EXW, FOB, CFR, and DDP are the Incoterms that are most frequently used in relation to marine freight. They can be separated into two groups based on advantages for both buyers and sellers.
Simply said, FOB and EXW are the most advantageous rules for a buyer. They give the option of selecting a freight forwarder, who is in charge of planning a significant portion of the shipment. In contrast, the seller selects a freight forwarding company when using CFR or DDP.
Furthermore, compared to CFR and DDP, EXW and FOB terms offer more flexibility in terms of planning, budgeting, and transportation. Who pays for costs associated with, for example, loading and unloading, customs processes, and insurance are also determined under Incoterms 2020.
FOB is without a doubt the rule that is applied the most in maritime transit. It should be noted that this choice solely and only pertains to interior and maritime transportation.
Like FOB, CIF is only used in the context of maritime and inland shipping. It is the second most popular rule in marine transportation as a result. An alternative to CIF in this situation is a CIP rule. It is not advised to transport containers using CIF.
The Incoterms 2020 FCA rule is the foundation for about 40% of contracts throughout the world. The fundamental reason for this is that it pertains to all forms of transportation, including combination transport.
Any mode of transportation is subject to Incoterms 2020 DAP. This formula can also be applied to combined transportation, which combines several modes of transportation.
To know more about customs processes click here
https://brainly.com/question/14654945
#SPJ4
Ivan met with his friend Anthony, who was driving a flashy new red convertible. Ivan knew that neither Anthony nor his family owned this car, but it looked good, so he got in and let Anthony take him for a ride. Ivan also knew that Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. Anthony offered to sell Ivan an MP3 player he had in the back seat of the car for $40. Ivan agreed to pay him the money.
a. Have any crimes been committed? If so, which crimes and by whom?
b. Why does society make receiving stolen property a crime? Should it be?
c. Would you ever buy something for an extremely low price from a friend? How would you know for sure it was not stolen?
Yes, a crime was committed as Anthony used drugs and sometimes took other people's things and sold them to get money to buy cocaine. This was a crime of theft.
The crime of receiving a stolen property is defined as knowingly receiving the stolen property with the sole intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property stolen. So, receiving of stolen property is a crime.
So, this tends to prevent concealing of a property by a particular person who thus know that such property is thus obtained by an illegal way. Suppose if an item is sold by at a very low price so the item can be stolen. Thus, this is an act of crime which is called theft.
Hence, handling stolen goods is a crime.
To learn more about theft here:
https://brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ1
Betty was at a baseball game seated one row behind a famous movie star. when betty stood up to cheer, she was bumped by the person beside her. she lost her balance and fell into the lap of the movie star. he sued her for the tort of assault. who prevails?
Betty would win since the person sitting next to her accidentally bumped into her, rather than falling into the lap of the movie star.
Only when someone tries to purposefully endanger you with harmful or offensive touches is the tort of assault admissible. This was not the circumstance here.
What is an assault?A legal definition of an assault may include the threat or actual commission of such an act as well as the act of inflicting physical injury or unwanted physical contact upon a person.
Due to the fact that it is both a crime and a tort, it could lead to either legal action or civil liability. In both criminal and tort law, the common law term is typically the same.
Learn more about assualt, from:
brainly.com/question/30028200
#SPJ4
Discuss FOUR (4) disadvantages of trade credit to the
buyer
extortion of public officials is called extortion under color of official right. T/F
True. Extortion of public officials is indeed called "extortion under color of official right."
"Extortion under color of official right" refers to the act of public officials unlawfully obtaining property or money from others by exploiting their position and authority. This term is commonly used in legal contexts to describe situations where public officials abuse their power to demand bribes, kickbacks, or other forms of illicit benefits in exchange for performing their official duties or granting favors. It is a form of corruption that involves the misuse of public office for personal gain. Therefore, it is accurate to state that the extortion of public officials is referred to as "extortion under color of official right."
Learn more about extortion here:
https://brainly.com/question/15286343
#SPJ11
True or false. a deductive syllogism consists of four statements. group of answer choices
False.
