False. Legally sufficient value in a contract is not limited to goods or money; it can include other forms of consideration as well.
Legally sufficient value refers to the consideration or something of value that is required in a contract to make it valid and enforceable. While goods or money are commonly used as forms of consideration, they are not the only types that can have legally sufficient value. Consideration can also include services, property, promises, or even refraining from doing something. The key requirement is that the consideration provided by each party must have some measurable value.
Legally sufficient value is a fundamental concept in contract law. It ensures that both parties in a contract exchange something of value, which helps establish a mutual obligation and prevents one-sided agreements. While goods and money are frequently used as consideration, they are not the exclusive options.
For example, in a contract between a landlord and a tenant, the tenant's promise to pay rent each month can be considered legally sufficient value. In another scenario, if someone promises not to disclose certain confidential information in exchange for a benefit, the promise of confidentiality can be considered valid consideration.
The principle of legally sufficient value is rooted in the idea that a contract should reflect a fair exchange of goods, services, promises, or any other valuable consideration. This requirement helps ensure that parties enter into contracts with a clear understanding of their obligations and that the agreement is supported by a genuine exchange of value. It also prevents contracts based on mere gifts or gratuitous promises from being legally enforceable.
In summary, while goods and money are commonly used forms of consideration, legally sufficient value in a contract can take various forms. As long as the consideration provided by each party has some measurable value and signifies a mutual exchange, it can meet the requirement for legally sufficient value.
Learn more about legally sufficient value.
brainly.com/question/30187192
#SPJ11
(HELP I'LL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST! ) Which criminologist from history is MOST likely to agree with this statement: It doesn’t matter if you raise a child correctly; if they are born without the ability to understand how others feel, they will end up as psychopaths.
A.
Michael Gottfredson
B.
William H. Sheldon
C.
Hans Eysenck
D.
Gabriel Tarde
For the given statement, the criminologist from history that is MOST likely to agree with this statement is: William H. Sheldon. Hence, Option B is correct.
What does criminologist mean?Criminal scientists who deal with law enforcement examine criminals closely, determining their circumstances and motivations as well as the effects on society, generational shifts, and other trends. They also explore ethics, looking into the motivations behind criminal behavior.
One might expect to make between Rs. 3 and 4 lacs a year as a criminologist. If they have any relevant expertise, they can work in both areas and receive competitive pay.
By providing the essential research to assist law enforcement and other professionals in their duties, criminologists have an impact on all of these fields.
Therefore, Option B is correct.
Learn more about criminologist from here:
https://brainly.com/question/14313357
#SPJ5
The federal government decides to require that automobile manufacturers install new anti-pollution equipment that costs $2,000 per car. Under what conditions can carmakers pass almost all of this costalong to car-buyers? Under what conditions can carmakers pass very little of this cost along to car- buyers? Sketch supply and demand diagrams to illustrate your answer.
Carmakers can pass almost all of the cost of new anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers when the demand for automobiles is high and consumers are willing to pay higher prices without a significant decrease in quantity demanded.
On the other hand, carmakers can pass very little of the cost to car-buyers when the demand for automobiles is low, and consumers are more price-sensitive, resulting in a significant decrease in quantity demanded. Supply and demand diagrams can illustrate these conditions.
When the demand for automobiles is high (illustrated by a steep demand curve), carmakers have more market power and can pass almost all of the cost of new anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers.
This is because consumers are willing to pay higher prices and the quantity demanded remains relatively unchanged. In this case, the supply curve (representing the cost of production) would shift upward by the amount of the equipment cost.
Conversely, when the demand for automobiles is low (illustrated by a flatter demand curve), carmakers have less market power, and passing the cost to car-buyers becomes more challenging.
Consumers are more price-sensitive, and a significant increase in price would result in a substantial decrease in quantity demanded. In this scenario, the supply curve shifting upward by the equipment cost would lead to a higher price but a much smaller quantity demanded.
By analyzing the supply and demand dynamics, it becomes evident that the ability of carmakers to pass the cost of anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers depends on the elasticity of demand for automobiles. If demand is relatively inelastic, carmakers can shift the majority of the cost burden to consumers.
