why did girls show off what they can do, before wemons rights we had it good all we had to do was watch babies, when we got jobs. like BIT.ch shut up thats the secret ok

The shaded area is 239.4 ft²

Salma traveled a total of 16.25 kilometers in all.

To find the total distance traveled, we need to convert the 750 meters that Salma traveled by the rickshaw to kilometers and add it to the 15.5 kilometers that she traveled by metro.
1 kilometer = 1000 meters
So, 750 meters = 750/1000 = 0.75 kilometers
Now, we can add the two separate distances that she traveled together:
15.5 km + 0.75 km = 16.25 km
Therefore, Salma traveled a total of 16.25 kilometers in all.

More questions involving calculation of distance: https://brainly.com/question/13343116

#SPJ11

Answer: To determine the marginal cost of the third taco for Jeremy, we need to compare the cost of buying it individually to the cost of buying it as part of the value meal.

Buying two tacos individually:

Buying the value meal with three tacos:

To calculate the marginal cost, we subtract the cost of buying the value meal from the cost of buying two tacos individually:

The negative value indicates that buying the value meal is more cost-effective than buying the third taco individually. Therefore, the marginal cost of the third taco for Jeremy would be $0 (option A).

Answer:

Uhmmm You Didn't Say The Formula...

There are approximately 0.4594 acres in 2.0 hectares.

We need to use the conversion factor between hectares and acres.

Given:

\(1 hectare = 1\) × \(10^4 m^2\)

\(1 acre = 4.356\) × \(10^4 ft\)

To find the number of acres in 2.0 hectares, we can set up the following conversion:

\(2.0 hectares * (1\) × \(10^4 m^2 / 1 hectare) * (1 acre / 4.356\) × \(10^4 ft)\)

Simplifying the units:

\(2.0 * (1\) × \(10^4 m^2) * (1 acre / 4.356\) ×\(10^4 ft)\)

Now, we can perform the calculation:

\(2.0 * (1\) × \(10^4) * (1 /\)\(4.356\) ×\(10^4)\)

= 2.0 * 1 / 4.356

= 0.4594

Therefore, there are approximately 0.4594 acres in 2.0 hectares.

Learn more about conversion factor here : brainly.com/question/28308386

#SPJ4

The lower limit for the 95% confidence interval for the true graduation rate is 0.704.

The percentage (frequency) of acceptable confidence intervals that include the actual value of the unknown parameter is represented by the confidence level.

We can use the formula for the confidence interval for a proportion:

lower limit = sample proportion - z * √((sample proportion * (1 - sample proportion)) / sample size)

where z is the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence (95% in this case), and sample size is 500.

The sample proportion is 371/500 = 0.742.

The z-score for a 95% confidence level can be found using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, and is approximately 1.96.

Plugging in the values, we get:

lower limit = 0.742 - 1.96 * √((0.742 * 0.258) / 500)

lower limit = 0.704

Rounding to three decimal places, the lower limit for the 95% confidence interval for the true graduation rate is 0.704.

Learn more about confidence interval on:

https://brainly.com/question/17034620

#SPJ4

The algebraic expression for the given sentence would be: 9(x - 7)

What is an algebraic expression?

An algebraic expression is a mathematical phrase that contains variables, constants, and mathematical operations.

The difference between "a number" and 7 can be found by subtracting 7 from x. This gives us the expression (x - 7). We then need to multiply this expression by 9 to get the final result. So the algebraic expression that represents the sentence is:

9(x - 7)

This tells us to take "a number," subtract 7 from it, and then multiply the result by 9.

Note that we don't simplify this expression as the instruction says that we do not need to simplify it. If we were to simplify it, we would get:

9x - 63

This represents the same thing as 9(x - 7), but it's a simplified version of the expression.

Therefore, The algebraic expression for the given sentence would be:

9(x - 7).

To learn more about algebraic expression from given link

https://brainly.com/question/19245500

#SPJ9

a) The monthly payment for this fully amortising mortgage is approximately $10,331.25.
b) The monthly payment for this interest-only mortgage is approximately $14,360.33.

c) The new monthly payment after the interest rate increase is approximately $9,090.70.

d) The remaining loan balance is approximately $625,014.72.