A deductive syllogism consists of three statements: two premises and a conclusion.
In deductive reasoning, a syllogism is a logical argument that follows a specific structure. It consists of two premises, which are statements that provide evidence or information, and a conclusion, which is the logical consequence drawn from those premises. The syllogism aims to establish a valid and sound argument. The two premises of a deductive syllogism provide the necessary information to support the conclusion. The first premise is typically a general statement or principle, while the second premise is a specific statement or example. By combining these premises, the syllogism reaches a logical conclusion. In summary, a deductive syllogism consists of three statements: two premises and a conclusion, forming a logical argument based on deductive reasoning.
Learn more about syllogism here : brainly.com/question/361872
#SPJ11
on what basis could the court hold that hemmerling is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits?
There are several potential reasons why a court could hold that Hemmerling is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits. One possibility is that the injury or illness he suffered was not directly related to his job or work activities. Another possibility is that Hemmerling was not an employee covered by workers' compensation laws.
For example, if Hemmerling was injured while engaging in personal activities during his workday, such as playing a sport or engaging in a hobby, the court might find that he was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits because the injury did not arise out of his employment. If he was an independent contractor rather than a traditional employee, he might not be eligible for benefits under workers' compensation laws.
Finally, it is possible that Hemmerling was not in compliance with the requirements of workers' compensation laws, such as failing to report his injury in a timely manner or failing to follow the procedures for filing a claim. In such cases, the court might find that he is not entitled to benefits because he did not meet the necessary legal requirements.
The court could hold that Hemmerling is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits on the basis of several factors, such as:
Employment status: If Hemmerling is not classified as an employee, but rather as an independent contractor, he would not be eligible for workers' compensation benefits. Injury not work-related: If the court determines that Hemmerling's injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment, he would not be entitled to workers' compensation benefits.
Failure to report the injury: If Hemmerling did not promptly report his injury to his employer as required by workers' compensation laws, the court could deny his benefits. Non-covered occupation: Certain occupations, such as seasonal or agricultural workers, might not be covered by workers' compensation insurance. If Hemmerling's occupation falls under an exclusion, the court could hold that he is not entitled to benefits.
Intentional self-inflicted injury: If the court finds that Hemmerling intentionally caused his own injury, they may deny him workers' compensation benefits. These factors, among others, could be used by the court to determine that Hemmerling is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits.
To know more about workers' compensation laws, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/27323344#
#SPJ11
If you need to slow down while driving on a slippery road the first thing you should do is:
If you need to slow down while driving on a slippery road, the first thing you should do is to reduce your speed gradually.
To reduce your speed gradually, you should take your foot off the gas pedal and use the brakes lightly and smoothly. If your vehicle has anti-lock brakes, apply firm and continuous pressure to the brake pedal, but if it doesn't, pump the brakes gently. This will help you maintain traction on the road and prevent skidding.
Another important thing to do when driving on slippery roads is to increase the distance between your vehicle and the vehicle in front of you. This will give you more time to react and stop in case of an emergency.
In addition, you should avoid sudden movements, such as sharp turns or lane changes, as this can also cause your vehicle to skid. Instead, use smooth and gradual movements when steering, accelerating or braking.
Overall, driving on slippery roads requires caution, patience and skill. By reducing your speed gradually, increasing your distance from other vehicles, and avoiding sudden movements, you can stay safe and avoid accidents.
For more such questions on driving visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29529618
#SPJ11
Question 6 of 10
Which term describes a situation in which one country can produce more of a
product than other countries?
Absolute Advantage
Explanation:
just got it right on my test?
Answer: Absolute advantage
Explanation: A P E X
Which term refers to an institution created by a society to enforce public policies?
Answer:
Government
Explanation:
Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Government
Explanation:
Did the quiz (k12) and got it right. It'd be awesome if you'd mark this as the brainliest answer :)
What is the purpose of bicameral legislature?
Purpose of a bicameral legislature is to ensure proper representation, provide a system of checks and balances, and ensure stability in a democratic government. It allows for more effective and efficient governance by balancing the needs of people with needs of states or regions.
