The false statement is B. 50% of houses in Ames are smaller than 1,499.69 square feet.
What is mean and median?Statistics uses both the mean and median as gauges of central tendency, although their definitions and methods of computation vary. A number's mean is determined by adding together all of the values and dividing by the total number of values. A group of numbers has a median, which is the midpoint value, with half of the values above and below.
The median size of a home in Ames is 1,499.69 square feet, thus this claim is untrue. Therefore, 50% of the homes are smaller and 50% are larger than 1,499.69 square feet. Thus, assertion B is untrue.
Learn more about mean here:
https://brainly.com/question/17060266
#SPJ1
Find the 18th term of this
arithmetic sequence:
12, 26, 40, 54,...
Answer:
110
Step-by-step explanation:
54+14=68+14=82+14=96+14=110
adding 14
4. Which equations have 4 as a possible solution for p? Select all that apply.
A. p²= 8
B.p³= 8
c.p²= 16
D.p²= 64
E.p³=64
Answer:
A. p2=16
soln:
p=4×4=16
so,
p2=16
The radius of a circle is 17 inches. What is the circle's area?
Use 3.14 for л.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for the area of a circle is:
A = πr^2
where A is the area, π (pi) is approximately 3.14, and r is the radius.
Substituting the given radius of 17 inches into the formula, we get:
A = 3.14 × 17^2
A = 3.14 × 289
A = 907.06
Therefore, the area of the circle is approximately 907.06 square inches.
Answer:
907.46
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of a circle formula is πr^2
It says the radius is 17
**Simplify**
(3.14)(17)^2=907.46
I’LL GIVE YA BRAINLESS!! I need the answer ASAP
In a survey of 3,300 people who owned a certain type of car, 1,815 said they would buy that type of car again. What percent of the people surveyed were satisfied with the car?
Answer:
55% because 1815 divided by 3300 is .55, and .55 is 55%
PLEASE HELP!! i’ll give brainliest
A. ||
B.
C. neither they are skew lines
Answer:
I think it's A (parallel)
Answer:
A. its parallel
Step-by-step explanation:
all angles are equal... two sides are perpendicular and two are parallel
7 less than one fourth of x is y
Assume that the recovery time for an individual from an infectious disease can be modeled as a normal distribution. (a) Calculate the time, d, in days for an individual to recover from being initially infected, with a 95% confidence level, assuming that the likelihood of recovering at any time is modeled as a normal distribution with a mean of 5 days and a standard deviation of 0.5 days. (b) Use the SIR model that you constructed previously. Assume that a city of 10 million people is confronted with a potential infectious epidemic. A ship arrives at the international airport carrying 100 individuals who are infected, but are unaware that they are infected. While contagious, infected individuals come into transmission contact with another individual once every 2 days. The recovery process is modeled using the Poisson process from Part (a). Assume that recovered individuals that survive develop immunity to the disease. Plot the fraction of susceptible individuals, infected individuals, and recovered individuals as a function of time throughout the epidemic. (c) What fraction of the total population will have ultimately come down with the infectious disease once the epidemic is over? How many days after the ship docking did this number finally reach steady state (i.e.,the epidemic is completely over). (d) What is the basis for this structured model (i.e.,scale, time, etc.)? What is/are the major assumptions associated with the structure?
Upper
daysThe(a) The time for an individual to recover from an infectious disease, is estimated to be between 4.02 and 5.98 days. (d) The structured SIR model assumes homogeneous mixing, constant population, recovered immunity.
(a) To calculate the time for an individual to recover with a 95% confidence level, we can use the properties of the normal distribution. The 95% confidence interval corresponds to approximately 1.96 standard deviations from the mean in both directions.
Given:
Mean (μ) = 5 days
Standard deviation (σ) = 0.5 days
The confidence interval can be calculated as follows:
Lower limit = Mean - (1.96 * Standard deviation)
Upper limit = Mean + (1.96 * Standard deviation)
Lower limit = 5 - (1.96 * 0.5)
= 5 - 0.98
= 4.02 days
Upper limit = 5 + (1.96 * 0.5)
= 5 + 0.98
= 5.98 days
Therefore, the time for an individual to recover from the infectious disease with a 95% confidence level is between approximately 4.02 and 5.98 days.
(b) To simulate the epidemic using the SIR model, we need additional information about the transmission rate and the duration of infectivity.
(c) Without the transmission rate and duration of infectivity, we cannot determine the fraction of the total population that will have come down with the infectious disease once the epidemic is over.