A) To calculate the monthly payment of a fully amortising mortgage, we can use the formula:

M = P * (r * (1+r)^n) / ((1+r)^n - 1)

Where:
M = Monthly payment
P = Loan amount
r = Monthly interest rate
n = Total number of payments

For the given question, the loan amount is 81% of $1,175,378, which is $952,622.38. The annual interest rate is 11.6%, so the monthly interest rate would be 11.6% / 12 = 0.9667%. The mortgage term is 21 years, which means a total of 21 * 12 = 252 payments.

Plugging these values into the formula, we can calculate the monthly payment:

M = 952,622.38 * (0.009667 * (1+0.009667)^252) / ((1+0.009667)^252 - 1)

The monthly payment for this fully amortising mortgage is approximately $10,331.25.

B) To calculate the monthly payment of an interest-only mortgage, we can use the formula:

M = P * r

Where:
M = Monthly payment
P = Loan amount
r = Monthly interest rate

For the given question, the loan amount is 80% of $1,495,863, which is $1,196,690.40. The annual interest rate is 14.4%, so the monthly interest rate would be 14.4% / 12 = 1.2%.

Plugging these values into the formula, we can calculate the monthly payment:

M = 1,196,690.40 * 0.012

The monthly payment for this interest-only mortgage is approximately $14,360.33.

C) To calculate the new monthly payment after an interest rate increase, we can use the same formula as in part A:

M = P * (r * (1+r)^n) / ((1+r)^n - 1)

For the given question, the remaining loan balance is $700,134. The current interest rate is 14.5% per annum, and the loan term is 12 years.

To calculate the new interest rate, we need to add 1% to the current interest rate, which gives us 15.5% per annum, or 15.5% / 12 = 1.2917% as the monthly interest rate.

Plugging these values into the formula, we can calculate the new monthly payment:

M = 700,134 * (0.012917 * (1+0.012917)^144) / ((1+0.012917)^144 - 1)

The new monthly payment after the interest rate increase is approximately $9,090.70.

D) To calculate the remaining loan balance, we can use the formula:

B = P * ((1+r)^n - (1+r)^p) / ((1+r)^n - 1)

Where:
B = Remaining loan balance
P = Loan amount
r = Monthly interest rate
n = Total number of payments
p = Number of payments made

For the given question, the monthly payment is $8,364. The annual interest rate is 12.4%, so the monthly interest rate would be 12.4% / 12 = 1.0333%. The remaining loan term is 10 years, which means a total of 10 * 12 = 120 payments have been made.

Plugging these values into the formula, we can calculate the remaining loan balance:

B = P * ((1+0.010333)^120 - (1+0.010333)^360) / ((1+0.010333)^360 - 1)

The remaining loan balance is approximately $625,014.72.

Know more about interest rate:

https://brainly.com/question/28236069

#SPJ11

Using the Subtraction Formula for Sine, and then simplifying, we get :  sin(x - π) - (-sin x) = 0.

The identity to be proven is

sin(x - π) + sin x.

Use the subtraction formula for sine, and then simplify.

Solution:

Using the subtraction formula for sine,

sin(x - π) can be expressed as sin x cos π - cos x sin π.

Substituting π = 180° in radians,

cos π = -1 and

sin π = 0,

sin(x - π) = sin x cos(180°) - cos x sin(180°)sin(x - π)

= sin x (-1) - cos x (0)sin(x - π)

= -sin x

Now, we substitute the above result in the given identity,

sin(x - π) - (-sin x).sin(x - π) - (-sin x) = -sin x + sin xsin (x - π) - (-sin x)

= 0

This completes the proof.

To know more about Subtraction visit :

brainly.com/question/12302401

#SPJ11

The difference between the mean and the median in this case may indicate that the distribution of weights is skewed, particularly due to the presence of outliers.

The given data represents the weights of 29 packages of beef in a supermarket meat display. To analyze the distribution, we can construct a histogram. Upon analyzing the data, it appears that there are some outliers (-75 and -89), which may need to be investigated further. However, without specific class boundaries provided, we can observe the general shape of the distribution.

The mean and median are two measures of center in a distribution. The mean is calculated by summing all the values and dividing by the number of observations, while the median represents the middle value when the data is arranged in ascending or descending order. The mean gives us an idea about the average weight of the packages, while the median represents the middle value of the distribution.

