to provide legal advice to the public is to engage in

It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.

A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.

Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.

In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.

Read more about bankruptcy filing

brainly.com/question/26392690

Najmi would be responsible to understand the validity of the contract entered by his guardian Pak Mat concerning the sale of one of the properties of his late parents left to him.

Generally under contract law, a minor is considered to lack the capacity to enter into a valid and binding agreement as established in the Malaysian case of Verinder Singh v Kamikar Singh and another appeal ([1994] 2 MLJ 438). Under s 20 of the Contracts Act 1950, a minor is not capable to enter into a valid contract.

Thus, any contract entered into by a minor is said to be voidable at his/her option. Consequently, any contract entered into by a minor is voidable which allows him/her to avoid the contract and seek restitution.

To know more about contract law, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31340061

#SPJ4

Customary law refers to a system of unwritten legal principles and norms that develop over time within a particular community or society. It is based on long-standing customs, traditions, and practices that are accepted and followed by the members of that community.

Customary law is often rooted in cultural, social, and historical contexts and can vary between different regions and communities. It governs various aspects of life, including family and property matters, dispute resolution, and community governance.

Customary law may coexist with statutory law and may be recognized and enforced by legal systems in certain jurisdictions. Its application and recognition can differ depending on the legal framework and jurisdiction in which it operates.

Know more about   legal systems here:

https://brainly.com/question/32888386

#SPJ8

Answer:

what was last week's lesson?

Answer: try and explain why u learned in this weeks lesson and write it down and write about what u thing it’s surprising

Explanation:

Three codes of law or other legal documents that have influenced modern democracy are The Code of Hammurabi, The Twelve Tables, and The Magna Carta.The Code of Hammurabi: The Code of Hammurabi is considered one of the most important legal codes in human history.

It is an ancient Mesopotamian legal code that has influenced modern law, particularly in civil law systems. It was written on a stone tablet in 1754 BC, making it one of the oldest legal documents. This code laid out the king's laws and punishments.The Twelve Tables: The Twelve Tables is an ancient Roman code of law written in 450 BC. It was the first written Roman law code and is regarded as the foundation of Roman law. The Twelve Tables focused on civil law, covering areas such as property law, family law, and contract law.

The Magna Carta: The Magna Carta was signed in 1215 in England, and it is a charter of liberties that influenced modern constitutional government. The Magna Carta limited the power of the English monarch and granted certain legal rights to English nobles, including the right to a fair trial.One way in which The Code of Hammurabi is different from the legal systems of democratic governments today is that it was based on strict retributive justice.

Learn more about codes of law here:https://brainly.com/question/30374022

#SPJ11

Answer:

All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.

Explanation:

This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness.  HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class  (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing.  This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face.  The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.

- Popular sovereignty

Where the leader/s of a country is chosen by the people (elected democratically).

- Autonomy

The right of a country to be independent and govern itself, either a unitary one where all states is governed by one government or a federal one where autonomy is granted through each state and where each state has its own government.

- Equality

Equality for all people regardless of demographics such as race.

The individual, who is a sales representative, should not continue selling medication.

The primary tasks of a Pharmaceutical Sales Representative are to serve clients by selling pharmaceutical items and addressing their needs. They travel regularly within their designated zone to make presentations and teach about the company's drugs at hospitals and doctor's offices.

The course addresses specific legal, ethical, and medical challenges that arise in medical practice and research. It focuses on questions of consent, autonomy, and the patient's and other interested parties' best interests, as well as how they overlap with other fields of law, including as tort, criminal, and personal property law.

Therefore, The sales agent should not continue selling medication since he lacks information about the medications and the type of medication.

Learn more about  Pharmaceutical Sales here:

https://brainly.com/question/841596

#SPJ1

Answer:

Human trafficking is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labour, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation for the trafficker or others. This may encompass providing a spouse in the context of forced marriage, or the extraction of organs or tissues, including for surrogacy and ova removal. Human trafficking can occur within a country or trans-nationally. Human trafficking is a crime against the person because of the violation of the victim's rights of movement through coercion and because of their commercial exploitation. Human trafficking is the trade in people, especially women and children, and does not necessarily involve the movement of the person from one place to another.