(d) The structured model in this case is the SIR (Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered) model, which is commonly used to study the dynamics of infectious diseases. The major assumptions associated with the SIR model include:
Homogeneous mixing: The model assumes that individuals in the population mix randomly, and each individual has an equal probability of coming into contact with any other individual.
Constant population: The model assumes a constant population size, without accounting for birth, death, or migration rates.
Recovered individuals develop immunity: The model assumes that individuals who recover from the infectious disease gain permanent immunity and cannot be reinfected.
No vaccination or intervention: The basic SIR model does not incorporate vaccination or other intervention measures.
These assumptions simplify the model and allow for mathematical analysis of disease spread dynamics. However, they may not fully capture the complexities of real-world scenarios, and more sophisticated models can be developed to address specific contexts and factors.
Learn more about Normal distribution here: brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11
which sum does the model below represent
Answer:
A- is ur answer
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
Someone please help?
Step-by-step explanation:
1=2 given
also 1=3. [ vertical opposite angles are equal]
From above equations:
2=3
corresponding angles are equal which means both lines are parallel.
Hope thus will help:)
Predict the distance covered after 12 hours using the line of Best Fit
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanaion
the line shows what predict and if you go over 12 hours the line says it would be 8.
________ charts are useful in displaying nominal data or numerical data that splits nicely into different categories so you can quickly see comparative results and trends.
Categorical charts are useful in displaying nominal data or numerical data that splits nicely into different categories so you can quickly see comparative results and trends.
The type of chart that is useful in displaying nominal data or numerical data that splits nicely into different categories is called a categorical chart. Categorical charts allow you to quickly see comparative results and trends by displaying data in separate categories or groups. This makes it easier to identify patterns and trends in the data and to draw conclusions about the relationships between different variables.
Examples of categorical charts include bar charts, column charts, and pie charts. Bar charts and column charts are commonly used to display numerical data, while pie charts are often used to display proportional data. Categorical charts can be used in a variety of contexts, such as business, education, and scientific research, to help communicate complex data in a clear and concise manner.
Overall, categorical charts are a powerful tool for organizing and displaying data in a way that makes it easy to identify patterns and trends. By using these charts, you can quickly and accurately visualize complex data sets and draw conclusions about the relationships between different variables.
Learn more about Nominal data:
https://brainly.com/question/14189587
#SPJ11
Find the perimeter and area of the rectangle with coordinates (3,7), (3,-2), (-6.-2) and (-6,7)
The area of the rectangle 81 square units and the perimeter of the rectangle is 36 units.
In this question, we have been given the rectangle with coordinates (3,7), (3,-2), (-6.-2) and (-6,7)
We need to find the perimeter and area of the rectangle.
Using distance formula we find the length and width of the rectangle.
d1 = √(-2 - 7)² + (3 - 3)²
d1 = √(-9)²
d1 = 9
And d2 = √(-2 + 2)² + (-6-3)²
d2 = √(-9)²
d2 = 9
d3 = √(7 + 2)² + (-6 + 6)²
d3 = 9
This means, the length and width of rectangle are equal i.e., 9 units.
So, perimeter would be,
P = 4 * 9
P = 36 units
And the area would be,
A = 9 * 9
A = 81 square units
Therefore, the area of the rectangle 81 square units and the perimeter of the rectangle is 36 units.
Learn more about the rectangle here:
https://brainly.com/question/20693059
#SPJ1
At their going out business sale, Bill’s Bikes sold 36 bikes and had 58 left. Which equation could be used to find x, the number of bikes the store had originally.
The equation that could be used to find x, the number of bikes the store had originally, is (x-94) = 0.
According to the question,
We have the following details:
Bill has sold 36 bikes and is left with 58 bikes more.
Now, the number of bikes the store had originally is given to be x.
So, we have:
x = Number of bikes sold + Number of bikes left
x = 36+58
x = 94
x-94 = 0 (94 was positive on the right hand side. So, it is negative on the left hand side.)
Hence, the equation that could be used to find number of original bikes in Bill's store is x-94 = 0.
To know more equation here
https://brainly.com/question/10413253
#SPJ1
f scores are normally distributed with a mean of 35 and a standard deviation of 10, what percent of the scores is: (a) greater than 34?
The percentage of scores greater than 34 is 0.5398 or 53.98%.