In terms of the symmetry or skewness of the distribution, the mean is influenced by extreme values or outliers, as it takes into account the magnitude of each value. On the other hand, the median is less affected by outliers and provides a better representation of the central tendency of the distribution. If the distribution is skewed or contains outliers, the mean may deviate from the median, reflecting the asymmetry in the data.

Therefore, the difference between the mean and the median in this case may indicate that the distribution of weights is skewed, particularly due to the presence of outliers.

To Know More about difference visit:

brainly.com/question/30241588  

#SPJ11

The complete question is :

he data listed here are the weights (in pounds) of 29 packages of beef in a supermarket meat display: 1.08 .83 1.02 97 1.05 1.18 1.05 .99 1.28 -75 1.01 1.24 1.33 1.03 -89 1.43 1.18 (5 Points) A. Construct a histogram to display the distribution of weights, and describe the shape. (You may want to first make the histogram on your calculator and then sketch what you see. You do not need to label the class boundaries; just show the shape of the distribution.) Page 3 of 3 B. Find the mean and the median of the distribution. C. Explain the difference of these two measures of center in terms of the symmetry or skewness of the distribution.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

&//&18289

If X = 37.5% of 20% of 48 and Y = 14.28% of  27.27% of 77, then  X>Y.

The first step is to determine the value of X.

X = 37.5% of 20% of 48

X = 0.375 x 0.2 x 48 = 3.6

The second step is to determine the value of Y.

Y = 14.28% of  27.27% of 77

Y = 0.1428 x 0.2727 x 77 = 3

Note that:  

> means greater than

< means less than

≥ means greater than or equal to  

≤ less than or equal to

Based on the above calculations, x > y.

To learn more about inequality, please check: https://brainly.com/question/5031619

The value of the line integral ∫cf⋅dr is (-2 + y) * sqrt(3).

To evaluate the line integral ∫cf⋅dr using Stokes' theorem, we first need to find the curl of the vector field f. The curl of f is given by ∇ × f, where ∇ is the del operator.

Calculating the curl of f:

\(∇ × f = (∂/∂y)(xz) - (∂/∂z)(2y) + (∂/∂z)(xy) - (∂/∂x)(xy) + (∂/∂x)(2y) - (∂/∂y)(2y)\)

\(= x - 2 - x + 2y - y\\= -2 + y\).

Now, let's find the area of triangle C using the vertices given. The triangle with vertices (2,0,0), (0,2,0), and (0,0,2) forms an equilateral triangle in the xy-plane with side length 2.

The area of an equilateral triangle is given by\((sqrt(3)/4) * (side length)^2\), so the area of this triangle is \((sqrt(3)/4) * (2)^2 = sqrt(3)\).

Since we have the curl of f as -2 + y and the area of the triangle as sqrt(3), we can now evaluate the line integral using Stokes' theorem:

∫cf⋅dr = ∬S (∇ × f) ⋅ dS

= ∬S (-2 + y) ⋅ dS

= (-2 + y) ∬S dS

= (-2 + y) * sqrt(3).

Therefore, the value of the line integral ∫cf⋅dr is (-2 + y) * sqrt(3).

To learn more about line integral from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/25706129

#SPJ4

Answer:

The relationship between these two sequences is it always doubles.  When we look at each sequence, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, each number is multiplied by 2 to create the other sequence.

1 x 2 = 2.

2 x 2 = 4.

3 x 2 = 6.

4 x 2 = 8.

5 x 2 = 10.

When we arrange these numbers, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, this is the exact sequence as before.  Therefore, this is the relationship.

Answer: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,                           <                                |

                                                                                               |

Step-by-step explanation:                                                    |                                if you just  arange the numbers to 1 x 2 = 2                         |

                                                          2 x 2 = 4                       |

                                                          2 x 3 = 6                       |

  and then so on and so on you would get this answerer. |

Answer:

See Below

Step-by-step explanation:

a.) y-int = 1,000

The y-int represents the base (lowest) price of the antique at age 0

b.) 0 to 10 years = 500

30 to 40 years ≈ 2000

Domain: all real numbers

Range: y ≥ 1,000

Happy Birthday :)

Answer:

Part A —> y intercept is 1000

Y intercept represents the value in dollars

X intercept represents the age of antique

Part B

Domain —> (1000,+oo)

Range —> (1000,+00)

Explanation :

Domain is the set of x values (input)

Range is the set of y values (output)

The correct answer is iii. 2n - c, where c is a constant.Kolmogorov complexity refers to the measure of the shortest possible description of a string in terms of computational resources required to generate it.