Hope this help!:)

Answer:

Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act.

Explanation:

Answer:

mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations.

Explanation:

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

Answer:According to "https://courses.lumenlearning.com/" "The law of conservation of mass states that mass in an isolated system is neither created nor destroyed by chemical reactions or physical transformations"

Explanation:

I hope this helped!

<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>

- Zack Slocum

*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆

The ethics of allowing confidential informants to commit crimes is that

Confidential informants, who are insiders in the drug trade and have the ability to visit locations and communicate with persons that the police are unable to, are frequently used in narcotics investigations to direct investigators to their primary targets. Informants are typically involved in illicit operations since they work inside a system of unlawful enterprises.

I believe that should informants be allowed to commit some crimes because if they do not, they may be found as informant and be killed.

Many law enforcement investigations depend on confidential informants, but they are especially important for drug investigations. Informants have access to detailed information that is indispensable from other sources.

But since informants frequently have criminal backgrounds, if they are not handled carefully, they can undermine the effectiveness of a law enforcement investigation, damage the reputation of the agency, and even put officers' lives in danger. Agencies must create formal and reliable procedures in order to successfully use confidential informants.

The courts effectively have no control over the way that the police use informants. Three Supreme Court rulings from the 1960s—Hoffa v. United States, Lewis v. United States, and Osborn v. United States—made it obvious that police might utilize informants quite freely. The top court said that using informant testimony does not violate either the Fifth Amendment's ban on self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on excessive searches and seizures.

Therefore, law enforcement frequently makes use of confidential informant, or CI, testimony. The approach does, however, pose a significant danger that the CI will provide false testimony. CIs are frequently enticed to volunteer information that authorities deem valuable (by the prospect of a plea bargain or no arrest for their own alleged offenses).

Learn more about informants from

https://brainly.com/question/14244373

#SPJ1

primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped

Answer:

It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.

Explanation:

The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.

No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.

Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.

The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.

Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.

The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.

In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.

Know more about statistical principle here:

https://brainly.com/question/30592795

#SPJ11

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Hope this helps if it is a true or false thingy

The county trial courts are courts of original jurisdiction.

The correct option is B.

The competence of a court to hear and rule on a case prior to any appellate review is called its Original Jurisdiction.

Original jurisdiction is a requirement for a trial court to hear certain sorts of matters.

The law's definition of the Court's original jurisdiction is found in 28 U.S.C. 1251.

According to Section 1251(a), the Court's jurisdiction over one form of issue (disputes between states) is not only "original," but also exclusive.

In other words, only the Supreme Court has the power to exercise jurisdiction under the Constitution if the parties are unable to reach a resolution.

Several minor but significant categories of cases are under the Supreme Court's "original jurisdiction."

To know more about original jurisdiction, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961368

#SPJ4

If the solid yellow line is on your right, you're driving: A. in a secure manner

Driving is the controlled operation and movement of an automobile, such as vehicles, bikes, vans, buses, and bicycles. Permission to drive on public highways is granted based totally on a fixed of situations being met and drivers are required to observe the installed avenue and traffic legal guidelines within the region they are driving.

Definition of driving: communicating force a using wheel. b: exerting pressure on a user to have an effect. 2a: having extraordinary pressure a riding rain a driving beat. b: acting with vigor: lively a hard-using worker.

The motive of driving. riding serves many functions. At its most fundamental degree, using a motor automobile is a reliable, green, and inexpensive mode of shipping. using a vehicle may be as smooth as going for walks or strolling once you get cozy at the back of the wheel. For this, you want to practice difficult, keep in thought all the guidelines and traffic laws and familiarize yourself well with the vehicle.