Given that the mean of scores (μ) = 35 and the standard deviation (σ) = 10. We need to find the percentage of scores greater than 34. Since the scores are normally distributed, we can standardize the variable by using the z-score formula.
z = (x - μ) / σ
Here, x = 34, μ = 35 and σ = 10z = (34 - 35) / 10z = -0.1
We need to find the area to the right of the z-score line on the standard normal distribution table. The standard normal distribution table provides the probabilities corresponding to the z-scores, i.e. the area under the curve to the right or left of the z-score line on the distribution table. The area to the right of the z-score line represents the percentage of scores that are greater than the given value. Using the standard normal distribution table, the area to the right of the z-score line -0.1 is 0.5398.
The percentage of scores greater than 34 is 0.5398 or 53.98%.
To learn more about percentage of scores refer :
https://brainly.com/question/25361715
#SPJ11
which of the expressions are equivalent to the one below? check all that apply.
5 x (8+3)
A. 55
B. 5 x 24
C. 43
D. 5 x 8 + 5 x 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hola supiste algo bro o no
The maximum intensities created by a diffraction pattern fall at angles θ which satisfy dsin(θ)=mλ, where d is the spacing between adjacent lines on the grating, λ is the wavelength being considered. Part 1) Differentiate this expression to find the dispersion.
The dispersion, which represents the rate of change of the angle \(\theta\) with respect to the wavelength \(\lambda\), is zero.
To differentiate the expression dsin(\(\theta\)) = m\(\lambda\), where d is the spacing between adjacent lines on the grating, \(\lambda\) is the wavelength, and m is the order of the maximum intensity, we need to differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to \(\theta\).
Differentiating dsin( \(\theta\)) = m\(\lambda\) with respect to \(\theta\):
d/d \(\theta\) (dsin( \(\theta\))) = d/d\(\theta\) (m\(\lambda\))
Using the chain rule, the derivative of dsin( \(\theta\)) with respect to \(\theta\) is d(cos( \(\theta\))) = -dsin( \(\theta\)):
-dsin( \(\theta\)) = 0
Since m\(\lambda\) is a constant, its derivative with respect to \(\theta\) is zero.
Therefore, the differentiation of dsin( \(\theta\)) = m\(\lambda\) is:
-dsin( \(\theta\)) = 0
Simplifying the equation, we have:
dsin( \(\theta\)) = 0
The dispersion, which represents the rate of change of the angle \(\theta\) with respect to the wavelength \(\lambda\), is zero.
Learn more about wavelength at:
https://brainly.com/question/28376218
#SPJ4
336,765=3,14×0.55×(l+0.55) please help
Answer:
l = 194999.45
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm going to assume that you meant 3.14 by 3,14.
336,765 = 3.14 × 0.55 × (l + 0.55)
336,765 ÷ (3.14 × 0.55) = l + 0.55
(336,765 ÷ (3.14 × 0.55)) - 0.55 = l
l = 194999.45
Scott swims several times per week in a lake near his home. Last summer, the lakes water temperature was 20 Celsius this year the average water temperature was 20% warmer what was the average temperature of the lakes this summer. Solve it step by step please
Answer:
ggggg
Step-by-step explanation:
gfv
Help I will give crown and brainiest
Answer:
quad then hex then oct then non
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose the company wants to improve its capability to a 5-sigma level by reducing the variability of its process. Which of the following standard deviations would meet a 5-sigma capablity for Cpk? Check all that apply, and assume the process mean remains unchanged from the original problem. a. 0.005 b. 0.015 c. 0. 025 d. 0.035 e. 0.045 f. 0.055
The standard deviations that would meet a 5-sigma capability for Cpk are 0.005, 0.015, and 0.025. (Options A, B and C).
How to Determine the Standard Deviation?To determine which standard deviations would meet a 5-sigma capability for Cpk, we need to use the following formula:
Cpk = minimum((USL - mean) / 3sigma, (mean - LSL) / 3sigma)
where USL is the upper specification limit, LSL is the lower specification limit, mean is the process mean, and sigma is the process standard deviation.
For a 5-sigma capability, we want Cpk to be at least 2.0, so we can set up the following inequality:
2.0 <= minimum((USL - mean) / 3sigma, (mean - LSL) / 3sigma)
Assuming the process mean remains unchanged, and the specification limits are at ±3 sigma from the mean (which is a common assumption), we can simplify the inequality to:
2.0 <= 1/3sigma
which can be rearranged as:
sigma <= 1/6
Therefore, the standard deviation should be less than or equal to 0.1667 to achieve a 5-sigma capability.