In a bicameral legislature, the lower chamber, which is typically called the House of Representatives, is designed to represent the people. It's based on population, and every member of the House is elected directly by the people they represent. This means that the House is closer to the people and more responsive to their needs.
On the other hand, the upper chamber, usually called the Senate, is meant to represent the states or regions. This chamber has a fixed number of members, typically two per state, and they're often chosen by state legislators, not by the people directly. This arrangement allows for more regional representation and ensures that each state or region has an equal say in the national government.
The bicameral legislature is designed to balance these two conflicting principles of representation and to create a system of checks and balances. By dividing the legislative process into two chambers, it's possible to ensure that legislation is properly scrutinized and debated. It also allows for the passage of more stable, long-term legislation.
Know more about legislature here:
https://brainly.com/question/32158538
#SPJ11
How can the United States influence the policies of other nations?
Answer:
Explanation:
With negotiated treaties with foreign countries the usa can have certain control foreign affairs.
whats the important thing in law school
Answer:
most importantly we need to learn how to tell lies
Explanation:
which clause states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws?
The clause that states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws is the Supremacy Clause. This clause is the Constitution's one of the most significant structural provision.
This clause states that the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the United States of America and shall supersede any statute, state laws or regulations when there is a conflict between the two.
However, if any law says that the State must comply with it and that no other law be it federal laws cannot supersede them then that law must be complied with as it says. Till this day, the Supreme Court relies heftily on this clause in deciding cases with conflict.
To know more about Supremacy Clause
https://brainly.com/question/13839329?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
A(n) ________ is issued by the clerk of the court and is delivered with a copy of the complaint to the defendant.
Answer:
Summons.
Explanation:
A(n) summons is issued by the clerk of the court and is delivered with a copy of the complaint to the defendant.
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
in the book night by elie wiesel explain how the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of elie and his father. chapter 8
Answer:
The roles of father and son are truly reversed in Chapter 8 of Elie Wiesel's novel "Night," when Elie and his father, Shlomo, endure the challenges of the concentration camp together. The severe environment and terrible events they face cause this reversal.
Elie's father had been the dominant role in their relationship at first, offering guidance and encouragement. Their roles, however, begin to evolve when they are subjected to the horrors of the concentration camp. Elie is becoming increasingly responsible for his father's physical and mental well-being.
Elie recalls the terrible winter circumstances in the camp and the physical toll it takes on his father in Chapter 8. He talks about how he must look after his father, making sure he has enough food and shielding him from the camp's violence. Elie's devotion to his father's survival is clear when he gives up a piece of bread for him, despite the fact that he is starving himself.
Furthermore, Elie becomes his father's mental and physical support. He attempts to encourage and motivate his father to persevere in the face of adversity. Elie's job as a caregiver becomes critical as he attempts to hide his father from the worst aspects of their circumstances, providing him with comfort and hope.
Throughout the chapter, Elie's actions demonstrate his deep love and devotion to his father. He takes on the responsibility of caring for him, ensuring his survival and providing emotional support. The reversal of their roles showcases the extent of their bond and the lengths Elie is willing to go to protect and care for his father.
Overall, in Chapter 8 of "Night," Elie Wiesel depicts a reversal of father/son roles, with Elie taking on the role of carer and protector for his father in the face of the horrific hardships of the concentration camp.
In the book Night by Elie Wiesel, the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of Elie and his father. This is particularly highlighted in chapter 8.
In this chapter, Elie and his father are both in the same concentration camp and are struggling to survive. Elie’s father is weak, sick, and is not able to keep up with the work that is required of him. This leads to Elie becoming his father’s caretaker. He helps his father with his work, carries his father's weight when he can no longer walk, and feeds him whatever scraps of food he can find.
