect your credit score
Why is it important to check your credit score reports every year?Checking your credit history and credit score rankings permits you to better understand your current credit position. Regularly checking your credit reports permit you to be more aware of what creditors might also see. Checking your credit score reviews can also assist you to locate any erroneous or incomplete information.
Creditors may additionally use your credit file facts to decide whether you could get a loan and the phrases you get for a loan (for instance, the interest charge they may charge you). coverage companies may additionally use the data to decide whether you could get coverage and to set the prices you will pay.
Conclusion: Your credit report is a record of your current and past debts, together with your fee history. it is crucial because it could impact a lot of areas of your life, including your potential to lease an apartment, purchase a house or car, get a loan, or even be hired for positive jobs.
Learn more about Credit Reports here https://brainly.com/question/9913263
#SPJ2
what is the juditial system
Answer:
The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law (which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce law (which is the responsibility of the executive), but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.
In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.
Explanation:
Answer:
The judicial system, aka branch, decides on how laws will help the citizens in real life situations, and whether or not it will break the Constitution.
Explanation:
pls mark brainiest and hope you have a great day! ;)
Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be
a. dismissed during a trial.
b. dismissed or settled before a trial
c. resolved only after a trial.
d. settled at a trial
In a typical legal case where Edie files a suit against Frank, it is likely that the case will be dismissed or settled before a trial takes place. Option B is correct.
This is because the majority of legal cases are resolved through settlements or dismissals rather than going to trial. Settlements occur when the parties involved negotiate an agreement to resolve the dispute without going to trial. Dismissals can happen for a variety of reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff.
Trials are usually seen as a last resort, as they can be time-consuming and expensive for all parties involved. Additionally, trials can be unpredictable, and the outcome is ultimately in the hands of a judge or jury. Overall, the legal system aims to resolve disputes in the most efficient and fair manner possible, and settling or dismissing a case before a trial is often the preferred method.
Option B holds true.
Learn more about legal cases: https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
determine what type of evidence the following may be: A man holding a book of matches at the scene of a fire
Answer:
Well, The only specific evidence we have at the current scene would be that man that has a book of matches but sense we cant really determine whether or not he was the one who did it, therefore we have no exponential evidence that he did it.
Explanation: