The 3 beliefs of the open-door policy
The belief in free trade:The belief in the territorial and administrative integrity of China:The belief in the rule of law:What is the open-door policy?The belief in free trade: The United States believed that free trade was essential for economic development and prosperity and that all countries should have equal access to trade opportunities in China.
The belief in the territorial and administrative integrity of China: The United States supported the independence and sovereignty of China, and opposed any attempts by foreign powers to carve out spheres of influence or annex territory within China.
The belief in the rule of law: The United States believed that international relations should be governed by the rule of law and that agreements between nations should be respected. The Open Door Policy was intended to ensure that all countries were treated fairly and that there was no discrimination against any one country in terms of access to trade and investment opportunities in China.
Read more about the open-door policy
https://brainly.com/question/29772022
#SPJ1
Rojan (Roy) worked for the Metropolis City Government. One day at work a co-worker approached him and asked whom he planned to vote for as mayor in the next election. Roy told his colleague that he didn't think much of either candidate, and he didn't plan on voting for either one. The next day Roy's boss fired him because he felt that Roy should not have expressed any negative views about elected officials. Roy plans to file a lawsuit against the city based on its violation of his federal constitutional freedom of speech right. If Roy files his lawsuit in federal district court ( Rojan Degoey v. Metropolis City):________
a. The court may hear his case based on federal-question jurisdiction.
b. The court may hear his case based on diversity jurisdiction.
c. The court cannot hear his case because it does not have jurisdiction of this matter.
d. A and B only.
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Why was the era of Roman Emperor Justinian I (529–534) considered significant for the concept of laws throughout history?
Responses
Justinian I studied the law and brought attention to a wide variety of legal details.
Justinian I studied the law and brought attention to a wide variety of legal details.
Justinian I was responsible for codifying many laws into a unified source of civil law.
Justinian I was responsible for codifying many laws into a unified source of civil law.
Justinian I traveled throughout the Roman Empire in order to obtain the wishes of all his citizens.
Justinian I traveled throughout the Roman Empire in order to obtain the wishes of all his citizens.
Justinian I gathered all the legal experts to show how consensus is used in creating laws.
Justinian I gathered all the legal experts to show how consensus is used in creating laws.
Answer:
The era of Roman Emperor Justinian I (529-534) was significant for the concept of laws throughout history because of the creation of the Code of Justinian. The Code of Justinian was a collection of laws that were compiled and revised during Justinian's reign[1]. The Code was a comprehensive set of laws that covered all aspects of Roman life, including civil law, criminal law, and commercial law. It was considered a significant achievement because it brought together all the laws of the Roman Empire into one unified code[2]. Justinian considered it his divine duty to restore the Roman Empire to its ancient boundaries and wanted to reform the government and legal system, which had long suffered from corruption and outdated laws[3][4].
Can you sue someone for urinating on your wife?
Answer:
Yes!
Explanation:
You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
I want This question deleted after I post This what restaurants are being boycotted That support Trump
Answer:
Mcdonalds
Explanation:
It is unhealthy
Please post detailed answers to the following questions. Please use complete sentences.
Why do you think individuals commit crimes?
what responsibility do the media and politicians have to inform the public of the reality of crime? of the real dangers of victimization that exist in a specific area? Are there any advantages to this misunderstanding?
you must abide by the _______ while collecting evidence.
Answer:
You must abide by the legal and ethical standards while collecting evidence.
Answer:
You must abide by the rules and regulations while collecting evidence.
Do you think juveniles should be entitled to a trial by jury or is the current system adequate? Explain your answer.
I do not think that Juveniles should be entitled to a trial by jury or is the current system adequate.
What is meant by the trial by jury?A jury trial, often known as a trial by jury, is a legitimate process in which a jury renders a verdict or makes factual findings. It differs from a bench trial where all judgments are made by a judge or panel of judges.
The American legal system heavily relies on juries. The collaboration of judge and jury, working together in a shared endeavor, puts the ideas of our great heritage of freedom into practice, and is substantially responsible for the safeguarding of our rights and liberties.
In juvenile court, a minor typically does not have the right to a jury trial. This is so because the employment of a jury would compromise the privacy of juvenile court proceedings, according to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Read more on jury trials here: https://brainly.com/question/2321192
#SPJ1
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
According to Alabama license law, all offers to purchase must contain what type of clause prominently displayed in the contract?
Under Alabama license law, all offers to purchase must contain a prominently displayed "as-is" clause in the contract.
The inclusion of an "as-is" clause in a purchase offer signifies that the property is being sold in its current condition, without any warranties or guarantees from the seller regarding its condition or any potential defects. It serves as a legal disclaimer and communicates to the buyer that they are accepting the property in its present state, assuming all risks and responsibilities associated with it.
The "as-is" clause is designed to protect sellers from potential future claims by buyers regarding the condition of the property. It puts the onus on the buyer to thoroughly inspect the property, conduct due diligence, and make an informed decision before entering into the transaction.
By requiring this clause to be prominently displayed in the contract, Alabama license law aims to ensure that buyers are aware of and understand the implications of purchasing a property in its current condition. It emphasizes the importance of buyer due diligence and encourages them to seek professional inspections or assessments before finalizing the transaction.
The "as-is" clause does not absolve sellers from disclosing known material defects or engaging in fraudulent practices. However, it reinforces the principle of caveat emptor ("let the buyer beware") and places the burden of investigation and evaluation on the buyer.
know more about investigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32801442
#SPJ11
lan lives in a poor Inner-city neighborhood known for criminal activity. Because of this, few of the residents want to get involved in reporting a
crime. Ian learns from his friends how to break into cars. Since few people will report the crime and there are plenty of cars on the street, lan
and his friends become experts at stealing stereos and other valuables out of locked vehicles. According to differential opportunity theory, what
might lan have been like if he grew up on a farm instead?
ОА. He would've learned to steal parts from farm equipment.
OB. He would not have ended up breaking into vehicles.
OC. He would have found other crimes to commit.
OD
He would have broken in to even more cars because no one was around.
Answer:
OB. He would not have ended up breaking into vehicles.
Explanation:
Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin work Delinquency and Opportunity, written more than 50 years ago, combined strain and social disorganization principles to portray a gang-sustaining criminal subculture. The centerpiece of Cloward and Ohlin's theory is differential opportunity.
Differential opportunity theory, which is the idea that people (usually teens) from low socioeconomic backgrounds who have few opportunities for success, will use any means at their disposal to achieve success. ... The means are generally referred to as subcultures.
Answer:
He would not have ended up breaking into vehicles.
Explanation:
Burglary of a conveyance occurs when someone enters a motor vehicle, ship, vessel, railroad car, trailer, aircraft, or sleeping car with the intent to commit a crime inside. The most common burglary of this type is someone breaking into a car to take goods that are laying out, such as car radios and GPS devices.
Also, I took the quiz :)
Which of the following is considered as innovative criminal defense strategy?
O self-defense
O battered women's syndrome
O duress
O mistake
Considering the available options, the choice that is considered as an innovative criminal defense strategy is "battered women's syndrome."
What is battered women's syndrome?Battered women's syndrome is a medical and psychological term that is used to describe the severe mental health ailment resulting from serious domestic abuse.
Given the legal situation, battered women's syndrome is not a typical condition that is common but has been innovated by some defenders to justify their offense so they can get discharged and acquitted.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Battered women's syndrome.
Learn more about the criminal defense strategy here: https://brainly.com/question/11342133
Is QAnon a Threat to American Safety?
THIS IS WORTH 25 POINTS
Which of the following is not true?
a) During a court proceeding, the judge is there to decide questions of law.
b) After trial, on appeal, only issues or questions of law can be appealed.
c) During a trial that is not a bench (or non-jury) trial, it is the jury that decides
questions or issues of fact.
d) During a trial to achieve justice, the judge and the jury can consult and
collaborate to decide either issues of law or of facts.
e) None of the preceding answers, a) thru d), is a correct answer to the question.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D. During a trial to achieve justice, the judge and the jury can consult and collaborate to decide either issues of law or of facts.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Explain why is law is an instrument which regulate human conducts?
Answer:
Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.
How much alcohol and drugs affect a persons weight
Answer:
in small doses weight is not affected much
but in heavy doses in small periods of time can cause extreme obesity
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
What is filed between two parties in a civil case?
Answer:
A complaint.
Explanation:
A complaint is a document that outlines the jurisdictional basis for the court demanding a judicial relief to the plaintiff. It is a pleading by the plaintiff that starts a case between the two parties in a civil case.
The complaint is to be drafted by an attorney, outlining the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. A complaint also specify any remedy that plaintiff desires from the defendant.
Therefore, the correct answer is a complaint.
What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
Answer:
Amherst College
Explanation:
Amella, aged 21, is on trial for polsoning her small Infant. The case has made the news and most people in the town already know about it.
Trying to find anyone who will be sympathetic to Amelia is going to be difficult. What prospective Juror might the prosecution use a preemptory
challenge on?
OA. a 34-year-old mother of one who underwent fertility treatments to concelve.
OB. a 64-year-old grandmother of seven who lives with her grown son.
OC. a 28-year-old firefighter who has three children of his own.
OD. a 36-year-old mother of two who admitted to suffering from postpartum depression.
No
Answer:
OD
Explanation:
A person that has mental health issues might be able to understand what the mother is going through?
A woman with same mental health can understand Amelia on that base prospective Juror might the prosecution use a preemptory challenge on . Hence option D is Correct.
In what fact Amelia can proof herself innocent ?Many women experience postpartum depression (commonly known as PPD), which is a medical disorder. After giving delivery, there are intense emotions of sadness, anxiety (concern), and exhaustion that persist for a long time. You may find it challenging to care for both you and your infant as a result of these feelings.
After giving birth, most new mothers endure postpartum "baby blues," which frequently include mood changes, crying bouts, anxiety, and trouble sleeping. The first two to three days after delivery are usually when baby blues start, and they can last for up to two weeks.
By the above fact prosecution use a preemptory challenge
Learn more about Case Study here
https://brainly.com/question/27035549
# SPJ 2
Why did calhoun want to nullify tariff laws? because he wanted higher tariffs because he thought they unfairly hurt the south because he thought tariffs helped trade with britain.
Calhoun want to nullify tariff laws Because he thought that they unfairly hurt the South.
A tariff is a charge that a nation's government or a supranational organization imposes on products being imported or exported. Import taxes are not only a way for the government to make money, but they can also be used to control international trade and to support or protect domestic industry. Along with export quotas, import quotas, and other non-tariff trade barriers, protective tariffs are some of the most frequently employed tools of protectionism.
Tariffs may be either fixed (i.e., a set amount per unit of imported goods or a set proportion of the price) or variable. Import taxes make goods more expensive, which makes people less likely to purchase them.
Learn more about Import taxes, here
https://brainly.com/question/27104258
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
What aspect of the Constitution was brought up as the central issue regarding the health care reform law?
The central issue regarding the health care reform law and the Constitution was the individual mandate. The mandate required individuals to purchase health insurance or face a penalty.
Opponents argued that Congress did not have the authority under the Commerce Clause to require individuals to purchase a product. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld the individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power. This decision set a precedent for the scope of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and the limits of the federal government's authority in regulating individual behavior.
For more such questions on insurance , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28562565
#SPJ11
Write an essay on interrelationship among law and society.
Explanation:
Law is enacted to establish solidarity in society based on rational and reasonable social norms and values. All the provisions of law are based on society and their dominant values respecting minority residing in a society. Social control and social change both are applicable in relation with law and society.
If the defendant successfully proves __________, no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence, the plaintiff will be denied any recovery of damages. a. negligence per se b. comparative negligence c. contributory negligence d. res ipsa loquitur
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
____ and ____ are the two forms of contracts.
Answer:
fixed price contracts and cost-reimbursement contracts