However, if demand is elastic, carmakers will have to bear a significant portion of the cost themselves to avoid a sharp decline in sales.
Learn more about steep demand curve here:
brainly.com/question/14434713
#SPJ11
Carmakers can pass almost all of the cost of new anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers when the demand for automobiles is high and consumers are willing to pay higher prices without a significant decrease in quantity demanded.
On the other hand, carmakers can pass very little of the cost to car-buyers when the demand for automobiles is low, and consumers are more price-sensitive, resulting in a significant decrease in quantity demanded. Supply and demand diagrams can illustrate these conditions.
When the demand for automobiles is high (illustrated by a steep demand curve), carmakers have more market power and can pass almost all of the cost of new anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers.
This is because consumers are willing to pay higher prices and the quantity demanded remains relatively unchanged. In this case, the supply curve (representing the cost of production) would shift upward by the amount of the equipment cost.
Conversely, when the demand for automobiles is low (illustrated by a flatter demand curve), carmakers have less market power, and passing the cost to car-buyers becomes more challenging.
Consumers are more price-sensitive, and a significant increase in price would result in a substantial decrease in quantity demanded. In this scenario, the supply curve shifting upward by the equipment cost would lead to a higher price but a much smaller quantity demanded.
By analyzing the supply and demand dynamics, it becomes evident that the ability of carmakers to pass the cost of anti-pollution equipment to car-buyers depends on the elasticity of demand for automobiles. If demand is relatively inelastic, carmakers can shift the majority of the cost burden to consumers.
However, if demand is elastic, carmakers will have to bear a significant portion of the cost themselves to avoid a sharp decline in sales.
Learn more about steep demand curve here:
brainly.com/question/14434713
#SPJ11
Describe the role conflict that exists for treatment professionals.
In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:
Unclear Job Expectations.Poor Communication.Toxic Work Environment.What is the concept of role conflict?Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.
A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.
Learn more about role conflict, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13603130
#SPJ1
An officer has made application for a court order approving electronic surveillance of Defendant. The order is granted, stating: "From June 1 to June 7, Officer X, having established probable cause, is granted the authority to intercept the wire communications of Defendant." The officer proceeded to enter Defendant’s house, without a warrant, to install the listening device. Eventually, a recording is made of Defendant discussing his illegal activities with a friend. Defendant is arrested, charged, and has filed a motion to suppress the interception. Defendant asserts that the entry into his house was illegal. Discuss.
Answer:
he wasn't granted permission to enter the home
Explanation:
he was granted right to monitor not break in to his home
the state's lawyer, who is responsible for bringing charges against accused lawbreakers, is a: a) prosecutor. b) district lawyer. c) solicitor general. d) judge advocate general.
A prosecutor is the state's lawyer who is in charge of pursuing charges against accused lawbreakers. Here option A is the correct answer.
A prosecutor is a lawyer who is responsible for bringing criminal charges against individuals who are accused of violating the law. Prosecutors work for the state or federal government and are tasked with investigating crimes, gathering evidence, and presenting cases in court.
The role of a prosecutor is critical in ensuring that justice is served and that criminals are held accountable for their actions. They have the power to determine whether to file charges, negotiate plea deals, or take a case to trial. Prosecutors are also responsible for representing the government in criminal proceedings and presenting evidence to a judge or jury.
While district attorneys and solicitors general are both types of prosecutors, they are specific titles given to prosecutors who hold certain positions within their respective jurisdictions. A district attorney is typically an elected official who heads a county or district's prosecutorial office, while a solicitor general is appointed by the state attorney general to represent the state in legal matters.
To learn more about prosecutor
https://brainly.com/question/30404247
#SPJ4
Having to do all the work is an example of a(n)
A. disadvantage to society of using authority
B. disadvantage to the user of using authority
C. advantage to society of using authority
D. advantage to the user of using authority
Answer:
A
Explanation:
, Studio GFF hid your b ok gift but no you don't need to
Most cases in medical malpractice law fall within the ____________________ law of torts. a tort is a private wrong or injury, other than breach of contract, for which the court will provide a remedy.