The relationship between Elie and his father is one of love and devotion. Elie cares for his father, despite the terrible circumstances they are in. However, as his father's health deteriorates, Elie begins to feel a sense of anger and frustration. He becomes angry at his father for not being able to take care of himself and for being a burden on him. He is also angry at himself for feeling this way and for not being able to do more to help his father. Despite these feelings, Elie continues to care for his father until the very end.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel visit here:
brainly.com/question/15099354
#SPJ11
What is the maximum penalty for selling beverages to an intoxicated person alcoholic beverages
The Liquor manages Act prohibits an alcoholic liquor permittee or their employees from supplying alcohol to intoxicated individuals (CGS § 30-86(b)(1)). Violations are punishable by using as much as $1,000 up to at least one-12 months imprisonment, or, for every offense (CGS § 30-113).
Some commonplace signs and symptoms of intoxication are Loud speech, boasting, crude conduct, consuming on my own, ingesting too fast, slurred speech, ordering doubles, looking for rounds, and stumbling.
Single indicator as a way to particularly become aware of seen intoxication.
1)frequency of drinking.
2)Speech.
3)Incoherent, rambling, and slurring.
4)conduct.
5)impolite, offensive, overly pleasant, annoying, confused, aggressive, violent, and inappropriate.
6)stability.
7)Unsteady on toes, dazzling and swaying.
8)Coordination.
Learn more about the intoxicated person here: https://brainly.com/question/28019347
#SPJ1
Which of the following terms refer to a law that allows individuals to be prosecuted for an action that, when committed, was not a crime, but was outlawed afterwards?
Select one:
A. ex post facto law
B. habeas corpus law
C. appellate law
Answer:
It’s A
Explanation:
I got it correct on prepworks
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Answer:
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Explanation:
There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the novel A Cool Million, how does economics, politics,
xenophobia, abuses of power, or the criminal justice system work to
oppress individuals or help them out? Moreover, in what ways does
politic
A Cool Million is a novel by Nathanael West. It shows how the economics, politics, xenophobia, abuses of power, or the criminal justice system work to oppress individuals. It also reveals how politics may be one way to help individuals.
A Cool Million is a satirical novel that shows the tough life of Lemuel Pitkin. The novel starts with Pitkin, a young man who lives in a small town, dreaming of a better life. Pitkin leaves the town and travels to New York City to seek his fortune. Lemuel Pitkin is confident that he will succeed in New York City. Unfortunately, things do not go as planned. The opportunities are scarce, and he ends up working for a crooked politician, Shagpoke Whipple. Whipple promises to help him get a job and gives him a list of tasks to accomplish.
Learn more about accomplish
https://brainly.com/question/31598462
#SPJ11
what is delegated legislation
Sentencing of offenders is assessed differently using different ethical perspectives. Explain
The punishment that an offender receives is based on the different ethical perspective of the person doing the sentencing.
How does ethical perspective affect sentencing?The ethical view that a judge takes when they are sentencing a person is what ultimately determines the sentence that the offender will get.
For instance, a man runs red lights and has an accident. He doesn't stop because he is trying to get his wife who is in labor to the hospital.
A judge who believes that the ends justifies the means will give that man a lighter sentence because he was just trying to get his wife proper medical care.
Another judge might impose a heavy sentence because the judge wouldn't look at why the man committed the crime, but how it affected other people.
Find out more on ethical perspectives at https://brainly.com/question/8590993.
#SPJ1
following a proper hearing and due process, the commission may impose administrative fines on a licensee. all of the following are true statements about administrative fines on a licensee except:
The specific laws and regulations governing administrative fines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the licensing authority. Therefore, it is always advisable to refer to the relevant laws and regulations applicable in a specific context.
Administrative fines can be imposed on a licensee after a proper hearing and due process. However, there are some statements about administrative fines that are not true. Here are some possible exceptions:
1. Administrative fines are never imposed: This statement is false. Administrative fines can indeed be imposed on a licensee, but only after following a proper hearing and due process.
2. Administrative fines are always imposed immediately: This statement is false. After a proper hearing and due process, the commission has the authority to impose administrative fines on a licensee. However, the timing of the imposition may vary depending on the circumstances of the case.