An incompressible string is a string that does not have any patterns or regularities that can be exploited to generate a shorter description.

For an incompressible string of length n, the Kolmogorov complexity is expected to be close to the length of the string itself. In other words, the shortest possible description of an incompressible string of length n would be of similar length to the string itself.

The option iii. 2n - c represents a bound where the constant c accounts for the details of the specific computation model used for measuring Kolmogorov complexity. It is a conservative estimate of the Kolmogorov complexity of an incompressible string, as it allows for some additional constant overhead in the description length beyond the length of the string itself.

Options i. logn - c and ii. n - c are not accurate estimations for the Kolmogorov complexity of incompressible strings. The logarithmic term in option i. is not suitable for incompressible strings because it suggests that the complexity decreases as the string length increases, which is not the case. Option ii. suggests that the complexity is simply the length of the string minus a constant, which does not account for the inherent complexity of the string itself.

Learn more about statistics here:

https://brainly.com/question/31527835

#SPJ11

13) The points A (9,0), B (9,6), C(-9,6), D(-9,0) are the vertices of

A) square ✓✓✓

B) rectangle

C) rhombus

D) trapezium.

۔

Answer:

3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because you need to count the tick marks to 1.

That should be 7.

Then you count to the red dot.

That should be 3.

3/7

Answer: 3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 7 segments that separates 1 from 0, therefore our denominator of the fraction is 7.

The red dot is on the third tick, making our numerator 3.

Our answer is 3/7, or \(\frac{3}{7}\)

Answer: 1/10 is literally only one out of 10. the fraction to a decimal is 0.1 so, 3 x 0.1 is 0.3 and 3 x 10 is 30.

0.3 is less than 30.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The number is 4/9

Step-by-step explanation:

3(6*(4/9))=3*(2+(2/3))=8

After calculations, it is determined that the required spacing of the closed stirrups is approximately 6 inches.

To determine the required spacing of closed stirrups for the given beam, we need to consider the factored shear and factored torsional moment. The formula for calculating the spacing of closed stirrups is given by:

s = (0.75√(f'c) / fy) * (Av / (bd - 2s))

where:

s = spacing of stirrups

f'c = specified compressive strength of concrete

fy = specified yield strength of steel reinforcement

Av = area of one closed stirrup

b = width of the beam

d = effective depth of the beam

Given information:

Width (b) = 15 in.

Effective depth (d) = 26.5 in.

Factored shear = 80 kips

Factored torsional moment = 50 ft-kips

Stirrup centroid from concrete face = 1.75 in.

No. 4 (no. 13) closed stirrup size = 0.2 square inches

First, we need to calculate the area of one closed stirrup:

Av = (No. of stirrups) * (Area of one stirrup)

Av = (2) * (0.2 square inches)

Av = 0.4 square inches

Next, we can substitute the values into the formula to calculate the spacing (s):

s = (0.75√(f'c) / fy) * (Av / (bd - 2s))

Assuming f'c = 4 ksi (common value for concrete strength) and fy = 60 ksi (common value for steel reinforcement strength), we can calculate:

s = (0.75√(4) / 60) * (0.4 / (15 * 26.5 - 2s))

Simplifying the equation, we get:

s = 0.0986 / (397.5 - 30s)

To solve for s, we can use an iterative approach or trial and error method. By substituting different values of s into the equation, we can find the spacing that satisfies the equation.

Know more about closed stirrups here:

https://brainly.com/question/541723

#SPJ11

Answer: 4mn+2m^2 -26m+ 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: --1• (3m + 4n -- 24)

Step-by-step explanation:

I have done this equation before I just can find how to do the problem sorry

Since the cost function provided does not explicitly state the quantity of output (q), it is not possible to calculate the exact equilibrium price without additional information.

To calculate the long-run equilibrium price in this perfectly competitive wheat market, we need to find the point where the market demand curve intersects with the average total cost (ATC) curve of the farmers, as this is the point of minimum average total cost.

The market demand curve is given by QD = 1400 - 50P.