Now we can check which of the given standard deviations meet this criterion:
a. 0.005: Yes, this is less than 0.1667.
b. 0.015: Yes, this is less than 0.1667.
c. 0.025: Yes, this is less than 0.1667.
d. 0.035: No, this is greater than 0.1667.
e. 0.045: No, this is greater than 0.1667.
f. 0.055: No, this is greater than 0.1667.
Learn more about standard deviation here: https://brainly.com/question/28225633
#SPJ1
Please help with the problem in the image!
(Dont answer if you don't know it)
Expand and simplify 2(5x + 3) - 2(2x - 3)
Answer:
6x+12
Step-by-step explanation:
2(5x+3)-2(2x-3)
(10x+6)-(4x-6)
10x+6-4x+6
6x+12
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 2(5x + 3) - 2(2x - 3)
10x + 6 - 2(2x - 3)
2. 10x + 6- 2(2x - 3)
3. 10x + 6 - 4x + 6
10x + 12 - 4x
4. 10x + 12 - 4x
6x + 12
circle experts...help! will give brainly to most detailed answer
=========================================================
Explanation:
Line AE is a tangent while line AU is a secant. The angle formed by the secant and tangent lines connects with the arcs through this formula
secant tangent angle = (larger arc - smaller arc)/2
More specifically, we can say:
angle EAI = (arc EU - arc IE)/2
42 = ( (7m+5) - (3m-1) )/2
42*2 = (7m+5) - (3m-1)
84 = 7m+5 - 3m+1
84 = 4m+6
4m+6 = 84
4m = 84-6
4m = 78
m = 78/4
m = 39/2
m = 19.5
Use this value of m to compute each arc
arc IE = 3m-1 = 3*19.5-1 = 57.5 degreesarc EU = 7m+5 = 7*19.5+5 = 141.5 degreesLet's say arc IU is some unknown number x. It must add to the other two arc measures to form 360 degrees, which is a full circle.
(arc IU) + (arc IE) + (arc EU) = 360
x + 57.5 + 141.5 = 360
x + 199 = 360
x = 360-199
x = 161
The measure of minor arc IU is 161 degrees
Answer:
IU = 161
Step-by-step explanation:
Angle Formed by Two Secants= 1/2 (difference of Intercepted Arcs)
42 = 1/2 (7m+5 - (3m-1))
Distribute the minus sign
42 = 1/2 (7m+5 - 3m+1))
Combine like terms
42 = 1/2 ( 4m+6)
Distribute the 1/2
42 = 2m+3
Subtract 3 from each side
42-3 = 2m+3-3
39 = 2m
Divide by 2
19.5 = m
The sum of the arcs = 360
IU+ 3m-1 + 7m+5 = 360
IU +10m+4 = 360
IU +10(19.5) +4 = 360
IU +195+4 = 360
IU = 360 - 199
IU=161
Solve:
3x + 2 <-7 or -4x+ 5 <1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3x<-9
x<-3
-4x+5<1
-4x<-4
x>1
A line has a slope of -2. One of the points on the line is (7.-4). Which of the following could be another point on the line? A (2,14) B (1,8) с (-4,7) D (1,12)
Answer:
C should be right
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps
Problem 1: Long-Term Growth [12 Points] This will be a graph shifting question, which asks about the intuition of both the AD-A5 figures and the INS figures, specifically relating them ta long-term growth. 1. When we consider the equation for National Savings [NS) from lecture and our model, would an increase in Real GDP lead to an increase, decrease, or no change in the quantity of Natianal Sarvings supplied? Explain your answer. [3 points] Suppese that the economy uses (only) two majar inputs in its production: Gapital {K} and labour (L). Su ppose also that we are thinking about lone-term growth, specifically through productivity growth. 2. Using the AD-AS model we have been working with, what would you expect to happen to equilibrium γ
∗
and p
∗
in the economy over the long-run as this productivity growth continues to occur? Assume that the government takes no action in this case and so that the economy ardjusts naturally. Explain your irnswer using cxplariatinns and also the AD-A5 ligures. [3 points] Suppose that the government is concerned about keeping pace with this long-term growth and ensuring that it maintains a stable price level in its long-term equilibrium. Therefore, it daes act and decides to keep increasine the autonomous demand for investment in order to try and maintain a constant price level in the face of this productivity growth. 3. Does the AD-A5 model predict that this strategy could be effective? What would we expect to happen to both p
∗
and the equilibrium interest rates in this example? Explain your answer. [3 points] Finally, consider if this increase in investment as a result of gowernment policy might have a further effect on long-term growth. Assurne that this investrnent is used completely on apital accu mulation- i.e. increasing the captal stock in the economy. Suppose that the production function in this economy instead exhibits both (i) increasing returns and (ii) constant returns to scale, as in lecture. 4. Notice that the production function of this economy exhibited not diminishing returns, but rather increasina returns, which means that for each additional unit of capital (ceteris paribus), the marginal product of capital is increasing. Would this capital accumulation be a sustainable source of long-term growth in both GDP and GDP per Gapita? Why or why not? Explain your answer. [3 points]