3. Administrative fines are only imposed for minor violations: This statement is false. Administrative fines can be imposed on a licensee for both minor and major violations. The severity of the violation determines the amount of the fine, with major violations typically resulting in higher fines.
4. Administrative fines can be waived by the commission: This statement is true. In some cases, the commission may have the discretion to waive or reduce the administrative fines imposed on a licensee. This could be due to factors such as the licensee's cooperation, previous compliance record, or mitigating circumstances.
It is important to note that the specific laws and regulations governing administrative fines may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the licensing authority. Therefore, it is always advisable to refer to the relevant laws and regulations applicable in a specific context.
Learn more about laws and regulations from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13458836
#SPJ11
Mississippi has adopted the rule that an employee is acting within the scope of their employment if force is intentionally used and that use of force is not unexpected by the employer. (Mar-Jac Poultry MS, LLC v. Love). If a cashier were to tackle a suspected shoplifter, do you believe that behavior would be unexpected by the employer?
Answer:
Yes but no really.
Explanation:
This behavior would not be expected by a employer but if you really think about it the Employer would rather be shocked and if it was a shop lifter they would be rewarded as because of there braveness to stop a shop lifter if that is what you are referring to.
the federal election commission enforces federal election laws. however, they have not filled an open position in four years, preventing the commission from enforcing laws. in response, the senate committee on rules and administration calls a hearing and subpoenas the members of the federal election committee to testify. which of the following statements best explains the reason the senate committee called this hearing?
The matter of investigating not being in the hands of the Federal Election Commission, and the accountability of bureaucracy, is the reason that best explains the fact that the Senate Committee called the hearing in the above case.
The FEC, or the federal election commission may be taken into interpretation as the official authority that does not belong to any political party or ideology, but tends to maintain the level of decency while holding the federal elections in the country during regular intervals.
Learn more about the federal election commission here:
https://brainly.com/question/29792596
#SPJ4
Complete question
The Federal Election Commission enforces federal election laws. However, they have not filled an open position in four years, preventing the commission from enforcing laws. In response, the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration calls a hearing and subpoenas the members of the Federal Election Committee to testify.
What is the reason that best explains the reason the Senate committee called this hearing?
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
mCours
days must register their vehidets).
Question 2:
Select the best answer from the multiple choices below
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than
29
03
13
30
300
were
Posto
mpleted
answered
answered
answered
answered
answered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
unanswered
21 answered
22. Unanswered
23 Unanswered
Suhant Exam for Crossing
Time remaining to complete exam in minutes): 180
wered
Answer:
It's 90 days but u don't have that a optionExplanation:
90 days
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than 90 days must register their vehicles. If you are a new Texas resident, you are allowed to drive with your valid and unexpired licence from another U.S. state, U.S territory or a Canadian province for up to 90 days after moving here.
Answer: I don’t know how to answer this question
Explanation:
there is also no possible question, sorry
b. What restrictions, if any, should the government place on the manufacture of firearms? The sale of firearms? The possession of firearms? Explain.
Answer:b
Explanation:
at a party, a man poisons the food of his neighbor. the man wants revenge for the hideous color his neighbor painted his house. the neighbor gets very sick and needs to go to the hospital. the sick neighbor can sue the man who poisoned his food for which of the following?
The sick neighbor can sue the man who poisoned his food for the battery.
What is meant by Sue?to pursue legal action against a person or organization, particularly to pursue monetary compensation for harm suffered: He threatened legal action against the letter's allegations because he was so furious about them; initiate a civil lawsuit against: to sue another person for damages.
"continue, persevere," from Anglo-French suer "follow after, continue," from Old French suir, sivre "pursue, follow after, sue in court" (Modern French suivre), from Vulgar Latin *sequere "follow," from Latin sequi "follow" A sarcastic expression implying that a person who disagrees with the speaker's actions or opinions can take legal action against the speaker. quotations.
The majority of the time, it is because someone has not treated you fairly. You might have been hurt physically or financially by them. It's possible that they failed to deliver on their promises. It's possible that they are refusing to pay you a debt.
To know more about Legal Action, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13138525
#SPJ4