The cost function for each farmer is C(q) = 0.5q + 10q + 18, where MC = q + 10, AVC = 0.5q + 10, and ATC = 0.5q + 10 + 18/q.

In the long run, firms in a perfectly competitive market operate at their minimum average total cost, implying that price is equal to average total cost (P = ATC).

Setting the market demand equal to the average total cost:

1400 - 50P = 0.5q + 10 + 18/q

To solve for the equilibrium price, we need to find the quantity q at which this equation holds.

However, Since the cost function provided does not explicitly state the quantity of output (q), it is not possible to calculate the exact equilibrium price without additional information.

Learn more about cost function here:

https://brainly.com/question/2292799

#SPJ11

Answer:

C = 28.26 in

Step-by-step explanation:

the circumference (C) is calculated as

C = πd ( d is the diameter ) , then

C = 3.14 × 9 = 28.26 in

\(\rule{300}{1}\\\dashrightarrow\large\blue\textsf{\textbf{\underline{Given question:-}}}\)

                 What's the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 9 inches?

\(\dashrightarrow\large\blue\textsf{\textbf{\underline{Answer and how to solve:-}}}\)

  We are asked to find the circumference of a circle, which we can find using the following formula:-

\(\bold{Circumference{(circle)}=\pi d}\)

\(\hookrightarrow\sf{C=3.14\times9}\)

\(\bigstar\) On simplification,

\(\hookrightarrow\sf{C=28.26\:inches}\)

Notice that we are not asked to round our answer, so we leave it like that - C=28.26.

                  \(\rule{200}{2}\)

Answer:

huh

Step-by-step explanation:

The magnification n can be found by using the formula n = -s'/s, where s' is the image distance and s is the object distance. The value of s' obtained from this new equation can be found by rearranging the formula to s' = -ns.

To find the magnification n, we can use the formula n = -s'/s, where s' is the image distance and s is the object distance. In this case, the object is placed 45.0 centimeters from the mirror, so s = 45.0 cm. The magnification can be found by calculating the ratio of the image distance to the object distance. By rearranging the formula, we get n = -s'/s.

To find the value of s' obtained from this new equation, we can rearrange the formula n = -s'/s to solve for s'. This gives us s' = -ns. By substituting the value of n calculated earlier, we can find the value of s'. The negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.

Using the given values, we can now calculate the magnification and the value of s'. Plugging in s = 45.0 cm, we find that s' = -ns = -(2/3)(45.0 cm) = -30.0 cm. This means that the image is located 30.0 centimeters from the mirror and is inverted compared to the object.

To know more about Image visit.

https://brainly.com/question/30725545

#SPJ11

Answer:

  E, D, B, A, C

Step-by-step explanation:

Please report this incomplete question to your teacher. You should not have to put up with this nonsense.

__

A. (x, y) ⇒ (3x, y) . . . horizontal stretch by a factor of 3

B. (x, y) ⇒ (x+3, y) . . . translation 3 units right

C. (x, y) ⇒ (x, 3y) . . . vertical stretch by a factor of 3

D. (x, y) ⇒ (x, y+3) . . . translation 3 units up

E. (x, y) ⇒ (3x, 3y) . . . dilation with a scale factor of 3

Answer:

vertex = (-1, -6)

Step-by-step explanation:

The function you gave is in the Standard Form : y = aX^2 + bX + c.

So you use the equation x = -b/ 2a    to solve for the x coordinate of your vertex.

Based on your question, a =4, b =8 and c = -2.

So you plug that in and get  x = -8/2(4).   Thus, x value for the vertex is -1.

Now you plug -1 into your original equation to find your y value.

y = 4 (-1)^2 + 8 (-1) -2

So y = -6.  Thus,  your vertex is at pt (-1, -6)

Both Isaac and Micah are using a compass and straightedge for their constructions.

The differences between their construction steps are:

Isaac is constructing congruent segments, which means he is dividing the original line segment into equal parts, while Micah is constructing a segment bisector, which means he is dividing the line segment into two equal parts and finding the midpoint.

Isaac only needs to mark one point on the line segment with his compass to get two congruent segments, while Micah needs to mark two points and then find the midpoint between them.

The final results of their constructions are different: Isaac will have two congruent line segments, while Micah will have one line segment bisector that splits the original line segment in half.

Read more about congruent segments here:

https://brainly.com/question/18031301

#SPJ1