Most cases in medical malpractice law fall within the cause in fact law of tort.
What is tort?Tort occur when an individual breach an argument.
The breach could cause another individual harm which can be a case with medical practitioners.
Therefore, most cases in medical malpractice law fall within the cause in fact law of tort.
Learn more on tort below
https://brainly.com/question/14965931
#SPJ4
Distinguish between the eurocentic and africa approaches to corrections and punishment
The Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment focuses on retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, while the African approach emphasizes restorative justice, community involvement, reconciliation, and collective responsibility.
The Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment typically focuses on the following aspects:
1. Retribution: Punishment is aimed at making the offender pay for their crime.
2. Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to prevent future criminal behaviour.
3. Incapacitation: Offenders are removed from society to protect the public.
4. Rehabilitation: Programs are provided to help offenders change their behaviour and reintegrate into society.
On the other hand, the African approach to corrections and punishment is based on the following principles:
1. Restorative justice: The focus is on repairing the harm caused by the crime and promoting healing for the victim, the offender, and the community.
2. Community involvement: The community plays an active role in the offender's rehabilitation and reintegration process.
3. Reconciliation: The aim is to restore relationships and promote social harmony.
4. Collective responsibility: The responsibility for addressing crime and punishment is shared among individuals, families, and the community.
Learn more about the Eurocentric approach to corrections and punishment: https://brainly.com/question/27175976.
#SPJ11
Who did Jeremy Bentham think deserved special consideration?
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Who was Jeremy Bentham What did he believe in?Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.
To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1085669
#SPJ4
2. What is national consensus?
3. What is the difference between material
and non-material culture?
Liability for a defective product can be triggered even when A) the product is not expected to reach the user without a substantial change in its condition. B) the seller has exercised all possible care in preparation and sale of the product. C) the injured party can prove that the product was not received at all. D) the seller is not engaged in the business of selling such a product.
Liability for a defective product can be triggered even when the seller has exercised all possible care in preparation and sale of the product. The correct option is c.
This is because the concept of strict liability applies in product liability cases. This means that regardless of the seller's intent or level of care
They can still be held responsible for any harm caused by a defective product.
t is not necessary for the product to reach the user without a substantial change in its condition, nor is it necessary for the injured party to prove that the product was not received at all.
However, if the seller is not engaged in the business of selling such a product, they may have a defense against liability.
To know more about liability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28391469#
#SPJ11
What is an advantage of photographing animals at the zoo rather than the wild?
Answer:
they animals is in cages so they won't get to kill u I don't know
Is a security officer justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone?
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.
A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.
Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.
A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.
Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.
You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176
#SPJ11
Explain how public safety is met because police officers enforce the laws? Use examples of laws that are routinely broken on a daily basis.
Answer:
What is this about
Explanation:
???????????
what has happened to presidential power as the government has expanded its services and bureaucracy?
As the government has expanded its services and bureaucracy, the power of the President of the United States has also increased in many ways. This is due to several factors, including the growth of executive agencies, the increased complexity of government operations, and the expanding role of the federal government in American society.
One of the key ways in which presidential power has increased is through the growth of the executive branch and its associated bureaucracy. The President is responsible for appointing the heads of executive agencies, such as the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the Environmental Protection Agency, among others. These agencies have significant powers and responsibilities, and the President can exercise significant control over them through his or her appointment power and other mechanisms.
Another factor contributing to the expansion of presidential power is the increasing complexity of government operations. As the government has taken on new roles and responsibilities, such as providing social welfare programs and regulating economic activity, it has become more difficult for Congress to effectively oversee and manage all aspects of government operations. This has led to a greater reliance on executive agencies and the President to manage and coordinate government activities.
Finally, the expanding role of the federal government in American society has also contributed to the growth of presidential power. As the government has taken on more responsibilities in areas such as healthcare, education, and environmental regulation, the President has become a more important figure in shaping public policy and managing government operations.
Overall, while the power of the President has ebbed and flowed over the course of American history, the expansion of government services and bureaucracy has generally tended to increase the power of the executive branch and the President in particular.
in a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information obtained during discovery.