Learn more about driving here: https://brainly.com/question/1071840

#SPJ9

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

Candidate A has the highest vote among all the candidates participating in the election.

Hence, in order to form a party two of the parties need to collaborate to form a government as none of the three candidates is in majority.

Therefore, the candidate B and C  or A and B  or A and C will share their votes to form a government.

Hence, option B is correct

The quote given by James Madison in relation to the endangering of the liberty through its abuse as well as the abuse of powers states that the liberty of the individual must be protected at all costs.

Liberty is in close relation to the freedom enjoyed by an individual granted to him or her under the constitution. However, it may also be abused with the misuse of powers held by higher or superior authorities.

Thus, James Madison, while framing the constitution of American society, gave emphasis on creation of laws that are directly aimed towards the protection of liberty, being the fundamental right of the citizens.

Learn more about the liberty here:

https://brainly.com/question/28389177

#SPJ4

Complete question

"Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power."—James Madison

In at least two paragraphs, discuss the meaning and how this quote supports or rejects one of the following principles-limited government, natural rights, or separation of powers.

The legal term that is used for the full legal capacity of Tulum, a 16 year old is emancipation.

This simply means and denotes freedom from something and now has some level of independence and autonomy.

Hence, we can see that based on the fact that Tulum is a sixteen-year-old who has sought and received the full legal capacity to contract from the court. This means that Tulum is now fully emancipated.

Read more about emancipation here:
https://brainly.com/question/880731

Answer:

One personal trouble I have encountered that may also be a public issue is the increasing cost of healthcare. Even with health insurance, many people are struggling to pay for necessary medical treatments due to rising costs. This issue affects a large number of people, making it a public issue.

Explanation:

The events that led to recent Supreme Court cases regarding the Second Amendment include landmark cases such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010). These cases have shaped the interpretation and application of the Second Amendment and have sparked debates on gun rights and gun control measures.

In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms for self-defense within their home. This case challenged the handgun ban in Washington, D.C., and affirmed the individual's right to bear arms. It was a significant event that clarified the interpretation of the Second Amendment.

McDonald v. Chicago extended the individual right to bear arms to state and local governments, incorporating the Second Amendment as applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. This case struck down the handgun ban in Chicago and further solidified the individual's right to possess firearms.

These events have played a crucial role in recent Supreme Court cases regarding the Second Amendment, influencing the ongoing debates and legal challenges surrounding gun rights and regulations in the United States.

You can learn more about Second Amendment at

https://brainly.com/question/1750552

#SPJ11

Answer:

The relationship between state and federal regulations in the United States is one of delegation and complement: in principle, the states are the holders of sovereignty and, therefore, possess all the rights and powers that they have not expressly delegated to the Federal Government to through the Constitution. In turn, in the event that the states have delegated prerogatives to the federal government, these may only be exercised by the federal government, and subsidiarily (and always in a complementary manner and respecting federal guidelines) by the states.

The common law was imposed on the Commonwealth countries where the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth were founded on English common law.

The common law is considered to be the law which is declared by the judges, derived from precedent and custom. Thus, it is said to originate with the legal reforms of King Henry II in the 12th century and was called “common” because it tend to apply equally across the whole country.

So, it is said that the vast majority of legal systems in the Commonwealth are founded on English common law. Where it is purely not the case, the system is applied in interlocked or parallel with other legal systems.

Hence, the English common law originated in the early Middle Ages.

To learn more about the common law here:

https://brainly.com/question/8476406

#SPJ1

Answer & Explanation:

1.DNA, Saliva/ Semen (Can Be Tested)

2.Blood Splatter (Can Make A Prediction)

3.Drinks Such As Beer (Can Predict If They Were Under The Influence)

Answer:

Logic is the means of thinking right.

Language  is essentially thought that shapes the language or shapes the language.

Explanation:

I hope this cleared confusion.

Answer:

I believe it is "deprivation"

Explanation:

I dont know much about law so I researched it and believe this is the best result.

IF ITS WRONG SORRY.