1. An increase in Real GDP would generally lead to an increase in the quantity of National Savings supplied.
2. In the long run, as productivity growth continues to occur, we would expect the equilibrium level of Real GDP (Y*) to increase.
3. The AD-AS model suggests that increasing autonomous demand for investment to maintain a constant price level in the face of productivity growth may not be effective in the long run.
4. Capital accumulation driven by increasing returns to scale can be a sustainable source of long-term growth in both GDP and GDP per capita.
1. The equation for National Savings (NS) includes components such as disposable income, taxes, and consumption.
As Real GDP increases, disposable income tends to increase as well, which can lead to higher savings. Additionally, as the economy experiences growth, individuals and businesses may have more resources available for savings, leading to an increase in the quantity of National Savings supplied.
2. This is because productivity growth leads to an increase in the potential output of the economy. As the AS curve shifts outward, the equilibrium level of Real GDP will increase, leading to higher output and economic growth.
The price level (P*) would generally remain stable or experience moderate inflation, as the increase in productivity allows the economy to produce more goods and services without significantly increasing the overall price level.
In the AD-AS figures, the long-term effect of productivity growth is represented by an outward shift of the AS curve. This shift reflects the increased productive capacity of the economy, resulting in higher equilibrium Real GDP and relatively stable prices.
3. This is because productivity growth increases the potential output of the economy, and attempting to maintain a constant price level by increasing investment demand would eventually lead to excess demand and inflationary pressures.
In this case, both the equilibrium price level (P*) and the equilibrium interest rates would likely rise, as the increased investment demand puts upward pressure on prices and borrowing costs.
4. Increasing returns to scale means that as the capital stock grows, the marginal product of capital increases, leading to higher output and productivity.
This positive feedback loop between capital accumulation and productivity growth can drive sustained economic growth over time. As the economy continues to accumulate capital, it can experience expanding production possibilities, higher levels of output, and increased GDP per capita.
However, it's important to note that sustaining long-term growth requires factors beyond capital accumulation alone. Other factors such as technological advancements, human capital development, institutional frameworks, and favorable economic policies also play crucial roles in supporting sustainable economic growth and improving living standards over time.
To know more about Real GDP refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28587972#
#SPJ11
How to do this question plz answer me step by step plzz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz
Answer:
288.4m
Step-by-step explanation:
This track is split into a rectangle and two semi-circles.
We can find the length of the semi-circles by finding its circumference with the formula \(2\pi r\).
\(2\cdot3.14\cdot30\\188.4\)
However this is half a circle, so:
\(188.4\div2=94.2\).
There are two semi-circles.
\(94.2\cdot2=188.4\)
Since there are two legs of 50m each, we add 100 to 188.4
\(188.4+100=288.4\)m
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve for the perimeter, we first look at the rectangle in the middle. the length is 50m, and there are two sides to it, so: 50 * 2 = 100m for the top and bottom of the track.
For the circle, we can see the diameter is 30m. To solve for the circumference, we need to use the formula 2πr.
15 * 2π ≈ 94.2477796077
We add that to 100m and get:
194.2477796077
Janelle expanded the Expression as shown below what errors did she make select 3 options
Given:
\(-4(-3x+\frac{2}{7})=-12x-3\frac{5}{7}\)Correct answer is
\(-4(-3x+\frac{2}{7})=12x-1\frac{1}{7}\)Final options are:
The first term should be positive.
She did not distribute the -4 properly.
\(\text{She added }\frac{2}{7}\text{ to -4 instead of multiplying }\frac{2}{7}\text{ by -4.}\)Question below, please help me
I NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE NO LINKS!!!
Answer:
1/8
Step-by-step explanation:
I looked it up lol
Answer:
1/8
Step-by-step explanation:
2^-3
= 1/2^3 ( The reciprocal of the negative exponent is positive).
= 1/8