In a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information in the pleadings. This statement is TRUE.
A request for judgment on the pleadings is appropriately made in a federal civil action once all pleadings, including the complaint, answer, any counterclaims, cross-claims, and answers, have been filed. This kind of motion is made simply on the claims made by the parties in the pleadings, without taking any evidence into account.
A move for judgment on the pleadings asks the court to determine that there are no genuine factual disputes and to conclude the case by applying the law to these undisputed facts. When one party files a request for judgment on the pleadings, they argue that even if all of the facts asserted by the other party are true, the case should still be determined in their favor.
To know more about pleadings refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
What is required to become a reserve police officer with most police departments? Responses The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer. The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer. The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor’s staff.
Answer:
To become a reserve police officer with most police departments, the candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer. Additionally, they must have served in the military, or have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. Finally, the candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor's staff.
Which of the following best illustrates a consequence of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development?
A. the governments of the developing world refusing to trade with the non-democratic state of China in the 1990s because of China's human rights policies
B. the IMF and World Bank lending heavily to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s in spite of existing claims of human rights violations
C. the policies of the World Bank that endorsed and supported the command economies of the Soviet Union and its satellites in the 1980s
D. the U.S. government sending troops to the non-democratic states of Iraq and Afghanistan as part of the global war on international terrorism
B. the IMF and World Bank lending heavily to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s in spite of existing claims of human rights violations best illustrates a consequence of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development.
The lending decisions of the IMF and World Bank to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s illustrate the consequences of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development. Despite concerns about human rights violations in these countries, the IMF and World Bank chose to support their economic development through loans and aid programs. This decision reflected the belief that economic growth and development could be achieved even in non-democratic regimes. This example highlights the tension between democratic values and economic development goals, and the difficult choices that international organizations and governments must make when considering whether to support non-democratic regimes.
Learn more about economic here:
https://brainly.com/question/14787713
#SPJ11
An eight-year-old girl was playing catch on the sidewalk with her friend when her friend made an errant throw over the girl's head. The ball hit a pedestrian, who was walking on the sidewalk in the other direction. The pedestrian angrily threw the ball into the street. The girl ran out into the street to retrieve it and was hit and seriously injured by a car. If the girl's guardian considers legal action on her behalf against the pedestrian and the driver of the car, which of the following best states the pedestrian's liability?
A. The girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence.
B. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain contribution from the pedestrian.
C. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain indemnity from the pedestrian.
D. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, and the driver will not be able to obtain contribution or indemnity from the pedestrian.
The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.
What is the basis for the pedestrian's potential liability and the girl's claim against them?In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.
As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.
Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.
Learn more about: negligence
brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
Discuss the mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights (ACHPR) and analyse the interface between the Commission and the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
Answer:
1. The mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights (ACHPR):
The African Union (formerly OAU) established the African Commission on Human and People's Rights (ACHPR) in 1981 with the mandate to promote and protect the human and people's rights of Africans through the adoption of the African Charter. Captured in Article 30 of the African Charter are the mandates of the Commission, which were further enumerated in Article 45 to include the following:
a. Promote human and people's rights
b. Protect human and people's rights
c. Interpret the African Charter on Human and People's Rights
d. Study, research, and document problems relating to human and people's rights
e. Work and cooperate with non-governmental and intergovernmental institutions to ensure that states in African observe and respect human and people's rights
f. Disseminate vital information and organize fora for entrenching human and people's rights
g. Appoint special rapporteurs to each state of the African Union.
2. Analysis of the interface between the Commission and the African Court on Human and People's Rights:
The African Court on Human and People's Rights is an international court based in Arusha, Tanzania. It was established to reinforce and complement the efforts and mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights. While the ACHPR carries out human and people's rights investigations, documents its findings, and submits reports to the African Court on Human and People's Rights, the court adjudicates on human and people's rights violations. They work in tandem with each other to achieve the mandate of the African Charter.
Explanation:
The African Charter, established by the Organization of African Unity (renamed the African Union), is a set of rules, called Articles, which guarantee and enforce certain human rights and fundamental freedoms for individuals and peoples of Africa. It was created and finally adopted by the OAU in June 1981, and became enforceable from October 1986. The charter established the ACHPR and the African Court on Human and People's Rights, as two vital institutions to promote and protect human and people's rights.
NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP AS IN RIGHT NOW!!!! What do we call the leader of the executive branch? *
President
Secretary
Speaker
Vice President
Answer:
The President of the United States
Explanation:
The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch. The President gets help from the Vice President, department heads (called Cabinet members), and heads of independent agencies.
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
E
According to the video, which abilities do Lawyers need? Select all that apply.
ability to lift heavy objects
ability to interpret complex legal documents
ability to travel frequently
ability to perform research
ability to prevent crimes
Answer:
Ability to interpret complex legal documents, and ability to perform research
Explanation:
Sometimes its also ability to travel frequently, but i think it depends on what kind of lawyer you are
Answer:
its b and d
Explanation:
edg.2021
Can police arrest me without evidence of my guilt? Why or why not
Answer:
no he has no right to arrest you
Discuss the critics against Cost Benefit Analysis model as espoused by the utilitarian ethics
The critic regarding cost benefit analysis is that it l tends to give little weight to long-term costs and overemphasize short-term gain. This is because a high discount rate tends to undervalue benefits that accrue over longer time periods. It does the same for potential negative consequences in the future.
What is the cost-benefit analysis?A cost-benefit analysis compares an intervention's costs and benefits, which are both expressed in monetary units. A cost-benefit analysis, also known as a benefit-cost analysis, is a methodical approach to estimating the advantages and disadvantages of various alternatives.
The issue of monetary valuation or incommensurability is a recurring theme in most cost benefit criticism. Costs and benefits can be difficult to quantify in monetary terms because their magnitude is unknown or uncertain, or because they are difficult to express in monetary terms even when their impact is known.
Learn more about cost benefit analysis on:
https://brainly.com/question/12545486
#SPJ1
Earning enough money to take a vacation is which rewards of work factor?
A Benefits
B Career
C Compensation
D Work content
Earning enough money to take a vacation is a compensation rewards of work factor. The correct option is c.
Earned income enables the ability to take a vacation, which is option C- Compensation. Wages, salaries and bonuses are all examples of financial rewards for work, which collectively constitute compensation. A concrete result of the compensation factor is the ability to earn enough money to take a vacation.
Demonstrating the connection between one's efforts at work and the financial resources that allow them to engage in leisure activities. This aspect of pay demonstrates how the financial benefits of work can be translated into rewarding experiences and benefits outside the workplace which benefits employees general wellbeing and work-life balance.
To know more about financial resources here
brainly.com/question/32199479
#SPJ3
Why does the government require qualified 18-year-old males to register for selective service?
Answer:
c
Explanation:
If a basic illustration is not provided, an insurer MUST provide a policy summary to a prospective insured at which of the following times?
An insurer must provide a policy summary to a prospective insured before the prospective insured is required to pay for the policy or to sign a contract for the policy.
A policy summary is a document that provides a brief overview of the coverage and benefits of an insurance policy, as well as any exclusions or limitations. It is intended to help the prospective insured understand the policy and make an informed decision about whether to purchase it. By providing the policy summary before the prospective insured is required to pay or sign a contract, the insurer is giving the prospective insured the opportunity to review the policy and ask any questions they may have before making a commitment.
at the defendant's trial for stealing an automobile, the defendant called a character witness who testified that the defendant had an excellent reputation for honesty. in rebuttal, the prosecutor calls another witness to testify that he recently saw the defendant cheat on a college examination. the prosecution witness's testimony should be
The prosecution witness's testimony should be:
The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
What do you mean by cross examination?
The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination. It gives the opposing party a chance to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.
The main aim of cross examination is to strengthen an individual's case. The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility
Rules of Cross-Examination
Asking Questions Only.Inclusion of New Fact Per Question.Break questions into a Series of Logical ProgressionsHence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
To know more about Cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28114975
#SPJ4